Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Terapia eléctrica en cardiología
Electrical therapy in cardiology
Palabras clave:
electrones, conductividad eléctrica, estimulación eléctrica, energía eléctrica, electro shock, paro cardíaco, fibrilación ventricular, taquicardia ventricular. (es)electrons, electric conductivity, electric stimulation, electricity, electroshock, heart arrest, ventricular fibrillation, tachycardia, ventricular (en)
Descargas
La terapia eléctrica en cardiología está encaminada a transferir electrones al miocardio, su mayor utilidad está dada en la cardioversión y desfibrilación. La terapia eléctrica cumple las leyes de la electricidad y el mayor factor a vencer es la impedancia o resistencia al flujo de electrones. Para mejorar la efectividad de la terapia eléctrica se han ideado diferentes formas en la onda de choque, en la duración y la polaridad. La terapia eléctrica ha logrado consolidarse como el tratamiento de elección del paro cardiorrespiratorio secundario a fibrilación ventricular y taquicardia ventricular sin pulso. Es igualmente el tratamiento de elección en taquiarritmias con compromiso hemodinámico. Pese a sus grandes ventajas tiene efectos secundarios que se deben conocer adecuadamente para dar un tratamiento oportuno.
Electrical shock in cardiology are pursuid transfer of electrons to the myocardium. Its main indications are`s cardioversion and defibrillation. The electrical shock therapy follows laws of electricity laws and consequently, its main difficulty is the impedance or resistance of electrons flow. To make better the effectiveness of this therapy, a number of improvements have been made on the shock wave, its duration, and polarity. The electric shock therapy has become the preferred treatment when dealing with cardiorespiratory arrest secondary, ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Similarly, it is the preferred treatment for ventricular tachyarrhythmia associated with hemodynamic compromise. Despite its significant advantages, this treatment causes secondary effects, which should adequately be known in order to provide a timely treatment
Referencias
Acierno L. The history of cardiology. Ed Roche. New York 1994; 239-64.
Galvani L. De viribus electricitatis in motu musculari commentaries. De Bononienssi Scientarium et Artium Instituto atque Academia Commentarii 7, 363-418.
Lénegre J, Maurice P. De qualques resultats obtenus par la derivation directe intracavitaire des courants électriques de l’oreillette et du ventricule droit. Arch. Mal. Coeur 1945; 38: 298-302.
Fowler R. Experiments and observations relative to the influence lately discovered by Mr Galvani, and commonly called animal electricity . Bibl Br 1786; 11. (1)
Reece R. Medical Guide for the use of the clergy, heads of families, and junior practitioners in medicine and surgery. Herst and Co London, 1824.
Green T. On death from chloroform: its prevention by galvanism. Br Med J 1872 1: 551-3
MacWilliam J. Fibriller condestion of the heart. JPhysol 1887; 8; 296.
MacWilliam J. On electrical stimulation of the mammalian heart. Trans Int Med Congress, th session. Washington 1887 vol III p.253.
MacWilliam J. Electrical stimulation of the heart in man. Br Med J. 1889; 1:348
Kouwenhoven WB. The development of the defibrillator. Ann Intern Med 1969 71: 449-58.
Beck CS, Patchard W, Feil HS. Ventricular fibrillation of long duration abolished by electric shock. JAMA 1947; 135: 985-8.
Mirowsky M, Mower M, Staewen M, et at. Standby automatic defibrillator an approach to prevention of sudden coronary death. Arch. Intern Med 1970; 126:158-61.
Barold S, Stokes K, Byrd C, McVenes R. Energy parameters in cardiac pacing should be abandoned. PACE 1997; 20: 1 12-21
Zipes DP, Fisher J, King RM, Nicoll A de B, Jolly W. Termination of ventricular fibrillation in dogs by depolarizing a critical amount of myocardium. Am JCardiol 1975; 36: 37-44.
Chen PS, Shibata N, Dixon EG, et al. Activation during ventricular defibrillation in open-chest dogs. Evidence of complete cessation and regeneration of ventricular fibrillation after unsuccessful shocks. J Clin Invest 1986; 77: 810-23.
Frazier D, Wolf P, Wharton J, et al. Stimulus-induced critical point. Mechanism for electrical initiation of reentry in normal canine myocardium. J Clin Invest 1989; 83: 1039-52.
Chen PS, Feld GK, Kerett J, et al. Relation betweenupper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in humans. Circulation 1993; 88: 186-92.
Sweeney R, Gill R, Steinberg M, Reid P. Ventricular refractory period extension caused by defibrillation shocks. Circulation 1990; 82: 965-72.
Bourland J, Tacker W, Geddes L. Strength-duration curves for trapezoidal waveforms of various tilts for transchest defibrillation in animals. Med Instrum 1978; 12: 38-41.
Kroll M. A minimal model of the monophasic defibrillation pulse. PACE 1993; 16: 769-77.
Feeser SA, Tang A, Kavanagh K, et al. Strengthduration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1990; 82:2128-41.
Swerdlow C, Kass R, Davie S, et al. Short biphasic pulses from 90 microfarad capacitors lower defibrillation threshold. PACE 1996; 19: 1053-60.
Schuder JC, Gold JH, Warwill M, Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in the 100 Kg calf with untruncated and truncated exponential stimuli. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980; 27: 37-43.
Lloyd M, Hayes D, Friedman P. Clinical relevants basics of pacing and defibrillation. In: Hayes, Lloyd M, Friedman P. Cardiac Pacing and defibrillation: A Clinical Approach. Futura Publishing. Armonk NY 2000. 1-52.
White J, Ideker R. Roles of schock characteristics in successful ventricular defibrillation. In Zipes D, Jalife J. Cardiac electrophysiology from cell to bedside. Saunders Company. Philadelphia 1999. 440-6.
Shorofsky S. Effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation thresholds in humans J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997; 8: 496-501.
Natale A, Sra J, Krum D, et al. Relative efficacy of different tilts with biphasic defibrillation in humans.PACE 1996; 19: 197-206.
Strickberger S, Hummel J Horwood L, et al. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1069-72.
Strickberger S, Man K, Daoud E, et al. Effect of first-phase polarity of biphasic shocks on defibrillation threshold with single transvenous lead system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1605-8.
Natale A, Sra J, Dhata A, et al. Effects of initial polarity on defibrillation threshold with biphasic pulses. PACE 1995; 18: 1809-93.
Shorofsky S, Gold M. Effects of waveform and polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans using transvenous leads system. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78: 313-6.
Schneider T, Martens P, Paschen H, et al. Multicenter randomized, controlled trial of 150 J biphasic shocks compared with 200 to 360 J monophasic shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims. Circulation 2000; 102: 1780-7.
Koster R W, Dorian P, Chapman FW, et al. A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversión of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2004; 147: e1-7.
Zhou X, Smith W, Justice R, Wayland J, Ideker R.Transmembrane potencial changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks. Am J Physiol 1998; 275:H 1798-1807.
Tang A, Yabe S, Wharton J, et al. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 207-14.
Jones J, Jones R. Decreased defibrillation-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectangular waveforms Am J Physiol 1984; 247: H 792-6.
Tovar O, Noe W, Jones J, et al. At long fibrillation durations actino potencials are more frequent and fractionated in the right ventricle than in the left ventricle. PACE 1998; 21: 931.
Tovar O, Wang Y, Jones J. Deterioration of contractile function during the first five minutes of ischemic ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 1999; 100: I317.
Waldecker B, Brugada P, Zehender M, et al. Dysrhythmias after direct-current cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 1986; 57: 120-3.
Stoeckle H, Nellis SH, Schuder JC. Incidence of arrhythmias in the dog following transthoracic ventricular defibrillation with unidirectional rectangular stimuli. Circ Res 1968; 23: 343-8.
Yabe S, Smith W, Daubert J et al. Conduction disturbances caused by high current density electric fields. Circ Res 1990; 66: 1190-1203.
Peleska B. Cardiac arrhythmias following condenser discharges and their dependence upon strength of current and phase of cardiac cycle. Cir Res 1963; 13: 21-32.
Lesigne C, Levy B. Saumont R, et al. An energy time analysis of ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds with interval electrodes. Med Biol Eng 1976; 14: 617-22.
Dahl CF, Ewy GA, Warner E, Thomas E. Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock: effect of paddle size and time interval between discharge. Circulation 1974; 50: 956-61.
Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee. Myocardial infarction redefined a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/ American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1502-13.
Goktein O, Molok M, Gorenek B, et al. Cardiac troponin T and cardiac enzymes after external transthoracic cardioversion of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease. Chest 2002; 122: 2050-4.
Grubb N, Cuthbert D, Cawood P, Flapan AD, FoxK. Effect of DC schock on serum levels of total creatine kinase, MB-creatine kinase mass and troponin T. Resuscitation 1998; 36: 193-9.
Kerber RE, Grayzel J, Hoyt R, Marcus M, Kennedy J, Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation: influence of body weight, chest size, serial schocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure. Circulation 1981; 63: 676-82.
Sirna SJ, Ferguson D, Charbonnier F , Kerber RE, Factors affecting transthoracic impedance during electrical cardioversion. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 1048-52.
Ewy GA, Hellman D, McClung S, Taren D. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness. Crit Care Med 1980; 8: 164-6.
Levine PA, Barold SS, Fletcher R, Talbot P. Adverse acute and chronic effects of electrical defibrillation and cardioversion on implanted unipolar cardiac pacing systems. J Am Coll Cardioll 1983; 1: 1413-22.
The americam heart association in collaboration withthe international liason committee on resuscitation (IL-COR). Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2000; 102: I-1-384.
Weaver WD, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Hallstrom AP. Ventricular defibrillation: a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks. N Eng J Med 1982; 307: 1101-6.
Bardy GH, Marchlinski F, Sharma A, et al. Trans thoracic Investigators. Multicenter comparison of truncated biphasic shocks and standard damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. Circulation 1996; 94: 1507-14.
Lown B. Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1967; 29: 469-89.
Kerber RE, Grayzel J, Kennedy J, Jensen SR: Elective cardioversion: influence of paddle electrode location and size on success rates and energy requirements. N Eng J Med 1981; 305: 658-62.
Kerber RE, Kienzle M, Olshansky B, et al. Ventricular tachycardia rate and morphology determine energy and current requirements for transthoracic cardioversion. Circulation 1992; 85: 158-63
Pinski S, Sgarbosa E, Ching E, Trohman R. A comparison of 50 J versus 100 J shocks for direct-current cardioversion of atrial flutter. Am Heart J. 1999; 137: 439-42.
Bgerkelund C, Orning M. The efficacy of anticoagulant therapy in preventing embolism related to DC cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1969; 23: 208-15.
Klein A, Grimm R, Block W, et al. Cardioversion guided by transesophageal echocardiography: the ACUTE pilot study. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 200-9.
Mancini GBJ, Goldberger AI. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: consideration of embolization, anticoagulation, prophylactic pacemaker and long-term success. Am Heart J 1982; 104: 617-21.
Omran H, Jung W, Rabahich R, et al. Left atrial chamber and appendage function after internal atrial defibrillation a prospective and serial transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 131-138.
Fuchs T. Cardioversion and defibrillation. In Podrid P. Kowey P. Cardiac arrhythmia. Mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore 1995; 726-37.
Kidway B, McIntyre A, Anderson J, et al. Optimization of transthoracic ventricular defibrillation-biphasic and triphasic shocks, waveform rounding, and synchronized shock delivery. J Electrocardiol 2002; 35:235-44.
Zhang Y, Ramabadran RS, Boddicker K, et al. Triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42: 568-75.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2005 Revista de la Facultad de Medicina
Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento 3.0 Unported.
Derechos de autor
Los autores deben aceptar transferir a la Revista de la Facultad de Medicina los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados. La editorial tiene el derecho del uso, reproducción, transmisión, distribución y publicación en cualquier forma o medio. Los autores no podrán permitir o autorizar el uso de la contribución sin el consentimiento escrito de la revista. Estos archivos están disponibles en https://goo.gl/EfWPdX y https://goo.gl/6zztk4 y deben cargarse en el paso 4 del envío OJS (archivos complementarios).
La carta de cesión de derechos de autor y la de responsabilidad de autoría deben ser entregadas junto con el original.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
