Publicado
A NEW SPECIES OF CHLEROGAS FROM THE ANDES OF CENTRAL COLOMBIA (HYMENOPTERA: HALICTIDAE)
Una especie nueva de Chlerogas de los Andes del centro de Colombia (Hymenoptera:
Halictidae)
MICHAEL S. ENGEL
VICTOR H. GONZALEZ
Division of Entomology, Natural History Museum, and Department of Ecology
& Evolutionary Biology, 1501 Crestline Drive - Suite 140, University of
Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66049-2811, USA. msengel@ku.edu
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue,
Haworth Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA. Current address:
U.S.D.A.-A.R.S. Bee Biology & Systematics Laboratory, Utah State University,
Logan, Utah 84322-5310, USA. victorgonzab@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
A new species of the long-headed bee genus Chlerogas Vachal (Halictinae: Augochlorini) is described and figured from a male captured at high elevation in central Colombia. Chlerogas tatamaensis Engel & Gonzalez, new species, is distinguished from its congeners on the basis of integumental coloration and sculpturing as well as features of the male terminalia. A revised key to the species of Chlerogas is provided.
Key words. Andes, Anthophila, Apoidea, Augochlorini, Colombia, taxonomy.
RESUMEN
Se describe e ilustra una especie nueva del género de abejas de cabeza larga Chlerogas Vachal (Halictinae: Augochlorini) a partir de un macho capturado a grandes alturas en el centro de Colombia. Chlerogas tatamaensis Engel & Gonzalez, especie nueva, se distingue de otras especies del género por la coloración y puntuación del integumento como también por caracteres de los órganos genitales del macho. También se presenta una clave actualizada para las especies de Chlerogas.
Palabras clave. Andes, Anthophila, Apoidea, Augochlorini, Colombia, taxonomía.
Recibido: 18/06/2009
Aceptado: 21/08/2009
Bees of the genus Chlerogas Vachal are among the more distinctive of Neotropical halictines. Despite their characteristic habitus (Figs. 1, 2, vide etiam Engel, 2009), moderate size (typically around a centimetre in total length), and distinctive apomorphies, individuals are infrequently encountered by melittologists and almost nothing is known of their biology. The genus was last revised by Brooks & Engel (1999) who recognized nine species, with a tenth species described by Engel et al. (2006) from Ecuador and the previously unknown males recently described for two others (Engel, 2009). Herein we provide the description of an eleventh species of Chlerogas captured in central Colombia. The specimen discussed here was initially believed to be a geographic variant of a previously described species. Upon continued contemplation and more thorough examination of the characters, particularly the genitalia, it is clear that the specimen actually is representative of a new species and accordingly is described to make it known to melittologists. This species can be added to the general list of Colombian bees itemized by Smith-Pardo (2003) as well as the list of Andean bees provided by Gonzalez & Engel (2004). Morphological terminology generally follows Engel (2001) and Michener (2007).
Chlerogas tatamaensis, new species
(Figs. 1-4)
Holotype. ?; [Colombia]: Parque Tatamá, Risaralda, Rio San Rafael, 4 Ene [Enero = January] 1993, C. Sarmiento, 2430 msnm; deposited in the Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá.
Diagnosis. The new species is close to C. colombiensis Brooks & Engel, with the genitalia being somewhat reminiscent of each other, particularly in volsellar shape (both species have short transverse volsellae). Chlerogas tatamaensis can be distinguished from C. colombiensis by the transverse dark brown bands on metasomal terga I and II (entirely amber in the latter species), the dark facial coloration with golden and green highlights (brilliant metallic green in C. colombiensis), the presence of a deep concave U-shaped medioapical notch on metasomal sternum V (such a notch absent in C. colombiensis), and by the structure of the terminalia (cf. Figs. 3-4 with figures in Brooks & Engel, 1999). Externally C. tatamaensis looks most similar to C. townesi Brooks & Engel, but the terminalia are considerably different as the latter belongs to a putative clade with greatly developed volsellae versus the short, transverse volsellae of C. tatamaensis and C. colombiensis, with the volsellar structure in C. hirsutipennis Cockerell being somewhat intermediate between these two classes of form.
Description. ?: Total body length 13.0 mm; forewing length 9.52 mm. Head 1.48 times longer than wide (Figs. 1-2), narrower than mesosoma. Gena about as broad as compound eye in profile. Base of clypeus below lower tangent of compound eyes by 0.17 mm. Head width 2.29 mm; length (to apex of clypeus) 3.38 mm; clypeal length 1.21 mm; malar space length 0.88 mm; lower interorbital distance 0.88 mm; upper interorbital distance 1.08 mm; intertorular distance 0.21 mm; torular-ocular distance 0.21 mm; torulus-median ocellus distance 0.67 mm; distance between lateral ocelli 0.25 mm; distance between lateral ocellus and median ocellus 0.13 mm; ocellocular distance 0.25 mm. Scape length 0.73 mm; pedicel as long as wide, length 0.16 mm; F1 as long as wide, length 0.21 mm; remaining flagellar articles longer than wide; F2 0.31 mm in length; F3-F4 each 0.39 mm in length; F5 0.43 mm in length; F6-F8 each 0.47 mm in length; F9 0.49 mm in length; F10 0.68 mm in length. Face with dense small punctures (punctures largely contiguous), such punctures becoming weaker and blending to granular integument in malar space and on vertex, and strongly imbricate integument on gena (with some weak rugae) and postgena; clypeus and supraclypeal area strongly imbricate with scattered shallow punctures. Intertegular distance 2.13 mm; mesosoma largely with small contiguous punctures, such punctures becoming ill-defined around median line of mesoscutum and integument granulose and imbricate; mesoscutellum as on mesoscutum, weakly bituberculate; metanotum rugulose; pleura with dense small punctures, integument otherwise strongly imbricate, punctures becoming weaker ventrally. Basal area of propodeum about as long as mesoscutellum, about 1.5 times as long as metanotum; lateral surface with integument strongly imbricate, less so on posterior surface; basal area distinctly obliquely striate, striae reaching apical margin, medially striae become more minutely rugulose and granulose. Forewing with basal vein distad cu-a by 1.5 times vein width; 1rs-m basad 1m-cu by 2 times vein width; 2rs-m distad 2m-cu by 6.5 times vein width; marginal cell length 2.5 mm, width 0.63 mm; first submarginal cell slightly shorter than combined lengths of second and third marginal cells (as measured along their posterior borders); second submarginal cell scarcely narrowed anteriorly; anterior border of second submarginal cell along Rs slightly shorter than anterior border of third submarginal cell; distal hamuli arranged 3-1-3 on hind wing. Inner metatibial spur with five short teeth, not including apical portion of rachus. Metasomal terga and sterna imbricate; sternum IV with apical margin weakly concave medially; apical margin of sternum V with deep U-shaped apical emargination; sternum VI as in C. townesi (vide Brooks & Engel, 1999); hidden sterna and genitalia as in figures 3 and 4, respectively.
Integument weakly shiny on head and mesosoma, relatively dull on metasoma.
Face dark brown with green and golden highlights, particularly strong around
antennal toruli and upper supraclypeal area; apex of clypeus with transverse
yellow mark (Fig. 2); labrum and antennae dark brown;
mandible black with reddish apex; labiomaxillary complex dark brown to black;
gena and postgena metallic green with golden highlights (Fig.
1). Mesosoma dark metallic brassy green, metallic coloration relatively
subdued on mesoscutum and pleura. Legs amber, with some irregular longitudinal
brown markings on dorsal and ventral surfaces of femora and tibiae; coxae not
amber, same color as mesosoma. Wing membranes infumate; veins dark brown. Metasoma
not metallic; metasomal tergum I largely amber, with apical transverse dark
brown band near margin, margin amber; metasomal tergum II amber with dark brown
transverse band occupying apical two-thirds of segment, margin amber; metasomal
tergum III largely dark brown except basal, lateral, and apical margins amber;
remaining metasomal terga dark brown, with extreme lateral margins amber and
narrow apical margins semi-translucent; metasomal sterna I-III amber, remaining
sterna dark brown.
Pubescence generally fulvous; setae of face generally simple, scattered, and
suberect, becoming slightly more fuscous by vertex and with some minute branches,
such setae intermingled with shorter, subappressed, plumose setae around antennal
toruli and on face bordering clypeus (Fig. 2). Setae
of mesosoma generally simple or with a few short branches, setae short to moderate
length, becoming gradually longer ventrally; setae of mesoscutum and mesoscutellum
more generally more fuscous than those of pleura; setae around pronotal lobe
more dense and plumose; setae on lateral surface of propodeum more numerous
and more densely branched, intermingled with very short, appressed, simple setae
not obscuring integument; such setae not present on posterior surface of propodeum.
Metasoma generally with scattered, suberect, simple or minutely-branched fulvous
setae; such setae more numerous on successively more distal terga and intermingled
with increasingly more numerous fuscous setae which become gradually longer
toward apex. Sterna with scattered fulvous setae, such setae particularly elongate
along apical margin of sternum IV, except not present medially along concavity;
sternum V with elongate, apically-branched fulvo-fuscous setae along apical
margin, such setae relatively dense, not present medially in deep U-shaped emargination.
Etymology. The specific epithet is taken from the National Park in which the
species was collected, Parque Natural National Tatamá.
Comments. The species C. nephos Brooks & Engel, known only from a single
female collected in Antioquia Province, is similar in some features to the males
of both C. colombiensis Brooks & Engel and C. tatamaensis and may represent
the female sex of one of these species (perhaps most likely C. colombiensis
given the proximity of their type localities) or, just as likely, truly a third
species in this complex. Continued exploration in Colombia is necessary in order
to capture males and females together, and ideally nests of these bees, in order
to provide further resolution to Chlerogas diversity.
Key to Species of Chlerogas
The following key is a key to species for the genus, with some revised and expanded elements from the one provided by Brooks & Engel (1999) but large portions are entirely new. In addition to the characters provided below, males of all species can be distinguished further by their terminalia as depicted in Brooks & Engel (1999), Engel et al. (2006), Engel (2009), and herein. In constructing the key we have attempted to rely largely on easily visible external features resulting in artificial groupings of species, whereas the genitalia and hidden sterna suggest what are more likely to be genealogical affinities [e.g., C. colombiensis and C. tatamaensis are perhaps close relatives, with C. hirsutipennis allied to them; C. chlerogas (Vachal) and C. cyaneus Brooks & Engel are close relatives (perhaps even basal in the genus); while C. araguaensis Brooks & Engel, C. cooperi Engel et al., C. townesi, and C. tiara Brooks & Engel likely form a clade].
1. Antenna with 10 flagellar articles; medioapical margin of metasomal tergum
V entire (males) ................... 2
-. Antenna with nine flagellar articles; medioapical margin of metasomal tergum
V with slit (females) ....................... 11
2(1). Metasomal terga metallic green to blue; legs dark brown to black ..................
3
-. Metasomal terga and legs largely amber to brown or black, not metallic ........
4
3(2). Integument between punctures ventrally on mesepisternum polished smooth
or very faintly imbricate and shining; basal area of propodeum with weak striae
in basal quarter to third ......................................................
C. chlerogas (Vachal)
-. Integument between punctures ventrally on mesepisternum strongly imbricate
and weakly shining; basal area of propodeum with distinct and complete striae
...................................................................... C. cyaneus
Brooks & Engel
4(2). Head and mesosoma not metallic, brown to black; leg coloration variable
....... 5
-. Head and mesosoma metallic green to blue, sometimes coloration is rather
subdued on mesosoma and face (i.e., C. tatamaensis); legs largely amber, never
entirely dark brown to black ............ 7
5(4). Legs largely amber; apex of clypeus with transverse amber marking ................
6
-. Legs dark brown to black, without amber podites or markings; apex of clypeus
dark brown, without transverse amber mark ........................................................
C. boliviensis Brooks & Engel
6(5). Metasomal sterna I-III brown ................................ C. hirsutipennis
Cockerell
-. Metasomal sterna I-III amber ......................................... C.
cooperi Engel et al.
7(4). Metasomal terga I and II amber with transverse dark brown bands ............
8
-. Metasomal terga I and II entirely amber ........ C. colombiensis Brooks &
Engel
8(7). Antennal scape dark brown to black .... 9
-. Antennal scape entirely amber ................................... C. tiara
Brooks & Engel
9(8). Apical margin of metasomal sternum V deeply concave ..............................
10
-. Apical margin of metasomal sternum V entire ...............................................................
C. araguaensis Brooks & Engel
10(9). Integument around median line of mesoscutum with well defined, small
punctures separated by 0.5-1.75 times puncture width and imbricate; metallic
green of head and mesosoma brilliant and shining ..........................................................
C. townesi Brooks & Engel
-. Integument around median line of mesoscutum granulose and imbricate, with
shallow, ill-defined largely contiguous punctures; metallic green of head and
mesosoma dark and subdued, particularly on mesosoma where it appears largely
as highlights dorsally or as dark metallic green on pleura and propodeum ........
C. tatamaensis n. sp.
11(1). Metasomal terga metallic green to blue, or nearly black with scattered
metallic highlights; legs dark brown to black, without amber coloration ..............
12
-. Metasomal terga without metallic coloration, instead amber and/or brown;
legs largely amber, although some with extensive brown markings .............
14
12(11). Basal area of propodeum with distinct striae, sometimes only basally
........ 13
-. Basal area of propodeum granular, without distinct striae .........................................
C. boliviensis Brooks & Engel
13(12). Basal area of propodeum with distinct and complete striae; integument
between punctures ventrally on mesepisternum strongly imbricate and weakly shining;
malar space to compound eye length ratio 0.37 ..............................................................
C. cyaneus Brooks & Engel
-. Basal area of propodeum with weak striae in basal quarter to third; integument
between punctures ventrally on mesepisternum polished smooth or very faintly
imbricate and shining; malar space to compound eye length ratio 0.48 .................
C. chlerogas (Vachal)
14(11). Face brilliant metallic green or brassy green ..............................................
15
-. Face black or dark brown, with green or gold highlights .. C. cooperi Engel
et al.
15(14). Mesoscutum with median longitudinal area of dark brown to black, nonmetallic
integument, laterally metallic green ................................. 16
-. Mesoscutum entirely metallic green ................. C. nephos Brooks &
Engel
16(15). Metasomal tergum II almost entirely brown; malar space to compound eye
length ratio 0.32 ........................................................ C.
tiara Brooks & Engel
-. Metasomal tergum II entirely amber, or nearly so; malar space to compound
eye length ratio 0.41 ......................................................
C. townesi Brooks & Engel
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript prior to publication. Partial support was provided by U.S. National Science Foundation grant EF-0341724 (to M.S. Engel). Line illustrations of the terminalia were prepared by S.L. Taliaferro through support from the University of Kansas Engel Illustration Fund. This is a contribution of the Division of Entomology, University of Kansas Natural History Museum.
LITERATURE CITED
1. BROOKS, R.W. & M.S. ENGEL. 1999. A revision of the augochlorine bee
genus Chlerogas Vachal (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Zoological Journal of the
Linnean Society 125(4): 463-486.
2. ENGEL, M.S. 2001. A monograph of the Baltic amber bees and evolution of the
Apoidea (Hymenoptera). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 259:
1-192.
3. ENGEL, M.S. 2009. Notes on the augochlorine bee genus Chlerogas (Hymenoptera:
Halictidae). Caldasia 31(2): 449-457.
4. ENGEL, M.S., F.F. DE OLIVEIRA & A.H. SMITH-PARDO. 2006. A new species
of the bee genus Chlerogas Vachal from Ecuador (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Entomologist's
Monthly Magazine 142(1703-1705): 103-106.
5. GONZALEZ, V.H. & M.S. ENGEL. 2004. The tropical Andean bee fauna (Insecta:
Hymenoptera: Apoidea), with examples from Colombia. Entomologische Abhandlungen
62(1): 65-75.
6. MICHENER, C.D. 2007. The Bees of the World [2nd Edition]. Johns Hopkins University
Press, Baltimore.
7. SMITH-PARDO, A.H. 2003. A preliminary account of the bees of Colombia (Hymenoptera:
Apoidea): Present knowledge and future directions. Journal of the Kansas Entomological
Society 76(2): 335-341.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2009 Caldasia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).