Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Versiones
- 2021-12-03 (2)
- 2021-10-19 (1)
Cyanogenic glycosides content as graft compatibility indicator in pear/quince combinations
Contenido de glucósidos cianogénicos como indicador de compatibilidad de injertos en combinaciones de pera/membrillo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v70n1.93516Palabras clave:
amygdalin, Cydonia, grafting, incompatible, prunasin (en)amigdalina, Cydonia, injerto, incompatibilidad, prunasina (es)
Descargas
The objective of this work is to evaluate the concentration of cyanogenic glycosides CGs (amygdalin and prunasin) in the cultivar and rootstock, as an indicator of compatibility in pear grafts. The work consists of two experiments. Experiment 1 evaluated Cascatense/Pyrus Calleryana and Cascatense/EMC combinations. Experiment 2 evaluated the combinations Packham’s Triumph/Adams, Santa Maria/Adams, and Rocha/Adams. The experimental design of the two experiments was randomized blocks with four replications. The evaluations were carried out in the spring and summer of the harvest 2014/2015. The results indicated graft compatibility in the Cascatense/P. Calleryana, Packham’s Triumph/Adams, and Rocha/Adams combinations; slight incompatibility of Santa Maria/Adams, and severe incompatibility of Cascatense/EMC. The obtained results indicate that differences ≥ 20 mg g-1 of CGs between scion and rootstock were correlated with a drastic reduction in vigor, problems of continuity in graft union, low yield, and early defoliation.
El objetivo de este trabajo es evaluar la concentración de glucósidos cianogénicos CG (amigdalina y prunasina) en el cultivar y portainjerto, como indicador de compatibilidad en injertos de pera. El trabajo consta de dos experimentos. El experimento 1 evaluó las combinaciones Cascatense/Pyrus Calleryana y Cascatense/EMC. El Experimento 2 evaluó las combinaciones Packham’s Triumph/Adams, Santa Maria/Adams y Rocha/Adams. El diseño experimental de los dos experimentos fue de bloques al azar con cuatro repeticiones. Las evaluaciones se realizaron en la primavera y el verano de la cosecha 2014/2015. Los resultados indicaron compatibilidad de injerto en el Cascatense/P. Calleryana; combinaciones de Packham’s Triumph/Adams y Rocha/Adams; leve incompatibilidad de Santa Maria/Adams; e incompatibilidad severa de Cascatense / EMC. Los resultados obtenidos indican que diferencias ≥ 20 mg g-1 de CG entre esqueje y portainjerto se correlacionaron con una drástica reducción del vigor, problemas de continuidad en la unión del injerto, bajo rendimiento y defoliación temprana.
Referencias
Balbi, R.V., Pio, R., Farias, D.H, Melo, E.T., Pereira, M.P., & Pereira, F.J. (2019). The cell regeneration and connection of grafting between pear and quince trees are defined by the cortex and phloem. Scientia Horticulturae, 257(17), 108662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108662
Bordo, D., & Bork, P. (2002). The rhodanese/Cdc25 phosphatase superfamily. Sequence-structure-function relations. EMBO Rep., 3, 741-746. https://doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kvf150
Conn, E.E. (1980). Cyanogenic glycosides. In E.A., Bell, & Charlwood, B.V. (Eds.), Secondary plant products, (pp. 461-492). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67360-3_17
Davies, F.T., Geneve, R.L., Wilson, S.B., Hartmann, H.T., & Kester, D.E. (2017). Hartmann & Kester's Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. 9th ed. Pearson.
Dogra, K., Kour, K., Kumar, R., Bakshi, P., & Kumar, V. (2018). Graft-incompatibility in horticultural crops. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences (IJCMAS), 7(2), 1805-1820. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.218
Ermel, F.F., Kervella, J., Catesson, A.M., & Poëssel, J.L. (1999). Localized graft incompatibility in pear/quince (Pyrus communis/Cydonia oblonga) combinations: multivariate analysis of histological data from 5-month-old grafts. Tree Physiology, 19(10), 645-654. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12651320/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/19.10.645
Errea, P., Felipe, A.J., & Herrero, M. (1994). Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp. Journal of Experimental Botany, 45(3), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/45.3.393
Fioravanço, J.C., Antoniolli, L.R., Czermainski, A.B.C., Oliveira, P.R.D., Almeida, G.K., & Ferreira de Araújo, W. (2016). Avaliação agronômica da Pereira ‘Rocha’ em Vacaria, RS. Bento Gonçalves, RS: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Circular Técnica 128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305157135_Avaliacao_Agronomica_da_Pereira_'Rocha'_em_Vacaria_RS
Fioravanço, J.C., & Oliveira, P.R.D. (2017). Avaliação Agronômica da Pereira ‘Santa Maria’ em Vacaria, RS. Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, Circular Técnica 137. https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/1075858/avaliacao-agronomica-da-pereira-santa-maria-em-vacaria-rs
Francescatto, P., Pazzin, D., Gazolla Neto, A., Fachinello, J.C., & Giacobbo, C.L. (2010). Evaluation of graft compatibility between quince rootstocks and pear scions. Acta Horticulturae, 872, 253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.872.34
Giacobbo, C.L, Fachinello, J.C., & Picolotto, L. (2007). Compatibilidade entre o marmeleiro porta-enxerto cv. EMC e cultivares de pereira. Scientia Agraria, 8(1), 33-37. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/995/99516333004.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v8i1.8339
Gur, A., & Blum, A. (1973). The role of cyanogenic glycoside in incompatibility between peach scions and almond rootstocks. Horticultural Research, 13, 1-10.
Gur, A., Samish, R.M., & Lifshitz, E., (1968). The role of the cyanogenic glycoside of the quince in the incompatibility between pear cultivars and quince rootstocks. Horticultural Research, 8, 113‑134.
Maas, F. (2008). Evaluation of Pyrus and quince rootstocks for high density pear orchards. Acta Horticulturae, 800, 599-609. https://www.actahort.org/books/800/800_80.htm DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.800.80
Machado, B.D., Magro, M., Rufato, L., Bogo, A., & Kreztschmar, A.A. (2017). Graft compatibility between european pear cultivars and east malling “C” rootstock. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 39(3), e-063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017063
Melo, E.T., Pio, R., Balbi, R.V., Ferreira, C.A., Mori, F.A. (2017). Anatomic compatibility of pear and quince trees grafted on Pyrus calleryana and Chaenomeles sinensis rootstocks. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 52(10), 877-886. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2017001000007
Miller, J.M., & Conn, E.E. (1980). Metabolism of hydrogen cyanide by higher plants. Plant Physiology, 65(6), 1199-1202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.65.6.1199
Moore, R. (1986). Graft incompatibility between pear and quince: the influence of metabolites of Cydonia oblonga on suspension cultures of Pyrus communis. American Journal of Botany, 73(1), 1‑4. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1986.tb09673.x
Nocito, F.F., Espen, L., Fedeli, C., Lancilli, C., Musacchi, S., Serra, S., Sansavini, S., Cocucci, M., & Sacchi, G.A. (2010). Oxidative stress and senescence-like status of pear calli co-cultured on suspensions of incompatible quince microcalli. Tree Physiology, 30(4), 450-458. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq006
Pasa, M.S., Fachinello, J.C., Schmitz, J.D., Kulkamp de Souza, A.L., & Franceschi, É. (2012). Growth, yield and fruit quality of pear grafted on quince rootstocks and Pyrus calleryana. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 34(3), 873-880. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452012000300029
Pereira, I.S., Pina, A., Correa Antunes, L.E., Diniz Campos, Â., & Fachinello, J.C. (2018). Genotypic differences in cyanogenic glycosides levels of compatible Prunus persica/P. persica and incompatible P. persica/P. mume combinations. Bragantia, 77(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.2016367
Pina, A, Errea, P., & Martens, H.J. (2012). Graft union formation and cell-to-cell communication via plasmodesmata in compatible and incompatible stem unions of Prunus spp. Scientia Horticulturae, 143(16), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2012.06.017
Pinto Tomaz, Z.F., Couto Rodrigues, A., Veríssimo, V, Marafon, A.C., Herter, F.G., Rufato, A.R. (2009). Compatibilidade de enxertia de cultivares de marmeleiros com pereiras. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 31(4), 1211-1217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452009000400041
Zagrobelny, M., Bak, S., Vinther Rasmussen, A., Jorgensen, B., Naumann, C.M., & Lindberg Moller, B. (2004). Cyanogenic glucosides and plant-insect interactions. Phytochemistry, 65(3), 293-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.10.016
Zarrouk, O., Pinochet, J., Gogorcena, Y., & Moreno, M.A. (2006). Graft compatibility between peach cultivars and Prunus rootstocks. HortScience. 41(6), 389-1394. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.6.1389
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Jin-lan Cheng, Yu Zhou, Kai-wen Gu, Yuan Zhang, Xue-song Feng. (2025). Extraction and liquid chromatographic analysis of cyanogenic glycosides: a review. Journal of Chromatography A, 1760, p.466292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466292.
Dimensions
PlumX
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Política sobre Derechos de autor:Los autores que publican en la revista se acogen al código de licencia creative commons 4.0 de atribución, no comercial, sin derivados.
Es decir, que aún siendo la Revista Acta Agronómica de acceso libre, los usuarios pueden descargar la información contenida en ella, pero deben darle atribución o reconocimiento de propiedad intelectual, deben usarlo tal como está, sin derivación alguna y no debe ser usado con fines comerciales.
