Published

2025-01-01

The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods

Crecimiento y rendimiento del cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) afectados por los métodos de almacenamiento

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202

Keywords:

Corm storage, Emergence, Growth, Taro, Weight loss, Quantum yield (en)
Almacenamiento de cormos, Emergencia, Crecimiento, Taro, Pérdida de peso, Rendimiento (es)

Downloads

Authors

Cocoyam (taro) (Colocasia esculenta) is an important tropical crop that requires minimal inputs compared to yam. However, increasing its production to meet the growing population’s food demand is hindered by the susceptibility of planting materials to rotting in the field before the next season. While reports on storage conditions for cocoyam cormels are available, information on the storage of corms (propagules) remains limited. Hence, this study assessed simple storage methods and the field performances of corms stored under these methods at the Ayepe research field of the University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria in 2019. Corms stored under shade, in pits, and on raised platforms were evaluated in a completely randomized design with three replicates. On the field, freshly harvested corms (S1), corms stored under shade (S2), corms stored in pits (S3) and corms stored on raised platforms (S4) were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The results indicated that weight loss and storage efficacy differed significantly (P<0.05) among the storage conditions. Weight loss ranged from 8.95 (S2) to 29.87% (S4), while storage efficacy ranged from 71.20 (S4) to 91.20% (S2). Corm emergence was significantly higher in S2 compared to S4 at 2 and 4 weeks after planting but was similar to the other treatments. Propagule storage conditions had no significant influence on cocoyam growth and yield. However, cormel yields for S1, S2, S3 and S4 were 7,483, 6,625, 6,729 and 6,208 kg h-1, respectively. Corms stored under shade or in pits were, therefore, recommended.

El cocoyam (taro) (Colocasia esculenta) es un importante cultivo tropical que requiere unos insumos mínimos en comparación con el ñame. Sin embargo, el aumento de su producción para satisfacer la creciente demanda de alimentos de la población se ve dificultado por la susceptibilidad de los materiales de siembra a pudrirse en el campo antes de la siguiente temporada. Aunque existen informes sobre las condiciones de almacenamiento de los cormos de cochayama, la información sobre el almacenamiento de los cormos (propágulos) sigue siendo limitada. Por lo tanto, este estudio evaluó métodos de almacenamiento simples y el rendimiento de campo de los bulbos almacenados con estos métodos en el campo de investigación Ayepe de la Universidad de Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria en 2019. En el campo, se evaluaron cormos recién cosechados (S1), cormos almacenados bajo sombra (S2), cormos almacenados en fosas (S3) y cormos almacenados en plataformas elevadas (S4) en un diseño de bloques completos al azar con tres repeticiones. Los resultados indicaron que la pérdida de peso y la eficacia del almacenamiento difirieron significativamente (P<0,05) entre las condiciones de almacenamiento. La pérdida de peso osciló entre 8,95 (S2) y 29,87% (S4), mientras que la eficacia de almacenamiento varió entre 71,20 (S4) y 91,20% (S2). La emergencia de cormos fue significativamente mayor en S2 en comparación con S4 a las 2 y 4 semanas después de la siembra, pero fue significativamente mayor en S2 en comparación con S4, similar a los otros tratamientos. Las condiciones de almacenamiento de los propágulos no tuvieron influencia significativa sobre el crecimiento y rendimiento del cocoyam. Sin embargo, los rendimientos de cormel para S1, S2, S3 y S4 fueron 7.483, 6.625, 6.729 y 6.208 kg h-1, respectivamente. Por lo tanto, se recomendó almacenar los bulbos bajo sombra o en fosas.

References

Baidoo EA, Akonor PT and Tortoe C (2014) Effect of pretreatment and storage condition on the physicochemical properties of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) flour. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition Engineering 4(4): 91-97.

Behailu M, Asrade C and Karta KK (2023) Effect of different storage methods on growth, seed quality and corm yield of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. (Schott.)) in Southwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science 33(4): 74-89. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejas/article/download/277626/261878

Castro GR, Nyman M and Ronnberg-Wastljung AC (2005) Agronomic performance of three cocoyam (Xanthosoma violaceum Schott) genotypes grown in Nicaragua. Euphytica 142: 265-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-2147-5

Deshi KE, Obasi MO and Odiaka NI (2021) Growth and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) as affected by storage conditions and storage duration in Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria. Open Agriculture 6: 779-797. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2021-0057

Diaguna R, Santosa E and Budima C (2023) The Effect of the taro corm type and storage on morphophysiological deterioration and early growth in the field. Hindawi International Journal of Agronomy 2023, Article ID 3280339, 6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3280339

Eze CS and Ameh GI (2011) Comparative assessment of pathogenicity of storage rot causing fungi of cocoyams (Colacasia esculenta) (L.) Schott and their host-pathogen Interactions. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology 22: 23-27

Eze CS and Nwani CD (2014) Comparative evaluation of storage losses, nutrient and mineral composition of three edible species of cocoyams in Nsukka, Nigeria. International Journal of AgriScience 4(8): 414-419

Eze SC, Ugwuoke KI, Ogbonna PE, Onah RN, Onyeonagu CC and Onyeke CC (2015) Evaluation of indigenous technologies of fresh cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) storage in Southeastern Nigeria. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10(8): 737-741. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.9304

FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2022) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL

Finch-Savage WE and Bassel GW (2016) Seed vigour and crop establishment: extending performance beyond adaptation. Journal of Experimental Botany 67(3): 567-591. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv490

Lawles K, Raun WR, Desta K and Freeman K (2012) Effect of delayed emergence on corn grain yields. Journal of Plant Nutrition 35(3): 480-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.639926

Miryeganeh M (2021) Senescence: The compromised time of death that plants may call on themselves. Genes (Basel) 12(2): 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12020143

Mitharwal S, Kumar A, Chauhan K and Taneja NK (2022) Nutritional, phytochemical composition and potential health benefits of taro (Colocasia esculenta L.) leaves: A review. Food Chemistry 383: 132406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132406

More SJ, Ravi V and Raju S (2019) Chapter 33: Tropical tuber crops. pp 719-757. In: de Freitas ST and Fareek S (eds.) Postharvest physiological disorders in fruits and vegetables. Publisher: CRC PRESS. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22001

Mugumo N (2021) Assessment of different traditional techniques of storing harvested corms of tannia (Xanthosoma sagitifollia) and taro (Colocasia esculenta) varieties. Afribary. https://afribary.com/works/assesiment-of-different-traditional-techniques-of-storing-harvested-cormsof-tannia-xanthosoma-sagitifollia-and-taro-colocasia-esculenta-varieties

Mukaila R, Falola A, Awoyelu FED, Akanbi SO et al (2022) Profitability of cocoyam production and its determinants in Cross River State. Nigeria Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 18(4): 279-292. https://doi.org/10.35516/jjas.v18i4.788

NASA POWER project (2024) POWER Project’s Hourly 2.x.x version on 2024/07/06.

Opara LU (2003) Edible aroids. In: Mejía D. (ed.). Post-harvest operation, AGST/FAO: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (Technical), Rome. 27 p. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/inpho/docs/Post_Harvest_Compendium_-_Edible_aroids.pdf

Owusu-Darko PG, Paterson A and Omenyo EL (2014) Cocoyam (corms and cormels) - An underexploited food and feed resource. Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Environment 03(1): 22-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/jacen.2014.31004

Oyefeso BO, Akintola A, Afolabi MG, Ogunlade CA, Fadele OK and Odeniyi OM (2021) Influence of the moisture content and speed on the cutting force and energy of tannia cormels. Research in Agricultural Engineering 67: 123-130. https://doi.org/10.17221/79/2020-RAE

Quain MD, Appiah-Kubi D, Adu-Gyamfi MO, Aboagye AA et al (2018) In vitro production of clean planting material: setting the timelines for an efficient seed system for vegetatively propagated crops in Ghana. Agricultural and Food Science Journal of Ghana 11: 977-985. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/afsjg/article/view/188959

Reed RC, Bradford KJ and Khanday I (2022) Seed germination and vigor: ensuring crop sustainability in a changing climate. Heredity 128: 450-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00497-2

Sajeev MS, Manikantan MR, Kingsly ARP, Moorthy SN and Sreekumar J (2004) Texture analysis of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) cormels during storage and cooking. Journal of Food Science 69(7): 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb13636.x

Sugri I, Maalekuu BK, Kusi F and Gaveh E (2017) Quality and shelf-life of sweet potato as influenced by storage and postharvest treatments. Trends in Horticultural Research 7: 1-10. https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=thr.2017.1.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/thr.2017.1.10

Ubalua AO, Ewa F and Okeagu OD (2016) Potentials and challenges of sustainable taro (Colocasia esculenta) production in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology 4 (01), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2016.40110

UN-Habitat (2014) Structure plan for Ikire and environs (2014 – 2033). State of Osun Structure Plans Project. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), 2014. Nairobi, Kenya. 118p. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/09/structure_plans_for_ikire_and_environs_state_of_osun_structure_plans_project.pdf

USAID and CIP (2015) Breaking postharvest bottlenecks: Longterm sweet potato storage in adverse climates. USAID. and CIP., Report, December 2015, 9 p.

How to Cite

APA

Akinrinola, T. B. & Tijani-Eniola, H. (2025). The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 78(1), 11047–11056. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202

ACM

[1]
Akinrinola, T.B. and Tijani-Eniola, H. 2025. The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. 78, 1 (Jan. 2025), 11047–11056. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202.

ACS

(1)
Akinrinola, T. B.; Tijani-Eniola, H. The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín 2025, 78, 11047-11056.

ABNT

AKINRINOLA, T. B.; TIJANI-ENIOLA, H. The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, [S. l.], v. 78, n. 1, p. 11047–11056, 2025. DOI: 10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/refame/article/view/111202. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Akinrinola, Tajudeen Bamidele, and Hassan Tijani-Eniola. 2025. “The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods”. Revista Facultad Nacional De Agronomía Medellín 78 (1):11047-56. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202.

Harvard

Akinrinola, T. B. and Tijani-Eniola, H. (2025) “The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods”, Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 78(1), pp. 11047–11056. doi: 10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202.

IEEE

[1]
T. B. Akinrinola and H. Tijani-Eniola, “The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods”, Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 11047–11056, Jan. 2025.

MLA

Akinrinola, T. B., and H. Tijani-Eniola. “The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods”. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, vol. 78, no. 1, Jan. 2025, pp. 11047-56, doi:10.15446/rfnam.v78n1.111202.

Turabian

Akinrinola, Tajudeen Bamidele, and Hassan Tijani-Eniola. “The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods”. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín 78, no. 1 (January 2, 2025): 11047–11056. Accessed March 20, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/refame/article/view/111202.

Vancouver

1.
Akinrinola TB, Tijani-Eniola H. The growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) as affected by storage methods. Rev. Fac. Nac. Agron. Medellín [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 2 [cited 2026 Mar. 20];78(1):11047-56. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/refame/article/view/111202

Download Citation

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Joy Jesumeda Oladimeji, Ranjana Bhattacharjee, Ayodeji Abe, Bolaji Osundahunsi, Ramesh Raju Vetukuri, P. Lava Kumar. (2025). Understanding Biotic Constraints to Taro (Colocasia esculenta) Production in the Derived Savanna and Humid Forest Agroecosystems of Nigeria. Plants, 14(22), p.3457. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14223457.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

285

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.