Influence of soil cover and herbicide application on weed control and corn yield
Influencia de la cobertura del suelo y la aplicación de herbicidas en el control de malezas y la productividad del maíz
Keywords:
Avena strigosa L , Consortium, Secale cereale L, Zea mays L (en)Avena strigosa L, Consorcio, Secale cereale L, Zea mays L (es)
Crop management and herbicide rotation have influenced the sustainability of production systems. The cover crops use and pre-and post-emergence herbicides are important tools that help farmers’ strategies and conserve the agricultural system. In this context, the objective of this research was to evaluate the dry matter production of different cover crops before the establishment of corn, the effect on decreasing weed population, and the increase in corn yield. In addition, the influence of pre-and post-emergence herbicides on summer cultivation, observing the behavior concerning weeds, crop injury, and crop yield. The experiment was conducted during the years 2018-2019 in Sertão/RS - Brazil. The experimental arrangement was of randomized blocks with four replications. The treatments used were three different winter cover crops preceding corn cultivation × four preemergence herbicides × four post-emergence herbicides, totaling 192 experimental units. Going through the results, atrazine and atrazine + simazine used in pre-emergence had more influence on weed number reduction, and the post-emergence ammonium glufosinate herbicide promoted the highest weed control in post-emergence. Amicarbazone and glyphosate resulted in the best combination for corn yield using in pre-and post-emergence, respectively. Rye + turnip + vetch as cover crop resulted in higher biomass production, more significant weed number reduction, and increase corn yield.
El manejo de cultivos y la rotación de herbicidas han influido en la sostenibilidad de los sistemas de producción. El uso de cultivos de cobertura y herbicidas de pre y post-emergencia son herramientas importantes que ayudan a los agricultores a desarrollar estrategias y conservar el sistema agrícola. En este contexto, el objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar diferentes cultivos de cobertura previos al establecimiento del cultivo de maíz en relación con la producción de materia seca, el efecto en la disminución de la población de malezas y el aumento del rendimiento del maíz. Además, la influencia de los herbicidas de pre y postemergencia en el cultivo de verano, observándose el comportamiento en relación a malezas, daño al cultivo y rendimiento del cultivo. El experimento se realizó durante los años 2018-2019 en Sertão/RS - Brasil. El arreglo experimental fue de bloques al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Los tratamientos utilizados fueron tres diferentes cultivos de cobertura de invierno que preceden al cultivo de maíz × cuatro herbicidas de preemergencia × cuatro herbicidas de postemergencia, totalizando 192 unidades experimentales. Al analizar los resultados, la atrazina y la atrazina + simazina utilizadas en preemergencia tuvieron más influencia en la reducción del número de malezas, y el herbicida glufosinato de amônio promovió el mayor control de malezas en postemergencia. La amicarbazona y el glifosato resultaron en la mejor combinación para el rendimiento de maíz en pre y postemergencia, respectivamente. El centeno + nabo + arveja como cultivo de cobertura dieron como resultado una mayor producción de biomasa, una reducción más significativa del número de malezas y un aumento del rendimiento del maíz.
Downloads
References
Adami PF, Colet RA, Lemes ES, Oligini KF and Batista VV. 2020. Cover plants in soybean-wheat and soybean-soybean offseason. Brazilian Journal of Development 6(3):16551-16567 https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n3-505
Alonso DG, Oliveira Jr. RS and Constantin J. 2011. Potencial de Carryover de herbicidas com atividade residual usados em manejo outonal. In: Brighenti, A.M.; Oliveira, M.F. Biologia de Plantas Daninhas. In: Biologia e Manejo de Plantas Daninhas. Oliveira Jr., R.S.; Constantin, J.; Inoue, M.H. Curitiba, PR: Omnipax, 348 p.
Barbieri JD, Dallacort R, Daniel DF, Dalchiavon FC and Freitas PSL. 2020. Coberturas de solo, evapotranspiração e produtividade do milho safrinha. Cultura Agronômica 29(1):76-91. http://doi.org/10.32929/2446-8355.2020v29n1p76-91
Barbieri M, Dossin MF, Dalla Nora D, Santos WB, Bevilacqua CB, Andrade N, Boeni M, Deuschle D, Jacques RJS and Antoniolli ZI. 2019. Trial on soil bioactivity under no-tillage in succession or rotation of winter and summer crops. Revista de Ciências Agrárias 42(1):122-134. http://doi.org/10.19084/RCA17068
Bybee‐Finley KA, Cordeau S, Yvoz, Mirsky SB and Ryan MR. 2022. Finding the right mix: a framework for selecting seeding rates for cover crop mixtures. Ecological Applications 32(1):e02484. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2484
Brighenti AM and Oliveira MF. 2011. Biologia de plantas daninhas. In: Biologia e manejo de plantas daninhas. Oliveira Jr RS, Constantin J, Inoue MH and Curitiba PR: Omnipax, 348 p.
Brunharo CACG, Christoffoleti PJ and Nicolai M. 2014. Aspectos do mecanismo de ação do amônio glufosinato: culturas resistentes e resistência de plantas daninhas. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 13(2):163-177. http://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v13i2.293
Cavenaghi AL, Rossi CVS, Negrisoli E, Costa EAD, Velini ED and Toledo REB. 2007. Dinâmica do herbicida amicarbazone (Dinamic) aplicado sobre palha de cana-de-açúcar (Saccarum officinarum). Planta Daninha 25(4):831-837. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582007000400020
Chahal I and Van Eerd LL. 2018. Evaluation of commercial soil health tests using a medium‐term cover crop experiment in a humid, temperate climate. Plant Soil p. 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3653-2
Chu M, Jagadamma S, Walker FR, Eash NS, Buschermohle MJ and Duncan LA. 2017. Effect of multispecies cover crop mixture on soil properties and crop yield. Agricultural & Environmental Letters 2(1):5p. https://doi.org/10.2134/ael2017.09.0030
Ferreira JHS, Oliveira AS.; Duarte DG, Almeida FJ, Paes JS and Delgado CHO. 2020. Eficácia do amicarbazone e flumioxazim no controle de Merremia aegypitia, Mucuna aterrima e Ricinus communis no sistema de cana crua. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 19(3). https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v19i3.701
Franz E, Tironi SP, Luz GL, Cezarotto LA, Zago DV, Munaretto D, Lajús CR and Barichello R. 2020. Manejo da cobertura de azevém em plantio direto na cultura do milho e sua fitossociologia. Brazilian Journal of Development 6(10):82574-82585, https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n10-621
Fuentes-Llanillo R, Telles TS, Junior DS, Melo TR, Friedrich T and Kassam A. 2021. Expansion of no-tillage practice in conservation agriculture in Brazil. Soil and Tillage Research 208: 104877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104877
Galon L, Bagnara MAM, Gabiatti RL, Reichert Jr FW, Basso FJM and Nonemacher F. 2018. Interference periods of weeds infesting maize crop. Journal of Agricultural Science 10(10):197-205. https://doi. org/10.5539/jas.v10n10p197
Galon L, Pinto JJO, Rocha AA, Concenço G, Silva AF, Aspiazú I, Ferreira EA, França AC, Ferreira FA, Agostinetto D and Pinho CF. 2008. Períodos de interferência de Brachiaria plantaginea na cultura do milho na região Sul do Rio Grande do Sul. Planta Daninha 26(4). http://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000400009
Gava R, Freitas PSL, Faria RT, Rezende R and Frizzone JA. 2013. Soil water evaporation under densities of coverage with vegetable residue. Engenharia Agrícola 33(1):89-98. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162013000100010
Gomes Jr FG and Christoffoleti PJ. 2008. Biologia e manejo de plantas daninhas em áreas de plantio direto. Planta Daninha 26(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000400010
Heap I and Duke SO. 2018. Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Management Science 74(5):1040-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4760
Klein C and Klein, VA. 2015. Strategies to improve the retention and availability of soil water. Electronic Journal of Management, Education and Environmental Technology 19(1):21-29. http://doi.org/10.5902/2236117014990
Maciel CDG and Velini ED. 2005. Simulação do caminhamento da água da chuva e herbicidas em palhadas utilizadas em sistemas de plantio direto. Planta daninha 23(3):471-481. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582005000300011
Martins D, Gonçalves CG and Junior ACS. 2016. Coberturas mortas de inverno e controle químico sobre plantas daninhas na cultura do milho. Revista Ciência Agronômica 47(4). https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20160078
Matos AKA, Carbonari CA, Gomes GLGC and Velini ED. 2016. Dynamics of preemergent herbicides in production systems with straw. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 15(1):97-106. http://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v15i1.441
Monquero PA, Amaral LR, Binha DP, Silva AC, Silva PV. 2008. Potencial de lixiviação de herbicidas no solo submetidos a diferentes simulações de precipitação. Planta daninha 26:2. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582008000200017
Moraes PVD, Agostinetto D, Panozzo LE, Oliveira C, Vignolo GK and Markus C. 2013. Manejo de plantas de cobertura no controle de plantas daninhas e desempenho produtivo da cultura do milho. Ciências Agrárias 32(2):497-508. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000200011
Ottavini D, Pannacci E, Onofri A, Tei F and Jensen PK. 2019. Effects of light, temperature, and soil depth on the germination and emergence of Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Agronomy 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9090533
São Miguel ASDC, Pacheco LP, Souza ED, Silva CMR and Carvalho IC. Cover crops in the weed management in soybean culture. Planta Daninha, 36, 10p. 2018. http://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100072
Silva FAS and Azevedo CAV. 2016. The Assistat Software Version 7.7 and its use in the analysis of experimental data. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11(39):3733-3740 http://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11522
Soltani N, Shropshire C and Sikkema PH. 2022 Impact of delayed postemergence herbicide application on corn yield based on weed height, days after emergence, accumulated crop heat units, and corn growth stage. Weed Technology 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2022.10
Brazilian Society of Soil. 2004. Manual Fertilization and Liming in the States of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina. Commission of Chemistry and Fertility of Soils, Rio Grande do Sul, 400 p.
Sorenson BA, Shea PJ and Roeth FW. 1991. Effects of tillage, application time and rate on metribuzin dissipation. Weed Research 31(6):333-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1991.tb01773.x
Tironi SP, Galon L, da Silva AF, Fialho CMT, Rocha PRR, Faria AT, Radünz AL. 2014. Época de emergência de azevém e nabo sobre a habilidade competitiva da cultura da cevada. Ciência Rural 44(9):1527-1533. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20131633
Vargas L, Mariani F, Gazziero D, Karam D and Agostinetto D. 2015. Azevém resistente: manejo e controle. II Colóquio Internacional sobre Plantas Daninhas Resistentes a Herbicidas. 5p.
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Eduardo Carlos Rüdell

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.

