The Role of Third Parties in Cyber Conflicts: The sima Simulator
El Papel de los Terceros en los Conflictos Cibernéticos: el Simulador sima
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v32n1.96322Keywords:
cyberaggression, chat, online aggression, conflict, pedagogical intervention (en)ciberagresión, chat, agresión virtual, conflicto, intervención pedagógica (es)
New media creates opportunities to directly measure how adolescents respond to aggressive situations. In this study, we report on sima, a simulator of digital chats, created to mimic online aggressive interactions within a conflict situation. Adolescents were invited to be part of a digital chat where all interactions were pre-programmed, except for the participants’ interventions, to discuss controversial topics (e.g., animal maltreatment). Two chat members engaged in a conflict programmed to escalate quickly through aggressive insults. Sixth and seventh-grade students (mostly aged 12 to 14; n = 287) from one public school (low ses) and one private school (high ses) participated in the study. Responses to open questions after finishing the chat suggest that the great majority considered that they were taking part in a real online interaction. Aggressive offenses towards other members of the chat were very common. sima opens many options for further research about bystander behavior in aggressive online interactions.
Los nuevos medios de comunicación han creado oportunidades para medir directamente cómo los adolescentes responden a situaciones de agresión. Presentamos a sima, un simulador de chats digitales creado para imitar interacciones agresivas en línea en una situación de conflicto. Los adolescentes son invitados a ser parte de un chat digital para discutir temas controversiales (p. ej., maltrato animal). En realidad, las interacciones están todas preprogramadas a excepción de las intervenciones de quienes participan. Dos supuestos miembros del chat tienen un conflicto programado para escalar de forma rápida con insultos agresivos. Participaron estudiantes de sexto y séptimo grado (principalmente de 12 a 14 años; n = 287) de un colegio público (nse bajo) y uno privado (nse alto). Las respuestas a preguntas abiertas sugieren que la gran mayoría consideró que estaban participando en una interacción en línea real. Las ofensas agresivas hacia otros miembros del chat fueron muy comunes. sima abre muchas opciones para futuras investigaciones sobre el comportamiento de espectadores en interacciones agresivas en línea.
References
American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1, 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.1.19
Arab, E., & Díaz, A. (2015). Impacto de las redes sociales e internet en la adolescencia: aspectos positivos y negativos. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes, 26, 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmclc.2014.12.001
Atlas, R. S., & Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597580
Bartels, M., Hendriks, A., Fung I., H., Hagenbeek, F., Nivard, M., van Dongen … Rose, R. (2018). Childhood aggression and the co-occurrence of behavioural and emotional problems: Results across ages 3-16 years from multiple raters in six cohorts in the eu-action project. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1169-1
Burger, J. M. (2009). Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today? American Psychologist, 64, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0010932
Burt, A., & Alhabash, S. (2018). Illuminating the nomological network of digital aggression: Results from two studies. Aggressive Behavior, 44, 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21736
Burt, S. A., Kim, M., & Alhabash, S. (2020). A novel in vivo measure of cyberaggression. Aggressive Behavior, 46, 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21911
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185-1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
Carrier, L. M., Spradlin, A., Bunce, J. P., & Rosen, L. D. (2015). Virtual empathy: Positive and negative impacts of going online upon empathy in young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.026
Chaux, E. (2012). Educación, convivencia y agresión escolar. Bogotá, Colombia: Ediciones Uniandes. Taurus, Santillana. https://doi.org/10.7440/2012.62
Chaux, E., Barrera, M., Molano, A., Velásquez, A. M., Castellanos, M., Chaparro, M. P., & Bustamante, A. (2017). Classrooms in Peace within violent contexts: Field evaluation of Aulas en Paz in Colombia. Prevention Science, 18, 828-838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0754-8
Cheng, J., Bernstein, M., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. cscw Conf Comput Support Coop Work, 1217-1230. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213
Chester, D. S., & Lasko, E. N. (2019). Validating a standardized approach to the Taylor aggression paradigm. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 620-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618775408
Constantino, G. D., & Álvarez, G. (2010). Conflictos virtuales, problemas reales: caracterización de situaciones conflictivas en espacios formativos online. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 15(44), 65-84. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/140/14012513005.pdf
Corcoran, L., Mc Guckin, C., & Prentice, G. (2015). Cyberbullying or Cyber aggression?: A review of existing definitions of cyber-based peer-to-peer aggression. Societies, 5, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020245
Craig, W., & Pepler, D. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 2, 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/082957359801300205
David-Ferdon, C. M., & Feldman, M. (2007). Electronic media, violence, and adolescents: An emerging state health problem. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 51-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.020
Del Rey, R., Mora-Merchán, J. A., Casas, J. A., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Jaén, P. E. (2018). Programa “Asegúrate”: Efectos en ciberagresión y sus factores de riesgo. Comunicar, 56, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C56-2018-04
Dickson, D. J., Richmond, A. D., Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., Laursen, B., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2015). Aggression can be contagious: Longitudinal associations between proactive aggression and reactive aggression among young twins. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21582
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Wiley.
Grigg, D. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851
Hooijsma, M., Huitsing, G., Dijkstra, J. K, Flache, A., & Veenstra, R. (2020). Being friends with or rejected by classmates: Aggression toward same- and cross-ethnic peers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(3), 678-692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01173-1
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa anti-bullying program: Grades 4-6. Child Development, 82, 311 -330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
Kim, M., Clark, S. L., Donnellan, M. B., & Burt, S. A. (2020). A multi‐method investigation of the personality correlates of digital aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103923
Kokko, K., Simonton, S., Dubow, E., Lansford, J. E., Olson, S. L., Huesmann, L. R., Pettit, G. S. (2014). Country, sex, and parent occupational status: Moderators of the continuity of aggression from childhood to adulthood. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 552-567. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21546
Lange, A., & Jakubowski, P. (1980). Responsible assertive behavior: Cognitive, behavioural procedures for trainers. Champaing: Research Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/583463
Lieberman, J. D., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). A hot new way to measure aggression: Hot sauce allocation. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:5<331::AID-AB2>3.0.CO;2-1
Macháčková, H., Dedkova, L., Sevcikova, A., & Cerna, A. (2018). Bystanders’ supportive and passive responses to cyberaggression. Journal of School Violence, 17, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2016.1222499
Martínez, J., Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. J., & Zych, I. (2020). Bullying and cyberbullying in adolescents from disadvantaged areas: Validation of questionnaires; prevalence rates; and relationship to self-esteem, empathy and social skills. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 6199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176199
Menin, D., Guarini, A., Mameli, C., Skrzypiec, G., & Brighi, A. (2021). Was that (cyber) bullying? Investigating the operational definitions of bullying and cyberbullying from adolescents’ perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 21.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100221
Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Fraczek, A., & Caprara, G. V. (1998). Crosscultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1998)24:1%3C1::aid-ab1%3E3.0.co;2-r
Parke, R. D., & Slaby, R. G. (1983). The development of aggression. En P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology. Socialization, Personality, and Social Development. (pp. 567-641). New York, usa: Wiley.
Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (1995). A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observations of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, 548- 553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.548
Redondo, J., Luzardo, M., & Rangel, K. (2016). Ciberagresión: un estudio sobre la prevalencia en estudiantes universitarios Colombianos. Informes Psicológicos, 16, 85-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.18566/infpsicv16n1a05
Runions, K. C., Bak, M. & Shaw, T. (2016). Disentangling functions of online aggression: The Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (catq). Aggressive Behavior, 43(1). 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21663
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
Salmivalli, C., & Kaukiainen, A. (2004). ‘Female aggression’ revisited: Variable- and person-centered approaches to studying gender differences in different types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 158-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20012
Salmivalli, C. (2014) Participant roles in bullying: How can peer bystanders be utilized in interventions? Theory Into Practice, 53, 286-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947222
Sticca, F. & Perren, S. (2013). Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 739-750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9867-3
Tremblay, R. E. (2002). Prevention of injury by early socialization of aggressive behavior. Injury Prevention, 8, 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.8.suppl_4.iv17
Wölfer, R., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Zagorscak, P., Jäkel, A., Göbel, K., & Scheithauer, H. (2013). Prevention 2.0: Targeting cyberbullying @ school. Prevention Science, 15, 879 887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0438-y
Wright, M. F. (2015). Adolescents cyber aggression perpetration and cyber victimization: the longitudinal associations with school functioning. Social Psychology of Education, 18(4), 653-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9318-6
Wright. M. F. (2017). The role of technologies, behaviors, gender, and gender stereotype traits in adolescents’ cyber aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35 (7-8), 1719-1738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517696858
Wright, M. F., Aoyama, I., Kamble, S. V., Li, Z., Soudi, S., Lei, L., & Shu, C. (2015). Peer attachment and cyber aggression involvement among Chinese, Indian, and Japanese adolescents. Societies, 5, 339-353. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020339
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Carolina Alcántar-Nieblas, Angel Alberto Valdés Cuervo, Lizeth Guadalupe Parra-Pérez, Francisco José Álvarez-Montero, Fernanda Inéz García-Vázquez. (2024). Psychometrics Properties of the Styles of Bystander Defender Intervention Scale in Cyberbullying: Its Relationships with Moral Identity and Cyberbullying. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 33(1), p.29. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v33n1.105145.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.












