Antioxidant and sensory profiles of Coffea arabica var. Caturra under Washed, Natural, and Honey processing
Perfiles antioxidantes y sensoriales de Coffea arabica var. Caturra con procesamiento Lavado, Natural y Honey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v79.125376Keywords:
Chlorogenic acid, Fermentation, Flavonoids, Organoleptic analysis, Phenolic acids, Tannins (en)Ácido clorogénico, Fermentación, Flavonoides, Análisis organoléptico, Ácidos fenólicos, Taninos (es)
Downloads
Postharvest processing modifies the composition and sensory characteristics of coffee, although global antioxidant assays may not reflect changes in individual metabolites. This study compared Washed, Natural, and Honey processes in Caturra coffee obtained from the same farm, lot, and harvest. The lot was divided into nine independent experimental units, with three replicates assigned to each process. Analytical determinations were subsequently performed in triplicate. Polyphenols, flavonoids, condensed tannins, four phenolic acids, and antioxidant responses determined using DPPH, ABTS, and ORAC assays were evaluated. Sensory profiles were established by consensus among three expert assessors. Honey coffee showed the highest total polyphenol content (3,136.35 mg GAE 100 g-1 d.s.) but lower concentrations of individual phenolic acids. Chlorogenic acid reached 46.9 mg 100 g-1 d.s. in Honey coffee and 316.5 mg 100 g-1 d.s. in Washed coffee; caffeic acid was not detected in Honey coffee but reached 388.2 mg 100 g-1 d.s. in Washed coffee. ORAC differed among the three processes, whereas ABTS was lower in Honey coffee than in Washed and Natural coffees. Washed coffee was balanced and pleasant; Natural coffee exhibited greater fragrance and wine-like notes; and Honey coffee showed higher acidity and sweet and citrus descriptors. Differences between global antioxidant assays and individual phenolic acids support the use of complementary analytical approaches. Under standardized fermentation and drying conditions, postharvest processing can alter the chemical and sensory profile of specialty coffees.
El procesamiento poscosecha modifica la composición y las características sensoriales del café, aunque los ensayos antioxidantes globales pueden no reflejar los metabolitos individuales. Este estudio comparó los procesos de Lavado, Natural y Honey en café Caturra procedente de una misma finca, lote y cosecha. El lote se dividió en nueve unidades experimentales independientes, con tres réplicas asignadas a cada proceso; posteriormente, las determinaciones analíticas se realizaron por triplicado. Se determinaron polifenoles, flavonoides, taninos condensados, cuatro ácidos fenólicos y respuestas antioxidantes mediante DPPH, ABTS y ORAC. Los perfiles sensoriales se establecieron por consenso de tres evaluadores expertos. El café Honey presentó el mayor contenido de polifenoles totales (3.136,35 mg EAG 100 g-1 b.s.), pero menores concentraciones de ácidos fenólicos individuales. El ácido clorogénico alcanzó 46,9 mg 100 g-1 b.s. en Honey y 316,5 mg 100 g-1 b.s. en Lavado; el ácido cafeico no se detectó en Honey, pero alcanzó 388,2 mg 100 g-1 b.s. en Lavado. ORAC presentó diferencias entre los tres procesos, mientras que ABTS fue menor en el café Honey que en los cafés Lavado y Natural. El Lavado fue balanceado y agradable; el Natural presentó mayor fragancia y notas vinosas; y el Honey mostró mayor acidez y descriptores dulces y cítricos. Las diferencias entre los ensayos antioxidantes globales y los ácidos fenólicos individuales respaldan el uso de enfoques analíticos complementarios. Bajo condiciones estandarizadas de fermentación y secado, el procesamiento poscosecha puede diferenciar cafés especiales mediante sus perfiles químicos y sensoriales.
References
AOAC International (2016) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 20th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Aswathi KN, Shirke A, Praveen A, Chaudhari SR and Murthy PS (2023) Pulped Natural/Honey robusta coffee fermentation metabolites, physico-chemical and sensory profiles. Food Chemistry 429:136897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136897
Aung Moon S, Wongsakul S, Kitazawa H and Saengrayap R (2024) Influence of post-harvest processing and drying techniques on physicochemical properties of Thai Arabica coffee. AgriEngineering 6(3):2198-2213. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6030129
Bastian F, Hutabarat OS, Dirpan A, Nainu F, Harapan H et al (2021) From plantation to cup: Changes in bioactive compounds during coffee processing. Foods 10(11):2827. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112827
Borrelli RC, Visconti A, Mennella C, Anese M and Fogliano V (2002) Chemical characterization and antioxidant properties of coffee melanoidins. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(22):6527-6533. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf025686o
Bule M, Khan F, Nisar MF and Niaz K (2020) Tannins (hydrolysable tannins, condensed tannins, phlorotannins, flavono-ellagitannins). In: Recent Advances in Natural Products Analysis. Elsevier, pp. 132–146. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339841545
De Bruyn F, Zhang SJ, Pothakos V, Torres J, Lambot C et al (2017) Exploring the impacts of postharvest processing on the microbiota and metabolite profiles during green coffee bean production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 83(1):e02398-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02398-16
Elhalis H, Cox J and Zhao J (2023) Coffee fermentation: Expedition from Traditional to controlled process and perspectives for industrialization. Applied Food Research 3(1):100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2022.100253
Floegel A, Kim D-O, Chung S-J, Koo SI and Chun OK (2011) Comparison of ABTS/DPPH assays to measure antioxidant capacity in popular antioxidant-rich US foods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 24(7):1043-1048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2011.01.008
Górnaś P, Dwiecki K, Siger A, Tomaszewska-Gras J, Michalak M and Polewski K (2016) Contribution of phenolic acids isolated from green and roasted boiled-type coffee brews to total coffee antioxidant capacity. European Food Research and Technology 242:641-653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-015-2572-1
Haile M and Kang WH (2019) Antioxidant activity, total polyphenol, flavonoid and tannin contents of fermented green coffee beans with selected yeasts. Fermentation 5(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation5010029
ICONTEC – Instituto Colombiano de Norma Técnica y Certificación (2000) Análisis sensorial. Café. Metodología para análisis sensorial cuantitativo descriptivo del café. NTC 4883-2000. Colombia.
Kelebek H, Selli S, Canbas A and Cabaroglu T (2009) HPLC determination of organic acids, sugars, phenolic compositions and antioxidant capacity of orange juice and orange wine made from a Turkish cv. Kozan. Microchemical Journal 91(2): 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2008.10.008
Makiso MU, Tola YB, Ogah O and Endale FL (2024) Bioactive compounds in coffee and their role in lowering the risk of major public health consequences: A review. Food science & nutrition 12(2): 734-764. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.3848
Nicolescu A, Bunea CI and Mocan A (2025) Total flavonoid content revised: An overview of past, present, and future determinations in phytochemical analysis. Analytical Biochemistry 700: 115794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2025.115794
Opitz SEW, Smrke S, Goodman BA, Keller M, Schenker S and Yeretzian C (2014) Antioxidant generation during coffee roasting: A comparison and interpretation from three complementary assays. Foods 3(4):586-604. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods3040586
Osorio V, Medina R, Acuña JR, Pabón J, Álvarez CI et al (2023) Transformation of organic acids and sugars in the mucilage and coffee beans during prolonged fermentation. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 123:105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105551
Peñuela-Martínez AE, Guerrero A and Sanz-Uribe JR (2022) Cromacafé®: Herramienta para identificar los estados de madurez de las variedades de café de fruto rojo. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé 535:1-8. https://doi.org/10.38141/10779/0535
Schaich KM, Tian X and Xie J (2015) Hurdles and pitfalls in measuring antioxidant efficacy: A critical evaluation of ABTS, DPPH, and ORAC assays. Journal of Functional Foods 14:111-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.01.043
Sunarharum WB, Williams DJ and Smyth HE (2014) Complexity of coffee flavor: A compositional and sensory perspective. Food Research International 62:315-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.02.030
Tan Y, Wu H, Shi L, Barrow CJ, Dunshea FR and Suleria HAR (2023) Impacts of fermentation on the phenolic composition, antioxidant potential, and volatile compounds profile of commercially roasted coffee beans. Fermentation 9(10):918. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9100918
Várady M, Tauchen J, Fraňková A, Klouček P and Popelka P (2022) Effect of method of processing specialty coffee beans (Natural, Washed, Honey, fermentation, maceration) on bioactive and volatile compounds. LWT 172:114245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114245
Velásquez S and Banchón C (2023) Influence of pre- and post-harvest factors on the organoleptic and physicochemical quality of coffee: A short review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 60:2526–2538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-022-05569-z
Wołosiak R, Drużyńska B, Derewiaka D, Piecyk M, Majewska E et al (2022) Verification of the conditions for determination of antioxidant activity by ABTS and DPPH assays—A practical approach. Molecules 27(1): 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27010050
Yang GB, Cen QJ, Bin ZJ, Lu ZZ, Qin JF, Rasheed U, and Chen GL (2026) From Germplasm to Cup: A Comprehensive Review of the Genetic, Environmental, and Postharvest Determinants of Coffee Quality and Their Interactions. Agriculture 16(7): 739. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16070739
Zapata-Vahos IC, Ochoa-Agudelo S, Alzate-Arbeláez AF et al (2019) Vinegar of andean berries (Vaccinium meridionale SW): antioxidant and antiproliferative activity in colon cancer cells SW480. Vitae 26(3): 135-147. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v26n3a02
Zapata-Londoño MB, Ramos-Polo A, Alzate-Arbeláez AF, Restrepo-Betancur LF et al (2020) Effect of mango (Mangifera indica) cv. azúcar juice consumption on plasma antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress biomarkers. Vitae 27(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v27n1a03
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.






