Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Published
Compromiso, Autorregulación e Intimidad en Parejas en Cohabitación: un Estudio Exploratorio en Bogotá, Colombia
Commitment, Self-regulation, and Intimacy in Cohabiting Couples: An Exploratory Study in Bogotá, Colombia
Compromisso, Autorregulação e Intimidade em Casais em Coabitação: Um Estudo Exploratório em Bogotá, Colômbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.74632Keywords:
autorregulación, calidad de la relación, compromiso, intimidad, razones para cohabitar (es)commitment, intimacy, reasons for cohabiting, self-regulation, quality of the relationship (en)
autorregulação, compromisso, intimidade, razões para coabitar, qualidade da relação (pt)
Downloads
Este estudio exploratorio examinó los efectos de razones para cohabitar, residencia antes de cohabitar, y duración de la relación en la autorregulación relacional, compromiso, e intimidad en uniones consensuales en Bogotá, Colombia. Una muestra autoseleccionada de 60 individuos (26 hombres y 34 mujeres) respondieron A cuestionarios de autorreporte en línea. Los resultados del MANOVA indicaron efectos de tres interacciones significativas (Sexo*Razones; Sexo*Residencia; Residencia*Razones) sobre la autorregulación. La duración de la relación tuvo un efecto significativo en el compromiso de tipo restricciones. Se presentan las implicaciones de estos resultados tanto para la investigación sobre cohabitación, como para las intervenciones clínicas para parejas que cohabitan.
Cómo citar este artículo:
Ripoll-Nuñez, K. J., & Cifuentes-Acosta, J. E. (2019). Compromiso, autorregulación e intimidad en parejas en cohabitación: un estudio exploratorio en Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 28, 125-139. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.74632
This exploratory study examined the effects of reasons to cohabitate, residence prior to cohabitation, and relationship length on relational self-regulation, commitment, and intimacy in cohabitating unions in Bogotá, Colombia. A self-selected sample of 60 individuals (26 men and 34 women) answered online self-report questionnaires. MANOVA results showed effects of three significant interactions (Sex*Reasons; Sex*Residence; Residence*Reasons) on self-regulation. Relationship length had a significant effect on commitment, of the restrictions type. The article discusses the implications of these results for both research on cohabitation and clinical interventions for cohabiting couples.
How to cite this article:
Ripoll-Nuñez, K. J., & Cifuentes-Acosta, J. E. (2019). Commitment, Self-regulation, and Intimacy in Cohabiting Couples: An Exploratory Study in Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 28, 125-139. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v28n2.74632
Este estudo exploratório examinou os efeitos de razões para coabitar, residência antes de coabitar e duração da relação na autorregulação relacional, compromisso e intimidade em uniões estáveis em Bogotá, Colômbia. Uma amostra autosselecionada de 60 indivíduos (26 homens e 34 mulheres) responderam a questionários de autorrelato on-line. Os resultados do MANOVA indicaram efeitos de três interações significativas (Sexo*Razões; Sexo*Residência; Residência*Razões) sobre a autorregulação. A duração da relação teve um efeito significativo no compromisso de tipo restrições. São apresentadas as implicações desses resultados tanto para a pesquisa sobre coabitação quanto para as intervenções clínicas para casais que coabitam.
References
Anderson, S. A., & Sabatelli, R. M. (2010). Family Interaction: A Multigenerational Developmental Perspective (5 ed.). Boston, EUA: Pearson.
Castro, T., Martín, T., & Puga, D. (September, 2008). Matrimonio vs. unión consensual en Latinoamérica: contrastes desde una perspectiva de género. Artículo presentado en el tercer congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Población, Córdoba, Argentina. Recuperado de http://www.alapop.org/alap/images/docsfinais_pdf/alap_2008_final_228.pdf
Curran, M., Burke, T., Young, V., & Totenhagen, C. (2016). Relational sacrifices about intimate behavior and relationship quality for expectant cohabitators. Marriage and Family Review, 52, 442-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2015.1113225
Esteve, A., Lesthaeghe, R., & López-Gay, A. (2012). The Latin American cohabitation boom, 1970-2007. Population Development Review, 38, 55-81. Recuperado de: http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.uniandes.edu.co:8080/stable/41857357
Fulda, B. E., & Lersch, P. M. (2018). Planning until death do us part: Partnership status and financial planning horizon. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 409-425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12458
Halford, W. K. (2001). Brief therapy for couples: Helping partners help themselves. Nueva York, EUA: Guilford Press.
Halford, W. K., Lizzio, A., Wilson, K. L., & Occhipinti, S. (2007). Does working at your marriage help? Couple relationship self-regulation and satisfaction in the first 4 years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 185-194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.185
Hsueh, A. C., Morrison, K. R., & Doss, B. D. (2009). Qualitative reports of problems in cohabiting relationships: Comparisons to married and dating relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015364.
Jose, A., O’Leary, D. K., & Moyer, A. (2010). Does premarital cohabitation predict subsequent marital stability and marital quality? A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00686.x
Kamp Dush, C., Rhoades, G., Sandberg-Thoma, S., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. (2014). Commitment across the transition to parenthood among married and cohabitating couples. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000006
Karney, B. R., Davila, J., Cohan, C. L., Sullivan, K., Johnson, M. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). An empirical investigation of sampling strategies in marital research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 909-920. https://doi.org/10.2307/353411
Knapp, D. J., Norton, A. M., & Sandberg, J. G. (2015). Family of origin, relationship self-regulation, and attachment in marital relationship. Contemporary Family Therapy, 37, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-015-9332-z
Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijin, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43, 203-221. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0018
Meyer, M., Larson, J., Busby, D., & Harper, J. (2012). Working hard or hardly working? Comparing relationship self-regulation, levels of cohabiting, married and remarried individuals. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 53, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.651987
Owen, J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Revised Commitment Inventory. Psyctests Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t24224-0005
Owen, J., Keller, B., Shuck, B., Luebcke, B., Knopp, K., & Rhoades, G. K. (2014). An initial examination of commitment uncertainty in couple therapy. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 232–238.
Podsakoff, P., McKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Reinhold, S. (2010). Reassessing the link between premarital cohabitation and marital instability. Demography, 47, 719-733. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0122
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 553-560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.4.553
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2008). Couples reasons for cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x08324388
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2009). The pre-engagement cohabitation effect: A replication and extension of previous findings. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014358
Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting dating relationships stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 543-550. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021008
Rodríguez, J. A. (2004). Cohabitación en América Latina: ¿modernidad, exclusión o diversidad? Papeles de Población, 10, 97-145.
Rogge, R. D., Cobb, R., Story, L., Johnson, M., Lawrence, E., Rothman, A., & Bradbury, T. (2006). Recruitment and selection of couples for intervention research: Achieving developmental homogeneity at the cost of demographic diversity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.4.777
Sabatelli, R. M., Lee, H., & Ripoll‐Núñez, K. (2018). Placing the social exchange framework in an ecological context. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10, 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12254
Shafer, K., Jensen, T. M., & Larson, J. H. (2014). Relationship effort, satisfaction, and stability: Differences across union type. Journal of marital and family therapy, 40, 212-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12007
Schaefer, M. T., & Olson, D. H. (1981). Assessing intimacy: The pair inventory. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1981.tb01351.x
Shannon, S., & Bartle-Harring, S. (2016). Unique characteristics of cohabiters seeking therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12169
Stanley, S. M., Whitton, S. W., & Markman, H. J. (2004). Maybe I do: Interpersonal commitment and premarital or nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 496-519.
Stanley, S., Rhoades, G., Scott, S., Kelmer, G., Markman, H., & Fincham, F. (2016). Asymmetrically committed relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 1241-1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516672013
Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro. (2019a). Uniones maritales de hecho en Colombia. Recuperado de: https://www.datos.gov.co/Justicia-y-Derecho/Uniones-Maritales-De-Hecho-En-Colombia/xxkm-hf7j
Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro. (2019b). Matrimonio y divorcio en Colombia. Recuperado de: https://www.supernotariado.gov.co/
Tang, C. Y., Curran, M., & Arroyo, A. (2014). Cohabitors’ reasons for living together, satisfaction with sacrifices, and relationship quality. Marriage & Family Review, 50, 598-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2014.938289
Walsh, F. (2016). Strengthening Family Resilience (3 ed.). Nueva York, EUA: Guilford Press.
Willis, G. B. (2004). Cognitive Interviewing: A tool for Improving Question Design. Thousand Oaks, EUA: Sage Publications.
Wilson, K. L., Charker, J., Lizzio, A., Halford, K., & Kimlin, S. (2005). Assessing how much couples work at their relationship: The Behavioral Self-regulation for Effective Relationships scale. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 385-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.3.38
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Melissa Ximena Navas Márquez, Hans Oudhof Van Barneveld, Perla Shiomara Del Carpio Ovando, Norma Ivonne González Arratia López Fuentes, Erika Robles Estrada. (2023). ¿Qué une a las parejas? Experiencias en las relaciones de mujeres del Valle de Toluca. Psicumex, 13, p.1. https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v13i1.531.
2. Cristovao Teixeira Luis Francisco, Ruth Hernández Vital, Jair Arody Del Valle López. (2022). Validación de instrumentos de medición para las variables conocimiento, convicción y compromiso de los padres respecto de un sistema educativo confesional. RIEE | Revista Internacional de Estudios en Educación, 22(2), p.83. https://doi.org/10.37354/riee.2022.223.
3. Ana Laura Suárez Muñoz, Dominga Austreberta Nazar Beutelspacher, Ernesto Benito Salvatierra-Izaba, Georgina Sánchez Ramírez, Arturo Torres Dosal. (2022). Types and circumstances of marital union in the occurrence of physical intimate partner violence in Chiapas, Mexico, 2016. Población y Salud en Mesoamérica, https://doi.org/10.15517/psm.v20i1.50254.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Colombiana de PsicologíaThe RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.
