Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM).
Psychometric Analysis of the Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) Scale Through a Model of Exploratory Structural Equations (ESEM)
Análise psicométrica da Escala de Dominância Social (SDO) através de um Modelo de Equações Estruturais Exploratórias (ESEM).
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808Keywords:
dominancia grupal, Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (esem), oposición a la igualdad, psicometría, validación de la Escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (es)SDO, Group Dominance, Opposition to Equality, ESEM, Psychometry. (en)
SDO, Domínio do Grupo, Oposição à igualdade, ESEM, Psicometria (pt)
Downloads
References
Altemeyer, B. (1998) The other “authoritarian personality”. En Zanna MP (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30. Academic Press. San Diego, CA, EE. UU. pp. 47-92.
American Educational Research Association (aera), American Psychological Association (apa), y National Council on Measurement in Education (ncme). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Aranda, M., Montes-Berges, B., & Castillo-Mayén, M. R. (2015). La orientación a la dominancia social en la adolescencia: el papel de la identidad de género y los rasgos estereotípicos femeninos y masculinos. Revista de Psicología Social, 30, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1016752
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204
Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. (2015). Bayesian Structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315591075
Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29, 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Beauducel A., & Herzberg, P. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in cfa. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305
Cárdenas, M., Meza, P., Lagues, K., & Yañez, S. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social (sdo) en una muestra chilena. Universitas Psychologica, 9, 161-168.
Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well-known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994
Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284282
Dunn, T., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From Alpha to Omega: A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problema of Internal Consistency Estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046
Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1
Espinosa, A., Calderón-Prada, A., Burga, G., & Güímac, J. (2007). Estereotipos, prejuicios y exclusión social en un país multiétnico: el caso peruano. Revista de Psicología, 25, 295-338. Recuperado de http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/1415
Etchezahar, E., Prado-Gascó, V., Jaume, L., & Brussino, S. (2014). Validación argentina de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70004-4
Ferrando, P., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 18-33. Recuperado de http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1793.pdf
Ferrando, P., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: algunas consideraciones adicionales. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1170-1175. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199991
Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2013). Relaciones del sexismo con justificación de la violencia, y con otras formas de prejuicio como la dominancia social y el autoritarismo. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751384
Hatibovic, F., Bobowik, M., Faúndez, X., & Sandoval, J. (2017). Xenofobia y homofobia como efectos de la orientación política, religión y sexo mediados por clasismo y patriocentrismo en jóvenes universitarios chilenos. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26, 131-148. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.55687
Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485
Herrmann, A., & Pfister, H. (2013). Simple measures and complex structures: Is it worth employing a more complex model of personality in Big Five inventories? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.004
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new sdo₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765
Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Forest, J. (2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44, 2638-2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653
Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26, 395–400. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349
Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
Jost J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci., 14, 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of selfesteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Groupbased dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23, 117-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0112-5
Lee, I. C., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025410
Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282002
Liviatan I., & Jost, J.T. (2011). Special Issue: System justification theory: Motivated social cognition in the service of the status quo. Soc. Cognit. 29, 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.231
Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in cfa models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773
Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: esem tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194-1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913
Marsh, H., Muthén, B., Aspahourov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modelling, integrating cfa and efa: application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
Martínez, M. F., Calzado, V., & Martínez, J. (2011). La orientación a la dominancia social y la identidad nacional en las actitudes hacia las políticas migratorias: el papel mediador de la amenaza percibida y el tamaño del exogrupo. Revista de Psicología Social, 26, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347411794078408
Montes-Berges, B., & Silván-Ferrero, M. D. P. (2004). Dominancia social y neosexismo: relación con las actitudes hacia programas de acción afirmativa. Revista de Psicología Social, 19, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1174/0213474041960487
Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling: an introduction. In GR Hancock & RO Mueller (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 2nd Edition (pp. 395–436). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of constructrelevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 37, 1135-1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.428
Peña, Y., & Sidanius, J. (2002). U.S. patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tales for asymmetry. J. Soc. Psychol., 142, 782-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603936
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social Dominance Theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
Pratto, F., Stallworth, L., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x
Prieto, G., & Delgado, A. (2010). Fiabilidad y validez. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 67-74.
Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z
Rottenbacher de Rojas, J. M. (2010). Sexismo ambivalente, paternalismo masculino e ideología política en adultos jóvenes de la ciudad de Lima. Pensamiento psicológico, 7(14), 9-18. Recuperado de https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/129/383
Rottenbacher de Rojas, J. M. (2012). Conservadurismo político, homofobia y prejuicio hacia grupos transgénero en una muestra de estudiantes y egresados universitarios de Lima. Pensamiento psicológico, 10, 23-37. Recuperado de https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/176
Rottenbacher de Rojas, J. M., & Molina-Guzmán, J. (2013). Intolerancia a la ambigüedad, conservadurismo político y justificación de la inequidad económica, legal, educativa y étnica en la ciudad de Lima-Perú. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 22, 253-274. Recuperado de https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/30027
Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 634-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.006
Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Polit. Psychol., 31, 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00747.x
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.). Political Psychology. Nueva York, NY: Psychology Press. pp. 315-332.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1<41::AIDEJSP976>3.0.CO;2-O
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Van Laar, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). The Social Dominance Theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
Silván-Ferrero, M. D. P., & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptación de la escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 22, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347407779697485
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin y S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Annals of Psychology, 33, 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
Williams, L. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1011
Xin, Z., & Chi, L. (2010). Wording effect leads to a controversy over the construct of the social dominance orientation scale. The Journal of Psychology, 144, 473 - 488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.496672
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de PsicologíaThe RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.