Chemical characterization, polyphenol content and antioxidant capacity of two pitahaya ecotypes (Hylocereus spp.)
Caracterización química, contenido de polifenoles y capacidad antioxidante de dos ecotipos de pitahaya (Hylocereus spp.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v74n3.92821Keywords:
DPPH, ABTS, Antioxidant capacity, Bioactive compounds, Functional foods, Polyphenols (en)DPPH, ABTS, Capacidad antioxidante, Compuestos bioactivos, Alimentos funcionales, Polifenoles (es)
Pitahaya has originated worldwide interest due to its content of bioactive compounds with proven beneficial effects on health, acting as antioxidants against free radicals. This study aimed to evaluate the nutraceutical potential of the peel and pulp of the red (Hylocereus monacanthus) and yellow (Hylocereus megalanthus) pitahaya ecotypes for nutritional formulation purposes. Two pitahaya ecotypes were analyzed, obtaining a methanolic extract of the peel and edible part to perform the proximal chemical analysis, the phytochemical screening, and determine antioxidant activity by the DPPH, ABTS, and IC50 methods. Flavonoids, tannins, quinones, among other bioactive compounds were identified. Yellow pitahaya presented higher content of polyphenols and higher antioxidant activity by the ABTS method, while the average inhibition percentage for both ecotypes was 93% by DPPH method. IC50 was higher for the edible part of red pitahaya with 1.68 mg mL-1. Both ecotypes have a high content of polyphenols and a high antioxidant capacity, which agree with those found in different studies such as those of Colombia, Brazil and Korea, being as high or even higher than most varieties of citrus fruits in Peru. Future studies should consider the inclusion of other metabolites and bioactive substances such as betalains due to their antioxidant activity. Both pitahaya ecotypes are rich in antioxidants, bioactive compounds, have low energy density, and may be suitable for food prescriptions as a functional ingredient in food industry.
La pitahaya ha suscitado el interés mundial debido a su contenido de compuestos bioactivos con comprobados efectos benéficos para la salud, actuando como antioxidantes frente a los radicales libres. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el potencial nutracéutico de la cáscara y pulpa de los ecotipos pitahaya roja (Hylocereus monacanthus) y amarilla (Hylocereus megalanthus), con fines de formulación nutricional. Se analizaron dichos ecotipos de pitahaya, obteniéndose un extracto metanólico de la cáscara y parte comestible de ambos ecotipos a fin de realizar el análisis químico proximal, la marcha fitoquímica, y determinar actividad antioxidante por los métodos DPPH, ABTS e IC50. Se identificaron flavonoides, taninos, quinonas, entre otros compuestos bioactivos. La pitahaya amarilla presentó mayor contenido de polifenoles y mayor actividad antioxidante por el método ABTS, mientras que el porcentaje de inhibición promedio para ambos ecotipos fue del 93% por el método DPPH. El IC50 fue mayor para la pulpa de pitahaya roja con 1,68 mg mL-1. Ambos ecotipos presentan un alto contenido de polifenoles y una alta capacidad antioxidante, los cuales concuerdan con los encontrados en distintos estudios como los de Colombia, Brazil y Corea, siendo tan alta o incluso superior a la de la mayoría de las variedades de cítricos en Perú. Futuros estudios deberían considerar incluir a otros metabolitos y sustancias bioactivas como las betalainas debido a su actividad antioxidante. Ambos ecotipos de pitahaya son ricos en antioxidantes, compuestos bioactivos, y de bajo aporte calórico, recomendándose su uso en prescripciones alimentarias y en la industria de alimentos como ingrediente funcional.
References
Abirami K, Swain S, Baskaran V, Venkatesan K, Sakthivel K and Bommayasamy N. 2021. Distinguishing three Dragon fruit (Hylocereus spp.) species grown in Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India using morphological, biochemical and molecular traits. Scientific Reports 11(1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81682-x
Altuna JL, Silva M, Álvarez M, Quinteros MF, Morales D and Carrillo W. 2018. Yellow pitaya (Hylocereus megalanthus) fatty acids composition from ecuadorian Amazonia. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 11(11): 218–221. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2018.v11i11.24922
AOAC International. 2019. Official Methods of Analysis (OMA) (21st Edition). AOAC International. https://www.aoac.org/officialmethods-of-analysis-21st-edition-2019
Arnao MB, Cano A and Acosta M. 2001. The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry 73(2): 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00324-1
Blois MS. 1958. Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 181(4617): 1199–1200. https://doi.org/10.1038/1811199a0
Collazos C, White PL, Viñas E, Alvistur E, Urquieta R and Vasquez J. 1993. Composición de los alimentos de mayor consumo en el Peru (6ta Edición). Ministerio de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Nutrición. Lima. Perú.
Cordeiro MHM, Da Silva JM, Mizobutsi GP, Mizobutsi EH and Da Mota WF. 2015. Caracterização física, química e nutricional da pitaia-rosa de polpa vermelha. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 37(1): 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-2945-046/14
Daza L, Herrera A, Murillo E and Méndez J. 2014. Evaluación de propiedades antioxidantes de parte comestible y no comestible de pitahaya, uchuva y mangostino. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial 12(1): 98–105.
Figueroa SL and Mollinedo O. 2017. Actividad antioxidante del extracto etanólico del mesocarpio del fruto de Hylocereus undatus “pitahaya” e identificación de los fitoconstituyentes (Tesis de Título Profesional). Universidad Norbert Wiener, Perú.64 p. http://repositorio.uwiener.edu.pe/handle/123456789/925
Ibrahim SRM, Mohamed GA, Khedr AIM, Zayed MF and ElKholy AAES. 2018. Genus Hylocereus: Beneficial phytochemicals, nutritional importance, and biological relevance—A review. Journal of Food Biochemistry 42(2): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12491
INACAL - Instituto Nacional de Calidad. 2011. NTP 205.003.1980. INACAL. https://salalecturavirtual.inacal.gob.pe:8098/detalle.aspx?id=23607&idtv=5407
ICONTEC - Instituto Colombiano de Normas Técnicas y Certificación. 1996. Norma Técnica Colombiana. NTC 3554. Frutas frescas. Pitahaya amarilla. https://tienda.icontec.org/gp-frutasfrescas-pitahaya-amarilla-ntc3554-1996.html
Jeronimo MC and Costa Orsine JV. 2015. Chemical and physical-chemical properties, antioxidant activity and fatty acids profile of red pitaya [Hylocereus Undatus (Haw.) Britton & Rose] grown in Brazil. Journal of Drug Metabolism & Toxicology 06(04): 6–11. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7609.1000188
Joshi M and Prabhakar B. 2020. Phytoconstituents and pharmaco-therapeutic benefits of pitaya: A wonder fruit. Journal of Food Biochemistry 44(7): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13260
Kim HJ, Choi HK, Moon JY, Kim YS, Mosaddik A and Cho SK. 2011. Comparative antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of red and white pitayas and their correlation with flavonoid and polyphenol content. Journal of Food Science 76(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01908.x
Lock de Ugaz O. 1994. Investigación fitoquímica. Métodos en el estudio de productos naturales. (Segunda Ed). Fondo Editorial, PUCP.
Ministerio de Salud del Perú. 2017. Tablas peruanas de composición de alimentos. 10ma Edición. Instituto Nacional de Salud, Centro Nacional de Alimentacion y Nutrición. http://www.ins.gob.pe/insvirtual/images/otrpubs/pdf/Tabla%20de%20Alimentos.pdf
Mohd Adzim Khalili R, Che Abdullah AB and Abdul Manaf A. 2012. Total antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and radical scavenging activity both flesh and peel of red pitaya, white pitaya and papaya. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 4(2): 113–122.
Olugbami JO, Gbadegesin MA and Odunola OA. 2014. In vitro evaluation of the antioxidant potential, phenolic and flavonoid contents of the stem bark ethanol extract of Anogeissus leiocarpus. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 43(Suppl 1): 101–109.
Ordoñez-Gómez ES, Reátegui-Díaz D and Villanueva-Tiburcio JE. 2018. Total polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of peel and leaves in twelve citrus. Scientia Agropecuaria 9(1): 123–131. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2018.01.13
Ortiz-Hernández YD, Livera-Muñoz M, Carrillo-Salazar JA, Valencia-Botin AJ and Castillo-Martínez R. 2012. Agronomical, physiological, and cultural contributions of pitahaya (Hylocereus spp.) in Mexico. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 60(3): 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1560/IJPS.60.3.359
Osuna-Enciso T, Ibarra-Zazueta ME, Muy-Rangel, MD, ValdezTorres JB, Villarreal-Romero M and Sergio Hernández-Verdugo. 2011. Calidad postcosecha de frutos de pitahaya (Hylocereus undatus Haw.) cosechados en tres estados de madurez. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana 34(1): 63–72.
Ramos E. 2017. ¿Por qué la pitahaya no surge todavía como fruto de exportación en Perú? Agencia Agraria de Noticias. https://agraria.pe/noticias/por-que-la-pitahaya-no-surge-todavia-comofruto-de-13943
Seyidoglu N and Aydin C. 2016. Stress, natural antioxidants and future perspectives. In Salanta LC. (Ed.). The health benefits of foods - current knowledge and further development (p. 13). Intechopen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91167
Singleton VL and Rossi Jr. JA. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16(3): 144–158.
Som AM, Ahmat N, Abdul Hamid HA and Azizuddin NM. 2019. A comparative study on foliage and peels of Hylocereus undatus (white dragon fruit) regarding their antioxidant activity and phenolic content. Heliyon 5(2): e01244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01244
Suleria HAR, Barrow CJ and Dunshea FR. 2020. Screening and characterization of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant capacity in different fruit peels. Foods 9(9): https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091206
Teixeira BJ, Mercedes I and Ataurima A. 2016. Evaluation of the content of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of the ethanol extracts of the fruits of aguaymanto (Physalis peruviana L.). Revista de la Sociedad Química del Perú 82(3): 272-279. http://revistas.sqperu.org.pe/index.php/revistasqperu/article/view/58/50
The Plant List. 2013. Cereus triangularis Haw. http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/record/kew-2712460
Torres-Grisales Y, Melo Sabogal DV, Torres-Valenzuela LS, Serna-Jiménez JA and Sanín Villarreal A. 2017. Evaluation of bioactive compounds with functional interest from yellow pitahaya (Selenicereus megalanthus Haw). Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomia Medellin 70(3): 8311–8318. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfna.v70n3.66330
Vásquez-Castillo W, Aguilar K, Vilaplana R, Viteri P, Viera W and Valencia-Chamorro YS. 2016. Calidad del fruto y pérdidas poscosecha de pitahaya amarilla (Selenicereus megalanthus Haw.) en Ecuador. Agronomia Colombiana 34(1): S1081–S1083. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n1supl.58279
Verma SK, Das AK, Cingoz GS and Gurel E. 2016. In vitro culture of Digitalis L. (Foxglove) and the production of cardenolides: An up-to-date review. Industrial Crops and Products 94: 20–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.031
Verona-Ruiz A, Urcia-Cerna J and Paucar-Menacho L. M. 2020. Pitahaya (Hylocereus spp.): Culture, physicochemical characteristics, nutritional composition, and bioactive compounds. Scientia Agropecuaria 11(3): 439–453. https://doi.org/10.17268/sci.agropecu.2020.03.16
Williamson G. 2017. The role of polyphenols in modern nutrition. Nutrition Bulletin 42(3): 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12278
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Zhibing Zhao, Yinmei Luo, Lang Wang, Liangjie Ba. (2026). Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality Differences of Red-Fleshed Pitahaya in Guizhou Province. Agronomy, 16(3), p.299. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16030299.
2. Jessica Sanmiguel, Valdemar Andrade, Yadira Vargas-Tierras, Iván Samaniego, Fernando Paredes-Arcos, Wilson Vásquez-Castillo, William Viera-Arroyo. (2025). Physical-Chemical Characterization of Fruit Harvested at Different Maturity Stages of Grafted Yellow Pitahaya (Selenicereus megalanthus Haw.). Plants, 14(2), p.178. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14020178.
3. David Aminagat Callirgos Romero, Raúl Siche, Cesar Valmor Rombaldi. (2025). Pitaya peel as a functional ingredient: Pectin, phenolics, pigments and applications. Food and Humanity, 5, p.100744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100744.
4. Adrian Cristian Orădan, Alexandra Cristina Tocai (Moțoc), Cristina Adriana Rosan, Simona Ioana Vicas. (2024). Fruit Extracts Incorporated into Meat Products as Natural Antioxidants, Preservatives, and Colorants. Processes, 12(12), p.2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12122756.
5. Miguel Ángel Castillo Reina, Nely Pérez Martínez, Iván David Ruiz Rosas . (2023). Pitahaya amarilla (Selenicereus megalanthus) en Miraflores, Boyacá, Colombia. Una perspectiva de capital social en una asociación de productores . Acta Agronómica, 71(4) https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v71n4.100152.
6. Antonio José Obregón-La Rosa, Michael Bracamonte-Romero, Sarela Alfaro-Cruz. (2024). RED PITAHAYA HYLOCEREUS UNDATUS (HAWORTH) BRITTON & ROSE GROWN ON THE PERUVIAN COAST: PHYSICOCHEMICAL, NUTRITIONAL, AND BIOACTIVE CHARACTERISTICS. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 59(5) https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.59.5.2.
7. Oliver Taype-Landeo, Sandy Vialid Yauricasa-Tornero, Denilson Taype-Landeo, Angela Margot Ccora-Huamán, Susan Karina Montes-Bujaico. (2026). Physical characterization, polyphenolic components, antioxidant activity and betalains of the fruits of Berberis lutea and Berberis virgata. Food Chemistry Advances, 10, p.101209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2025.101209.
8. Alex Erazo-Lara, María Emma García-Pastor, Pedro Antonio Padilla-González, Daniel Valero, María Serrano. (2024). Preharvest Elicitors as a Tool to Enhance Bioactive Compounds and Quality of Both Peel and Pulp of Yellow Pitahaya (Selenicereus megalanthus Haw.) at Harvest and during Postharvest Storage. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(10), p.5435. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25105435.
9. A. C. Morillo, E. H. Manjarres, M. C. Pedreros. (2023). Characterization of yellow pitahaya (Selenicereus megalanthus Haw.) genotypes under two productive systems in Colombia. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 83 https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.274152.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Luisa Medina-Pizzali, Estefany Quispe Lupuche, Jorge Antonio Chávez Pérez, Lillyan Loayza Gutiérrez, Eder Apumayta Suárez

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.






