Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
El efecto de los observadores y la estructura urbana en las estimaciones poblacionales en la tórtola turca (Streptopelia decaocto)
Observers and urban structure effects on population estimates in the Eurasian Collared-Dove (Streptopelia decaocto)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v46n2.105831Palabras clave:
área urbana, covariables múltiples, muestreo por distancia, puntos de conteo (es)Distance sampling, multiple covariates, point account method, urban area (en)
Descargas
Los métodos para estimar el tamaño poblacional de las aves urbanas no suelen considerar los efectos que pueden tener diferentes variables ambientales y antrópicas sobre su detectabilidad. El muestreo por distancia es una técnica de baja aplicación en ambientes urbanos, a pesar de que es un método muy efectivo para estimar densidades poblacionales y de bajo costo. En esta investigación analizamos aquellas covariables que pueden influir en la detectabilidad de la tórtola turca Streptopelia decaocto en ambientes antrópicos para estimar sus densidades en el este de España. A través de puntos de conteo realizamos estimaciones en ambientes urbanos, periurbanos y parques. La probabilidad de detección y la densidad fueron estimadas mediante el muestreo por distancia con múltiples covariables y empleamos varios análisis estadísticos para comparar las densidades estimadas. Nuestros resultados muestran que la altura de los edificios influye de manera negativa y la capacidad de los observadores influye positivamente en la detectabilidad de la tórtola turca. La zona urbana concentra la menor densidad tanto de grupos de aves como de individuos en comparación con las otras zonas. El uso del muestreo por distancia es de fácil aplicación en ambientes metropolitanos que ayuda al desarrollo de la ciencia ciudadana.
Methods to estimate populations of urban birds usually do not consider the effects of environmental and anthropic variables on their detectability. Distance sampling is not commonly used in urban environments even though is a highly effective and low-cost method to estimate the population densities of birds. In this research, we analyzed those covariables that may influence the detectability of the Eurasian collared dove Streptopelia decaocto detectability in anthropic environments to estimate population densities in Eastern Spain. Point counts were carried out in three environments: urban, peri-urban, and parks. Detection probability and density were estimated through distance sampling considering multiple covariables and we used several statistical tests to compare the estimated densities. Our results show that building height negatively affects the detectability of the Eurasian collared dove while the observers’ ability affects it positively. Moreover, the urban environment has a lower density of individuals and flocks of birds when compared with the other two areas studied. Distance sampling is easy to apply in urban environments and it will help in the development of citizen science.
Referencias
Aguilella A, Fos S, Laguna E, editores. 2010. Catálogo Valenciano de Especies de Flora Amenazadas. (Colección). Valencia: Conselleria de Medi Ambient, Aigua, Urbanisme i Habitatge, Generalitat Valenciana.
Akaike H. 1973. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. En: Petrov BN, Csaki F, editores. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado. p. 267-281.
Arandhara S, Sathishkumar S, Baskaran N. 2020. Modelling the effect of covariates on the detectability and density of native blackbucks and invasive feral-horse using Multiple Covariate Distance Sampling at Point Calimere Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India. Mamm. Biol. 100:173-186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-020-00018-w
Bermúdez-Cavero AO, Bernat-Ponce E, Gil-Delgado JA, López-Iborra GM. 2021. Urban landscape selection by Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) in eastern Spain. Caldasia 43(1):138-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.15446/caldasia.v43n1.82214
Bernat-Ponce E, Gil-Delgado JA, Guijarro D. 2018. Factors affecting the abundance of House Sparrows Passer domesticus in urban areas of southeast of Spain. Bird Study 65(3):404-416. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2018.1518403
Bernat-Ponce E, Gil-Delgado JA, López-Iborra GM. 2020. Replacement of semi-natural cover with artificial substrates in urban parks causes a decline of house sparrows Passer domesticus in Mediterranean towns. Urban Ecosyst. 23:471-481. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00940-4
Bernat-Ponce E, Gil-Delgado JA, López-Iborra GM. 2022. Efectos de las características de las ciudades occidentales contemporáneas sobre la avifauna urbana. Ecosistemas 31(1):2158. doi: https://doi.org/10.7818/ECOS.2158
Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA. 1993. Bird Census Techniques. London: Academic Press.
Blackburn TM, Duncan RP. 2001. Establishment patterns of exotic birds are constrained by non-random patterns in introduction. J. Biogeogr. 28(7):927-939. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2001.00597.x
Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P. 2009. Avian Invasions: The ecology and evolution of exotic birds. Chapter 9, The evolution of Exotic Birds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232543.003.0009
Bled F, Royle JA, Cam E. 2011. Hierarchical modeling of an invasive spread: the Eurasian Collared dove Streptopelia decaocto in the United States. Ecol. Appl. 21(1):290-302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1877.1
Bretz F, Hothorn T, Westfall P. 2010. Multiple Comparisons Using R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL. 1993. Distance Sampling: Estimating abundance of biological populations. London: Chapman and Hall.
Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Marques TA, Oedekoven CS. 2015. Distance Sampling: Methods and Applications. New York: Springer Cham.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Nueva York: Springer-Verlag.
Carrascal LM, Palomino D. 2008. Las aves comunes reproductoras en España. Población en 2004-2006. Madrid: SEO/BirdLife.
Carrete M, Tella JL. 2008. Wild-bird trade and exotic invasions: A new link of conservation concern? Front. Ecol. Environ. 6(4):207-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/070075
Coombs CFB, Isaacson AJ, Murton RK, Thearle RJP, Westwood NJ. 1981. Collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto) in urban habitats. J. Appl. Ecol. 18(1):41-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2402478
Cramp S. 1985. Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Midlle East and North Africa. Volume 4. The Birds of the Western Palearctic: Terns to Woodpeckers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crosbie SP, Souza LE, Ernest HB. 2011. Estimating western Scrub-Jay density in California by multiple-covariate distance sampling. Condor 113(4):843-852. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2011.090152
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J. 1997. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Vol. 4. Sandgrouse to Cuckoos. Barcelona: Lynx Editions.
Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Lee A, Jiguet, F. 2007. Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv. Biol. 21(3):741-751. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00671.x
Diefenbach DR, Brauning DW, Mattice JA. 2003. Variability in grassland bird counts related to observer differences and species detection rates. Auk 120(4):1168-1179.
Dunn PK, Smyth, GK. 2018. Generalized Linear Models With Examples in R. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0118-7
Dulisz B, Nowakowski JJ. 2011. Population dynamics of the Collared Dove Streptopelia decaocto in urban areas of Poland during wintertime. En: Indykiewicz P, Jerzak L, Böhner J, Kavanagh B, editores. URBAN FAUNA. Studies of animal biology, ecology and conservation in European cities. Bydgoszcz: University of Technology and Life Sciences. p. 449-460.
Efford MG, Dawson DK. 2009. Effect of distance-related heterogeneity on population size estimates from point counts. Auk 126(1):100-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2009.07197
Eglington SM, Davis SE, Joys AC, Chamberlain DE, Noble DG. 2010. The effect of observer experience on English Breeding Bird Survey population trends. Bird Study 57(2):129-141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650903440648
Eraud C, Boutin J-M, Roux D, Faivre B. 2007. Spatial dynamics of an invasive bird species assessed using robust design occupancy analysis: the case of the Eurasian collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto) in France. J. Biogeogr. 34(6):1077-1086. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01673.x
Fujisaki I, Pearlstine EV, Mazzotti FJ. 2010. The rapid spread of invasive Eurasian collared doves Streptopelia decaocto in the continental USA follows human-altered habitats. Ibis 152(3): 622-632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01038.x
Gibbons DW, Gregory RD. 2006. Birds. En: Sutherland WJ, editor. Ecological Census Techniques: A handbook (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 308-350.
Gibbs D, Barnes E, Cox J. 2010. Pigeons and doves: A guide to the pigeons y dove of the world. London: A & C Black Publishers.
Groom JD, McKinney LB, Ball LC, Winchell CS. 2007. Quantifying off-highway vehicle impacts on density and survival of a threatened dune-endemic plant. Biol. Conserv. 135(1):119-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.005
Guiry E, Buckley M. 2018. Urban rats have less variable, higher protein diets. P. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 285:20181441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1441
Hostetter NJ, Gardner B, Sillett TS, Pollock KH, Simons TR. 2019. An integrated model decomposing the components of detection probability and abundance in unmarked populations. Ecosphere 10(3):e02586. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2586
Hulme-Beaman A, Dobney K, Cucchi T, Searle JB. 2016. An Ecological and Evolutionary Framework for Commensalism in Anthropogenic Environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31(8):633-645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.001
Hutto RL, Pletschet SM, Hendricks P. 1986. A fixed-radius point count method for nonbreeding and breeding season use. Auk 103: 593-602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/103.3.593
INE. c2016. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Demografía y población. Padrón. Población por municipios. [last accessed: 15 Sep 2016]. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736177011&menu=resultados&idp=1254734710990
Johnston A, Newson SE, Risely K, Musgrove AJ, Massimino D, Baillie SR, Pearce-Higgins JW. 2014. Species traits explain variation in detectability of UK birds. Bird Study 61(3):340-350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2014.941787
Kasprzykowski Z, Goławski A. 2009. Does the use of playback affect the estimates of numbers of grey Partridge Perdix perdix? Wildlife Biol. 15(2):123-128. doi: https://doi.org/10.2981/08-001
Koper N, Leston L, Baker TM, Curry C, Rosa P. 2016. Effects of ambient noise on detectability and localization of avian songs and tones by observers in grasslands. Ecol. Evol. 6(1):245-255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1847
Lee ATK, Marsden SJ. 2012. The influence of habitat, season, and detectability on abundance estimates across an Amazonian parrot assemblage. Biotropica 44(4):537-544. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2011.00847.x
López-Davalillo J. 2014. Geografía Regional de España. Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
López-Iborra GM, Bañuls-Patiño A, Zaragozí-Llenes A, Sala-Bernabeu J, Izquierdo- Rosique A, Martínez-Pérez JE, Ramos-Sánchez J, Bañuls-Patiño D, Arroyo-Morcillo S, Sánchez-Zapata JA, Campos-Roig B, Reig-Ferrer A, editores. 2015. Atlas de las aves nidificantes en la provincia de Alicante. Alicante: Publicacions de la Universitat d’Alacant-SEO/Alicante.
MacGregor-Fors I, Payton, ME. 2013. Contrasting diversity values: Statistical inferences based on overlapping confidence intervals. PLOS ONE 8(2):8-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056794
Martín-Echevarría L. 1932. Geografía de España III. Barcelona: Editorial Labor S. A.
Marques TA, Thomas L, Fancy SG, Buckland ST. 2007. Improving estimates of bird density using multiple-covariate distance sampling. Auk 124(4):1229-1243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/124.4.1229
Marzluff J, Bowman R, Donnelly R. 2001. Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1531-9
Mason CF. 2006. Avian species richness and numbers in the built environment: Can new housing developments be good for birds? Biodivers. Conserv. 15(8):2365-2378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-1236-4
McKinney ML. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883-890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2
Murgui E, Hedblom M. 2017. Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1
Norvell RE, Howe FP, Parrish JR. 2003. A seven-year comparison of relative-abundance and distance-sampling methods. Auk 120(4):1013–1028. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/120.4.1013
Pennington DN, Blair RB. 2012. Using Gradient Analysis to Uncover Pattern and Process in Urban Bird Communities. En: Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, editores. Urban Bird Ecology and Conservation. Studies in Avian Biology. Berkeley: University of California Press. p. 9-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520273092.003.0002
Puckett EE, Orton D, Munshi-South J. 2020. Commensal Rats and Humans: Integrating Rodent Phylogeography and Zooarchaeology to Highlight Connections between Human Societies. BioEssays 42(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900160
R Core Team. c2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Revisada en: 01jun2019]. https://www.R-project.org/
Reynolds SJ, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Sumasgutner P, Mainwaring MC. 2019. Urbanisation and nest building in birds: a review of threats and opportunities. J. Ornithol. 160(3):841-860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-019-01657-8
Rigual A. 1972. Flora y vegetación de la provincia de Alicante. Alicante: Instituto de Estudios Alicantinos.
Rocha-Camarero G, Hidalgo de Trucios SJ. 1998. Distribución y abundancia de la Tórtola Turca Streptopelia decaocto en Extremadura (SO de España). Butlletí Del Grup Català d’Anellament 15, 1-8.
Rocha-Camarero G, Hidalgo de Trucios SJ. 2004. La Tórtola Turca, ¿especie cazable? En: Centro de Desarrollo Rural Campiña Sur, editores. Gestión Cinegética y Desarrollo Rural. Badajoz: Centro de Desarrollo Rural Campiña Sur. p. 143-152.
Rodríguez I. 1999. Evolución de la población de tórtola turca (Streptopelia decaocto) en la Comunidad de Madrid. Anuario Ornitológico de Madrid 42-47.
Romagosa CM, Labisky RF. 2000. Establishment anddispersal of the Eurasian Collared dove in Florida. J. Field Ornithol.71(1):159-166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1648/0273-8570-71.1.159
Sorace A. 2002. High density of bird and pest species in urban habitats and the role of predator abundance. Ornis Fennica 79(2):60-71.
Summers-Smith JD. 1988. The Sparrows: A Study of the Genus Passer. London: T & AD POYSER.
Thomas L, Buckland ST, Rexstad EA, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Hedley SL, Bishop JRB, Marques TA, Burnham KP. 2010. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J. Appl. Ecol. 47(1):5-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x
Thompson SJ, Handel CM, McNew LB. 2017. Autonomous acoustic recorders reveal complex patterns in avian detection probability. J. Wildlife Manage. 81(7):1228-1241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21285
Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Evans KL, Davies RG, Newson SE, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ. 2007. Bird densities are associated with household densities. Glob. Change Biol. 13(8):1685-1695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01390.x
Verma SK, Murmu TD. 2015. Impact of environmental and disturbance variables on avian community structure along a gradient of urbanization in Jamshedpur, India. PLoS ONE. 10(7):1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133383
Vimercati G, Probert AF, Volery L, Bernardo-Madrid R, Bertolino S, Céspedes V, Essl F, Evans T, Gallardo B, Gallien J, González-Moreno P, Charlotte M, Hui C, Jeschke JM, Katsanevakis S, Kühn I, Kumschick S, Pergl J, Pyšek P, Rieseberg L, Robinson TB, Saul W-C, Sorte CJB, Vilà M, Wilson JRU, Bacher S. 2022. The EICAT+ framework enables classification of positive impacts of alien taxa on native biodiversity. PLoS Biol 20(8):e3001729. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001729
Yackulic CB, Nichols JD, Reid J, Der R. 2015. To predict the niche, model colonization and extinction. Ecology, 96(1):16-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1361.1
Zerbini AN. 2006. Improving precision in multiple covariate distance sampling: a case study with whales in Alaska. [Tesis]. [Washington]: Universidad de Washington.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
