Published

2020-08-16

Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace

Procesos Psicosociales de Discriminación contra la Mujer en el Lugar de Trabajo

PROCESSOS PSICOSSOCIAIS DE DISCRIMINAÇÃO CONTRA A MULHER NO LOCAL DE TRABALHO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004

Keywords:

Gender discrimination, Parental leave, Stereotypes, Social Psychology, Sexism (en)
Discriminación de género, Permiso parental, Estereotipos, Psicología social, Sexismo (es)
Discriminação de gênero, Licença parental, Estereótipos, Psicologia Social, Sexismo (pt)

Downloads

Authors

  • Iara Maribondo Albuquerque Universidade Federal da Paraíba / Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Ana Raquel Rosas Torres Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • José Luis Álvaro Estramiana Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Alicia Garrido Luque Universidad Complutense de Madrid

This work aimed to analyze the influence of stereotypes on discrimination against women. Specifically, it investigated the effects of the candidate gender (man vs. woman), the status regarding parental leave (exercising the right vs. waiving the right), and the stereotypes of competence, sociability, and morality regarding this discrimination. Consistent with previous studies, the candidate gender and the parental leave status interact and together influence discrimination against women (Study 1, F(1, 229)=22.45, p<.001). In turn, the triple interaction of candidate gender, parental leave status, and the three dimensions of stereotypes (Study 2, F4, 587)=2.73, p=.030, ƞ²=.018) revealed that the woman who took parental leave received more positive evaluations in the three stereotypical dimensions, in comparison with to the woman who waived her right to the leave, and, at the same time, she was poorly assessed in the competence dimension, compared to the man who exercises the same right (Study 2, N=312).

 

How to cite this article: Albuquerque, I. M., Torres, A. R. R., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Garrido-Luque, A. (2020). Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1544/rcp.v29n2.80004

El objetivo de este trabajo fue analizar la influencia de los estereotipos en la discriminación contra la mujer. Específicamente, se investigó los efectos del género candidato (hombre frente a mujer); el estado con respecto al permiso parental (ejercicio del derecho frente a la renuncia al derecho) y los estereotipos de competencia, sociabilidad y moralidad sobre esta discriminación. De acuerdo con estudios anteriores, el género de los candidatos y el estado de licencia parental interactúan e influyen juntos en la discriminación contra las mujeres (Estudio 1, F(1, 229) =22.45, p<.001). A su vez, la triple interacción del género candidato, el estado de licencia parental y las tres dimensiones de los estereotipos (Estudio 2, F(4, 587)=2.73, p=.030, ƞ²=.018) revelaron que la mujer que tomó la licencia de paternidad se evaluó de manera más positiva en las tres dimensiones estereotipadas, en comparación con la mujer que renunció a su derecho a la licencia quien, al mismo tiempo, se evaluó de manera más pobre en la dimensión de competencia en comparación con el hombre que ejerce el mismo derecho (Estudio 2, N=312).

 

Cómo citar este artículo: Albuquerque, I. M., Torres, A. R. R., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Garrido-Luque, A. (2020). Procesos Psicosociales de Discriminación contra la Mujer en el Lugar de Trabajo. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1544/rcp.v29n2.80004

O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a influencia dos estereótipos na discriminação contra a mulher. Concretamente, verificou-se o efeito do sexo do candidato (homem vs. mulher), do status referente à licença parental (exerce o direito vs. renuncia o direito) e dos estereótipos de competência, sociabilidade e moralidade nessa discriminação. Consistente com estudos prévios, o sexo do candidato e o status referente à licença parental interagem e juntos influenciam a discriminação contra a mulher (Estudo 1, F(1,229) = 22.45, p < .001). Por sua vez, a interação tripla entre gênero do candidato, status referente à licença parental e as três dimensões dos estereótipos (Estudo 2, F(4, 587) = 2.73, p = .030, ƞ² = .018) revelou que a mulher que disfrutou da licença parental foi avaliada mais positivamente nas três dimensões estereotípicas quando comparada à mulher que tinha renunciado o direito à licença e, ao mesmo tempo, ela foi mais mal avaliada na dimensão de competência quando comparada ao homem que exercia o mesmo direito (Estudo 2, N = 312).

References

Albiston, C. (2007). Institutional Perspectives on Law, Work, and Family. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 397–426. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112803

Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative Discrimination and the Motherhood Penalty. Gender & Society, 24, 616–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210383142

Brambilla, M., Rusconi, P., Sacchi, S., & Cherubini, P. (2011). Looking for honesty: The primary role of morality (vs. sociability and competence) in information gathering. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.744

Burgess, N. (2013). The Motherhood Penalty: How Gender and Parental Status Influence Judgements of Job-Related Competence and Organizational Commitment. Seminar Research Paper Series, Paper 32. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/lrc_paper_series/32/?utm_source=digitalcommons.uri.edu%2Flrc_paper_series%2F32&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Bygren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Gähler, M. (2017). Do employers prefer fathers? Evidence from a field experiment testing the gender by parenthood interaction effect on callbacks to job applications. European Sociological Review, 33, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx051

Castillo-Mayén, R., & Montes-Berges, B. (2014). Analysis of Current Gender Stereotypes. Anales de Psicología, 30, 1044-1060. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.138981

Connor, R. A., Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2016). Ambivalent Sexism in the Twenty-First Century. In C. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Prejudice, 295 – 320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297-1338. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799

Cuadrado, I., López-Rodríguez, L., & Navas, M. (2016). La perspectiva de la minoría: estereotipos y emociones entre grupos inmigrantes. Anales de Psicología, 32, 535-544. http://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.2.205341

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When professionals become mothers, warmth doesn’t cut the ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.P., …., & Ziegler, R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X314935

Cundiff, J. L., & Vescio, T. K. (2016). Gender Stereotypes Influence How People Explain Gender Disparities in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 75, 126 – 138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0593-2

Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender,123-174. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275 – 298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719

Etaugh, C., & Folger, D. (1998). Perceptions of parents whose work and parenting behaviors deviate from role expectations. Sex Roles, 39, 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018850404838

Fiske, S. T., Xu, J., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis) respecting versus (dis) liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00128

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

Flaquer, L., & Escobedo, A. (2014). Licencias parentales y política social de la paternidad en España. Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 32, 69-99. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CRLA.2014.v32.n1.44714

Garrido-Luque, A., Álvaro-Estramiana, J. L., & Rosas-Torres, A. R. (2018). Estereotipos de género, maternidad y empleo: un análisis psicológico, Pensando Psicología, 14. https://doi.org/10.16925/pe.v14i23.2261

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109 – 118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109

Glick, P., Wilk, K., & Perreault, M. (1995). Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes. Sex Roles, 32, 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544212

González, M. J., Cortina, C., & Rodríguez, J. (2019). The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Hiring: A Field Experiment. European Sociological Review, 35, 187 -204. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy055

Gungor, G., & Biernat, M. (2009). Gender Bias or Motherhood Disadvantage? Judgments of Blue Collar Mothers and Fathers in the Workplace. Sex Roles, 60, 232- 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9540-1

Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, (32), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003

Heilman, M. E., & Chen, J. J. (2005). Same Behavior, different consequences: Reactions to Men’s and Women’s Altruistic Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.431

Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2008). Motherhood: A potential source of bias in employment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.189

Horvath, L. K., & Sczesny, S. (2011). Gender-fair language in job advertisements and hiring decisions. In S. Sczesny (Chair), Gender-fair language use from a social psychological perspective. Symposium conducted at the 16th General meeting of the European association of social psychology, Stockholm.

Johansson, E. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings, IFAU Working Paper 2010:4. ifau – Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation, Swedish Ministry of Employment. Uppsala, Sweden. Accessed May 1, 2017: http://www.ifau.se/ ISSN 1651-1166

Kricheli-Katz, T. (2012). Choice, Discrimination, and Motherhood Penalty. Law & Society Review, 46, 557–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00506.x

Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N., & Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of ingroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234

Livermore, T., Rodgers, J., & Siminski, P. (2011). The Effect of Motherhood on Wages and Wage Growth: Evidence for Australia. The Economic Record, 87, 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00745.x

López-Rodríguez, L., Cuadrado, I., & Navas, M. (2013). Extended application of the Stereotype Content Model (scm) towards three immigrant groups in Spain. Estudios de Psicología, 34, 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093913806751375

Lyness, K. S., & Judiesch, M. K. (2014). Gender egalitarianism and work–life balance for managers: Multisource perspectives in 36 countries. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 96-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12011

Michinov, N., Dambrun, M., Guimond, S., & Méot, A. (2005). Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: A new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 91-98. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206402

Morales, M. & Aguirre, E. (2018). Involucramiento parental basado en el hogar y desempeño académico en la adolescencia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27, 137-160. https://doi.org/10.15446/ rcp.v27n2.66212

Pedregosa, P. R., & Díaz, R. M. (2016). Sexismo hostil y benevolente en adolescentes. Una aproximación étnico-cultural. Género y Educación, 72, 31-46. https://doi.org/10.35362/rie72126

Pereira, M., Álvaro, J. L. & Garrido, A. (2016). Procesos de esencialización de hombres y mujeres: Un estudio comparado Brasil-España. Anales de psicología, 32(1), 190-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.190841

Plickert, G., & Sterling, J. (2017). Gender still matters: Effects of workplace discrimination on employment schedules of young professionals. Laws, 6, 28. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws6040028

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., & Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personal variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

Sterling, J., & Reichman, N. (2016). Overlooked and Undervalued: Women in Private Law Practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12, 373–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121705

Sullivan, C. (2015). ‘Bad Mum Guilt’: the representation of ‘work-life balance’ in UK women’s magazines. Community, Work & Family, 18, 284-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2014.970128

How to Cite

APA

Maribondo Albuquerque, I., Rosas Torres, A. R., Álvaro Estramiana, J. L. and Garrido Luque, A. (2020). Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004

ACM

[1]
Maribondo Albuquerque, I., Rosas Torres, A.R., Álvaro Estramiana, J.L. and Garrido Luque, A. 2020. Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 29, 2 (Jul. 2020), 13–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004.

ACS

(1)
Maribondo Albuquerque, I.; Rosas Torres, A. R.; Álvaro Estramiana, J. L.; Garrido Luque, A. Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2020, 29, 13-24.

ABNT

MARIBONDO ALBUQUERQUE, I.; ROSAS TORRES, A. R.; ÁLVARO ESTRAMIANA, J. L.; GARRIDO LUQUE, A. Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 2, p. 13–24, 2020. DOI: 10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/80004. Acesso em: 21 sep. 2024.

Chicago

Maribondo Albuquerque, Iara, Ana Raquel Rosas Torres, José Luis Álvaro Estramiana, and Alicia Garrido Luque. 2020. “Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace”. Revista Colombiana De Psicología 29 (2):13-24. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004.

Harvard

Maribondo Albuquerque, I., Rosas Torres, A. R., Álvaro Estramiana, J. L. and Garrido Luque, A. (2020) “Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace”, Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(2), pp. 13–24. doi: 10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004.

IEEE

[1]
I. Maribondo Albuquerque, A. R. Rosas Torres, J. L. Álvaro Estramiana, and A. Garrido Luque, “Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace”, Rev. colomb. psicol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 13–24, Jul. 2020.

MLA

Maribondo Albuquerque, I., A. R. Rosas Torres, J. L. Álvaro Estramiana, and A. Garrido Luque. “Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 29, no. 2, July 2020, pp. 13-24, doi:10.15446/rcp.v29n2.80004.

Turabian

Maribondo Albuquerque, Iara, Ana Raquel Rosas Torres, José Luis Álvaro Estramiana, and Alicia Garrido Luque. “Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 29, no. 2 (July 1, 2020): 13–24. Accessed September 21, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/80004.

Vancouver

1.
Maribondo Albuquerque I, Rosas Torres AR, Álvaro Estramiana JL, Garrido Luque A. Psychosocial Processes of Discrimination Against Women in the Workplace. Rev. colomb. psicol. [Internet]. 2020 Jul. 1 [cited 2024 Sep. 21];29(2):13-24. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/80004

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations2

1. Olga Teodora Bardales Mendoza, Renán Meza Díaz, María Carbajal. (2022). Feminicide Violence Before and During the COVID-19 Health Emergency. Violence and Gender, 9(1), p.30. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2021.0032.

2. Darja Kobal Grum, Katarina Babnik. (2022). The psychological concept of social sustainability in the workplace from the perspective of sustainable goals: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.942204.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

2566

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.