Effect of integrated plant nutrient management on indicators related to yield and productivity of spring barley (Hordéum vulgáre) under drought conditions in the growing season
Efecto del manejo integrado de nutrientes de las plantas en los indicadores relacionados con el rendimiento y la productividad de la cebada de primavera (Hordéum vulgáre) en condiciones de sequía en etapa de crecimiento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfnam.v75n2.97384Keywords:
abiotic stress, stress protector, mineral fertilizers, localization of fertilizers, integrated plant nutrition management systems (en)estrés abiótico, protector de estrés, fertilizantes minerales, localización de fertilizantes, sistemas integrados de gestión de la nutrición vegetal (es)
The agricultural production of the world is becoming increasingly vulnerable to extreme weather conditions, but adaptation to such conditions still suffers from a lack of integrated solutions and approaches that should cover relevant plant nutrition management issues, as well as technological mechanisms and tools. This study aimed to investigate the impact of fertilizer systems on yield indicators and the productivity of spring barley under arid growing conditions and determine the correlation between yield indicators and barley productivity to form a fertilization strategy for this crop under drought conditions. Two separate field experiments were conducted in 2018 in a small plot in six replications based on a long-term research field experiment on chernozem-type soil (black soil). As components of an integrated plant nutrient management system, the combined application of mineral fertilizers and stress protectors was used (for seed inoculation and foliar treatment), as well as the local application of mineral fertilizers at different depths (10-12 cm, 20-22 cm and at two depths simultaneously). The application of components of an integrated plant nutrient management system increased the chlorophyll content, leaf water content, and grain yield. These benefits of integrated fertilizer management led to significant improvement in grain yield. The maximum values of this indicator were noted for foliar treatment of plants by a stress protector at a rate of 1.0 L ha-1 (once per growing season) or 0.5 L ha-1 (twice per growing season) and for deep localization of mineral fertilizers (to a depth of 20-22 cm). The content of chlorophyll and bound water in the tissues of barley plants can be used as an indicator to determine the resistance of plants to arid growing conditions since these physiological characteristics are closely correlated with the yield of barley.
La producción agrícola del mundo se está volviendo cada vez más vulnerable a las condiciones climáticas extremas, pero la adaptación a tales condiciones todavía adolece de una falta de soluciones y enfoques integrados que deberían cubrir los problemas relevantes de gestión de la nutrición vegetal, así como los mecanismos y herramientas tecnológicos. El objetivo de este estudio fue investigar el impacto de los sistemas de fertilizantes en los indicadores de rendimiento y la productividad de la cebada de primavera en condiciones de crecimiento áridas y determinar la correlación entre los indicadores de rendimiento y la productividad de la cebada para formar una estrategia de fertilización de este cultivo en condiciones de sequía. En 2018 se llevaron a cabo dos experimentos de campo separados en parcelas pequeñas con seis repeticiones basadas en un experimento de campo de investigación a largo plazo en un suelo tipo chernozem (suelo negro). Como componentes del sistema de manejo integral de la nutrición vegetal, se utilizó la aplicación combinada de fertilizantes minerales y protectores de estrés (para inoculación de semillas y tratamiento foliar), así como la aplicación local de fertilizantes minerales a diferentes profundidades (10-12 cm, 20-22 cm y a dos profundidades simultáneamente). La aplicación de componentes del sistema integrado de gestión de la nutrición vegetal aumentó el contenido de clorofila, el contenido de agua de las hojas, producción de grano. Estos beneficios del manejo integrado de fertilizantes condujeron a una mejora considerable en el rendimiento de grano. Los valores máximos de este indicador se observaron para el tratamiento foliar de las plantas con un protector de estrés a unatasa de 1.0 L ha-1 (una vez por temporada de crecimiento) o 0.5 L ha-1 (dos veces por temporada de crecimiento) y para la localización profunda de fertilizantes minerales (hasta una profundidad de 20 22 cm). También se determinó que el contenido de clorofila y agua unida en los tejidos de las plantas de cebada se puede utilizar como indicadores para determinar la resistencia de las plantas en condiciones de crecimiento árido, dado que estas características fisiológicas están estrechamente relacionadas con el rendimiento de la cebada.
References
Agami RA, Medani RA, Abd El-Mola IA and Taha RS. 2016. Exogenous application with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) or proline induces stress tolerance in basil plants (Ocimum basilicum L.) exposed to water stress. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research (IJOEAR) 2: 78–92.
Ahmadpour R, Hosseinzadeh SR and Armand N. 2016. Evaluation of methanol role in reducing the negative effects of water deficit stress in lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Journal of Plant Process and Function 5(17): 1–13. Iranian. http://jispp.iut.ac.ir/article-1-394-en.html
Barnabás B, Jäger K and Fehér A. 2008. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell and Environment 31: 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.x
Beykkhormizi A, Abrishamchi P, Ganjeali A and Parsa M. 2016. Effect of vermicompost on some morphological, physiological and biochemical traits of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under salinity stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 39(6): 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2015.1109104
Chernyad’ev I.I. 1997. Plant photosynthesis under conditions of water stress and the protective effect of cytokinins: A review. Prikladnaya Biokhimiya i Mikrobiologiya 33(1): 5-17.
Chmeleva SI and Kucher EN. 2016. Methodological materials and tasks for conducting practical classes in the discipline “Plant resistance”. Simferopol. pp. 16-20. Russian. https://ta.cfuv.ru/system/files/Ustojchivost%27%20rastenij.pdf
Galasheva AM, Krasova NG and Yanchuk TV. 2013. Fractionalcomposition of water in leaves of apple varieties (Malus Mill). Plant Varieties Studying and Protection 1 (18): 18-21.
Ghassemi S, Farhangi-Abriz S, Faegi-Analou R, Ghorbanpour M and Lajayer BA. 2018. Monitoring cell energy, physiological functions and grain yield in fieldgrown mung bean exposed to exogenously applied polyamines under drought stress. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition 18(4): 1108–1125. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162018005003102
Ghassemi-Golezani K and Afkhami N. 2018. Changes in some morpho-physiological traits of saflower in response to water deficit and nano-fertilizers. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences 12(3): 391–398.
Hosseinzadeh SR, Amiri H and Ismaili A. 2018. Evaluation of photosynthesis, physiological, and biochemical responses of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. Pirouz) under water deficit stress and use of vermicompost fertilizer. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17(11): 2426-2437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61874-4
Kheirizadeh Y, Seyed R and Seyed R. 2016. Bio fertilizers and zinc effects on some physiological parameters of triticale under waterlimitation condition. Journal of Plant Interactions 11(1): 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2016.1262914
Kolupaev YuE and Karpets YuV. 2010. Formation of adaptive plant responses to the action of abiotic stressors. Osnova, Kyiv. 352 p.
Kozhukhar TV, Kokhan SS and Kirichenko OV. 2010. Influence of inoculation of seeds by biological compositions and mineral fertilizer on the content of chlorophyll in leaves of winter wheat. Bioresources and Nature Management 2 (1-2): 49–54.
Liang D, Ni Z, Xia H, Xie Y, Lv X, Wang J, Lin L, Deng Q and Luo X. 2019. Exogenous melatonin promotes biomass accumulation and photosynthesis of kiwifruit seedlings under drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae 246: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.10.058
Liu EK, Mei XR, Yan CR, Gong DZ and Zhang YQ. 2016. Effects of water stress on photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter translocation and WUE in two winter wheat genotypes. Agricultura Water Management 167: 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.026
Mamnabi S, Nasrollahzadeh S, Ghassemi-Golezani K and Raei Y. 2020. Improving yield-related physiological characteristics of spring rapeseed by integrated fertilizer management under water deficit conditions. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27(3): 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.01.008
Manivannan P, Jaleel CA, Sankar B, Kishorekumar A, Somasundaram R, Lakshmanan GA and Panneerselvam R. 2007. Growth, biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 59(2): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.05.002
Marschner P. 2012. Chapter 6 - Functions of macronutrients. marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. 3rd edition. Academic Press, UK, London. pp. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00006-6
Marulanda A, Barea JM and Azcon R. 2009. Stimulation of plant growth and drought tolerance by native microorganisms (AM fungi and bacteria) from dry environments: mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 28: 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-009-9079-6
Mittler R. 2006. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Science 11(1): 15-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002
Morgun VV, Kiriziy DA and Shadchina TM. 2010. Ecophysiological and genetic aspects of adaptation of cultivated plants to global climate changes. Fiziologiya i biokhimiya kul`turny`kh rastenij 42: 3-22. Russian. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/66260/01-Morgun%20.pdf?sequence=1
Rouphael Y, Cardarelli M, Schwarz D, Franken P and Colla G. 2012. Effects of drought on nutrient uptake and assimilation in vegetable crops. In: R. Aroca (Ed.) Plant responses to drought stress. Springer 7(1): 171–195.
Sadras VO and Milroy SP. 1996. Soil water thresholds for the responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: a review. Field Crops Research 47(2-3): 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(96)00014-7
Salehi A, Tasdighi H and Gholamhoseini M. 2016. Evaluation of proline, chlorophyll, soluble sugar content and uptake of nutrients in the German chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) under drought stress and organic fertilizer treatments. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 6: 886–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2016.08.009
Sehgal A, Sita K, Bhandari K, Kumar S, Kumar J, Vara Prasad PV, Siddique KH and Nayyar H. 2019. Influence of drought and heat stress, applied independently or in combination during seed development, on qualitative and quantitative aspects of seeds of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) genotypes, differing in drought sensitivity. Plant Cell and Environment 42: 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13328
Sorokin A, Evdokimov N and Tsevdenova A. 2017. Efficiency of the biological product Energiya M under conditions of acute drought. Chief agronomist 1: 12–15. Russian. https://panor.ru/articles/effektivnostbiopreparata-energiya-m-v-usloviyakh-ostroy-zasukhi/38071.html
Statistical Yearbook “Agriculture of Ukraine”. 2020. State Statistics Service of Ukraine, Kyiv. 89 p.
Studer C, Hu Y and Schmidhalter U. 2017. Interactive effects of N-, P- and K-nutrition and drought stress on the development of maize seedlings. Agriculture 7(11): 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture7110090
Sun Z, Zheng J and Sun W. 2009. Coupled effects of soil water and nutrients on growth and yields of maize plants in a semi-arid region. Pedosphere 19(5): 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60162-4
Suzuki N and Mittler R. 2006. Reactive oxygen species and temperature stresses: A delicate balance between signaling and destruction. Physiologia Plantarum 126: 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2005.00582.x
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yevheniia Hladkikh, Olesia Sіabruk, Alina Revtie-Uvarova, Vadym Smychenko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The journal allows the author(s) to maintain the exploitation rights (copyright) of their articles without restrictions. The author(s) accept the distribution of their articles on the web and in paper support (25 copies per issue) under open access at local, regional, and international levels. The full paper will be included and disseminated through the Portal of Journals and Institutional Repository of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, and in all the specialized databases that the journal considers pertinent for its indexation, to provide visibility and positioning to the article. All articles must comply with Colombian and international legislation, related to copyright.
Author Commitments
The author(s) undertake to assign the rights of printing and reprinting of the material published to the journal Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín. Any quotation of the articles published in the journal should be made given the respective credits to the journal and its content. In case content duplication of the journal or its partial or total publication in another language, there must be written permission of the Director.
Content Responsibility
The Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and the journal are not necessarily responsible or in solidarity with the concepts issued in the published articles, whose responsibility will be entirely the author or the authors.






