Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Published
Control and translocation of saflufenacil in fleabane (Conyza spp.) according to plant integrity
Control y translocación de saflufenacil en yerba canicera (Conyza spp.) en función de la integridad de la planta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n2.90951Keywords:
Conyza spp.; herbicide mobility; regrowth. (en)Conyza spp.; movilidad herbicida; rebrote. (es)
Efficient herbicide absorption and translocation, and satisfactory weed control can be affected by the site of herbicide application. However, during harvesting of crops of previous soybean sowing, the cutting process made by harvesters on the fleabane may generate a difficult management in pre sowing of the crop by limiting the leaf area of the absorption of the herbicide. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the control efficiency and translocation potential of saflufenacil in fleabane plants with different leaf and stem conditions. Experiment I was arranged in a 2x10 factorial scheme, with factor A corresponding to leaf integrity, and factor B corresponding to different levels of injury and saflufenacil application. Weed control was evaluated at 7, 14, and 21 days after herbicide treatment (DAT), and dry matter was evaluated at 21 DAT. Experiment II consisted of applying saflufenacil to different fleabane structures, where the percentage of necrotic area was evaluated at 1, 3, 5, and 7 DAT. Fleabane control was higher than 75% in all treatments with saflufenacil application, with greater control in plants previously defoliated. Saflufenacil application on 10 and 20 cm hairy fleabane plants was also efficient in all treatments. Saflufenacil application in old stem showed a larger necrotic area, while application in the site of the cutting resulted in a lower necrotic area. The main pathway for translocation of saflufenacil is via xylem and the stem proved to be the absorption element of the herbicide when leaf area is limited.
La eficiencia de absorción, translocación y control satisfactorio de malezas pueden ser afectados por el lugar de aplicación del herbicida. Sin embargo, durante la recolección de cultivos previos a la soya, el corte realizado por la cosechadora en la yerba carnicera dificulta el manejo de cultivos en presiembra al limitar el área foliar de absorción. Se realizaron experimentos para evaluar la eficiencia del control y el potencial de translocación de saflufenacil en plantas de yerba carnicera en diferentes condiciones. El primer experimento se organizó en esquema factorial 2x10. El factor A corresponde a la integridad de la hoja y el factor B corresponde a los diferentes niveles de daño y aplicación de saflufenacil. El control de Conyza se evaluó a los 7, 14 y 21 días después del tratamiento herbicida (DAT), y el peso seco a los 21 DAT. El experimento II consistió en aplicar saflufenacil a diferentes estructuras de Conyza, donde se evaluó el porcentaje de área necrótica a 1, 3, 5 y 7 DAT. El control de Conyza obtenido fue superior al 75% en todos tratamientos usando saflufenacil, con mayor control en plantas previamente defoliadas. La aplicación de saflufenacil en plantas de 10 y 20 cm fue eficaz en todos los tratamientos. Además, saflufenacil aplicado en el tallo viejo mostró un área necrótica mayor, mientras la aplicación en el sitio del corte generó como resultado un área menos necrótica. La translocación de saflufenacil se da através del xilema y el tallo demostrando ser el elemento a través del cual se da la absorción del herbicida.
References
Ashigh JJ and Hall C. 2010. Bases for interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate in plants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58(12): 7335-7343. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf100595a
Budd CM, Soltani N, Robinson DE, Hooker DC, Miller RT and Sikkema PH. 2017. Efficacy of saflufenacil for control of glyphosateresistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) as affected by height, density, and time of day. Weed Science 65(2): 275-84. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2016.24
Caldeira SF and Castro CKC. 2012. Herbicidas e danos físicos em tocos de teca para controle de brotos após o desbaste. Ciência Rural 42(10): 1826-1832. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012001000017
Cesco VJS, Nardi R, Krenchinski FH, Albrecht AJP, Rodrigues DM and Albrecht LP. 2019. Management of resistant Conyza spp. during soybean pre-sowing. Planta Daninha 37:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582019370100039
Constantin J, Oliveira Junior RS, Pla AM, Blainski E and Guerra N. 2013. Chapter 6 - Manejo da buva na entressafra. pp. 41-63. In: Constantin J, Oliveira Jr RS and Oliveira Neto AM (eds.). Buva: fundamentos e recomendações para manejo. Editora Omnipax, Curitiba. 122 p.
Dalazen G, Kruse ND, Machado SLO and Balbinot A. 2015. Sinergismo na combinação de glifosato e saflufenacil para o controle de buva. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 45(2): 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632015v4533708
Dan HA, Braz GBP, Biffe DF, Alonso DG and Raimondi MA. 2013. Chapter 2 - Histórico da infestação de buva resistente a herbicidas no mundo e no Brasil. pp.5-10 In: Constantin J, Oliveira JR RS, Oliveira Neto AM (eds.). Buva: fundamentos e recomendações para manejo. Omnipax Editora, Curitiba 104 p. http://omnipax.com.br/livros/2013/BFRM/bfrm-livro.pdf
Davis VM, Kruger GR, Young BG and Johnson WG. 2010. Fall and spring preplant herbicide applications influence spring emergence of glyphosate resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technology 24(1): 11-10. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-09-064.1
Eubank TW, Nandula VK, Reddy KN, Poston DH and Shaw DR. 2013. Saflufenacil efficacy on horseweed and its interaction with glyphosate. Weed Biology and Management 13(4): 135-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/wbm.12022
Frihauf JC, Stahlman PW and Al-Khatib K. 2010. Saflufenacil absorption and translocation in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 98(2): 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2010.06.014
Grossmann K, Hutzler J, Caspar G, Kwiatkowski J and Brommer CL. 2011. Saflufenacil (KixorTM): biokinetic properties and mechanism of selectivity of a new protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase inhibiting herbicide. Weed Science 59(3): 290-98. https://doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-10-00179.1
Kaspary TE, Lamego FP, Langaro AC, Ruchel Q and Agostinetto D. 2016. Investigation of the mechanism of resistance to glyphosate herbicide in hairy fleabane. Planta Daninha 34(3): 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582016340300016
Kleier DA and Hsu FC. 1996. Phloem mobility of xenobiotics.VII. The design of phloem systemic pesticides. Weed Science 44:749-756. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4045665
Mellendorf TG, Young JM, Matthews JL and Young BG. 2013. Influence of plant height and glyphosate on saflufenacil efficacy on glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technology 27(3): 463-467. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00004.1
Moreira MS, Melo MSC, Carvalho SJP, Nicolai M and Crhistoffoleti PJ. 2010. Alternative Herbicides to Control GlyphosateResistant Biotypes of Conyza bonariensis and C. canadensis. Planta Daninha 28(1): 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000100020
Oliveira Júnior RS. 2011. Chapter 7 - Mecanismos de ação de herbicidas. pp. 142-191. In: Oliveira Júnior RS, Constantin J and Inoue MH (eds.). Biologia e manejo de plantas daninhas. Omnipax Editora, Curitiba. 362 p.
Oliveira Neto AM, Constantin J, Oliveira Júnior RSO, Guerra N, Dan HA, Vilela LMS, Botelho LVP and Ávila LA. 2013. Sistema de dessecação de manejo com atividade residual no solo para áreas de inverno infestadas com buva. ComunicataScientiae 4(2): 120-128. https://core.ac.uk/reader/327127670
Oliveira Neto AM, Constantin J, Oliveira Jr RS, Guerra N, Dan HA, Alonso DG, Blainski E and Santos G. 2010. Estratégias de manejo de inverno e verão visando ao controle de Conyza bonariensis e Bidens pilosa. Planta Daninha 28: 1107-16. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582010000500018
Osipe R, Adegas FS and Osipe JB. 2013 Plantas daninhas na agricultura: o caso da buva. In: Constantin J, Oliveira Júnior RS, Oliveira Neto AM. Buva: Fundamentos e Recomendações para Manejo. Curitiba: OmnipaxEditora, 104 p. http://omnipax.co.br/livros/2013/BFRM/bfrm-livro.pdf
Owen LN, Mueller TC, Main CL, Bond J and Steckel LE. 2011. Evaluating rates and application timings of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadenis) prior to planting no-till cotton. Weed Technology 25(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00054.1
Pellegrini LG, Nabinger C, Carvalho PCF and Neumann M. 2007. Diferentes métodos de controle de plantas indesejáveis em pastagem nativa. Revista Brasielira de Zootecnia 36(5): 1247-54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007000600005
Pereira LV, Carvalho LB and Dal Magro T. 2016. Is the chemical control of glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane more efficient during pre-flowering or re-growth? Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 15(3): 277-280. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711532016277
R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org
Ramos FT, Ferreira LS, Pivetta F and Maia JCS. 2015. Área do limbo foliar de diferentes plantas estimada por medidas lineares e matéria seca, calibradas com o software imagej. Interciencia 40(8):570-575. https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/570-C-RAMO6.pdf
Taiz L andZeiger E. 2017. Fisiologia vegetal. Sixth edition. Artmed, Porto Alegre. 855 p.
Trezzi MM, Vidal RA, Kruse ND, Silva RP, Gustamann MS and Franchin E. 2009. Fomesafen absorption site as a mechanism of resistance in an Euphorbia heterophylla biotype resistant to PROTOX inhibitors. Planta Daninha 27(1): 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000100018
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Bruno Mussoi Cavichioli, Geovana Facco Barbieri, Cassiano Salin Pigatto, Glauco Pacheco Leães, Nelson Diehl Kruse, André da Rosa Ulguim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.
