How Do Couples Disagree? An Analysis of Conflict Resolution Profiles and the Quality of Romantic Relationships
¿Cómo no Están de Acuerdo las Parejas? Un Análisis de los Perfiles de Resolución de Conflictos y la Calidad de las Relaciones Románticas
Como os Casais Entram em Desacordo? Uma Análise dos Perfis de Resolução de Conflitos e a Qualidade dos Relacionamentos Amorosos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.72265Keywords:
conflict resolution, latent profiles, marital relations, relationship conflict, relationship quality (en)calidad de las relaciones, conflictos en las relaciones de pareja, perfiles latentes, relaciones maritales, resolución de conflictos (es)
conflitos nos relacionamentos de casais, perfis latentes, qualidade dos relacionamentos, relações conjugais, resolução de conflitos (pt)
This study aimed to identify conflict resolution profiles and assess relationship quality levels associated with each profile. The participants were 750 heterosexual couples living in southern Brazil. They filled out measures about conflict resolution strategies, relationship quality, and sociodemographic data. A latent profile analysis was conducted in order to classify participants regarding conflict resolution. Variance and association analyses were also conducted in order to examine relationships between the resolution profiles and other study variables. Four profiles were identified: Low Conflict/Withdraw, Validator, Hostile, and Volatile. The Validator profile showed higher relationship quality, followed by Low Conflict/Withdraw and Volatile profiles, which did not differ from each other, and the Hostile, which showed low levels of relationship quality. We conclude that even though validation and negotiation are desirable, emotionally intense strategies may also be beneficial for couples in some contexts.
How to cite this article:
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2019). How do couples disagree? An analysis of conflict resolution profiles and the quality of romantic relationships. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 28, 91-108. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.72265
El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar los perfiles de resolución de conflictos y evaluar los niveles de calidad de la relación asociados con cada perfil. Participaron 750 parejas heterosexuales residentes en el sur de Brasil, que diligenciaron cuestionarios relativos a estrategias de resolución de conflictos, la calidad de la relación y datos sociodemográficos. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de perfiles latentes para clasificar a los participantes con respecto a la resolución de conflictos. También se realizaron análisis de varianza y asociación para examinar las relaciones entre los perfiles de resolución y las otras variables del estudio. Se identificaron cuatro perfiles: Conflicto Bajo/Evasión, Validador, Hostil y Volátil. El perfil de Validador mostró una calidad de relación más alta, seguido de los perfiles de Conflicto Bajo/Evasión y Volátil, que no presentaron diferencias entre si. El perfil Hostil mostró bajos niveles de calidad de relación. Concluimos que, aunque la validación y la negociación son deseables, las estrategias emocionalmente intensas también pueden ser benéficas para las parejas en algunos contextos.
Cómo citar este artículo:
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2019). ¿Cómo no Están de Acuerdo las Parejas? Un Análisis de los Perfiles de Resolución de Conflictos y la Calidad de las Relaciones Románticas. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 28, 91-108. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.72265
O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os perfis de resolução de conflitos e avaliar os níveis de qualidade do relacionamento associados com cada perfil. Participaram 750 casais heterossexuais residentes do sul do Brasil, que responderam a questionários relativos a estratégias de resolução de conflitos, qualidade do relacionamento e dados sociodemográficos. Foi realizada uma análise de perfis latentes para classificar os participantes a respeito da resolução de conflitos. Também foram realizadas análises de variância e associação para avaliar as relações entre os perfis de resolução e as outras variáveis do estudo. Foram identificados quatro perfis: Conflito Baixo/Evasão, Validador, Hostil e Volátil. O perfil de Validador mostrou uma qualidade do relacionamento mais alta, seguido dos perfis de Conflito Baixo/Evasão e Volátil, que não apresentaram diferenças entre si. O perfil Hostil mostrou baixos níveis de qualidade do relacionamento. Concluímos que, embora a validação e a negociação sejam desejáveis, as estratégias emocionalmente intensas também podem ser benéficas para os casais em alguns contextos.
References
Barton, A. W., Futris, T. G., & Nielsen, R. B. (2014). With a little help from our friends: Couple social integration in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 986-991. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000038
Birditt, K. S., Brown, E., Orbuch, T. L., & McIlvane, J. M. (2010). Marital conflict behaviors and implications for divorce over 16 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1188-1204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00758.x
Boerner, K., Jopp, D. S., Carr, D., Sosinsky, L., & Kim, S. K. (2014). “His” and “her” marriage? The role of positive and negative marital characteristics in global marital satisfaction among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 579-589. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu032
Bolze, S. D. A., Crepaldi, M. A., Schmidt, B., & Vieira, M. L. (2013). Relacionamento conjugal e táticas de resolução de conflito entre casais. Actualidades en Psicología, 27, 71-85.
Bonache, H., Gonzalez-Mendez, R., & Krahé, B. (2019). Adult attachment styles, destructive conflict resolution, and the experience of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516640776
Busby, D. M., & Holman, T. B. (2009). Perceived match or mismatch on the Gottman conflict styles: Associations with relationship outcome variables. Family Process, 48, 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01300.x
Cao, H., Fang, X., Fine, M. A., Ju, X., Lan, J., & Liu, X. (2015). Beyond the average marital communication: Latent profiles of the observed interactions among Chinese newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 850-862. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000126
Carstensen, L. L., Pasupathi, M., Mayr, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2000). Emotional experience in everyday life across the adult life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 644-655. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.644
Caughlin, J. P., & Afifi, T. D. (2004). When is topic avoidance is unsatisfying? Examining moderators of the association between avoidance and dissatisfaction. Human Communication Research, 30, 479-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00742.x
Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2002). A contextual analysis of the association between demand/withdraw and marital satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 9, 95-119. https://doi.org/10.1111/14756811.00007
Costa, C. B., & Mosmann, C. P. (2015). Estratégias de resolução dos conflitos conjugais: Percepções de um grupo focal. Psico, 46, 272-282. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2015.4.20606
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2015). Estratégias de resolução de conflitos conjugais: Evidências de validade do CRBQ. Avaliação Psicológica, 14, 233-242. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2015.1402.08
Delatorre, M. Z., & Wagner, A. (2018). Marital conflict management of married men and women. Psico-USF, 23, 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712018230204
Ellison, J. K., Kouros, C. D., Papp, L. M., & Cummings, E. M. (2016). Interplay between marital attributions and conflict behavior in predicting depressive symptoms. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000181
Falcke, D. (2003). Águas passadas não movem moinhos? As experiências na família de origem como preditoras da qualidade do relacionamento conjugal. (Doctoral Dissertation, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.)
Falcke, D., & Zordan, E. (2010). Amor, casamento e sexo: Opinião de adultos jovens solteiros. Arquivos Brasileiros de Psicologia, 62, 143-155.
Fincham, F. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01215
Fincham, F. D. (2009). Marital conflict. Encyclopedia of Human Relationships (pp. 298-303). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage.
Friedlander, M. L., Lee, M., & Escudero, V. (2019). What we do and do not know about the nature and analysis of couple interaction. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 8, 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000114
Garcia, M. L. T., & Tassara, E. T. O. (2001). Estratégias de enfrentamento do cotidiano conjugal. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 14, 635-642. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722001000300019
Gottman, J. M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and clinical psychology, 61, 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.6
Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47
Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2000). Decade review: Observing marital interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 927-947. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00927.x
Harth, J., & Falcke, D. (2017). Manejo do dinheiro e qualidade conjugal. Interação em Psicologia, 21, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v21i1.32215
Holley, S. R., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2013). Age-related changes in demand-withdraw communication behaviors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 822-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12051
Honkaniemi, L., Feldt, T., Metsäpelto, R. L., & Tolvanen, A. (2013). Personality types and applicant reactions in real life selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12015
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2014). Síntese de indicadores sociais: Uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IBGE.
Jobe-Shields, L., Andrews, A. R., Parra, G. R., & Williams, N. A. (2015). Person-centered approaches to understanding early family risk. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 7, 432-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12118
Kamp Dush, C. M., & Taylor, M. G. (2012). Trajectories of marital conflict across the life course: Predictors and interactions with marital happiness trajectories. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11409684
Kurdek, L. A. (1995). Predicting change in marital satisfaction from husbands’ and wives’ conflict resolution styles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 153-164. https://doi.org/10.2307/353824
Kusner, K. G., Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., & DeMaris, A. (2014). Sanctification of marriage and spiritual intimacy predicting observed marital interactions across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Family Psychology, 28, 604-614. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036989
Ladd, B. O., & McCrady, B. S. (2016). Typology of couples entering alcohol behavioral couple therapy: An empirical approach and test of predictive validity on treatment response. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12121
Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and anovas. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
Lantagne, A., Furman, W., & Novak, J. (2017). “Stay or leave”: Predictors of relationship dissolution in emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 5, 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817699750
Li, X., Cao, H., Lan, J., Ju, X., Zheng, Y., Chen, Y., Zhou, N., & Fang, X. (2019). The association between transition pattern of marital conflict resolution style and marital quality trajectory during the early years of Chinese marriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 153-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517721380
Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 292-300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023028
McNulty, K. J. K., & Russell, V. M. (2010). When “negative” behaviors are positive: A contextual analysis of the long-therm effects of problem-solving behaviors on changes in relationships satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017479
Mosmann, C., Wagner, A., & Féres-Carneiro, T. (2006). Qualidade conjugal: Mapeando conceitos. Paidéia, 16, 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2006000300003
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mixture modeling with cross-sectional data. In Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition (pp. 153-207). Los Angeles, USA: Muthén & Muthén.
Neumann, A. P., Wagner, A., & Remor, E. (2018). Couple relationship education program “Living as Partners”: Evaluation of effects on marital quality and conflict. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 31, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-018-0106-z
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 620-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012961
Overall, N. C., & McNulty, J. K. (2017). What type of communication during conflict is beneficial for intimate relationships? Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.002
Rauer, A., & Volling, B. (2015). The role of relational spirituality in happily-married couples’ observed problem-solving. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000022
Rubenstein, J. L., & Feldman, S. S. (1993). Conflictresolution behavior in adolescent boys: Antecedents and adaptational correlates. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 41-66. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0301_3
Rust, J., Bennun, I., Crowe, M., & Golombok, S. (1986). The Golombok Rust Inventory of Marital State (grims). Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 25, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990903550183
Salazar, L. R. (2015). The negative reciprocity process in marital relationships: A literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 24, 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.00
Scheeren, P., Delatorre, M. Z., Neumann, A. P., & Wagner, A. (2015). O papel preditor dos estilos de apego na resolução do conflito conjugal. Estudos e Pesquisas em Psicologia, 15, 835-852. https://doi.org/10.12957/epp.2015.19415
Scheeren, P., Vieira, R. V. A., Goulart, V., & Wagner, A. (2014). Marital quality and attachment: The mediator role of conflict resolution styles. Paidéia, 24, 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272458201405
Stinson, M. A., Bermúdez, J. M., Gale, J., Lewis, D., Meyer, A. S., & Templeton, G. B. (2017). Marital satisfaction, conflict resolution styles, and religious attendance among Latino couples: Using the actor-partner interdependence model. The Family Journal, 25, 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717710645
Wagner, A. (2010). Mapeamento e intervenção nas relações conjugais no rs: Questões de gênero, resolução de conflitos e violência. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Wheeler, L. A., Updegraff, K. A., & Thayer, S. M. (2010). Conflict resolution in Mexican-origin couples: Culture, gender, and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 991-1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00744.x
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Marina Zanella Delatorre, Adriana Wagner, Lívia Maria Bedin. (2022). Dyadic relationships between personality, social support, conflict resolution, and marital quality. Personal Relationships, 29(1), p.199. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12410.
2. José Ventura‐León, Shirley Tocto‐Muñoz, Cristopher Lino‐Cruz, Andy Rick Sánchez‐Villena, Renzo Martinez‐Munive, Karim Talledo‐Sánchez, Kenia Casiano‐Valdivieso. (2025). Validation and Reliability of the Negative Interaction Scale for Couple Relationships in Peru: A Bayesian Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach. Family Process, 64(1) https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.70029.
3. Laura M. Vowels, Katherine B. Carnelley. (2021). Attachment styles, negotiation of goal conflict, and perceived partner support during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, p.110505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110505.
4. Wei Tong, Jichao Jia, Renhui Fang, Waxun Su, Qiong He, Jia Liu, Xiaoyi Fang. (2023). Stress and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: The Moderating Role of Communication. Marriage & Family Review, 59(2), p.161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2022.2114055.
5. Laura M. Vowels, Katherine B. Carnelley, Rachel R. R. Francois-Walcott. (2022). Successful negotiation of goal conflict between romantic partners predicts better goal outcomes during COVID-19: A mixed methods study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(2), p.155. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211033341.
6. Isabel Katherine Huanca Marca, Carmen Eleana Zevallos Chipana, Esther Edelmira Méndez-Zavaleta, Isaac Alex Conde Rodríguez. (2026). Gender Differences in the Influence of Spirituality and Conflict Resolution Strategies on Couple Satisfaction in Peruvian Adults. The Family Journal, https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807251413779.
7. Slavica Blažeka Kokorić, Lucija Matković. (2022). The Correlation Between Self-Esteem And Conflict Resolution in Students’ Romantic Partnerships. Društvene i humanističke studije (Online), 7(2(19)), p.711. https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2022.7.2.711.
8. Melisa Minaz. (2025). Examining the mediator roles of conflict resolution styles and the interpersonal cognitive distortions in the association between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 9(3), p.375. https://doi.org/10.57127/kpd.26024438.1536349.
9. Marina Zanella Delatorre, Adriana Wagner. (2022). Construção e Evidências de Validade da Escala de Qualidade Conjugal. Psico-USF, 27(1), p.129. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712022270110.
10. Lídia Käfer Schünke, Denise Falcke, Clarisse Pereira Mosmann. (2023). Structural Model of Money Management, Conflict Resolution Strategies and Marital Adjustment. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 44(3), p.523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-022-09851-2.
11. Özge Ünal, Serap Akgün. (2022). Conflict resolution styles as predictors of marital adjustment and marital satisfaction: an actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), p.898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1766542.
12. Ina Grau, Lena Miketta, Christine Ebbeler, Rainer Banse. (2025). Cultural Differences in Correlations With Marital Satisfaction: The Vulnerability-Stress-Adaptation Model in 65 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 56(5), p.528. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221251323216.
13. Zaeema Farooq, Nasreen Akhtar, Tammy Zacchilli. (2024). Validation of Romantic Partner Conflict Scale (RPCS) in Pakistani Married Couples: Establishing Measurement Invariance. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 18(1), p.79. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.12555.
14. Eva J. Geiger, Luise Pruessner, Sven Barnow, Jutta Joormann. (2025). What empathizers do: Empathy and the selection of everyday interpersonal emotion regulation strategies. Journal of Affective Disorders, 370, p.76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.056.
15. Angélica Paula Neumann, Fabricio de Andrade Rocha, Giovania Mitie Maesima, Adriana Wagner. (2024). Qualidade Conjugal na Etapa de Formação da Conjugalidade: Fatores Preditores e Moderadores. Psico-USF, 29 https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-8271202429e267953.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Colombiana de PsicologíaThe RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.












