Compreensão dos valores da humanização do parto e do nascimento
Understanding the values of humanizing labor and birth
Comprender los valores de la humanización del parto y el nacimiento
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v42n1.109229Keywords:
Parto Humanizado, Enfermagem Obstétrica, Obstetrícia, Centros de Saúde Materno-Infantil, Humanização da Assistência (pt)Humanization of Assistance, Humanizing Delivery, Obstetric Nursing, Obstetrics, Maternal-child Health Centers (en)
Humanización de la Atención, Parto Humanizado, Obstetricia, Enfermería Obstétrica, Centro de Salud Materno-Infantil (es)
Downloads
Objetivo: compreender os valores da humanização pelos profissionais de saúde na atenção do parto e do nascimento.
Materiais e método: estudo fenomenológico com a teoria de valores de Max Scheler. Foram entrevistados 48 profissionais de saúde em quatro maternidades da Região Metropolitana II do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Posteriormente à coleta de dados, foi realizada a análise
com base na teoria de interpretação de Paul Ricoeur.
Resultados: foram observados carências e valores que mostram a necessidade de intervir na lógica assistencial no campo obstétrico, com práticas pautadas nas evidências científicas, as quais ampliem a humanização e estabeleçam uma atenção obstétrica mais benéfica para o binômio “mulher-criança”.
Conclusões: a compreensão dos valores da humanização na atenção ao parto e ao nascimento constitui um ponto central para garantir uma mudança da forma de cuidar e reorganizar o modelo assistencial.
Objective: To understand the values of humanization held by health professionals in labor and birth care.
Materials and method: Phenomenological study using Max Scheler’s Theory of Values. Forty-eight health professionals at four maternity hospitals in the Metropolitan Region II of the state of Rio de Janeiro were interviewed. After collecting the data, an analysis was carried out based on Paul Ricoeur’s Theory of Interpretation.
Results: There were shortcomings and values expressed, indicating the need to intervene in the logic of obstetric care through the implementation of practices based on scientific evidence, that increase humanization and establish more beneficial obstetric care, for the "woman-child" binomial.
Conclusions: Understanding the values of humanization in labor and birth care is essential to guaranteeing a change in the way care is provided and a restructuring of the care model.
Objetivo: comprender los valores de humanización de los profesionales de la salud en la atención al parto y el nacimiento.
Materiales y método: estudio fenomenológico desarrollado en el marco de la teoría de los valores de Max Scheler. En total, 48 profesionales de la salud adscritos a cuatro centros de salud de maternidad en la Región Metropolitana II del estado de Río de Janeiro fueron entrevistados. Luego de la fase de recolección de datos, se realizó un análisis de la información con base en la teoría de la interpretación de Paul Ricoeur.
Resultados: se reportaron deficiencias y valores expresados que muestran la necesidad de intervenir en la lógica de la atención obstétrica mediante prácticas basadas en la evidencia científica, que permitan favorecer la humanización del cuidado, así como establecer prácticas de cuidado obstétricas más beneficiosas para el binomio "mujer-niño/niña".
Conclusiones: comprender los valores de la humanización en la atención al parto y el nacimiento es fundamental para garantizar un cambio en la forma de prestar la atención y una reorganización del modelo asistencial.
References
(1) Scorsolini-Comin F. A re-humanização. Rev SPAGES P. 2022;23(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.32467/issn.2175-3628v23n1a1
(2) Diniz CSG. Humanização da assistência ao parto no Brasil: os muitos sentidos de um movimento. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. 2005;10(3):627-637.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232005000300019
(3) Lamy ZC; Gonçalves LLM; Carvalho RHSBF; Alves MTSSB; Koser ME; Martins MS et al. Labor and childbirth care in maternity facilities in Brazil’s North and Northeast regions: perceptions of the evaluators of the Stork Network Program. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. 2021;26(3):951-960.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.26572020
(4) Curtin M; Savage E; Murphy M; Leahy-Warren P. A meta-synthesis of the perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals on the humanisation of childbirth using a meta-ethnographic approach. Women Birth. 2021;35(4):e369-e378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.07.002
(5) Salter CL; Olaniyan A; Mendez DD; Chang JC. Naming silence and inadequate obstetric care as obstetric violence is a necessary step for change. Violence against women. 2021;27(8):1019-1027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801221996443
(6) Curtin M; Savage E; Leahy-Warren P. Humanisation in pregnancy and childbirth: A concept analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(9-10):1744-1757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15152
(7) Souza KCR; Silva TPR; Damasceno AKC; Manzo BF; Souza KV; Filipe MML et al. Coexistence and prevalence of obstetric interventions: An analysis based on the grade of membership. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(618):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-04092-x
(8) Mena-Tudela D; Iglesias-Casás S, González-Chordá VM; Cervera-Gasch Á; Andreu-Pejó L; Valero-Chilleron MJ. Obstetric violence in Spain (Part II): Interventionism and medicalization during birth. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010199.
(9) Mastro NI; Tejada-Llacsa PJ; Reinders S; Pérez R; Solís Y; Alva I et al. Home birth preference, childbirth, and newborn care practices in rural Peruvian Amazon. PLoS ONE . 2021;16(5):e0250702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250702
10) World Health Organization. WHO recommendations Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva; 2018. https://bit.ly/4ac9EXX
(11) Rodrigues DP; Alves VH; Paula CC; Vieira BDG; Pereira AV; Reias LC et al. Humanized childbirth: The values of health professionals in daily obstetric care. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(2):e20210052. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0052
(12) Scheler M. Da reviravolta dos valores. 2.ª ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2012.
(13) Paula CC; Padoin SMM; Terra MG; Souza IEO; Cabral IE. Modos de condução da entrevista em pesquisa fenomenológica: relato de experiência. Rev Bras Enferm. 2014;67(3):468-472. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=267031414021
(14) Ricoeur P. Teoria da interpretação: o discurso e o excesso de significação. Lisboa: Edições 70 Ltda; 2013.
(15) Silva SF; Melo Neto JF. Saber popular e saber científico. Rev Tem. Educ. 2015;24(2):137-154. https://bit.ly/3v4X3H8
(16) Adu-Bonsaffoh K; Mehrtash H; Guure C; Maya E; Vogel JP; Irinyenikan TA et al. Vaginal examinations and mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth in health facilities: Secondary analysis of labour observations in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;5(Suppl 2):e006640. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006640
(17) Camano L; Souza E. Assistência ao parto e tocurgia — Manual de orientação. São Paulo: Ponto;2002.
(18) World Health Organization. WHO labour care guide: user’s manual. Geneva; 2020.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240017566
(19) Santos RV; Pereira ARR; Lima CROP; Dantas DS; Ferreira CWS. Perineal trauma in nulliparous women and its associated factors. ABCS Health Sci. 2021;46:e021224. https://doi.org/10.7322/abcshs.2020047.1496
(20) Jacob TNO; Rodrigues DP; Alves VH; Ferreira ES; Carneiro MS; Penna LHG; Bonazzi VCAM. The perception of woman-centered care by nurse
midwives in a normal birth center. Esc. Anna. Nery. 2022;26:e20210105. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-9465-EAN-2021-0105
(21) Jiang H; Qian X; Carroli G; Garner P. Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD000081. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub3
(22) Huang J; Zang Y; Ren LH; Li FJ; Lu H. A review and comparison of common maternal positions during the second-stage of labor. Int J Nurs Sci. 2019;6(4):460-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2019.06.007
(23) Brasil, Ministério da Saúde. Brasil. Diretrizes nacionais de assistência ao parto normal: versão resumida. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde do Brasil; 2017. https://bit.ly/4coKt6v
(24) Duarte MR; Alves VH; Rodrigues DP; Souza KV; Pereira AV; Pimentel MM. Care technologies in obstetric nursing: Contribution for the delivery and birth. Cogitare Enferm. 2019;24:e54164. http://doi.org/10.5380/ce.v24i0.54164
(25) Pereira SB; Diaz CMG; Backes MTS; Ferreira CLL; Backes DS. Good practices of labor and birth care from the perspective of health professionals. Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2018;71(supl. 3): 1313-1319. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0661
How to Cite
VANCOUVER
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Pereira Rodrigues, Valdecyr Herdy Alves, Cristiane Cardoso de Paula, Bianca Dargam Gomes Vieira, Ana Zélia Silva Fernandes de Sousa, Thalita Rocha Oliveira, Fabianne de Jesus Dias de Sousa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published by Avances en Enfermería are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Starting 2020, we added the CC-BY-NC recognition to the license, which means anyone is allowed to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and transform our contents with non-commercial purposes, and although new works must adequately cite the original work and source and also pursue non-commercial purposes, users do not have to license derivative works under the same terms.


















