Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Expectativas racionales, ergodicidad y expectativas sociales
Rational expectations, ergodicity and social expectations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v43n92.106494Palabras clave:
incertidumbre, expectativas racionales, ergodicidad, sistemas complejos (es)uncertainty, rational expectations, ergodicity, complex systems (en)
Descargas
En el presente artículo se crítica la teoría de las expectativas racionales. Se destaca que Knight y Keynes, al distinguir entre riesgo e incertidumbre, propusieron una avenida de investigación completamente diferente. El objetivo es demostrar cómo la falta de comprensión del concepto de ergodicidad y el uso arbitrario de la palabra por parte de economistas –especialmente de la escuela poskeynesiana– desorientó la crítica al enfoque probabilístico de la corriente principal y privó a la teoría económica de los frutos que se podrían haber obtenido siguiendo el camino planteado por Keynes y Knight. Se propone retomar este camino desde la perspectiva de los sistemas adaptativos complejos.
The theory of rational expectations is critiqued. It is noted that Knight and Keynes, by distinguishing between risk and uncertainty, proposed an entirely different avenue of inquiry. It demonstrates how the lack of understanding of the concept of ergodicity and the arbitrary use of the word by economists –especially from the Post Keynesian school– disoriented the critique of the Mainstream probabilistic approach and deprived economic theory of the fruits that could have been obtained by following the path proposed by Keynes and Knight. It is proposed to resume this path based on the perspective of complex adaptive systems.
Referencias
Acemoglu, D., & Ozdaglar A. (2011). Opinion dynamics and learning insocial networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 1, 3-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13235-010-0004-1
Acemoglu, D., & Fagnani, F. (2013). Opinion fluctuations and disagreementin social networks. Mathematics of Operations Research, 38(1), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.1120.0570
Borovkov, A. (1994). Ergodicity and stability of stochastic processes. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.
Carrión Álvarez, M., & Ehnts, D. (2016). Samuelson and Davidson on ergodicity: A reformulation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 39(1),1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2016.1145062
Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Kamdar, R. (2018). The formation of e0xpectations, inflation, and the Phillips curve. Journal of Economic Literature,56, 1447-1491. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171300
Dalege, J., y van der Does, T. (2021). Changing beliefs about scientific issues: The role of moral and social belief network. https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10751
Davidson, P. (1982). Rational expectations: A Fallacious Foundation for Studying Crucial Decision-Making Processes. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(2), 182-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1982.11489355
Davidson, P. (2007a). John Maynard Keynes. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-23547-2
Davidson, P. (2007b). Interpreting Keynes for the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286559
De Miguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2007). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915-1953. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075
Doctor, J. N., Wakker, P., & Wang, T. (2020). Economists’ views on the ergodicity problem. Nature Physics, 16(12), 1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01106-x
Dow, S. C. (2005). Axioms and Babylonian thought: A reply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(3), 385-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2005.11051453
Evans, G. W., & Honkapohja, S. (2001). Learning and expectations in macroeconomics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400824267
Galesic, M., Olsson, H., Dalege, J., Van Der Does, T., & Stein, D. (2021). Integrating social and cognitive aspects of belief dynamics: Towards a unifying framework. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18(176), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2020.0857
Hamilton, J. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691218632
Hassler, U. (2017). Ergodic for the mean, Economics Letters, 151, 75- 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.013
Hommes, C. (2021). Behavioral and experimental macroeconomics and policy analysis: A complex systems approach. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(1), 149-219. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20191434
Keynes, J. M. (1937). The general theory of employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2), 209-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1882087
Lavoie, M. (2014). Post-Keynesian economics: New foundations. Edward Elgar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783475827
Matuszewski, P., & Szabó, G. (2023). The role of hyperactive Twitter accounts in the diffusion of political information. Policy Studies, 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.2237911
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin. L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Norris, J.R., & Chains, M. (1997). Cambridge series in statistical & probabilistic mathematics. Cambridge University Press.
Peters, O., & Gell-Mann, M. (2016). Evaluating gambles using dynamics. Chaos, 26 (2), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940236
Peters, O. (2019). The ergodicity problem in economics. Nature Physics, 15(12),1216-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0732-0
Peters, O., & Adamou, A. (2021). The time interpretation of expected utility theory. http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03680
Ravazzi, C., Frasca, P., Tempo, R., & Ishii, H. (2015). Ergodic randomized algorithms and dynamics over networks. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 2(1), 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2014.2367571
Rizvi, S. A. T. (2006). The Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu results after thirty years. History of Political Economy, 38(Suppl 1), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-2005-024
Romer, D. (2019). Advanced macroeconomics (5th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Ross, S. y Pekoz, E. (2007). A second course in probability. Probability Book Store.
Shiller, R. J. (2020). Expectations. In The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 1-11). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5
Sijtsema, J. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: Advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002
Smaldino, P. E. (2023). Modeling Social behavior. Princeton University Press.
Steinert-Threlkeld, Z. (2017). Spontaneous collective action: Peripheral mobilization during the Arab Spring. American Political Science Review, 111, 379-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000769
Zhang, B., Pavlou, P. A., & Krishnan, R. (2018). On direct vs. Indirect peer influence in large social networks. Information Systems Research, 29(2), 292-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0753
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Cuadernos de Economía
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Cuadernos de Economía a través de la División de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia promueve y garantiza el acceso abierto de todos sus contenidos. Los artículos publicados por la revista se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), lo que implica lo siguiente:
