Published

2024-04-09

Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia

Ideología política y legitimación de las desigualdades sociales en Colombia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218

Keywords:

Political ideology, inequality, system justification, Colombia, Social Psychology (en)
ideología política, desigualdad, justificación del sistema, Colombia, Psicología social (es)

Downloads

Authors

This article examines the effect of left-right political ideology on attitudes toward inequality and the maintenance of the status quo in Colombia. In three studies, we examined the influence of political orientation on attitudes towards economic inequality (Study 1, N = 506), gender inequality (Study 2, N = 277), and political inequality (Study 3, N = 1,555). Our results suggest that people positioning further to the right on the political spectrum —political conservatism—were consistently associated with lower perception of social inequalities, greater justification of the unequal status quo, and refusal to take actions that redress inequality. These results were consistent across different domains, such as economic, political and gender inequalities. Furthermore, our findings also suggest that political ideology was also associated with political and affective polarization. Political ideology is discussed as a category that allows people to perceive and understand the social world from which they position themselves in relation to political issues.

 En este artículo se examina el efecto de la ideología política de izquierda-derecha sobre las actitudes hacia la desigualdad y el mantenimiento del statu quo en Colombia. En tres estudios, evaluamos la influencia de la orientación política sobre las actitudes hacia la desigualdad económica (Estudio 1, N = 506), la desigualdad de género (Estudio 2, N = 277) y la desigualdad política (Estudio 3, N = 1.555). Nuestros resultados sugieren que las personas que se posicionan más a la derecha en el espectro político —conservadurismo político— se asocian sistemáticamente con una menor percepción de las desigualdades sociales, una mayor justificación del statu quo, y un mayor rechazo a emprender acciones que promuevan el cambio social. Estos resultados fueron consistentes en diferentes ámbitos, como las desigualdades económicas, políticas y de género. Además, nuestros resultados también sugieren que el conservadurismo político estuvo asociado con diferentes formas de polarización política y afectiva. La ideología política se discute como una categoría que permite a las personas percibir y comprender el mundo social desde el que se posicionan en relación con las cuestiones políticas.

References

Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493

Alisat, S., & Riemer, M. (2015). The Environmental Action Scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.006

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Santos, R. J. (2013). The monopoly of violence: Evidence from colombia. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(SUPPL. 1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01099.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01099.x

Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right: Multilevel Models and the Politics of Inequality, Ideology, and Legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 564–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007313113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007313113

Aristizábal, J. C. (2010). Crítica y empírica: el rol de la psicología en el cambio social. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 19(2), 241–257. http://bases.bireme.br/cgibin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xis&src=google&base=LILACS&lang=p&nextAction=lnk&exprSearch=595057&indexSearch=ID

Avendaño, D., Duarte, A., & Pallares, A. (2021). Not so conservative: Suppression effects between social and economic ideology on moral foundations and moral absolutism. International Journal of Psychology, October. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12817

Azevedo, F., Jost, J. T., Rothmund, T., & Sterling, J. (2019). Neoliberal Ideology and the Justification of Inequality in Capitalist Societies: Why Social and Economic Dimensions of Ideology Are Intertwined. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 49–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12310

Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Cambridge Polity Press. (ed.).

Brandt, M. J., & Reyna, C. (2017). Individual Differences in the Resistance to Social Change and Acceptance of Inequality Predict System Legitimacy Differently Depending on the Social Structure. European Journal of Personality, 31(3), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2100

Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2020). A Privileged Point of View: Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Naïve Realism and Political Division.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220921043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220921043

Cárdenas, M., Lay, S., González, C., Calderón, C., Alegría, I. (2010). Inventario de sexismo ambivalente: Adaptación, validación y relación con variables psicosociales. Salud & Sociedad, 1(2),125-135. [fecha de Consulta 31 de marzo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=439742463006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.2010.0002.00006

Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2018). On the Left and Right Ideological Divide: Historical Accounts and Contemporary Perspectives. Political Psychology, 39, 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12476

Caviedes, J. C. P. (2016). ¿Polarización? Posiciones ideológicas durante la campaña presidencial colombiana en 2014. Colombia Internacional, 87, 199–215. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint87.2016.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint87.2016.08

Coronado, S. (2019). Rights in the time of populism: Land and institutional change amid the reemergence of right-wing authoritarianism in Colombia. Land, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/land8080119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land8080119

Dane (2021). Encuesta de Cultura Política [fecha de consulta 31 de marzo de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/comunicados-y-boletines/estadisticas-sociales/cultura-politica

Díaz, M. C. (2017). Autoritarismo, dominancia social y orientación política en jovenes universitarios de Medellín [Universidad de Antioquia]. In: Trabajo de grado. https://bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co/bitstream/10495/14123/1/DiazMiya_2017_AutoritarismoDominanciaSocial.pdf

Freire, A. (2008). Party polarization and citizens’ left-right orientations. Party Politics, 14(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807085889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807085889

Gaitán-bohórquez, J., & Malagón-pinzón, M. (2019). Fascismo y autoritarismo en Colombia. Universitas, 118, 293–316. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845299822

Gamboa Gutiérrez, L. (2019). El reajuste de la derecha colombiana. El éxito electoral del uribismo. Colombia Internacional, 29(99), 187–214. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint99.2019.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint99.2019.07

García-Castro, J. D. (2010). Ideología De La Desigualdad: Análisis de la investigación empírica en psicología social. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Política, Año 8 No 2, 67–87.

García-Castro, J. D., Willis, G. B., & Rodríguez-Bailón, R. (2019). I know people who can and who cannot: A measure of the perception of economic inequality in everyday life. The Social Science Journal, 56(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.008

García‐Castro, J. D., García‐Sánchez, E., Montoya‐Lozano, M., & Rodríguez‐Bailón, R. (2021). The perception of economic inequality in everyday life: My friends with the most and least money. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, ajsp.12476. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12476

García-Sánchez, E., Molina-Valencia, N., Buitrago Sánchez, E., Ramírez González, V., Sanz, Z., & Tello Cifuentes, A. (2022). Adaptación y Validación de la Escala de Orientación a la Dominancia Social 7 en Colombia. Psykhe (Santiago), 31(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2019.21999 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2019.21999

García-Sánchez, E., Willis, G. B., Rodríguez-Bailón, R., García-Castro, J. D., Palacio-Sañudo, J., Polo, J., & Rentería-Pérez, E. (2018). Perceptions of Economic Inequality in Colombian Daily Life: More Than Unequal Distribution of Economic Resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(September), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01660

Glick, P., & Whitehead, J. (2010). Hostility toward men and the perceived stability of male dominance. Social Psychology, 41(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000025

González, J. T. (2011). Formation of the autoritarian personality in Colombia, and exclusion and violence against the ethnically different individual. Analisis Politico, 24(71).

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141

Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and Below Left–Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573

Hatibovic Díaz, F., Bobowik, M., Faúndez Abarca, X., & Sandoval Moya, J. (2017). Xenofobia y Homofobia como Efectos de la Orientación Política, Religión y Sexo Mediados por Clasismo y Patriocentrismo en Jóvenes Universitarios Chilenos. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 26(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.55687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n1.55687

Hetherington, M. J. (2009). Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 413–448. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501

Hunt, M. O. (2014). Ideologies. In: J. D. McLeod, E. J. Lawler, & M. Schwalbe (Eds.), Hanbook of social psychology of inequality (pp. 325–351). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9002-4_14

Jahn, D. (2011). Conceptualizing left and right in comparative politics: Towards a deductive approach. Party Politics, 17(6), 745–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380091 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810380091

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. The American Psychologist, 61(7), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651

Jost, J. T. (2009). “Elective Affinities”: On the Psychological Bases of Left–Right Differences. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028599

Jost, J. T. (2017). Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology. Political Psychology, 38(2), 167–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12407

Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339

Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x

Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. a., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x

Kajsiu, B. (2019). The Colombian Right: the political ideology and mobilization of Uribismo. Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 44(2), 204-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2019.1581495 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08263663.2019.1581495

Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., Besta, T., Bosson, J. K., Jurek, P., Vandello, J. A., Best, D. L., Wlodarczyk, A., Safdar, S., Zawisza, M., Żadkowska, M., Sobiecki, J., Agyemang, C. B., Akbaş, G., Ammirati, S., Anderson, J., Anjum, G., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Ashraf, M., Bakaitytė, A., … Žukauskienė, R. (2020). Country-level and individual-level predictors of men’s support for gender equality in 42 countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, June, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2696

Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) (2020). The Americas Barometer Data for 2018. Vanderbilt University, United States of America. www.LapopSurveys.org

Leader Maynard, J., & Mildenberger, M. (2018). Convergence and Divergence in the Study of Ideology: A Critical Review. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 563–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000654

Lobato, R. M., Sainz, M., & García-Sánchez, E. (2020). Adaptation and Validation of the Self-Censorship Orientation (SCO) scale into Spanish (Adaptación y validación de la escala de Orientación a la Autocensura (OAC) al español). International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 310–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1723367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1723367

López-Sáez, M. Á., García-Dauder, D., & Montero, I. (2020a). Correlate Attitudes Toward LGBT and Sexism in Spanish Psychology Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(August), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02063

López-Sáez, M. Á., García-Dauder, D., & Montero, I. (2020b). Intersections Around Ambivalent Sexism: Internalized Homonegativity, Resistance to Heteronormativity and Other Correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(December), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608793

Lovakov, A., & Agadullina, E. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752

Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., Bernard, M. M., & Luke, M. A. (2006). Ideologies, Values, Attitudes, and Behavior. In: J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 283–308). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-X_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-X_12

Martínez-Franzoni, J., & Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2018). The Quest for Universal Social Policy in the South. Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107564893, April. https://ideas.repec.org/b/cup/cbooks/9781107564893.html

Miller, T., Dorcé, A., Uribe, E., & Saavedra. J. (2021). Citizenship and neoliberalism: pandemic horror in Latin America, Continuum, https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2021.2020724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2021.2020724

Moncada, E. (2013). Business and the Politics of Urban Violence in Colombia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(3), 308–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9135-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-013-9135-x

Movilizatorio. (2021). Estudio Nacional sobre xenofobia y polarización ara lograr inclusión y cohesión en Colombia. https://www.movilizatorio.org/estudio

Nilsson, A., & Jost, J. T. (2020). Rediscovering Tomkins’ polarity theory: Humanism, normativism, and the psychological basis of left-right ideological conflict in the U.S. and Sweden. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0236627. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236627 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236627

Noureddine, R., & Gravelle, T. B. (2021). The Polarising Worlds of Welfare: Political Orientations, Macroeconomic Context, and Support for Redistribution. Journal of Social Policy, 50(4), 828–851. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000537 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000537

Rincón, O. (2021). Tras el estallido social: otra democracia es posible en Colombia. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/es/2021/05/31/espanol/opinion/democracia-colombia-estallido-social.html

Rochlin, J. (2019). Colombia and the transformation of warfare: the end of ideology? Global Change, Peace & Security, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2019.1650734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2019.1650734

Rogowski, J. C., & Sutherland, J. L. (2016). How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization. Political Behavior, 38(2), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9323-7

Rottenbacher, J. M. (2012). Conservadurismo político y rigidez cognitiva en una muestra de estudiantes y egresados universitarios de la ciudad de Lima Political conservatism and cognitive rigidity in a sample of university students and graduates of the city of Lima Conservadorismo P. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 30(2), 257–271.

Rottenbacher, J. M., & Cáceres, C. C. (2014). El autoritarismo y la justificación de la inequidad como condicionantes ideológicos de los niveles de deliberación y participación política. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana, 32(3), 495–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12804/apl32.03.2014.10

Rottenbacher, J. M., & Guzmán, J. M. (2013). Intolerancia a la ambigüedad, conservadurismo político y justificación de la inequidad económica, legal, educativa y étnica en la ciudad de Lima - Perú. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 22(2), 253–274.

Ruthig, J. C., Kehn, A., Gamblin, B. W., Vanderzanden, K., & Jones, K. (2017). When Women’s Gains Equal Men’s Losses: Predicting a Zero-Sum Perspective of Gender Status. Sex Roles, 76(1–2), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0651-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0651-9

Rutjens, B. T., & Brandt, M. J. (2019). Beliefs systems and the perception of reality. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315114903

Satherley, N., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Identity, ideology, and personality: Examining moderators of affective polarization in New Zealand. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103961

Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social Dominance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175043

Solano-Silva, D. (2018). Conservadurismo y Orientación Política, ¿su relación es similar en Latinoamérica y Occidente? Psicoperspectivas. Individuo y Sociedad, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol17-Issue1-fulltext-1098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol17-Issue1-fulltext-1098

Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining Radical Group Behavior: Developing Emotion and Efficacy Routes to Normative and Nonnormative Collective Action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728

Thorisdottir, H., Jost, J. T., Liviatan, I., & Shrout, P. E. (2007). Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientation: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfm008

van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504

Vegetti, F., & Širinić, D. (2018). Left–Right Categorization and Perceptions of Party Ideologies. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9451-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9451-y

Webster, S. W., & Abramowitz, A. I. (2017). The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate. American Politics Research, 45(4), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17703132 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17703132

Wiesehomeier, N. (2010). The meaning of left-right in Latin America: a comparative view. Journal of Peace Research. No. 370; The Helen Kellog Institute for International Studies.

Wiesehomeier, N., & Doyle, D. (2012). Attitudes, Ideological Associations and the Left–Right Divide in Latin America. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802x1200400101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1200400101

How to Cite

APA

García-Sánchez, E., Palacio-Sañudo, J. and Romero Royert, D. . (2024). Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 33(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218

ACM

[1]
García-Sánchez, E., Palacio-Sañudo, J. and Romero Royert, D. 2024. Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 33, 1 (Jun. 2024), 67–86. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218.

ACS

(1)
García-Sánchez, E.; Palacio-Sañudo, J.; Romero Royert, D. . Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2024, 33, 67-86.

ABNT

GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ, E.; PALACIO-SAÑUDO, J.; ROMERO ROYERT, D. . Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, [S. l.], v. 33, n. 1, p. 67–86, 2024. DOI: 10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/97218. Acesso em: 25 aug. 2024.

Chicago

García-Sánchez, Efraín, Jorge Palacio-Sañudo, and Daniela Romero Royert. 2024. “Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia”. Revista Colombiana De Psicología 33 (1):67-86. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218.

Harvard

García-Sánchez, E., Palacio-Sañudo, J. and Romero Royert, D. . (2024) “Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia”, Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 33(1), pp. 67–86. doi: 10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218.

IEEE

[1]
E. García-Sánchez, J. Palacio-Sañudo, and D. . Romero Royert, “Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia”, Rev. colomb. psicol., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 67–86, Jun. 2024.

MLA

García-Sánchez, E., J. Palacio-Sañudo, and D. . Romero Royert. “Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 33, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 67-86, doi:10.15446/rcp.v33n1.97218.

Turabian

García-Sánchez, Efraín, Jorge Palacio-Sañudo, and Daniela Romero Royert. “Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia”. Revista Colombiana de Psicología 33, no. 1 (June 12, 2024): 67–86. Accessed August 25, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/97218.

Vancouver

1.
García-Sánchez E, Palacio-Sañudo J, Romero Royert D. Political Ideology and the Legitimization of Social Inequalities in Colombia. Rev. colomb. psicol. [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 12 [cited 2024 Aug. 25];33(1):67-86. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/97218

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

247

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The RCP is published under the Creative Commons license and can be copied and reproduced according to the conditions of this license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5). RCP articles are available online at https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/issue/archive. If you would like to subscribe to the RCP as reader, please go to https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/information/readers and follow the instructions mentioned in the webpage. Additionally, a limited number of print journals are available upon request. To request print copies, please email revpsico_fchbog@unal.edu.co.