Kinetic study and modeling of xylitol production using Candida tropicalis in different culture media using unstructured models
Estudio cinético y modelado de la producción de xilitol utilizando Candida tropicalis en diferentes medios de cultivo mediante modelos no estructurados
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n2.92270Keywords:
xylose, fermentation, oil palm empty fruit bunch, unstructured models (en)Fermentación , Racimo vacío de palma de aceite , Modelos no estructurados , Xilosa (es)
Unstructured models for cell growth, xylose consumption and xylitol production were applied for to describe the fermentation kinetics of xylitol production using Candida tropicalis in synthetic medium, and in non-detoxified oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB) hydrolysate at 100 mL flask scale. In synthetic medium, the experimental maximum specific growth rate (μmax) and the cell mass yield factor (YX/S) were closer to the results of the Tessier model than those of the Contois and Monod models. Whereas, in non-detoxified OPEFB hydrolyzate, these parameters were closer to the results of the Contois model than those of the Tessier and Monod models. According to the models’ results, xylitol is mainly produced during the cell growth phase. The Tessier model in synthetic medium and Contois model in non-detoxified OPEFB hydrolysate had a coefficient of variation in growth kinetics of 32 and 33%, respectively. The significance of this study lies in simplifying the fermentation process through an unstructured and non-segregated model using three events at the same time, cell growth, substrate consumption and metabolite production.
Se aplicaron modelos no estructurados de crecimiento celular, consumo de xilosa y producción de xilitol para describir la cinética de fermentación en la producción de xilitol usando Candida tropicalis en medio sintético y en hidrolizado de raquis de la palma de aceite no desintoxicado (OPEFB siglas en inglés) en escala de matraz de 100 mL. En medio sintético, la tasa máxima de crecimiento
específico experimental (μmax) y el factor de rendimiento de masa celular (YX/S) estuvieron más cerca de los resultados del modelo Tessier que los de los modelos Contois y Monod. Mientras que, en el hidrolizado de OPEFB no desintoxificado, estos parámetros se acercaron más a los resultados del modelo Contois que a los de los modelos Tessier y Monod. Según los resultados de los modelos, el xilitol se produce principalmente durante la fase de crecimiento celular. El modelo de Tessier en medio sintético y el modelo de Contois en hidrolizado de OPEFB no desintoxificado tuvieron un coeficiente de variación en la cinética de crecimiento de 32 y 33%, respectivamente. La importancia de este estudio radica en simplificar el proceso de fermentación mediante un modelo no estructurado y no segregado utilizando tres eventos al mismo tiempo, crecimiento celular, consumo de sustrato y producción del metabolito.
References
Aguiar WB, Faria LFF, Couto MAPG, Araujo OQF and Pereira N. 2002. Growth model and prediction of oxygen transfer rate for xylitol production from d-xylose by C. guilliermondii. Biochemical Engineering Journal 12: 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00040-2
Aranda-Barradas JS, Delia ML and Riba JP. 2000. Kinetic study and modelling of the xylitol production using Candida parapsilosis in oxygen-limited culture conditions. Bioprocess Engineering 22: 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009113
Esener AA, Roels JA and Kossen NWF. 1983. Theory and applications of unstructured growth models: Kinetic and energetic pects. Biotechnology Bioengineering 25: 2803–2841. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260251202
Fedepalma. 2014. Producción de aceite de palma se incrementó 7% en 2013. Fed. Nac. Cultiv. Palma Aceite 3. https://web.fedepalma.org/node/653
Ghosh S, Chakraborty R, Chatterjee G and Raychaudhuri U. 2012. Study on fermentation conditions of palm juice vinegar by response surface methodology and development of a kinetic model. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering 29: 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-66322012000300003
Guo D-S, Ji X-J, Ren L-J, Yin F-W, Sun X-M, Huang H and Zhen G. 2018. Development of a multi-stage continuous fermentation strategy for docosahexaenoic acid production by Schizochytrium sp. Bioresource Technology 269: 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.066
Krichen E, Harmand J, Torrijos M, Godon JJ, Bernet N and Rapaport A. 2017. High biomass density promotes densitydependent microbial growth rate. Biochemical Engineering Journal 130: 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2017.11.017
Kucharska K, Hołowacz I, Konopacka-Łyskawa D, Rybarczyk P and Kamiński M. 2018. Key issues in modeling and optimization of lignocellulosic biomass fermentative conversion to gaseous biofuels. Renew Energy 129: 384–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.018
Mahdinia E, Mamouri SJ, Puri VM, Demirci A and Berenjian A. 2019. Modeling of vitamin K (Menaquinoe-7) fermentation by Bacillus subtilis natto in biofilm reactors. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 17: 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2018.11.022
Manjarres-Pinzon K, Arias-Zabala M, Correa-Londono G and Rodriguez-Sandoval E. 2017. Xylose recovery from dilute-acid hydrolysis of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) empty fruit bunches for xylitol production. African Journal of Biotechnology 16: 1997–2008. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2017.16214
Manjarres J, Bravo A, Arias JP, Ortega I, Vasquez A and Arias M. 2018. Biotechnological production of xylitol from oil palm empty fruit bunches hydrolysate. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 16: 134–137. https://doi.org/10.19026/ajfst.16.5945
Manjarres-Pinzon K, Arias-Zabala M, Molina-Ramírez YA, Betancur-Nieto MI and Rodríguez-Sandoval E. 2016. Producción de xilitol por Candida guilliermondii a partir de fermentación de residuos de palma de aceite. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica 19(2): 403–409. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-42262016000200017&lng=en
Mohamad NL, Mustapa Kamal SM, Mokhtar MN, Husain SA and Abdullah N. 2016. Dynamic mathematical modelling of reaction kinetics for xylitol fermentation using Candida tropicalis. Biochemical Engineering Journal 111: 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2016.02.017
Pappu JSM and Gummadi SN. 2016. Modeling and simulation of xylitol production in bioreactor by Debaryomyces nepalensis NCYC 3413 using unstructured and artificial neural network models. Bioresource Technology 220:490–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.097
Prakasham RS, Rao RS and Hobbs PJ. 2009. Current trends in biotechnological production of xylitol and future prospects. Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy 3(1): 8-36. http://abap.co.in/sites/default/files/2-Paper%208-36.pdf
Rao VL, Goli JK, Gentela J and Koti S. 2016. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass to xylitol: An overview. Bioresource Technology 213: 299-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.092
Sakthipriya N, Doble M and Sangwai JS. 2018. Kinetic and thermodynamic behavior of the biodegradation of waxy crude oil using Bacillus subtilis. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 160: 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.056
Singh R, Tevatia R, White D, Demirel Y and Blum P. 2019. Comparative kinetic modeling of growth and molecular hydrogen overproduction by engineered strains of Thermotoga maritima. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44: 7125–7136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.124
Tian X, Shen Y, Zhuang Y, Zhao W, Hang H and Chu J. 2018. Kinetic analysis of sodium gluconate production by Aspergillus niger with different inlet oxygen concentrations. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 41: 1697–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-018-1993-1
Tochampa W, Sirisansaneeyakul S, Vanichsriratana W, Srinophakun P, Bakker HHC and Chisti Y. 2005. A model of xylitol production by the yeast Candida mogii. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 28: 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-005-0025-0
Veeravalli SS and Mathews AP. 2018. Continuous fermentation of xylose to short chain fatty acids by Lactobacillus buchneri under low pH conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal 337: 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.100
Wang Y and Witarsa F. 2016. Application of Contois, Tessier, and first-order kinetics for modeling and simulation of a composting decomposition process. Bioresource Technology 220: 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.099
Yewale T, Panchwagh S, Sawale S, Jain R and Dhamole PB. 2017. Xylitol production from non-detoxified and non-sterile lignocellulosic hydrolysate using low-cost industrial media components. 3 Biotech 7(1): 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0700-2
Zhu C, Fang B and Wang S. 2016. Effects of culture conditions on the kinetic behavior of 1,3-propanediol fermentation by Clostridium butyricum with a kinetic model. Bioresource Technology 212: 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.028
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Katherine Manjarres-Pinzón, Leonardo Barrios Ziolo, Mario E. Arias Zabala, Guillermo Correa Londoño, Eduardo Rodriguez Sandoval

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.






