Evaluation of sustainability and the impact of the agriculture styles of the chilean coastal dry lands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v66n1.52218Palabras clave:
Emergy, horticulture, emergy index and cultural landscape (es)
Descargas
Agriculture has been progressing continuously, from the use of free natural resources to the fossil fuels as energy sources. Even though agriculture depends mainly on ecosystem resources and services, its development has been apparently centered only on yield, not considering neither the ecological value of the negative externalities nor the decapitalization of the resources that influence sustainability. Thus, the information on the evaluation of the sustainability on different agriculture styles is scarce or almost null. This investigation evaluates the sustainability in different agriculture styles (intensive horticulture, traditional farm and self-sustaining horticulture) established in Hualqui (Region of Biobío, Chile), through the energy flows present on each style to measure the impact generated on the land. The results revealed that the self-sustaining horticulture style showed a higher sustainability compared to the traditional farm and intensive horticulture style. These results can contribute to the public, policies to reorient the action strategy to encourage the sustainability in the different agriculture styles.
Citas
Alene, A. D., & Coulibaly, O. (2009). The impact of agricultural research on productivity and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Policy, 34(2), 198-209. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.014
Burger, J.R., Allen, C.D., Brown, J.H., Burnside, W.R., Davidson, A.D., Fristoe, T.S., … Gerber, J.S. (2012). The Macroecology of Sustainability. PLoS Biology, 10(6), e1001345. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001345
Campbell, D.E., & Garmestani, A.S. (2012). An energy systems view of sustainability: emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado. J Environ Manage, 95(1), 72-97. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.07.028
Candela, L., Elorza, F.J., Jiménez-Martínez, J., & Von Igel, W. (2012). Global change and agricultural management options for groundwater sustainability. Comput Electron Agr, 6, 120-130. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2011.12.012
Cavalett, O., De Queiroz, J.F., & Ortega, E. (2006). Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil. Eco Model, 193(3-4), 205-224. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.023
Chen, D., Chen, J., Luo, Z., & Lv, Z. (2009). Emergy evaluation of the natural value of water resources in Chinese rivers. Environ Manage, 44(2), 288-297. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9320-x
Dale, V.H., Kline, K.L., Kaffka, S.R., & Langeveld, J.H. (2013). A landscape perspective on sustainability of agricultural systems. Landscape ecol, 28(6), 1111-1123. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9814-4
Gastó, J., Cosio, F., & Panario, D. (1993). Clasificación de ecorregiones y determinación de sitio y condición. Manual de aplicación a municipios y predios rurales. Quito, Ecuador, Red de Pastizales Andinos, CIID. Canadá. pp 253.
Gastó, J., Vera, L., Vieli, L., & Montalba, R. (2009). Sustainable agriculture: unifying concepts. Cienc Inv Agr. 36(1), 5-26. http://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-16202009000100001
Ghaley, B.B., & Porter, J.R. (2013). Emergy synthesis of a combined food and energy production system compared to a conventional wheat (Triticum aestivum) production system. Ecol Indic, 24, 534-542. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.009
Hendrickson, J.R., Liebig, M.A., & Sassenrath, G.F. (2008). Environment and integrated agricultural systems. Renew Agr Food Syst, 23(04), 304-313. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170508002329
McKenzie, P., Cooper, A., McCann, T., & Rogers, D. (2011). The ecological impact of rural building on habitats in an agricultural landscape. Landscape Urban Plan, 101(3), 262-268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.031
Moonen, A.C., & Barberi, P. (2008). Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 127(1), 7-21. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.02.013
Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363(1491), 447-465. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2163
Rodrigues, G.S., Rodrigues, I.A., Buschinelli, C.C. de A., & de Barros, I. (2010). Integrated farm sustainability assessment for the environmental management of rural activities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(4), 229–239. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.10.002
Rydberg, T., & Haden, A.C. (2006). Emergy evaluations of Denmark and Danish agriculture: Assessing the influence of changing resource availability on the organization of agriculture and society. Agr Ecosyst Environ, 117(2-3), 145-158. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.03.025
Schneider, U. A., Havlík, P., Schmid, E., Valin, H., Mosnier, A., Obersteiner, M., … Fritz, S. (2011). Impacts of population growth, economic development, and technical change on global food production and consumption. Agricultural Systems, 104(2), 204–215. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.11.003
Stoate, C., Báldi, A., Beja, P., Boatman, N. D., Herzon, I., van Doorn, A., … Ramwell, C. (2009). Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe – A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 22–46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.07.005
Vélez, L., & Gastó, J. (2002). Metodología y determinación de los estilos rurales en escala predial. In J. Gastó P. Rodrigo and I. Aránguiz. Ordenación Territorial, Desarrollo de Predios y Comunas Rurales. LOM Ediciones. Santiago, Chile. pp. 171-195.
Zhang, L.X., Song, B., & Chen, B. (2012). Emergy-based analysis of four farming systems: insight into agricultural diversification in rural China. J Clean Prod, 28, 33-44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.042
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2017 Acta Agronómica

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Política sobre Derechos de autor:Los autores que publican en la revista se acogen al código de licencia creative commons 4.0 de atribución, no comercial, sin derivados.
Es decir, que aún siendo la Revista Acta Agronómica de acceso libre, los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna y no debe ser usado con fines comerciales.















