Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Published
Satisfaction among dairy farm owners after certification on good management practices
Satisfacción entre propietarios de granjas lecheras luego de certificarse en buenas prácticas ganaderas
Keywords:
Dairy cattle, Personnel satisfaction, Social behavior, GMP certification (en)Ganado de leche, Satisfacción personal, Conducta social, BPG certificación (es)
The adoption of good management practices (GMP) in dairy farming implies changes that generate satisfaction for the personnel involved in the milk production process. The objective of this study was to assess the level of satisfaction obtained among GMP-certified producers. A total of 37 farm owners in northern Antioquia were surveyed. Data were analyzed using factor analysis and structural equations.
A “General satisfaction” variable was analyzed using recursive partitioning and regression trees. Producers were satisfied with the GMP certification, mostly with the changes achieved in working conditions, interrelationships and staff training. The GMP satisfy owners by generating positive changes in the working conditions of the personnel, providing permanent training, and improving their image to other farmers and milk-buying companies.
La adopción de buenas prácticas ganaderas (BPG) en producción de leche implica cambios generadores de satisfacción al personal involucrado en el proceso productivo. Con el objetivo de evidenciar la satisfacción de productores certificados, se encuestaron 37 propietarios de predios
lecheros del norte antioqueño, los datos fueron analizados mediante análisis factorial y ecuaciones estructurales. La variable “satisfacción general” se analizó mediante partición recursiva y árboles de regresión. Los productores están satisfechos con la certificación principalmente con los cambios en las condiciones laborales, las interrelaciones y la capacitación del personal. Las BPG satisfacen a los propietarios de sistemas lecheros, al generar cambios en las condiciones laborales del personal, propiciar capacitación permanente y mejorar su imagen ante productores y empresas compradoras
de leche.
Downloads
References
Agudelo D and Bedoya O. 2005. Composición de la leche de ganado vacuno. Medellín, Revista Lasallista de Investigación 2(1): 1-5.
Battaglini AP, Fagnani R, Dunga K and Beloti V. 2013. Dissemination of good production practices and characterization of dairy production. Córdoba, Archivos de Zootecnia 62(237): 151-154. doi: 10.4321/S0004-05922013000100017
Bentler PM. 1990. Quantitative methods in psychology: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Washington, Psychological Bulletin 107(2): 238–246.
Bewley J, Palmer R and Jackson-Smith D. 2001. An overview of experiences of Wisconsin dairy farmers who modernized their operations. Champaign, Journal of Dairy Sciences 84: 717-729.
Cerón-Muñoz MF, Herrera AC, Múnera O, Rodríguez C, Díaz A and Vergara O. 2014. Manejo de información zootécnica en hatos lecheros, evaluación genética de ganado Holstein Antioquia. Primera edición. Fondo Editorial Biogénesis, Medellín. pp. 1-38.
Cerón-Muñoz MF, Ramírez Arias J, Bolívar-Vergara D, Bedoya GI and Palacio LG. 2015. Buenas prácticas ganaderas: Caracterización de sistemas de producción bovina de leche en el norte antioqueño y su relación con calidad higiénica y sanitaria de la leche cruda. Livestock Research for Rural Development 27: 11.
Claeys W, Verraes C, Cardoen S, Huyghebaert A, Raes K, Dewettinck K and Herman L. 2014. Consumption of raw or heated milk from different species: An evaluation of nutritional and potential health benefits. Wageningen, Food Control 42: 188-201. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.01.045
Cronbach L. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Madison, Psychometrika 16(3): 297–334.
De Silva SASD, Kanugala KANP and Weerakkody NS. 2016. Microbiological quality of raw milk and effect on quality by implementing good management practices. London, Procedia Food Science 6: 92-96. doi: 10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.019
ICA - Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. 2008. Resolución 3585 del 2008. Colombia. http://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/f6d9bf9bdefc-4b43-9d2a-88473ef99c65/2008R3585.aspx
Londoño C, Barrios D, Bedoya GI, Rodríguez H, Toro CA, Silva ML, Dávila MD, Pemberty P, Suárez P and Palacio LG. 2016. Buenas prácticas ganaderas y gestión empresarial, mejoramiento del sistema productivo de las ganaderías de leche, carne y doble propósito, mediante buenas prácticas ganaderas en fincas piloto del departamento de Antioquia. Primera edición. Fondo Editorial Biogénesis, Medellín. pp. 1-76.
Lüdecke D. 2016. Sjstats: Statistical functions for regression models. Hamburg, R package versión 0.6.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjstats
Maslow A. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50(13): 370-396.
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural - MADR. 2012. Resolución 0017 de 2012. Colombia. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/ministerio/direcciones/Documents/d.angie/Res%20%20000017%20
de%202012.pdf
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural - MADR. 2015. Resolución 0077 de 2015. Colombia. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/Normatividad/Resoluciones/Resolucion%20%20077%20de%202015.pdf
Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural - MADR. 2015. Resolución 468 de 2015. Colombia. https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/ministerio/direcciones/Documents/d.angie/REsoluci%C3%B3n%20468%20de%2028%20dic%202015.pdf
Ministerio de la Protección Social - MPS. 2006. Decreto 616 del 2006. Colombia. http://www.ica.gov.co/getattachment/15425e0f-81fb-4111-b215-63e61e9e9130/2006D616.aspx
Nahuelhual L, Engler M, Carrillo B, Moreira V and Castro I. 2009. Adoption of cleaner production practices by dairy farmers in southern Chile. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 36(1): 97-106. doi: 10.4067/S0718-16202009000100009
Perilla LE. 1998. David C. McClelland (1917-1998). Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología 30(3): 529-532.
Pinto JM. 2002. El legado de Frederick Irving Herzberg. Revista Universidad EAFIT 128: 79-86.
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Radder S and Bhanj SK. 2011. Perceptions of dairy farmers of Gadag district in northwestern part of Karnataka state, India regarding clean milk production. Veterinary World 4(2): 79-81.
Revelle W. 2016. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
Rigdon E. 1996. CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling 3(4): 369–79. doi: 10.1080/10705519609540052
Rosseel Y. 2012. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48(2): 1-36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Tafur M and Nieto A. 2011. Las buenas prácticas ganaderas en la producción de leche. Primera edición, Editorial Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario,. Bogotá. 32 p.
Therneau T, Atkinson B and Ripley B. 2015. rpart: Recursive partitioning and regression trees. R package versión 1-10, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rpart
Veenhoven R. 1996. Developments in satisfaction-research. Social Indicators Research 37(1): 1-46.
Young I, Rajíc A, Hendrick S, Parker S, Sanchez J, McClure JT and McEwen SA. 2010. Attitudes towards the Canadian quality milk program and use of good production practices among Canadian dairy producers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 94: 43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.018
Yuen SK, Yee CF and Yin FH. 2012. Microbiological quality and the impact of hygienic practices on the raw milk obtained from the small-scale dairy farmers in Sabah, Malaysia. International Journal of Research in Agriculture and Food Sciences 2(2): 55-59.
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.
