Published

2020-08-16

Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM).

Psychometric Analysis of the Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) Scale Through a Model of Exploratory Structural Equations (ESEM)

Análise psicométrica da Escala de Dominância Social (SDO) através de um Modelo de Equações Estruturais Exploratórias (ESEM).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808

Keywords:

dominancia grupal, Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (esem), oposición a la igualdad, psicometría, validación de la Escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (es)
SDO, Group Dominance, Opposition to Equality, ESEM, Psychometry. (en)
SDO, Domínio do Grupo, Oposição à igualdade, ESEM, Psicometria (pt)

Downloads

Authors

El objetivo de la presente investigación es analizar las propiedades psicométricas de la Escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO), een una muestra no universitaria de la ciudad de Arica, Chile, implementando técnicas psicométricas de acuerdo con el estado del arte disciplinar. El muestreo fue no probabilístico, por conveniencia y disponibilidad de 812 participantes, entre edades de 18 a 89 años. Se realizaron estimaciones de fiabilidad, análisis factoriales confirmatorios y modelos de ecuaciones estructurales exploratorios, contrastando diferentes modelos. Los resultados proporcionaron evidencia de validez basada en la estructura interna de la prueba, presentando buen ajuste de la estructura de la SDO (RMSEA = ,073; CFI = ,971; TLI = ,959), y adecuados niveles estimados de fiabilidad (Oposición a la Igualdad: α = ,85 y ω = ,84; Dominancia Grupal: α = ,67 y ω = ,66). Finalmente, se concluye que las puntuaciones de la escala SDO poseen evidencia suficiente para sustentar su uso e interpretación, en población general equivalente a la del presente estudio.
The objective of this research is to analyze the psychometric properties of the Social Dominance Orientation (SDO) Scale, in a community sample of the city of Arica, Chile, implementing psychometric techniques according to the state of disciplinary art. The sampling was non-probabilistic, for convenience and the availability of 812 participants, between the ages of 18 to 89 years. Reliability estimates, confirmatory factorial analyses, and exploratory structural equation models were performed. The results provided evidence of validity based on the internal structure of the test, presenting good adjustment of the structure of SDO (RMSEA = .073; CFI = .971; TLI = .959), and estimated adequate levels of reliability (Opposition to the Equality: α = .85 and ω = .84, Group dominance: α = .67 and ω = .66). Finally, it is concluded that the scores of the SDO scale have sufficient evidence to support its use and interpretation, in general population equivalent to that of the present study.
O objetivo desta pesquisa é analisar as propriedades psicométricas da orientação para a escala Dominância Social (SDO) em uma amostra da comunidade da cidade de Arica, Chile, técnicas psicométricas implementadas de acordo com o estado da arte disciplinar. A amostragem foi não probabilística, por conveniência e disponibilidade de 812 participantes, entre as idades de 18 a 89 anos. Foram realizadas estimativas de confiabilidade, análises fatoriais confirmatórias e modelos de equações estruturais exploratórias. Os resultados forneceram provas de validade com base na estrutura interna do teste, mostrando bom ajuste da estrutura do SDO (RMSEA =, 073; TPI = 971; TLI = 959), e os níveis apropriados estimados de fiabilidade (oposição à Igualdade: α =, 85 e ω =, 84, Grupo de dominância: α =, 67 e ω =, 66). Por fim, concluise que os escores da escala SDO possuem evidências suficientes para sustentar seu uso e interpretação, em uma população geral equivalente à do presente estudo.

References

Altemeyer, B. (1998) The other “authoritarian personality”. En Zanna MP (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 30. Academic Press. San Diego, CA, EE. UU. pp. 47-92.

American Educational Research Association (aera), American Psychological Association (apa), y National Council on Measurement in Education (ncme). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Aranda, M., Montes-Berges, B., & Castillo-Mayén, M. R. (2015). La orientación a la dominancia social en la adolescencia: el papel de la identidad de género y los rasgos estereotípicos femeninos y masculinos. Revista de Psicología Social, 30, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1016752

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 397-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008204

Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Morin, A. J. (2015). Bayesian Structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: Comments on Stromeyer et al. Journal of Management, 41, 1561-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315591075

Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29, 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511

Beauducel A., & Herzberg, P. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in cfa. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2

Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305

Cárdenas, M., Meza, P., Lagues, K., & Yañez, S. (2010). Adaptación y validación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social (sdo) en una muestra chilena. Universitas Psychologica, 9, 161-168.

Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well-known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18, 207-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994

Christopher, A. N., & Mull, M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x

Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205284282

Dunn, T., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From Alpha to Omega: A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problema of Internal Consistency Estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046

Duriez, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2002). The march of modern fascism: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1

Espinosa, A., Calderón-Prada, A., Burga, G., & Güímac, J. (2007). Estereotipos, prejuicios y exclusión social en un país multiétnico: el caso peruano. Revista de Psicología, 25, 295-338. Recuperado de http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/1415

Etchezahar, E., Prado-Gascó, V., Jaume, L., & Brussino, S. (2014). Validación argentina de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70004-4

Ferrando, P., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 18-33. Recuperado de http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/pdf/1793.pdf

Ferrando, P., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: algunas consideraciones adicionales. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1170-1175. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199991

Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2013). Relaciones del sexismo con justificación de la violencia, y con otras formas de prejuicio como la dominancia social y el autoritarismo. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 127-139. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751384

Hatibovic, F., Bobowik, M., Faúndez, X., & Sandoval, J. (2017). Xenofobia y homofobia como efectos de la orientación política, religión y sexo mediados por clasismo y patriocentrismo en jóvenes universitarios chilenos. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26, 131-148. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.55687

Henry, P. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400802049936

Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485

Herrmann, A., & Pfister, H. (2013). Simple measures and complex structures: Is it worth employing a more complex model of personality in Big Five inventories? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 599-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.004

Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new sdo₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N., & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211432765

Howard, J. L., Gagné, M., Morin, A. J., & Forest, J. (2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44, 2638-2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653

Izquierdo, I., Olea, J., & Abad, F. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies: Uses and recommendations. Psicothema, 26, 395–400. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.349

Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

Jost J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci., 14, 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of selfesteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1999.1403

Kugler, M. B., Cooper, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2010). Groupbased dominance and opposition to equality correspond to different psychological motives. Social Justice Research, 23, 117-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0112-5

Lee, I. C., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025410

Levin, S., Federico, C. M., Sidanius, J., & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2002). Social dominance orientation and intergroup bias: The legitimation of favoritism for high-status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282002

Liviatan I., & Jost, J.T. (2011). Special Issue: System justification theory: Motivated social cognition in the service of the status quo. Soc. Cognit. 29, 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.231

Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1151-1169. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Morin, A. J. S., & Von Davier, M. (2013). Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: Two wrongs do not make a right—Camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in cfa models. Psychological Methods, 18, 257-284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032773

Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: esem tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1194-1218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026913

Marsh, H., Muthén, B., Aspahourov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modelling, integrating cfa and efa: application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220

Martínez, M. F., Calzado, V., & Martínez, J. (2011). La orientación a la dominancia social y la identidad nacional en las actitudes hacia las políticas migratorias: el papel mediador de la amenaza percibida y el tamaño del exogrupo. Revista de Psicología Social, 26, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347411794078408

Montes-Berges, B., & Silván-Ferrero, M. D. P. (2004). Dominancia social y neosexismo: relación con las actitudes hacia programas de acción afirmativa. Revista de Psicología Social, 19, 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1174/0213474041960487

Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling: an introduction. In GR Hancock & RO Mueller (Eds.), Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, 2nd Edition (pp. 395–436). Greenwich, CT: IAP.

Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of constructrelevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800

Morin, A. J., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23, 116-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.961800

Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 37, 1135-1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.428

Peña, Y., & Sidanius, J. (2002). U.S. patriotism and ideologies of group dominance: A tales for asymmetry. J. Soc. Psychol., 142, 782-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540209603936

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social Dominance Theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

Pratto, F., Stallworth, L., & Sidanius, J. (1997). The gender gap: Differences in political attitudes and social dominance orientation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1997.tb01118.x

Prieto, G., & Delgado, A. (2010). Fiabilidad y validez. Papeles del Psicólogo, 31, 67-74.

Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z

Rottenbacher de Rojas, J. M. (2010). Sexismo ambivalente, paternalismo masculino e ideología política en adultos jóvenes de la ciudad de Lima. Pensamiento psicológico, 7(14), 9-18. Recuperado de https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/129/383

Rottenbacher de Rojas, J. M. (2012). Conservadurismo político, homofobia y prejuicio hacia grupos transgénero en una muestra de estudiantes y egresados universitarios de Lima. Pensamiento psicológico, 10, 23-37. Recuperado de https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/176

Rottenbacher de Rojas, J. M., & Molina-Guzmán, J. (2013). Intolerancia a la ambigüedad, conservadurismo político y justificación de la inequidad económica, legal, educativa y étnica en la ciudad de Lima-Perú. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 22, 253-274. Recuperado de https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/30027

Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Update to core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 634-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.06.006

Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2010). The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Polit. Psychol., 31, 109-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00747.x

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2004). Social dominance theory: A new synthesis. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.). Political Psychology. Nueva York, NY: Psychology Press. pp. 315-332.

Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. (2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1<41::AIDEJSP976>3.0.CO;2-O

Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Van Laar, C., & Sears, D. O. (2008). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.998

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476

Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2004). The Social Dominance Theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25, 845-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x

Silván-Ferrero, M. D. P., & Bustillos, A. (2007). Adaptación de la escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social al castellano: validación de la Dominancia Grupal y la Oposición a la Igualdad como factores subyacentes. Revista de Psicología Social, 22, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347407779697485

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. En W. G. Austin y S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 769. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769

Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Annals of Psychology, 33, 755-782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401

Williams, L. J., & Brown, B. K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1011

Xin, Z., & Chi, L. (2010). Wording effect leads to a controversy over the construct of the social dominance orientation scale. The Journal of Psychology, 144, 473 - 488. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.496672

How to Cite

APA

Henríquez Henríquez, D. T., Ferrer Urbina, R. M. and Romero Romero, J. C. (2020). Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM). Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808

ACM

[1]
Henríquez Henríquez, D.T., Ferrer Urbina, R.M. and Romero Romero, J.C. 2020. Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM). Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 29, 2 (Jul. 2020), 41–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808.

ACS

(1)
Henríquez Henríquez, D. T.; Ferrer Urbina, R. M.; Romero Romero, J. C. Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM). Rev. colomb. psicol. 2020, 29, 41-55.

ABNT

HENRÍQUEZ HENRÍQUEZ, D. T.; FERRER URBINA, R. M.; ROMERO ROMERO, J. C. Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM). Revista Colombiana de Psicología, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 2, p. 41–55, 2020. DOI: 10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/78808. Acesso em: 19 aug. 2024.

Chicago

Henríquez Henríquez, Diego Tomás, Rodrigo Mario Ferrer Urbina, and Juan Carlos Romero Romero. 2020. “Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM)”. Revista Colombiana De Psicología 29 (2):41-55. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808.

Harvard

Henríquez Henríquez, D. T., Ferrer Urbina, R. M. and Romero Romero, J. C. (2020) “Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM)”., Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), pp. 41–55. doi: 10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808.

IEEE

[1]
D. T. Henríquez Henríquez, R. M. Ferrer Urbina, and J. C. Romero Romero, “Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM)”., Rev. colomb. psicol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 41–55, Jul. 2020.

MLA

Henríquez Henríquez, D. T., R. M. Ferrer Urbina, and J. C. Romero Romero. “Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM)”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 29, no. 2, July 2020, pp. 41-55, doi:10.15446/rcp.v29n2.78808.

Turabian

Henríquez Henríquez, Diego Tomás, Rodrigo Mario Ferrer Urbina, and Juan Carlos Romero Romero. “Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM)”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 29, no. 2 (July 1, 2020): 41–55. Accessed August 19, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/78808.

Vancouver

1.
Henríquez Henríquez DT, Ferrer Urbina RM, Romero Romero JC. Análisis psicométrico de la escala Orientación hacia la Dominancia Social (SDO) mediante un Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales Exploratorias (ESEM). Rev. colomb. psicol. [Internet]. 2020 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Aug. 19];29(2):41-55. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/78808

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

852

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Colombiana de Psicología

The RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.