The residual effect of metsulfuron on soybean tolerant and non-tolerant to sulfonylureas
Efecto residual de metsulfurón en soya tolerante y no tolerante a sulfonilureas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v73n2.79552Keywords:
Herbicide, Pre-seeding, Safety interval, STS (en)Herbicida, Pre-siembra, Tiempo de seguridad, STS (es)
Metsulfuron is widely used for weed management; however, the residual effect on STS soybean cultivars is unknown. The objective of this work was to evaluate the residual effect of the herbicide metsulfuron on the BMX Garra RR2/STS and M 6410 IPRO (non-STS) soybean cultivars. The herbicide metsulfuron was applied at a rate of 2.4 g a.i. ha-1, in pre-planting of soybean plants. The design was completely randomized in a 2×5 factorial scheme with four replications (first factor: two soybean cultivars - STS and no-STS; second factor: five periods between metsulfuron application and soybean sowing - 0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 days). At 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after sowing (DAS), an emergency evaluation of the soybean seedlings was performed; at 28 DAS, height and dry mass of the shoot were evaluated. The height averages for the STS cultivar were higher than the values of the no-STS cultivar. The average dry mass of soybean plants was higher in the STS cultivar at 0, 15, and 30 days between application and sowing. No differences were observed between the cultivars for the periods of 45 and 60 days, for average dry mass. The BMX soybean cultivar Garra RR2/STS was potentially tolerant for the pre-sowing application of the herbicide metsulfuron. The cultivar of M 6410 IPRO (nonSTS) was affected in its initial development by the metsulfuron application during the pre-emergence stage; however, the 60-day metsulfuron application was safer, and therefore, it is recommended to perform the herbicide application in that interval.
El metsulfurón se usa ampliamente para el manejo de malezas, sin embargo, el efecto residual en los cultivares de soja STS es desconocido. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar el efecto residual del herbicida metsulfurón en los cultivares de soja BMX Garra RR2/STS y M 6410 IPRO (no-STS). El metsulfurón se aplicó a una dosis de 2,4 g i.a. ha-1, en la pre-siembra de soja. El diseño experimental fue completamente aleatorio en un esquema factorial de 2x5 con cuatro repeticiones (primer factor: dos cultivares de soja - STS y no-STS y segundo factor: 5 períodos entre la aplicación y la siembra de soja - 0, 15, 30, 45 y 60 días). A los 7, 14, 21 y 28 días después de la siembra se realizó una evaluación de emergencia de las plántulas de soja, a los 28 días, se evaluó la altura y la masa seca de la parte aérea. Los promedios de altura para el cultivar STS fueron más altos que los valores del cultivar no-STS. La masa seca promedio de las plantas de soja fue mayor en el cultivar STS a los 0, 15 y 30 días entre la aplicación y la siembra. No se observaron diferencias entre los cultivares por los periodos de 45 y 60 días, para el promedio de masa seca. El cultivar de soja BMX Garra RR2/STS fue potencialmente tolerante para la aplicación previa a la siembra del metsulfurón. El cultivar de M 6410 IPRO (no-STS) tuvo su desarrollo inicial afectado por la aplicación de metsulfurón en preemergencia; sin embargo, la aplicación de metsulfurón de 60 días fue más segura y, por lo tanto, se recomienda realizar la aplicación de herbicida en ese intervalo de tiempo.
Downloads
References
Albrecht AJP, Silva AFM, Albrecht LP, Pereira VGC, Krenchinski FH, Migliavacca RA and Victoria Filho R. 2017. Effect of sulfonylureas application on RR/STS soybean. Brazilian Journal of Agriculture 92(1): 37-49.
Albrecht LP, Albrecht AJP, Silva AFM, Krenchinski FH, Placido HF and Victoria Filho R. 2018. Rates of chlorimuron applied in glyphosate-tolerant and sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 21(3): 211-216. doi: 10.1007/s12892-018-0029-0
Anderson AH and Simmons FW. 2004. Use of the sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean trait to reduce soybean response to prosulfuron soil residues. Weed Technology 18(3): 521-526. doi: 10.1614/WT-03-062R1
Esbenshade WR, Curran WS, Roth GW, Hartwig NL and Orzolek MD. 2001. Effect of tillage, row spacing, and herbicide on the emergence and control of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 15(2): 229-235. doi: 10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0229:EOTRSA]2.0.CO;2
Ferreira DF. 2011. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35(6): 1039-1042. doi: 10.1590/s1413-70542011000600001
Ghio C, Ramos ML, Altieri E, Bulos M and Sala CA. 2013. Molecular characterization of Als1, an acetohydroxyacid synthase mutation conferring resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126(12): 2957-2968. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2185-7
Green JM. 2007. Review of glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicide crop resistance and resistant weed management. Weed Technology 21(2): 547-558. doi: 10.1614/WT-06-004.1
Green JM. 2012. The benefits of herbicide‐resistant crops. Pest Management Science 68(10): 1323-1331. doi: 10.1002/ps.3374
Grey TL, Braxton LB and Richburg JS. 2012. Effect of wheat herbicide carryover on double-crop cotton and soybean. Weed Technology 26(2): 207-212. doi: 10.1614/WT-D-11-00143.1
Izadi-Darbandi E and Aliverdi A. 2015. Optimizing sulfosulfuron and combination of sulfosulfuron metsulfuron-methyl activity tank-mixed with vegetable oil to control wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum Koch.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17(6): 1769-1780.
Manley BS, Wilson HP and Hines TE 2001. Weed management and crop rotations influence populations of several broadleaf weeds. Weed Science 49(1): 106-122. doi: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0106:WMACRI]2.0.CO;2
Mantovani EE, Souza NOS, Silva LAS and Santos MA. 2017. Characterization of soybean population with sulfonylurea herbicides tolerant alleles. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12(19): 1661-1668. doi: 10.5897/AJAR2017.12251
Merotto Júnior A, Vidal RA e Fleck NG. 2000. Tolerância da cultivar de soja Coodetec 201 aos herbicidas inibidores de ALS. Planta Daninha 18(1): 93-102. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582000000100010
MAPA – Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. 2009. Regras para análise de sementes. Mapa/ACS, Brasília. 399 p.
Nandula VK, Poston DH, Reddy KN and Whiting K. 2009. Response of soybean to halosulfuron herbicide. International Journal of Agronomy 2009: 7. doi: 10.1155/2009/754510
Neve P, Barney JN, Buckley Y, Cousens RD, Graham S, Jordan NR, Lawton‐Rauh A, Liebman M, Mesgaran MB, Schut M, Shaw J, Storkey J, Baraibar B, Baucom RS, Chalak M, Childs DZ, Christensen S, Eizenberg H, Fernández‐Quintanilla C, French K, Harsch M, Heijting S, Harrison L, Loddo D, Macel M, Maczey N, Merotto Júnior A, Mortensen D, Necajeva J, Peltzer DA, Recasens J, Renton M, Riemens M, Sønderskov M and Williams M. 2018. Reviewing research priorities in weed ecology, evolution and management: a horizon scan. Weed Research 58(4): 250-258. doi: 10.1111/wre.12304
Piasecki C e Rizzardi MA. 2016. Herbicidas aplicados em pré-emergência controlam plantas individuais e touceiras de milho voluntário RR® F2 em soja? Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 15(4): 323-331. doi: 10.7824/rbh.v15i4.497
Pimentel-Gomes F and Garcia CH. 2002. Estatística aplicada a experimentos agronômicos e florestais: exposição com exemplos e orientações para uso de aplicativos. FEALQ, Piracicaba. 309 p.
Porterfield D, Everman WJ and Wilcut JW. 2006. Soybean response to residual and in-season treatments of trifloxysulfuron. Weed Technology 20(2): 384-388. doi: 10.1614/WT-05-033R.1
Poston DH, Nandula VK, Koger CH and Matt Griffin R. 2008. Preemergence herbicides effect on growth and yield of early-planted Mississippi soybean. Crop Management 7(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1094/CM-2008-0218-02-RS
Rodrigues BN e Almeida FS. 2018. Guia de herbicidas. Sétima Edição. Produção Independente, Londrina. 764 p.
Rogozin IB, Berikov VB, Vasunina EA and Sinitsina OI. 2001. The effect of the primary structure of DNA on induction of mutations by alkylating agents. Russian Journal of Genetics 37(6): 704-710. doi: 10.1023/A:1016641812010
Rosario-Lebron A, Leslie AW, Yurchak VL, Chen G and Hooks CRR. 2019. Can winter cover crop termination practices impact weed suppression, soil moisture, and yield in no-till soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]? Crop Protection 116: 132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.10.020
Roso AC and Vidal RA. 2011. Culturas resistentes aos herbicidas inibidores da enzima ALS: Revisão de literatura. Pesticidas: Revista de Ecotoxicologia e Meio Ambiente 21: 13-24. doi: 10.5380/pes.v21i0.25849
Sebastian SA, Fader GM, Ulrich JF, Forney DR and Chaleff RS. 1989. Semidominant soybean mutation for resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides. Crop Science 29(6): 1403-1408. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900060014x
Silva AFM, Albrecht AJP, Albrecht LP, Victoria Filho R and Giovanelli BF. 2016. Application of post-emergence ALS inhibitor herbicides associated or not to glyphosate in RR/STS soybean. Planta Daninha 34(4): 765-776. doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582016340400017
Silva AFM, Albrecht AJP, Damião VW, Giraldeli AL, Marco LR, Placido HF, Albrecht LP and Victoria Filho R. 2018. Selectivity of nicosulfuron isolated or in tank mixture to glyphosate and sulfonylurea tolerant soybean. Journal of Plant Protection Research 58(2): 152-160. doi: 10.24425/122930
Silva AFM, Albrecht AJP, Silva GS, Kashivaqui ESF, Albrecht LP and Victoria Filho R. 2019. Rates of nicosulfuron applied in glyphosate-tolerant and sulfonylurea-tolerant soybean. Planta Daninha 37: e019188317. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582019370100010
Tormena T, Kashiwaqui MM, Maciel CDG, Souza JI, Soares CRB, Pivatto RA, Helvig EO, Silva AAP and Karpinski RAK. 2016. Control of globe fringerush (Fimbristylis miliacea) and selectivity to rice crop irrigated with bispyribac-sodium + metsulfuron-methyl associated with adjuvants. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 83: e0952014. doi: 10.1590/1808-1657000952014
Tukey JW. 1949. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5(2): 99-114. doi: 10.2307/3001913
Vargas L, Bianchi MA, Rizzardi MA, Agostinetto D e Dal Magro T. 2007. Buva (Conyza bonariensis) resistente ao glyphosate na região sul do Brasil. Planta Daninha 25(3): 573-578. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582007000300017
Walker S, Widderick M, McLean A, Cook T and Davidson B. 2013. Improved chemical control of Conyza bonariensis in wheat limits problems in the following fallow. Weed Biology and Management 13(4): 144-150. doi: 10.1111/wbm.12021
Walter KL, Strachan SD, Ferry NM, Albert HH, Castle LA and Sebastian SA. 2014. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Als1 and Als2 mutations conferring tolerance to acetolactate synthase herbicides in soybean. Pest Management Science 70(12): 1831-1839. doi: 10.1002/ps.3725
Zargar M, Bayat M, Lyashko M and Chauhan B. 2019. Postemergence herbicide applications impact canada thistle control and spring wheat yields. Agronomy Journal 111(6): 2874-2880. doi: 10.2134/agronj2019.02.0125
Zhou Q, Liu W, Zhang Y and Liu KK. 2007. Action mechanisms of acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 89(2): 89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.04.004
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.






