Publicado
Versiones
- 2021-11-23 (2)
- 2021-05-03 (1)
Visitantes florales no polinizadores en plantas del género Cucurbita y su relación con la presencia de abejas polinizadoras
Non-pollinating flower visitors in flowers of the genus Cucurbita and their relationship with the presence of pollinating bees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v69n4.87639Palabras clave:
coleópteros, dípteros, formícidos, interacción, zapallos (es)coleoptera, diptera, formicide, interaction, squash (en)
Los insectos visitantes de flores pueden ser polinizadores o, por el contrario, no tener relación con el proceso reproductivo de las plantas. Las interacciones entre visitantes florales polinizadores y no-polinizadores pueden influir negativamente en la transferencia de polen. Poco se conoce acerca de los efectos de las visitas de abejas en la polinización de flores de zapallo (Cucurbita spp.) y sus interacciones con la presencia de otros visitantes florales. El estudio se realizó en la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias (Universidad Nacional de Rosario) en el sur de Santa Fe (Argentina) y en él se evaluó el efecto de la presencia de visitantes florales no-polinizadores en el forrajeo de las abejas presentes en las flores de dos especies cultivadas de zapallo. Como variables se incluyeron el sexo de la flor y las especies de zapallo C. maxima y C. moschata. Se registraron un total de 937 visitantes en 403 flores. Las abejas de las tribus Eucerini y Apini fueron los polinizadores más abundantes con un promedio de 2.3 individuos por flor durante 10 minutos de observación. Los dípteros, el sexo de la flor y la especie de zapallo no influyeron en el número de visitas de las abejas, mientras que la estadía prolongada de coleópteros y formícidos afectaron negativamente la presencia de abejas en ambas especies de zapallo. La presencia de coleópteros redujo las visitas de abejas en 38%; mientras que, en presencia de hormigas, aquéllas no visitaron las flores. El robo de néctar y polen por parte de visitantes florales no-polinizadores podría tener un efecto negativo sobre el éxito reproductivo de zapallo.
Visiting flower insects can be pollinators or, on the contrary, have no relation to the reproductive process of plants. Interactions between pollinating and non-pollinating floral visitors can negatively influence pollen transfer. Little is known about the effects of bee visits on the pollination of squash flowers (Cucurbita spp.) their interactions with the presence of other floral visitors. The study was carried out at the Faculty of Agrarian Sciences (National University of Rosario) in the south of Santa Fe (Argentina). The effect of the presence of non-pollinating floral visitors on the foraging of bees present in the flowers of two cultivated species of pumpkin was evaluated. As variables, the sex of the flower and the squash species C. maxima and C. moschata were included. A total of 937 visitors were registered in 403 flowers. Bees from the Eucerini and Apini tribes were the most abundant pollinators with an average of 2.3 individuals per flower during 10 minutes of observation. Diptera, flower sex and pumpkin species did not influence the number of visits by bees, while the prolonged stay of coleoptera and formicids negatively affected the presence of bees in both pumpkin species. The presence of beetle reduced bee visits by 38%; in the presence of ants, the bees did not look for the flowers. The theft of nectar and pollen by non-pollinating floral visitors can have a negative effect on the reproductive success of squash.
Referencias
Acuña Perandrés, A. 2016. Pheidole pallidula como posible vector de polinización asistida en cultivos de calabacín (Cucurbita pepo L.). Tesis de pregrado. Universitat de Girona. España 32 p. http://hdl.handle.net/10256/12976
Agbagwa, I. O.; Ndukwu, B. C.; Mensah, S. I. 2007. Floral biology, breeding system, and pollination ecology of Cucurbita moschata (Duch. ex Lam) Duch. ex poir. varieties (Cucurbitaceae) from parts of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Turkish Jounal of Botany. 31(5), 451–458. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tbtkbotany/issue/11808/141149
Almeida, A. M.; Figueiredo, R. A. 2003. Ants visit nectaries of Epidendrum denticulatum (Orchidaceae) in a Brazilian rainforest: effects on herbivory and pollination. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 63(4), 551–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000400002
Andrews, E. S.; Theis, N.; Adler, L. S. 2007. Pollinator and herbivore attraction to Cucurbita floral volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 33(9), 1682–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-007-9337-7
Ashworth, L.; Galetto, L. 2001. Pollinators and reproductive success of the wild cucurbit Cucurbita maxima ssp. andreana (Cucurbitaceae). Plant Biology. 3(4), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-16451
Bates, D.; Machler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 67(1), 1-48. https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v067i01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Batista, E. L.; Pérez, R. O. 2015. Influencia de la abeja melífera en el rendimiento del cultivo de la calabaza (Cucurbita pepo L.). Centro Agrícola. 42(2), 47–53. https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/centro-agricola/articulo/influencia-de-la-abeja-melifera-en-el-rendimiento-del-cultivo-de-la-calabaza-cucurbita-pepo-l
Bazo, I. S.; Espejo, R. J.; Palomino, C. A.; Flores, M. P.; Chang, M. L.; López, C. B.; Mansilla, R. S. 2018. Estudios de biología floral, reproductiva y visitantes florales en el “Loche” de Lambayeque (Cucurbita moschata DUCHESNE). Ecología Aplicada. 17(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.21704/rea.v17i2.1239
Bolton, B.; Palacio, E.; Fernández, F.; Lattke, J. E.; MacKay, W. P.; Brandão, C. R.; Cuezzo, F.; Ward, P. 2003. Claves y sinopsis de las subfamilias y géneros. In F. Fernández (Ed.), Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical (p. XXVI + 398). Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Colombia. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11761/32961/978-958-8151-23-6.pdf?sequence=1
Breheny, P.; Burchett, W. 2017. Visualization of regression models using visreg. The R Journal. 9(2), 56-71. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2017/RJ-2017-046/index.html DOI: https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-046
Canto-Aguilar, M. A.; Parra-Tabla, V. 2000. Importance of conserving alternative pollinators: assessing the pollination efficiency of the squash bee, Peponapis limitaris in Cucurbita moschata (Cucurbitaceae). Journal of Insect Conservation. 4, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009685422587
Cembrowski, A. R.; Tan, M. G.; Thomson, J. D.; Frederickson, M. E.; McPeek, M. A. 2014. Ants and ant scent reduce bumblebee pollination of artificial flowers. American Naturalist. 183(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1086/674101
Claps, L.; Roig, S.; Debandi, G. 2008. Biodiversidad de artrópodos argentinos. Vol. II. INSUE – UNT. Sociedad Entomológica Argentina ediciones. Mendoza, Argentina. 620 pp. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lucia-Claps/publication/287332333_Biodiversidad_de_artropodos_argentinos_vol_2/links/6028272d4585158939a24a44/Biodiversidad-de-artropodos-argentinos-vol-2.pdf
Cuba, O. H. 2005. Polinización y hormigas. http://lamarabunta.org/videos/Polinyhorm.pdf
Dalmazzo, M.; González-Vaquero, R. A.; Roig-Alsima, A.; Debandi, G. 2014. Hymenoptera: Halictidae. En: Roig-Juñent, S.; Claps, L. E.; Morrone, J. J. (Eds.). Artrópodos Argentinos volumen IIII. Editorial INSUE - UNT, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina. 203-219 p. https://info.csnat.unt.edu.ar/investigacion/institutos/insue/publicaciones/libros/item/675-libros
Delabie, J. H. C.; Ospina, M.; Zabala, G. 2003. Relaciones entre hormigas y plantas: una introducción. En: Fernández, F. (Ed.). Introducción a las hormigas de la región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Colombia. 440 p. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.11761/32961/978-958-8151-23-6.pdf?sequence=1
Delgado-Carrillo, O.; Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M.; Ashworth, L.; Aguilar, R.; Lobo, J. A.; Quesada, M. 2017. A scientific note on the first record of nesting sites of Peponapis crassidentata (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Apidologie. 48(5), 644–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-017-0507-5
Delgado-Carrillo, O.; Martén-Rodríguez, S.; Ashworth, L.; Aguilar, R.; Lopezaraiza-Mikel, M.; Quesada, M. 2018. Temporal variation in pollination services to Cucurbita moschata is determined by bee gender and diversity. Ecosphere. 9(11), e02506. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2506
Delignette-Muller, M. L.; Dutang, C. 2015. Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions. Journal of Statistical Software. 64(4), 1-34. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v64/i04/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v064.i04
Dmitruk, M. 2008. Flowering, nectar production and insects visits in two cultivars of Cucurbita maxima Duch. flowers. Acta Agrobotanica. 61(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.5586/aa.2008.013
Freitas, L.; Bernardello, G.; Galetto, L.; Paoli, A. A. S. 2001. Nectaries and reproductive biology of Croton sarcopetalus (Euphorbiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 136(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1006/bojl.2000.0437
Giannini, T. C.; Saraiva, A. M.; Alves-dos-Santos, I. 2010. Ecological niche modeling and geographical distribution of pollinator and plants: A case study of Peponapis fervens (Smith, 1879) (Eucerini: Apidae) and Cucurbita species (Cucurbitaceae). Ecological Informatics. 5(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2009.09.003
Goitia, W.; Bosque, C.; Jaffe, K. 1992. Interacción hormiga-polinizador en cacao. Turrialba. 42(2), 178–186. http://atta.labb.usb.ve/Klaus/art88.pdf
Gonzálvez, F. G.; Santamaría, L.; Corlett, R. T.; Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. 2013. Flowers attract weaver ants that deter less effective pollinators. Journal of Ecology. 101(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12006
Hartig, F. 2019. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.3.1. https://r.meteo.uni.wroc.pl/web/packages/DHARMa/vignettes/DHARMa.html
Herrera, C. M.; De Vega, C.; Canto, A.; Pozo, M. I. 2009. Yeasts in floral nectar: a quantitative survey. Annals of Botany. 103(9), 1415–1423. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp026
Herrera, C. M.; Medrano, M.; Rey, P. J.; Sanchez-Lafuente, A. M.; Garcia, M. B.; Guitian, J.; Manzaneda, A. J. 2002. Interaction of pollinators and herbivores on plant fitness suggests a pathway for correlated evolution of mutualism and antagonism related traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 99(26), 16823–16828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.252362799
Herrera Villalobos, M. J. 2019. Determinación del rendimiento del cultivo de Zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.) por acción de las abejas (Apis mellifera L.) como agentes polinizadores en el cantón Riobamba, provincia de Chimborazo. Tesis de pregrado. Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo. Ecuador. 81 pp. http://dspace.espoch.edu.ec/handle/123456789/10729
Hurd, P. D.; Linsley, E. G. 1964. The squash and gourd bees—genera Peponapis Robertson and Xenoglossa Smith—inhabiting America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Hilgardia. 35(15), 375–477. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v35n15p375
Hurd, P. D.; Linsley, E. G.; Whitaker, T. W. 1971. Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of the cultivated cucurbita. Evolution. 25(1), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406514
Irwin, R. E.; Brody, A. K.; Waser, N. M. 2001. The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia. 129, 161–168 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100739
Junker, R.; Chung, A. Y. C.; Blüthgen, N. 2007. Interaction between flowers, ants and pollinators: additional evidence for floral repellence against ants. Ecological Research. 22(4), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0306-3
Krug, C.; Alves-dos-Santos, I.; Cane, J. 2010. Visiting bees of Cucurbita flowers (Cucurbitaceae) with emphasis on the presence of Peponapis fervens Smith (Eucerni - Apidae) - Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil. Oecologia Australis. 14(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2010.1401.06
Krupnick, G. A.; Weis, A. E.; Campbell, D. R. 1999. The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology. 80(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.2307/176984
Leavitt, H.; Robertson, I. C. 2006. Petal herbivory by chrysomelid beetles (Phyllotreta sp.) is detrimental to pollination and seed production in Lepidium papilliferum (Brassicaceae). Ecological Entomology. 31(6), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00820.x
Leguizamón, A. 2014. Modifying Argentina: GM soy and socio-environmental change. Geoforum. 53, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.001
Lenzi, M.; Orth, A. I.; Guerra, T. M. 2005. Ecologia da polinização de Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae), em Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 28(3), 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-84042005000300008
López-Anido, F.; Vesprini, J. L. 2007. Extrafloral Nectaries in Cucurbita maxima Sub. andreana (Naudin) Filov. Cucurbit Genetic Cooperative Report. 30, 38–42. https://cucurbit.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/cgc30-12.pdf
Lundin, O.; Smith, H. G.; Rundlof, M.; Bommarco, R. 2012. When ecosystem services interact: crop pollination benefits depend on the level of pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 280(1753). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2243
Maloof, J. E.; Inouye, D. W. 2000. Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology. 81(10), 2651–2661. https://doi.org/10.2307/177331
Martínez-Pérez, L.; Faife-Cabrera, M. 2018. Robo de néctar en especies de los cuabales de Santa Clara, Cuba central. Revista del Jardín Botánico Nacional. 39, 83-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/26600681
Martins Belo, R.; Fekete Moutinho, M.; Sicsu, P.; Frigeri, E. 2011. Formigas diminuem a quantidade de visitantes florais em Cordia curassavica (Boraginaceae)? Curso de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia - Universidade de São Paulo. Ecología de la mata atlántica. 4p. http://www.ecologia.ib.usp.br/curso/2011/pdf/PO2-G1.pdf
Martins, J.; Carneiro, A.; Souza, L.; Almeida-Cortez, J. 2019. How pollinator visits are affected by flower damage and ants presence in Ipomoea carnea subs. fistulosa (Martius and Choise) (Convolvulaceae)? Brazilian Journal of Biology. 80(1), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.189025
Mathewson, J. A. 1968. Nest construction and life history of the eastern cucurbit bee, Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 41(2), 255–261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25083703
McCall, A. C.; Irwin, R. E. 2006. Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecology Letters. 9(12), 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00975.x
Michener, C.D; LaBerge, W.; Moure, J. 1955. Some american eucerini bees. Dusenia. 6(6), 213–228. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1118&context=bee_lab_mc
Michener, Charles D. 1979. Biogeography of the bees. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 66(3), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2398833
Molina, G. A. R.; Poggio, S. L.; Ghersa, C. M. 2014. Epigeal arthropod communities in intensively farmed landscapes: effects of land use mosaics, neighbourhood heterogeneity, and field position. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 192(1), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.013
Mothershead, K.; Marquis, R. J. 2000. Fitness impacts of herbivory through indirect effects on plant-pollinator interactions in Oenothera macrocarpa. Ecology. 81(1), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/177131
Nepi, M.; Pacini, E.; Willemse, M. T. M. 1996. Nectary biology of Cucurbita pepo: ecophysiological aspects. Acta Botanica Neerlandica. 45(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1996.tb00494.x
Ness, J. H. 2006. A mutualism’s indirect costs: the most aggressive plant bodyguards also deter pollinators. Oikos. 113(3), 506–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14143.x
Nicodemo, D.; Couto, R. H. N.; Malheiros, E. B.; De Jong, D. 2009. Honey bee as an effective pollinating agent of pumpkin. Scientia Agricola. 66(4), 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162009000400007
Parra-Tabla, V.; Campos-Navarrete, M. J.; Arceo-Gómez, G. 2017. Plant–floral visitor network structure in a smallholder Cucurbitaceae agricultural system in the tropics: implications for the extinction of main floral visitors. Arthropod-Plant Interactions. 11, 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-017-9529-1
Passarelli, L. M. 2002. Importancia de Apis mellifera L. en la producción de Cucurbita maxima Duch. (Zapallito de tronco). Investigación Agraria. Producción y Protección Vegetal. 17(1), 5–13. http://www.inia.es/IASPV/2002/vol17/cucurbita.pdf
R Core Team. 2018.R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org
Schemske, D. W.; Horvitz, C. C. 1988. Plant-animal interactions and fruit production in a neotropical herb: a path analysis. Ecology. 69(4), 1128–1137. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941267
Sing, T.; Sander, O.; Beerenwinkel, N.; Lengauer, T. 2005. ROCR: Visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics. 21(20), 3940-3941. https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/21/20/3940/202693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti623
Strauss, S. Y. 1997. Floral characters link herbivores, pollinators, and plant fitness. Ecology. 78(6), 1640–1645. https://doi.org/doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1640:fclhpa]2.0.co;2
Sutter, L.; Albrecht, M. 2016. Synergistic interactions of ecosystem services: florivorous pest control boosts crop yield increase through insect pollination. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283(1824) 20152529, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2529
Trejo-Salazar, R. E.; Scheinvar, E.; Eguiarte, L. E. 2015. ¿Quién poliniza realmente los agaves? Diversidad de visitantes florales en 3 especies de Agave (Agavoideae: Asparagaceae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 86(2), 358–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2015.04.007
Tsuji, K.; Hasyim, A.; Harlion; Nakamura, K. 2004. Asian weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, and their repelling of pollinators. Ecological Research. 19(6), 669–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2004.00682.x
Universidad Federal de Paraná. 2011. Moure’s bee catalogue. Peponapis Robertson 1902. Brasil. http://moure.cria.org.br/catalogue?id=30357
Vesprini, J. L.; Galetto, L.; Bernardello, G. 2003. The beneficial effect of ants on the reproductive success of Dyckia floribund (Bromeliaceae), an extrafloral nectary plant. Canadian Journal of Botany. 81(1), 24-27. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-003
Vidal, M. das G.; Jong, D. de; Wien, H. C.; Morse, R. A. 2010. Pollination and fruit set in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) by honey bees. Brazilian Journal of Botany. 33(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042010000100010
Wäckers, F. L.; van Rijn, P. C. J.; Ruin, J. 2005. Plant-provided food for carnivorous Insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 356p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542220
Wäckers, Felix L.; Romeis, J.; van Rijn, P. 2007. Nectar and pollen feeding by insect herbivores and implications for multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology. 52, 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091352
Walsh, G. C. 2003. Host range and reproductive Traits of Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) and Diabrotica viridula (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), two species of South American pest rootworms, with notes on Other Species of Diabroticina. Environmental Entomology. 32(2), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x-32.2.276
Wielgoss, A.; Tscharntke, T.; Rumede, A.; Fiala, B.; Seidel, H.; Shahabuddin, S.; Clough, Y. 2014. Interaction complexity matters: disentangling services and disservices of ant communities driving yield in tropical agroecosystems. Proceeding of the Royal Society. 281(1775) 20132144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2144
Wille, A. 1985. Las abejas Peponapis y Xenoglossa en Costa Rica y su importancia en la polinización de las Cucurbita domésticas. Revista de Biologia Tropical. 33(1), 17–24. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/24466/24662
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Milagros Dalmazzo, Leticia Zumoffen, Carla Ghiglione, Arturo Roig-Alsina, Natacha Chacoff. (2024). Diversity and biological traits of bees visiting flowers of Cucurbita maxima var. zapallito differ between biodiversity-based and conventional management practices. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12161-1.
2. Mariana P. Mazzei, Leonardo Galetto, José L. Vesprini. (2025). The role of native and exotic bees in Cucurbita maxima var. zapallito pollination: the effects of pollination intensity and visits on commercial fruits. Apidologie, 56(1) https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-025-01146-3.
3. Maria Luisa P. Frigero, Carmen S. F. Boaro, Leonardo Galetto, Priscila Tunes, Elza Guimarães. (2025). Extreme events induced by climate change alter nectar offer to pollinators in cross pollination-dependent crops. Scientific Reports, 15(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94565-2.
4. Mariana Paola Mazzei, José Luis Vesprini, Tom David Breeze, María Del Rosario Iglesias, Leonardo Galetto. (2024). Creating territorialized sustainability indices to evaluate pollination. Agricultural Systems, 219, p.104043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104043.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Acta Agronómica

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Política sobre Derechos de autor:Los autores que publican en la revista se acogen al código de licencia creative commons 4.0 de atribución, no comercial, sin derivados.
Es decir, que aún siendo la Revista Acta Agronómica de acceso libre, los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna y no debe ser usado con fines comerciales.














