Forage quality in a neotropical savanna based on different types of fertilization
Calidad del forraje en una sabana neotropical basada en diferentes tipos de fertilización
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v75n2.96791Keywords:
agroecosystems, biomass, nitrogen fixation, cover crop (en)Agroecosistema, biomasa, fijación de nitrógeno, cultivo de cobertura (es)
The application of different sources of nutrients to the soil with varying degrees of solubility, as well as the use of organic and inorganic fertilizers, can generate different responses in agroecosystems. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fertilization options on the quality of forage in the conservation-based agroecosystems of neotropical savannas. Both perennial species Brachiaria dictyoneura and the legume Centrosema macrocarpum are associated with corn cultivation. Four fertilization treatments were evaluated within each cover crop, applying 150 kg ha-1 of nitrogen, 150 kg ha-1 of P2O5, 100 kg ha-1 of K2O, and varying the source of phosphorus, being the treatments distributed as follows: i) phosphoric rock, high dose of phosphorus (100% of P2O5 as phosphoric rock), ii) diammonium phosphate, high dose of P (50% of P2O5 as phosphoric rock and 50% as diammonium phosphate), iii) biological fertilization, low dose of P (25% of P2O5 as phosphoric rock and inoculation with biofertilizer based on native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, such as Gigaspora, Scutellospora, Acaulospora, and Glomus), and finally, iv) the unfertilized treatment. The results show that under direct sowing and the use of biological fertilization sources using phosphoric rock as a source of P, similar and even higher levels of raw protein can be reached than when using fertilization with soluble sources such as the diammonium phosphate, which induce greater sustainability of the cover biomass, being an alternative in the management of this types of agroecosystems.
La aplicación de distintas fuentes de nutrientes al suelo, con variados grados de solubilidad, así como el uso de fertilizantes de tipo orgánico e inorgánico, pueden generar diferentes respuestas en los agroecosistemas. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el efecto de diferentes opciones de fertilización sobre la calidad del forraje en el manejo conservacionista de sabanas neotropicales. Las especies introducidas fueron Brachiaria dictyoneura y la leguminosa Centrosema macrocarpum, ambas perennes, asociadas al cultivo de maíz. Dentro de cada cobertura se evaluaron cuatro tratamientos de fertilización, aplicando 150 kg ha-1 de nitrógeno, 150 kg ha-1 de P2O5, 100 kg ha-1 de K2O, y variando la fuente de fósforo, quedando los tratamientos distribuidos de la siguiente forma: i) roca fosfórica, dosis alta de fósforo (100% del P2O5 como roca fosfórica), ii) fosfato diamónico, dosis alta de P (50% del P2O5 como roca fosfórica y 50% como fosfato diamónico , iii) fertilización biológica, dosis baja de P (25% del P2O5 como roca fosfórica e inoculación con biofertilizante a base de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares nativos, como Gigaspora, Scutellospora, Acaulospora y Glomus) y por último, iv) el tratamiento sin fertilizar. Los resultados permiten concluir que bajo siembra directa y uso de fuentes de fertilización biológica empleando roca fosfórica como fuente de P, se pueden alcanzar niveles de proteína cruda similares e incluso mayores, que al utilizar fertilización con fuentes solubles como el fosfato diamonio, por lo cual se induce a una mayor sostenibilidad de la biomasa de las coberturas, siendo una alternativa en el manejo de este tipo de agroecosistemas
References
Akdeniz H, Hosaflioglu I, Koç A, Hossain A, Islam S, Iqbal M, Imtiaz H, Gharib H and El Sabagh A. 2019. Evaluation of herbage yield and nutritive value of eight forage crop species. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(3): 5571–5581. https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1703_55715581
Albarracín-Zaidiza A, Fonseca-Carreño E and López-Vargas L. 2019. Agroecological Practices as Contribution to the Sustainability of Agroecosystems. Case Study of Sumapaz Province. Ciencia y Agricultura 16(2): 39–55. https://doi.org/10.19053/01228420.v16.n2.2019.9139
Alewell C, Ringeval B, Ballabio C, Robinson D, Panagos P and Borrelli P. 2020. Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nature Communications 11(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18326-7
Berroterán L. 2000. Modelo de utilización cereal-pasto en sistemas de producción de sabanas bien drenadas con suelos ácidos en Venezuela. Interciencia 25 (4): 203-209
Beura S, Ghosh K, Pradhan K, Kohli A, Singh M, Shambhavi S and Kumar S. 2021. Fractional release kinetics of phosphorus from compost amended with phosphate rock. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 52(10): 1115-1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2021.1872606
Bondaruk V, Lezama F, del Pino A and Piñeiro G. 2020. Overseeding legumes in natural grasslands: Impacts on root biomass and soil organic matter of commercial farms. Science of the Total Environment 743: 140771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140771
Bravo C, Lozano Z, Hernández RM, Piñango L and Moreno B. 2004. Efecto de diferentes especies de coberturas sobre las propiedades físicas de un suelo de sabana con siembra directa de maíz. Bioagro, 16(3): 163-172.
Bremmer M. 1982. Total nitrogen. Methods of soil analysis. American Society Agronomy 10 (2): 594–624. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/10008236329
Campos V, Sanchis R and Talavera C. 2021. The importance of social value in agroecological farms: Adjusting the common good balance sheet to improve their sustainable management. Sustainability 13(3): 1184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031184
Chippano T, García I, Cofré N and Mendoza R. 2020. Forage biomass yield and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in a legume and C3 and C4 grasses under increasing soil phosphorus availability. Crop and Pasture Science 71(10): 907. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP20030
Chippano T, Mendoza R, Cofré N and García I. 2021. Divergent root P uptake strategies of three temperate grassland forage species: P uptake strategies of forage species. Rhizosphere 17: 100312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100312
Ciavatta C, Antisari V and Sequi P. 1989. Determination of organic carbon in soils and fertilizers. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 20(7–8): 759–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103628909368115
Correa A, Peres D and Holdbrook R. 2020. Patterns of alimentary resource use by dung beetles in introduced Brazilian pastures: Cattle versus sheep dung. Entomological Science 23(3): 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12425
de Melo Lisboa M, Silva R, da Silva, F, de Carvalho P, da Silva D, Paixão T and de Lima M. 2021. Replacing sorghum with palm kernel cake in the diet decreased intake without altering crossbred cattle performance. Tropical Animal Health and Production 53(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02460-x
Depablos L and Ordóñez J. 2009. Suplementación mineral proteica de novillas a pastoreo en los Llanos Centrales de Venezuela. Zootecnia Tropical. 27(3): 249–262.
Di Rienzo A, Casanoves F, Balzarini G, Gonzalez L and Tablada C. 2020. InfoStat versión 2020. Centro de Transferencia InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Argentina.
Duncan A. 1974. Quality control and industrial statistics 4th Edition. R. D. Irwin, 1974, la Universidad de Michigan.
Francisquini A, Calonego C, Rosolem A, dos Santos H and Tiritan S. 2020. Increase of nitrogen-use efficiency by phosphorus fertilization in grass–legume pastures. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 118(2): 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10091-9
Gwenzi W. 2021. Rethinking restoration indicators and end-points for post-mining landscapes in light of novel ecosystems. Geoderma, 387: 114944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.114944
Hernández I, Estévez L, Peña M and Nápoles M. 2020. Selection of promising rhizobia to inoculate herbaceous legumes in saline soils. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science 54(3):435-449. http://cjascience.com/index.php/CJAS/article/view/971
Lebbink G, Fensham R and Cowley R. 2018. Vegetation responses to fire history and soil properties in grazed semi-arid tropical savanna. The Rangeland Journal 40(3): 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1071/RJ17075
Lozano Z, Bravo C, Ovalles F and Hernández-Hernández RM. 2004. Selección de un diseño de muestreo en parcelas experimentales a partir del estudio de la variabilidad espacial de los suelos. BIOAGRO. 16(1): 61-72
Maiquetía M, Vargas T, Toro M and García C. 2020. Estudios en la germinación y propagación in vitro de tres especies de Leguminosae: Calopogonium sp.,Stylosantes capitata y Cassia moschata. Revista Científica Ecosiencia 7(6): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.21855/ecociencia.76.393
Mora , Lopez-Hernández D and Toro M. 2019. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae and PGPR Applications in Tropical Savannas. In: Zúñiga-Dávila D., González-Andrés F., Ormeño-Orrillo E. (eds) Microbial Probiotics for Agricultural Systems. Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17597-9_11
Morantes M, Herrera P, Colmenares O, Romero E, Jáuregui D, Hernández-Chong, L., ... and Rivas J. 2018. Effect of mixed grazing by ovine and cattle in the selection of herbaceous in Venezuela’s well drained savannas. Revista Cientifica, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Del Zulia 28(6): 437–444.
Morantes M, Ojeda Á, Hernández-Chong L, Baldizán A, Rivas J. and Vargas D. 2010. Selection in the herbaceous stratum by
cattle grazing in Venezuela’s well drained savannas during the transitional rainy-dry period. Revista de La Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad Central de Venezuela 36(1): 28–33.
Moura G, Carvalho S, Bucher C, Souza B, Aguiar F, Ferraz J, Bucher C. and Coelho P. 2020. Diversity of Rhizobia and importance of their interactions with legume trees for feasibility and sustainability of the tropical agrosystems. Diversity 12(5): 206-216. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050206
Nascimento B, Pedreira C, Sollenberger E, Pereira D, Magalhães S and Chizzotti M. 2021. Herbage accumulation, canopy structure and tiller morphology of marandu palisadegrass growing in open pasture and in silvopasture. Agroforestry Systems 95(2): 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00590-7
Niswati A, Fajrianto D, Hidayat F, Yusnaini S and Rivaie A. 2021. Changes in soil phosphorus availability and nutrient uptake by maize following the application of wastewater-acidulated phosphate rock. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 724(1): 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/724/1/012016
Ojo A, Olufemi J, Adetokunbo A, Odunaye T, Bakare A and Adeyemi A. 2020. Growth components and chemical composition of some improved dual-purpose cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) varieties as influenced by manure application. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production 44(2): 299–310. https://doi.org/10.51791/njap.v44i2.1122
Ramírez-Iglesias E, Hernández-Hernández RM and Herrera P. 2017. Dinámica del fósforo en un agroecosistema conservacionista maíz-ganado de sabanas neotropicales. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA 9(2): 147. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v9.n2.2017.552
Ramírez-Iglesias E, Hernández-Hernández RM, Bravo C, Ramírez-Iglesias JR and Herrera P. 2020. Consumption, digestibility and cattle condition according to forage composition and quality in maize-cattle from conservation-based agroecosystems. AIMS Agriculture and Food 5(3): 480–499. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.480
Ramírez-Iglesias E, Hernández-Hernandez RM and Iglesias JR. 2021. Nutrient dynamics of corn fed to livestock in conservation-based agroecosystems in neotropical savannas. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 20(1): 086–092. https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712012021086
Tapia J, Atencio M, Mejía L, Paternina Paternina Y and Cadena J. 2019. Evaluación del potencial productivo de nuevas gramíneas forrajeras para las sabanas secas del Caribe en Colombia. Agronomía Costarricense 43(2): 45–60. https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v43i2.37943
Turner G and Carpenter R. 1999. Tips and Traps in Interdisciplinary Research. Ecosystems 2(4): 275–276. www.jstor.org/stable/3659016
Vera-Infanzón R and Ramírez-Restrepo A. 2020. Long term beef production in extensive cow-calf systems in the tropicalsavannas of eastern Colombia. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v67n1.87678
Watters, R. 2021. The Agroecological Revolution. In: Rural Latin America in Transition. Governance, Development, and Social Inclusion in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65033-9_3
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Sunday Oladipo Olajesu, Tajudeen Akinrinola. (2024). The influence of soil properties on grass and Kob abundance in Kainji Lake National Park, Nigeria. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 77(1), p.10553. https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v77n1.104425.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Elizabeth del Carmen Ramirez Iglesias

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.






