Publicado

2021-11-26 — Actualizado el 2022-07-27

Versiones

Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation

Comparación de las preferencias de hábitat de Catasetum bicolor y C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae): implicaciones para su conservación

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765

Palabras clave:

Ecological niche, Maxent, Neotropics, PCA, Orchids, Species distribution (en)
ACP, Distribución de especies, Maxent, Neotrópicos, Nicho ecológico, Orquídeas (es)

Descargas

Autores/as

Family Orchidaceae is widely recognized for its mutualistic relationship with their pollinators, however, the knowledge about the most diverse monocotyledonous group on the planet it is still limited. Here, we recognized the ecological requirements and modeled the habitat preferences for Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Subfamily: Epidendroideae). We used climatic and bioclimatic data along with species’ occurrences records in a) Principal Components Analysis (PCA) to screen for the most influential variables; and, b) a maximum entropy algorithm (Maxent) for habitat suitability modeling. Also, preliminary conservation status and probable priority areas for monitoring and conservation were identified. Both species differed in their habitat preferences as shown by the altitudinal range. Factors screened by PCA were associated to temperature (average, minimum, seasonality), solar radiation, and precipitation of the driest and warmest months. The variables that influenced the most in the modeling process for C. bicolor were solar radiation, temperature seasonality, and its annual range; while for C. ochraceum were the precipitation of the driest month and solar radiation. Areas with habitat suitable conditions were identified in countries (Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Panama, and Venezuela) and biomes (humid and dry tropical, and subtropical forests) with highly dynamic land cover changes. The studied species were found to be in an endangered status based on their area of occupancy (< 76 km2). However, considering their extent of occurrence (> 20000 km2), they are in a status of less concern. These findings may be relevant for future monitoring plans and planning for ex-situ and in-situ conservation strategies.

La familia Orchidaceae es ampliamente reconocida por las relaciones mutualistas con sus polinizadores, sin embargo, aún es limitado el conocimiento sobre este grupo de monocotiledóneas, el más más diverso del planeta. Aquí se reconocieron los requisitos ecológicos y se modelaron las preferencias de hábitat de Catasetum bicolor y C. ochraceum (Subfamilia: Epidendroideae). Datos climáticos, bioclimáticos y registros de presencia fueron usados en a) Análisis de Componentes Principales (ACP) para identificar las variables más influyentes; y, b) algoritmo de máxima entropía (Maxent) en modelado de hábitats idóneos. Además, se identificó el estado de conservación y posibles áreas prioritarias de monitoreo y conservación para estas especies. Ambas especies difieren en sus preferencias de hábitat de acuerdo con su rango altitudinal. Los factores resultantes del ACP estuvieron asociados a temperatura (promedio, mínima, estacionalidad); radiación solar, y precipitación de los meses más secos y cálidos. Durante la modelación, las variables más influyentes para Cbicolor fueron radiación solar, amplitud anual de temperatura y su estacionalidad; mientras que para Cochraceum fueron la precipitación del mes más seco y la radiación solar. Se identificaron áreas con condiciones favorables de hábitat en varios países (Brasil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Nicaragua, Panamá y Venezuela) y biomas (bosques tropicales y subtropicales húmedos y secos) sujetos a procesos de cambio de cobertura muy dinámicos. De acuerdo con el área de ocupación (< 76 km2), las especies estudiadas se encuentran en estado de peligro. Sin embargo, por su extensión de ocurrencia (> 20000 km2) su estado de conservación es de menor preocupación. Estos resultados pueden ser relevantes para futuros planes de monitoreo y al planificar estrategias de conservación ex-situ e in-situ.

Referencias

Achard, F., Beuchle, R., Mayaux, P., Stibig, H.J., Bodart, C., Brink, A., Carboni, S., Desclée, B., Donnay, F., Eva, H.D., Lupi, A., Raši, R.; Seliger, R., & Simonetti, D. (2014). Determination of tropical deforestation rates and related carbon losses from 1990 to 2010. Global Change Biology, 20(8), 2540-2554. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12605

Ackerman, J.D. (1983). Specificity and mutual dependency of the orchid-euglossine bee interaction. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 20(3), 301-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1983.tb01878.x

Aguirre Gutiérrez, J., Carvalheiro, L.G., Polce, C., van Loon, E.E., Raes, N., Reemer, M., & Biesmeijer, J.C. (2013). Fit-for-purpose: Species distribution model performance depends on evaluation criteria – Dutch hoverflies as a case study. PLoS ONE, 8(5), e63708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063708

Aide, T.M., Clark, M.L., Grau, H.R., Lopez-Carr, D., Levy, M., Redo, D., Bonilla Moheno, M., Riner, G., Andrade-Nuñez, M.J., & Muñiz, M. (2013). Deforestation and reforestation of Latin America and the Caribbean (2001-2010). Biotropica, 45(2), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00908.x

Allen, P.H. (1949). Flora of Panama. Part III. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 36(1), 1-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/2394411

Alvarado Solano, D.P., & Otero Ospina, J.T. (2017). Áreas naturales de bosque seco tropical en el Valle del Cauca, Colombia: una oportunidad para la restauración. Biota Colombiana, 18 (S1), 9-34. http://revistas.humboldt.org.co/index.php/biota/article/view/439

American Museum of Natural History. (2021, August 21). Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions. https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/

American Orchid Society (AOS). (2021, July 16). Catasetum Culture Sheet. https://www.aos.org/orchids/culture-sheets/catasetum.aspx

Apan, A., Phinn, S., McAlpine, C., & Kath, J. (2010, September 1-3). Mapping habitat of threatened reptiles in Western Downs, Queensland: a spatial modelling approach using “presence-only” occurrence data. [Conference presentation]. Queensland Surveying and Spatial Conference 2010 (QSSC 2010), Brisbane, Queensland. http://eprints.usq.edu.au/9312

Arcila Cardona, A.M., Valderrama Ardila, C., & Chacón de Ulloa, P. (2012). Estado de fragmentación del bosque seco de la cuenca alta del río Cauca, Colombia. Biota Colombiana, 13(2), 86-101. http://revistas.humboldt.org.co/index.php/biota/article/view/264

Armenteras, D., Espelta, J.M., Rodríguez, N., & Retana, J. (2017). Deforestation dynamics and drivers in different forest types in Latin America: Three decades of studies (1980-2010). Global Environmental Change, 46, 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2017.09.002

Armenteras, D., & Mulligan, M. (2010). Modelling the potential distribution of tree species on a national scale in Colombia: Application to Palicourea Angustifolia Kunth and Palicourea Guianensis Aubl. Caldasia, 32(2), 355-380. https://168.176.5.108/index.php/cal/article/view/36229

Atlas of Living Costa Rica. (2021, September 3). Atlas of Living Costa Rica. http://www.crbio.cr/crbio/?page_id=2&lang=es

Austin, M. (2007). Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling, 200(1-2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005

Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A., de la Torre, J., & Scott, B. (2011). Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys, 150, 117-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109

Blasco, F., Whitmore, T.C., & Gers, C. (2000). A framework for the worldwide comparison of tropical woody vegetation types. Biological Conservation, 95(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00032-X

Bonilla Morales, M.M., Aguirre-Morales, A.C., & López Toscano, H. (2016). Diversidad y conservación de Catasetum (Orchidaceae: Catasetinae) en el Departamento de Santander, Colombia. Ciencia en Desarrollo, 7(2), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.19053/01217488.v7.n2.2016.3925

Bottom, S. (2016). Catasetum and their kind. St. Augustine Orchid Society. https://staugorchidsociety.org/PDF/CatasetumsbySueBottom.pdf

Braverman, I. (2014). Conservation without nature: the trouble with in situ versus ex situ conservation. Geoforum, 51, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2013.09.018

Chase, M.W., Cameron, K.M., Freudenstein, J.V., Pridgeon, A.M., Salazar, G., van den Berg, C., & Schuiteman, A. (2015). An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 177(2), 151-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12234

Croat, T.B., & Busey, P. (1975). Geographical affinities of The Barro Colorado Island Flora. Brittonia, 27, 127-135. https://doi.org/10.2307/2805473

Cruz Fernández, Q. T., Alquicira Arteaga, M.L., & Flores Palacios, A. (2011). Is orchid species richness and abundance related to the conservation status of oak forest? Plant Ecology, 212(7), 1091-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9889-4

Dodson, C.H. (1962). Pollination and variation in the subtribe Catasetinae (Orchidaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 49(1-2), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2394740

Doko, T., Fukui, H., Kooiman, A., Toxopeus, A.G., Ichinose, T., Chen, W., & Skidmore, A.K. (2011). Identifying habitat patches and potential ecological corridors for remnant Asiatic black bear (Ursus thibetanus japonicus) populations in Japan. Ecological Modelling, 222(3), 748-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.11.005

Duarte, M.M., & Gandolfi, S. (2017). Diversifying growth forms in tropical forest restoration: Enrichment with vascular epiphytes. Forest Ecology and Management, 401, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.063

Elith, J., & Leathwick, J.R. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40(1), 677-697. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159

Fick, S.E., & Hijmans, R.J. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 37(12), 4302-4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086

GBIF. (2021, September 12). 20 ocurrences included in download. https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/download/0010090-170714134226665

Gentry, A.H., & Dodson, C.H. (1987). Diversity and biogeography of Neotropical vascular epiphytes. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 74(2), 205-233. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399395

Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool (GeoCAT). (2021, September 23). Geospatial Conservation Assessment Tool. http://geocat.kew.org/

Givnish, T.J., Spalink, D., Ames, M., Lyon, S.P., Hunter, S.J., Zuluaga, A., Iles, W.J.D., Clements, M. A., Arroyo, M.T.K… & Cameron, K.M. (2015). Orchid phylogenomics and multiple drivers of their extraordinary diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282(1814). http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1814/20151553

Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). (2021, September 18). Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Free and open access to biodiversity data. https://www.gbif.org/

Gray, S.B., & Brady, S.M. (2016). Plant developmental responses to climate change. Developmental Biology, 419(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.07.023

Gregg, K.B. (1975). The effect of light intensity on sex expression in species of Cycnoches and Catasetum (Orchidaceae). Selbyana, 1(2), 101-113. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41759587

Gregg, K.B. (1982). Sunlight-enhanced ethylene evolution by developing inflorescences of Catasetum and Cycnoches and its relation to female flower production (Cycnoches warscewieczii Catasetum expansum). Botanical Gazette, 143(4), 466-475. https://doi.org/10.1086/337322

Gustafsson, A.L.S., Verola, C.F., & Antonelli, A. (2010). Reassessing the temporal evolution of orchids with new fossils and a Bayesian relaxed clock, with implications for the diversification of the rare South American genus Hoffmannseggella (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 10(177). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-177

Hills, H.G., Williams, N.H., Dodson, C.H. (1972). Floral fragrances and isolating mechanisms in the Genus Catasetum (Orchidaceae). Biotropica, 4(2), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2989728

Holst, A.W. (1999). The world of Catasetums. Timber Press.

Hsu, R.C.C., Wolf, J.H.D., & Tamis, W.L.M. (2014). Regional and elevational patterns in vascular epiphyte richness on an East Asian island. Biotropica, 46(5), 549-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12131

Herbário Virtual da Flora e dos Fungos (INCT). (2021, September, 7). Herbário virtual da flora e dos fungos. http://inct.splink.org.br/

Instituto SINCHI. (2021, September, 8). Herbario amazónico colombiano COAH. https://www.sinchi.org.co/coah

IUCN Species Survival Commission. (2001). IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN. https://www.iucn.org/content/iucn-red-list-categories-and-criteria-version-31

IUCN Species Survival Commission. (2012). Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red List Criteria at Regional and National Levels: Version 4.0. IUCN. https://www.iucn.org/content/guidelines-application-iucn-red-list-criteria-regional-and-national-levels-version-40

IUCN. (2021, August 7). The IUCN red list of threatened species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/

Jain, A., Sarsaiya, S., Chen, J., Wu, Q., Lu, Y., & Shi, J. (2021). Changes in global Orchidaceae disease geographical research trends: recent incidences, distributions, treatment, and challenges. Bioengineered, 12(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1853447

Jarnevich, C.S., Stohlgren, T J., Kumar, S., Morisette, J.T., & Holcombe, T.R. (2015). Caveats for correlative species distribution modeling. Ecological Informatics, 29(1), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.06.007

Kadmon, R., Farber, O., & Danin, A. (2003). A systematic analysis of factors affecting the performance of climatic envelope models. Ecological Applications, 13(3), 853-867. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0853:ASAOFA]2.0.CO;2

Kartzinel, T.R., Campbell, D.A., & Trapnell, D.W. (2016). Spatial patterns of Haplotype variation in the epiphytic bromeliad Catopsis nutans. Biotropica, 48(2), 206-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12272

Kolanowska, M. (2014). The orchid flora of the Colombian Department of Valle del Cauca. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 85(2), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.32511

Leach, K., Montgomery, W.I., & Reid, N. (2016). Modelling the influence of biotic factors on species distribution patterns. Ecological Modelling, 337, 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.06.008

Londoño, V., & Torres, A.M. (2015). Estructura y composición vegetal de un bosque seco tropical en regeneración en Bataclán (Cali, Colombia). Colombia Forestal. 18(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.14483/udistrital.jour.colomb.for.2015.1.a04

Martínez, S., Bonilla, M.M., & López, H. (2016). Listado de la Flora Orchidaceae de Santander y Comentarios Sobre sus Especies Endémicas. Revista Facultad De Ciencias Básicas, 11(2), 54-111. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.1299

Merow, C., Smith, M.J., & Silander, J.A. (2013). A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography, 36(10), 1058-1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x

Milet-Pinheiro, P., & Gerlach, G. (2017). Biology of the Neotropical orchid genus Catasetum: A historical review on floral scent chemistry and pollinators. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 27, 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2017.05.004

Nicholson, C.C., Bales, J.W., Palmer-Fortune, J.E., & Nicholson, R.G. (2008). Darwin’s bee-trap: The kinetics of Catasetum, a new world orchid. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 3(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.3.1.4980

Nogueira Batista, J. A., Mota, A.C.M., Proite, K., Bianchetti, L.de B., Romero-González, G.A., Huerta, H., & Salazar, G.A. (2014). Molecular phylogenetics of Neotropical Cyanaeorchis (Cymbidieae, Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae): geographical rather than morphological similarities plus a new species. Phytotaxa, 156(5), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.156.5.1

Nunes, C.E.P., Gerlach, G., Bandeira, K.D.O., Gobbo-Neto, L., Pansarin, E.R., Sazima, M. (2017). Two orchids, one scent? Floral volatiles of Catasetum cernuum and Gongora bufonia suggest convergent evolution to a unique pollination niche. Flora, 232, 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2016.11.016

Olson, D.M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E.D., Burgess, N.D., Powell, G.V.N., Underwood, E.C., D’amico, J.A., Itoua, I., Strand, H.E… & Kassem, K.R. (2001). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience, 51(11), 933-938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2

Orejuela, J.E. (2007). Orchids of a regenerated tropical dry forest in the Cali river watershed, municipality of Cali, Colombia. Lankesteriana, 7(1-2), 71-82. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813014

Pedroso-de-Moraes, C., De Souza-Leal, T., Saoncella, A.L., & De Almeida, M. (2016). Floral sexual differentiation in Catasetum fimbriatum (Catasetinae, Orchidaceae) exposed to different light intensities. Lankesteriana, 16(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.15517/lank.v16i1.23746

Pérez Escobar, O.A., Sánchez, E.P., & Ortiz Valdivieso, P. (2009). Inventario orquideológico de la Reserva Bosque de Yotoco, Valle del Cauca. Acta Agronómica, 58(3), 189-196. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/acta_agronomica/article/view/11515

Pérez Escobar, O.A., Gottschling, M., Whitten, W. M., Salazar, G., & Gerlach, G. (2016). Sex and the Catasetinae (Darwin’s favourite orchids). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 97, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMPEV.2015.11.019

Pérez Escobar, O.A., Chomicki, G., Condamine, F.L., Karremans, A.P., Bogarín, D., Matzke, N.J., Silvestro, D., & Antonelli, A. (2017). Recent origin and rapid speciation of Neotropical orchids in the world’s richest plant biodiversity hotspot. New Phytologist, 215(2), 891-905. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14629

Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., & Schapire, R.E. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190(3-4), 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

Phillips, S. (2010). A Brief Tutorial on Maxent. Lessons in Conservation, 3, 108-135. https://www.amnh.org/content/download/141371/2285439/file/LinC3_SpeciesDistModeling_Ex.pdf

Pizano, C., & García, H. (Eds.). (2014). El bosque seco tropical en Colombia. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH). Bogotá, Colombia. http://repository.humboldt.org.co/handle/20.500.11761/9333

Reina Rodríguez, G., Ospina-Calderón, N.H., Castaño, A., Soriano, I., & Otero, J.T. (2010). Catálogo de las orquídeas del Valle geográfico del río Cauca y su piedemonte andino bajo. Sur-occidente colombiano. Cespedesia, 32(90-91), 7-22. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/101140/1/625048.pdf

Reina Rodríguez, G.A., & Otero, J.T. (2011). Guía ilustrada de las orquídeas del valle geográfico del Cauca y piedemonte andino bajo. Asociación Vallecaucana de Orquideología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Palmira. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306169113_Guia_ilustrada_de_orquideas_del_Valle_geografico_del_rio_Cauca_y_piedemonte_andino_bajo

Reina Rodríguez, G.A. (2016). Aportaciones al conocimiento de las orquídeas del Bosque Seco Tropical y escenarios de cambio climático en Colombia [Doctoral Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, España].

Reina Rodríguez, G.A., Rubiano, J.E., Alexander, F., Llanos, C., & Otero, J.T. (2016). Spatial distribution of dry forest orchids in the Cauca River Valley and Dagua Canyon: Towards a conservation strategy to climate change. Journal for Nature Conservation, 30, 32-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2016.01.004

Reina Rodríguez, G.A., Rubiano Mejía, J.E., Castro Llanos, F.A., & Soriano, I. (2017). Orchid distribution and bioclimatic niches as a strategy to climate change in areas of tropical dry forest in Colombia. Lankesteriana, 17(1), 17-47. https://doi.org/10.15517/lank.v17i1.27999

Romero, G.A. (1987). A new Catasetum from southern Venezuela (Orchidaceae). Selbyana, 10(1), 73-75.

Ruiz Vega, R., Esquivel Berrio, C., Salgado Cruz, A., & Saab Ramos, H. (2015). Catálogo de epífitas vasculares del sector El Silencio (Parque Nacional Natural Paramillo) y zona amortiguadora, Córdoba, Colombia. Acta Biológica Colombiana, 20(3), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.15446/abc.v20n3.42572

Sánchez Cuervo, A.M., Aide, T.M., Clark, M.L., & Etter, A. (2012). Land cover change in Colombia: Surprising Forest Recovery Trends between 2001 and 2010. PLOS ONE, 7(8), e43943. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043943

Silvera, K., Santiago, L.S., Cushman, J.C., & Winter, K. (2009). Crassulacean acid metabolism and epiphytism linked to adaptive radiations in the Orchidaceae. Plant Physiology, 149(4), 1838-1847. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.132555

Silvera, K., Santiago, L.S., Cushman, J.C., & Winter, K. (2010). The incidence of crassulacean acid metabolism in Orchidaceae derived from carbon isotope ratios: a checklist of the flora of Panama and Costa Rica. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 163(2), 194-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01058.x

Souza Rocha, F., & Luiz Waechter, J. (2010). Ecological distribution of terrestrial orchids in a south Brazilian Atlantic region. Nordic Journal of Botany, 28(1), 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00500.x

Stern, W.L., & Judd, W.S. (2001). Comparative anatomy and systematics of Catasetinae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 136(2), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2001.tb00564.x

Stern, W.L., & Judd, W.S. (2002). Systematic and comparative anatomy of Cymbidieae (Orchidaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00046.x

Suzuki, R.M., Kerbauy, G.B., Pescador, R., Purgatto, E., Ceccantini, G.C.T., & Ferreira, W. de M. (2010). Dark-induced hormone changes coincide with the resumption of light-inhibited shoot growth in Catasetum fimbriatum (Orchidaceae). Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(5), 375-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2009.10.002

Szalachetko, D.L., Mytnik-Ejsmont, J., & Baranow, P. (2013). New species of thegenus Epistephium (Orchidaceae, Vanilloideae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 299(8), 1519-1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-013-0815-9

The Biodiversity Information System of Colombia (SIB). (2021, October, 3). Portal de datos. http://datos.biodiversidad.co/

Tremblay, R.L., Ackerman, J.D., Zimmerman, J.K., & Calvo, R.N. (2005). Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: A spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 849(1), 1-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00400.x

TROPICOS. (2021a, September 3). TROPICOS. Connecting the world to botanical data since 1982. http://www.tropicos.org/

TROPICOS. (2021b, October 4). Catasetum ochraceum. https://www.tropicos.org/name/Search?name=catasetum%20ochraceum

Tshwene-Mauchaza, B., & Aguirre-Gutiérrez, J. (2019). Climatic drivers of plant species distributions across spatial grains in Southern Africa tropical forests. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 2, 69. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00069

WorldClim. (2021a, September 15). Maps, graphs, tables, and data of the global climate. https://www.worldclim.org/

WorldClim. (2021b, October 9). Historical climate data. https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html

World Flora Online (WFO). (2021, August 20). Orchidaceae Juss. http://www.worldfloraonline.org/taxon/wfo-7000000429

World Wild Life (WWF). (2021, October, 5). Terrestrial ecoregions of the world. https://www.worldwildlife.org/publications/terrestrial-ecoregions-of-the-world

Zapata Hoyos, J.S., Maldonado Figueroa, C.J., Arteaga Morales, D.A., Valdez Benítez, O.J., López Machado, F., & Otero Ospina, J.T. (2020). Estructura poblacional y agentes polinizadores de Catasetum ochraceum en los farallones de la Cordillera Occidental (La Vorágine, Colombia). Revista Facultad De Ciencias Básicas, 16(2), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.18359/rfcb.5098

Zimmerman, J.K. (1991). Ecological correlates of labile sex expression in the Orchid Catasetum Viridiflavum. Ecology, 72(2), 597-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937200

Zotz, G., & Ziegler, H. (1997). The occurrence of crassulacean acid metabolism among vascular epiphytes from Central Panama. New Phytologist, 137(2), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00800.x

Cómo citar

APA

Alvarado-Solano, D. P., Martínez López, S., Šarapatka, B. & Otero Ospina, J. T. (2021). Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation. Acta Agronómica, 70(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765

ACM

[1]
Alvarado-Solano, D.P., Martínez López, S., Šarapatka, B. y Otero Ospina, J.T. 2021. Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation. Acta Agronómica. 70, 2 (nov. 2021), 211–226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765.

ACS

(1)
Alvarado-Solano, D. P.; Martínez López, S.; Šarapatka, B.; Otero Ospina, J. T. Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation. Acta Agron. 2021, 70, 211-226.

ABNT

ALVARADO-SOLANO, D. P.; MARTÍNEZ LÓPEZ, S.; ŠARAPATKA, B.; OTERO OSPINA, J. T. Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation. Acta Agronómica, [S. l.], v. 70, n. 2, p. 211–226, 2021. DOI: 10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/acta_agronomica/article/view/91765. Acesso em: 6 mar. 2026.

Chicago

Alvarado-Solano, Diana Patricia, Sergio Martínez López, Bořivoj Šarapatka, y Joel Tupac Otero Ospina. 2021. «Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation». Acta Agronómica 70 (2):211-26. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765.

Harvard

Alvarado-Solano, D. P., Martínez López, S., Šarapatka, B. y Otero Ospina, J. T. (2021) «Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation», Acta Agronómica, 70(2), pp. 211–226. doi: 10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765.

IEEE

[1]
D. P. Alvarado-Solano, S. Martínez López, B. Šarapatka, y J. T. Otero Ospina, «Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation», Acta Agron., vol. 70, n.º 2, pp. 211–226, nov. 2021.

MLA

Alvarado-Solano, D. P., S. Martínez López, B. Šarapatka, y J. T. Otero Ospina. «Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation». Acta Agronómica, vol. 70, n.º 2, noviembre de 2021, pp. 211-26, doi:10.15446/acag.v70n2.91765.

Turabian

Alvarado-Solano, Diana Patricia, Sergio Martínez López, Bořivoj Šarapatka, y Joel Tupac Otero Ospina. «Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation». Acta Agronómica 70, no. 2 (noviembre 26, 2021): 211–226. Accedido marzo 6, 2026. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/acta_agronomica/article/view/91765.

Vancouver

1.
Alvarado-Solano DP, Martínez López S, Šarapatka B, Otero Ospina JT. Comparison of Catasetum bicolor and C. ochraceum (Catasetinae: Orchidaceae) habitat preferences: implications for their conservation. Acta Agron. [Internet]. 26 de noviembre de 2021 [citado 6 de marzo de 2026];70(2):211-26. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/acta_agronomica/article/view/91765

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

1186

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.