Publicado

2021-02-02

Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad

Implicit Measures in Cognition: An Approach to the Study of Automaticity

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106

Palabras clave:

medidas implícitas, memoria implícita, aprendizaje implícito, actitudes implícitas, procesamiento dual (es)
Implicit measures, implicit memory, implicit learning, implicit attitudes, dual-process models (en)

Descargas

Autores/as

La investigación en cognición implícita ha aumentado de manera vertiginosa durante las últimas décadas, principalmente por el uso generalizado de procedimientos experimentales conocidos como medidas implícitas. A diferencia de los cuestionarios de autoinforme, estas metodologías impiden que sesgos como la deseabilidad social afecten las respuestas de los participantes, lo que permite abordar temas sensibles. Sin embargo, las medidas implícitas difieren en aspectos como las instrucciones, los materiales o los indicadores conductuales analizados. Debido a esto, hay controversia sobre la naturaleza de los procesos que están siendo medidos, las características que se les atribuyen y, por ende, la posibilidad de hacer comparaciones entre los estudios que emplean diferentes medidas implícitas. Basándose en un modelo de procesamiento dual, este trabajo propone que las medidas implícitas pueden entenderse como indicadores de procesos automáticos. A partir de dicha propuesta, se discuten los requisitos que las medidas implícitas deben cumplir y algunos desafíos para la investigación en automaticidad.

 

Cómo citar este artículo: Parra, J. A., & Tamayo, R. M. (2021). Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 30(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106

The research on implicit cognition has increased dramatically over the past few decades, mainly because of the widespread use of experimental procedures known as implicit measurements. In contrast to self-report questionnaires, these methodologies prevent biases as social desirability from affecting participants’ responses, allowing sensitive issues to be addressed. However, the implicit measures differ in central aspects as the instructions, materials, or behavioral indicators analyzed. For those reasons, there is controversy about the nature of the processes being measured, the characteristics attributed to them, and, therefore, the possibility of making comparisons between studies that use different implicit measures. Based on a dual processing model, this paper proposes that implicit measures can be understood as indicators of automatic processes. Finally, we will discuss the requirements that implicit measures must satisfy, and some challenges for research in automaticity.

 

How to cite this article: Parra, J. A., & Tamayo, R. M. (2021). Implicit Measures in Cognition: An Approach to the Study of Automaticity. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 30(1), 89-110. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106

Referencias

Altmann, G. T. M., Dienes, Z., & Goode, A. (1995). Modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 899-912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.899

Asendorpf, J. B., Banse, R., & Mücke, D. (2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: the case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.380

Atkinson, R. C. (2018). The mind’s theorist. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 27(1), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v27n1.68594

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit Stereotypes and Prejudice. En M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology, Vol. 7. The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 7 (pp. 55-76). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Banse, R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Personality and implicit social cognition research: past, present and future. European Journal of Personality, 21(), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.638

Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. En R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Basic processes; Applications (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bargh, J. A. (2018). ¿Por qué hacemos lo que hacemos? El poder del inconsciente. Bogotá: Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.

Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.437

Berry, D. C., & Dienes, Z. (1991). The relationship between implicit memory and implicit learning. British Journal of Psychology, 82(3), 359-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02405.x

Brownstein, M. (2018). The Implicit Mind: Cognitive Architecture, the Self, and Ethics. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190633721.001.0001

Brunstein, J. C., & Schmitt, C. H. (2004). Assessing individual differences in achievement motivation with the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(6), 536-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.01.003

Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of Automatic Evaluation: Immediate Behavioral Predispositions to Approach or Avoid the Stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007

Claparéde, E. (1951). Recognition and “me-ness” En D. Rapaport (Ed.), Organization and pathology of thought: Selected sources (pp. 58-75). Nueva York: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10584-003

Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: news from the front. Trends un Cognitive Sciences, 2(10), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01232-7

Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8

Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit Attitude Measures: Consistency, Stability, and Convergent Validity. Psychological Science, 12(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00328

Cvencek, D., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Developing implicit social cognition in early childhood: Methods, phenomena, prospects. En S. Robson & S. F. Flannery Quinn (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of young children’s thinking and understanding (pp. 43-53). Abingdon, Inglaterra: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746043

De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.1026/1618-3169.50.2.77

De Houwer, J., Heider, N., Spruyt, A., Roets, A., & Hughes, S. (2015). The relational responding task: Toward a new implicit measure of beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00319

De Neys, W. (2006a). Automatic-heuristic and executive analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual task considerations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 1070-1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000123

De Neys, W. (2006b). Dual processing in reasoning: Two systems but one reasoner. Psychological Science, 17(5), 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01723.x

Destrebecqz, A., & Peigneux, P. (2005). Methods for studying unconscious learning. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(05)50006-2

Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2006). Duality models in social psychology: from dual processes to interacting systems. Psychological Inquiry, 17(3), 166-172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1703_2

Dienes, Z., & Berry, D. C. (1997). Implicit learning: below the subjective threshold. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 3-23. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210769

Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (1999). A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(5), 735-808. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002186

Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006) A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 1(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62

Dulany, D. E., Carlson, R. A., & Dewey, G. I. (1984) A case of syntactical learning and judgment: how conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 541-555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.541

Echebarria Echabe, A. (2013). Relationship Between Implicit and Explicit Measures of Attitudes: The Impact of Application Conditions. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i2.544

Egloff, B., & Schmukle, S. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1441-1455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1441

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012

Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629

Evans, J. St. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225

Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229-238. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.50.2.229

Fiedler, K., & Bluemke, M. (2005). Faking the IAT: Aided and unaided response control on the implicit association tests. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(4), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2704_3

Frensch, P., & Rünger, D. (2003). Implicit Learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01213

Frith, C., & Frith U. (2008). Implicit and Explicit Processes in Social Cognition. Neuron, 60(3), 503-510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.10.032

Foerde, K. (2010). Implicit Learning and Memory: Psychological and Neural Aspects. En G. F. Koob, M. Le Moal & R. F. Thompson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience (pp. 84-93). Oxford, US: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045396-5.00139-1

Gawronski, B., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2007). What Do Implicit Measures Tell Us?: Scrutinizing the Validity of Three Common Assumptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(2), 181-193.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00036.x

Gawronski, B., & Ye, Y. (2014). What Drives Priming Effects in the Affect Misattribution Procedure? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213502548

Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo Heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x

Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (2011). Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior. Nueva York, US: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744282.001.0001

Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(3), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.3.501

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). The Implicit Revolution: Reconceiving the Relation Between Conscious and Unconscious. American Psychologist, 72(9), 861-871. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000238

Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3

Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022-1038. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.1022

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17-41. https://doi.org//10.1037/a0015575

Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.691

Hamann, S. B., & Squire, L. R. (1997). Intact perceptual memory in the absence of conscious memory. Behavioral Neuroscience, 111(4), 850-854. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.111.4.850

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034

Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F

Jacoby, L. L., & Kelley. C. M. (1992). A Process-Dissociation Framework for Investigating Unconscious Influences: Freudian Slips, Projective Tests, Subliminal Perception, and Signal Detection Theory. Currents Directions in Psychological Science, 1(6), 174-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770017

Jacoby, L. L., Lindsay, D. S., & Toth, J. P. (1992). Unconscious influences revealed: Attention, awareness, and control. American Psychologist, 47(6), 802-809. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.47.6.802

Jin, Z., Shiomura, K., & Jiang, L. (2015). Assessing implicit mate preferences among chinese and japanese women by providing love, sex or money cues. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.PR0.116k11w6

Johnston, C., Belschner, L., Park, J., Stewart, K., Noyer, A., & Schaller M. (2017). Mothers’ Implicit and Explicit Attitudes and Attributions in Relation to Self-Reported Parenting Behavior. Parenting, 17(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2016.1184954

Kahneman, D. (2012). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Barcelona, España: Editorial Debate.

Karpinski, A., & Hilton, J. L. (2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 774-788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.774

Keren, G., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one. A critical evaluation of two-system theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(6), 533-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01164.x

Koning, I. M., Spruyt, A., Doornwaard, S. M., Turrisi, B., Heider, N., & Houwer, J. (2017). A different view on parenting: automatic and explicit parenting cognitions in adolescents’ drinking behavior. Journal of Substance Use, 22(1), 96-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2016.1217088

Lee, K. M., Lindquist, K. A., Arbuckle, N. L., Mowrer, S. M., & Payne, B. K. (2019). An indirect measure of discrete emotions. Emotion, 20(4), 659-676. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000577

Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1421-1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1421

Li, Y., Li, J., Chan, D. K. S., & Zhang, B. (2016). When love meets money: priming the possession of money influences mating strategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00387

Litman, L., & Reber, A.S. (2005). Implicit Cognition and Thought. En K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 431-453). Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406921

Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492-527. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492

Macy, J. T., Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., & Yeung, E. (2015). Exposure to graphic warning labels on cigarette packages: Effects on implicit and explicit attitudes towards smoking among young adults. Psychology & Health, 31(3), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1104309

Melnikoff, D. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2018). The mythical number two. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.001

Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723-739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723

Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 1-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231

Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8

Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit–Explicit Relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00477.x

Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-Go association task. Social Cognition, 19(6), 625-664. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.6.625.20886

Nosek, B. A., Hawkins, C. B., & Frazier, R. S. (2011). Implicit social cognition: from measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 152-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.005

Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., … Banaji, M. R. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18(1), 36-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053

Payne, B. K, Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277

Payne, K., & Lundber, K. (2014). The affect misattribution procedure: Ten years of evidence on reliability, validity, and mechanism. Social and Personality Psychology, 8, 672-686. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12148

Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(3), 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.264

Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X23491

Perugini, M., & Leone, J. (2009). Implicit self-concept and moral action. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 747-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.015

Phillips, W. J., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2018). Self-compassion moderates the predictive effects of implicit cognitions on subjective well-being. Stress and Health, 34(1), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2773

Phillips, W. J., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2010). Implicit cognition and depression: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(6), 691-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.05.002

Ranganath, K. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2008). Implicit attitude generalization occurs immediately; explicit attitude generalization takes time. Psychological Science, 19(3), 249-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02076.x

Reber, A. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6(6), 855-863. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(67)80149-X

Reber, A. S. (1969). Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 115-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027454

Reber, A. S. (1976). Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(1), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.88

Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219

Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Nueva York, US: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195106589.001.0001

Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing Implicit Learning with Indirect Tests: Determining What is Learned about Sequence Structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(3), 585-594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.585

Rehbein, L., Alonqueo, P., & Filsecker, M. (2008). Aprendizaje implícito en usuarios intensivos de videojuegos. Paidéia, 18(39), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2008000100015

Roediger, H. L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45(9), 1043-1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.9.1043

Rohr, M., Degner, J., & Wentura, D. (2015). The “emotion misattribution” procedure: Processing beyond good and bad under masked and unmasked presentation conditions. Cognition and Emotion, 29(2), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.898613

Rohr, M., Folyi, T., & Wentura, D. (2018). Emotional misattribution: Facial muscle responses partially mediate behavioral responses in the emotion misattribution procedure. Psychophysiology, 55(10), e13202. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13202

Rusu, A., Sârbescu, P., Moza, D., & Stancu, A. (2017). Implicit attitudes towards risky driving: Development and validation of an affect misattribution procedure for speeding. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 100, 15-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.12.022

Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory and Cognition, 13(3), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501

Schacter, D. L., & Buckner, R. L. (1998). Priming and the brain. Neuron, 20(2), 185-195. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80448-1

Schacter, D. L., Chiu, P., & Ochsner, K. N. (1993). Implicit memory: A selective review. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16(1), 159-182. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.16.1.159

Schacter, D. L., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2004). Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 853-862. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1534

Shanks, D. R. (2005). Implicit Learning. En K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition (pp. 202-220). Londres, Inglaterra: Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608177.n8

Shanks, D. R. (2017). Misunderstanding the behavior priming controversy: Comment on Payne, Brown-Iannuzzi, and Loersch (2016). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(8), 1216-1222. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000307

Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-395. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00035032

Sherman, S. J., Rose, J. S., Koch, K., Presson, C. C., & Chassin, L. (2003). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward cigarette smoking: The effects of context and motivation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(1), 13-39. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.22.1.13.22766

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3

Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108-131. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01

Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005

Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341140.001.0001

Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2014). Rationality, intelligence, and the defining features of Type 1 and Type 2 processing. En J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 80-91). Nueva York, US: The Guilford Press.

Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 220-247. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1

Tamayo, R. (2003). Efectos del reforzamiento sobre el aprendizaje de secuencias generadas por una gramática artificial del estado finito. Suma Psicológica, 10(2), 211-222.

Tamayo, R., & Frensch, P. A. (2015). Temporal Stability of Implicit Sequence Knowledge: Implications for Single-system Models of Memory. Experimental Psychology, 62, 240-253. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000293

Teige-Mocigemba, S., Penzl, B., Becker, M., Henn, L., & Klauer, K. C. (2016). Controlling the “uncontrollable”: Faking effects on the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition and Emotion, 30(8), 1470-1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1070793

Thibaut, C., & Rosas, R. (2007). Diseño de juegos basados en el paradigma de gramáticas artificiales para favorecer el aprendizaje implícito en niños. Psykhe, 16(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-22282007000200005

Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247(4940), 301-306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2296719

Underwood, G., & Bright, J. (1995). Cognition with and without awareness. En G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit Cognition (pp. 1-48). Oxford, Inglaterra: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198523109.003.0001

Van Dessel, P., Smith, C. T., & De Houwer, J. (2018). Graphic cigarette pack warnings do not produce more negative implicit evaluations of smoking compared to text-only warnings. PloS one, 13, e0194627. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194627

Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1968a). A study of learning and retention in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia, 6, 283-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(68)90026-2

Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1968b). New Method of Testing Long-term Retention with Special Reference to Amnesic Patients. Nature, 217, 972-974. https://doi.org/10.1038/217972a0

Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). The amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval? Nature, 228, 628-630. https://doi.org/10.1038/228628a0

Wells, T. T., Tucker, R. P., Kraines, M. A., Smith, L. M., & Unruh-Dawes, E. (2020). Implicit bias for suicide persists after ideation resolves. Psychiatry Research, 285, 112784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112784

Williams, L. M., Mathersul, D., Palmer, D. M., Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., & Gordon, E. (2009). Explicit identification and implicit recognition of facial emotions: I. Age effects in males and females across 10 decades. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390802255635

Znanewitz, J., Braun, L., Hensel, D., Altobelli, C. F., & Hattke, F. (2018). A critical comparison of selected implicit measurement methods. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 11(4), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000086

Cómo citar

APA

Parra, J. A. y Tamayo, R. M. (2021). Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106

ACM

[1]
Parra, J.A. y Tamayo, R.M. 2021. Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad. Revista Colombiana de Psicología. 30, 1 (ene. 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106.

ACS

(1)
Parra, J. A.; Tamayo, R. M. Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad. Rev. colomb. psicol. 2021, 30.

ABNT

PARRA, J. A.; TAMAYO, R. M. Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 1, 2021. DOI: 10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/85106. Acesso em: 22 ene. 2025.

Chicago

Parra, José Alirio, y Ricardo Mauricio Tamayo. 2021. «Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad». Revista Colombiana De Psicología 30 (1). https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106.

Harvard

Parra, J. A. y Tamayo, R. M. (2021) «Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad», Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 30(1). doi: 10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106.

IEEE

[1]
J. A. Parra y R. M. Tamayo, «Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad», Rev. colomb. psicol., vol. 30, n.º 1, ene. 2021.

MLA

Parra, J. A., y R. M. Tamayo. «Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad». Revista Colombiana de Psicología, vol. 30, n.º 1, enero de 2021, doi:10.15446/rcp.v30n1.85106.

Turabian

Parra, José Alirio, y Ricardo Mauricio Tamayo. «Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad». Revista Colombiana de Psicología 30, no. 1 (enero 1, 2021). Accedido enero 22, 2025. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/85106.

Vancouver

1.
Parra JA, Tamayo RM. Medidas Implícitas en Cognición: Una Aproximación al Estudio de la Automaticidad. Rev. colomb. psicol. [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2021 [citado 22 de enero de 2025];30(1). Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/85106

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations3

1. Ricardo M. Tamayo, Danilo Rodríguez-Zapata, José A. Parra. (2023). Influencia de las actitudes explícitas e implícitas en la selección de noticias y la orientación política: un estudio en diarios colombianos. Palabra Clave, 26(3), p.1. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2023.26.3.7.

2. Ricardo M. Tamayo, Harold A. Lugo, Sally Adams. (2024). Exploring Implicit and Explicit Affective Responses to Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packages in Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 33(2), p.27. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v33n2.106852.

3. Diana Marcela Lizarazo Pereira, Felicia Roberts, Ricardo M. Tamayo. (2023). The Influence of Emotions and Word Frequency in First and Second Language Processing: Evidence From the Emotional Stroop Task. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 25(1), p.161. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v25n1.95379.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

874

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2020 Revista Colombiana de Psicología

Todo el contenido de esta revista cuenta con una licencia Creative Commons “Reconocimiento, No comercial y Sin obras derivadas” Internacional 4.0. Sin embargo, si el autor desea obtener el permiso de reproducción, se evaluará cualquier solicitud de su parte.