Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Towards participatory governance in the management of cultural heritage ecosystems: The Colombian Coffee Cultural Landscape
Hacia una gobernanza participativa en la gestión de los ecosistemas del patrimonio cultural: el paisaje cultural cafetero colombiano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v44n96.117867Palabras clave:
Cultural heritage ecosystems, Social participation, Latent class models, Multiple correspondence analysis, Heritage management. (en)ecosistemas del patrimonio cultural, participación social, modelos de clases latentes, análisis de correspondencias múltiples, gestión del patrimonio (es)
Descargas
We analyse the propensity to engage in the sustainability and enhancement of a cultural heritage ecosystem –the Colombian Coffee Cultural Landscape from a demand-side perspective. Using survey data collected from visitors and residents, we innovatively integrate two methodologies for audience classification: latent class models and multiple correspondence analysis. Our findings reveal three distinct segments based on varying degrees of propensity to participate and valuation intensity. Moreover, the perceptions each group holds regarding government actions significantly influence their decision to become involved. This highlights the need to implement participatory governance models in cultural heritage management and reveals their impact on local economic development.
Este artículo analiza la propensión a participar en la sostenibilidad y mejora de un ecosistema de patrimonio cultural —el paisaje cultural cafetero de Colombia— desde la perspectiva de la demanda. Utilizando datos de encuestas realizadas a visitantes y residentes, integramos de forma innovadora dos metodologías para la clasificación del público: los modelos de clases latentes y el análisis de correspondencias múltiples. Nuestros resultados revelan la existencia de tres segmentos distintos basados en diferentes grados de propensión a participar y de intensidad de valoración. Además, las percepciones que cada grupo tiene de las acciones gubernamentales influyen de manera significativa en su decisión de participar. Todo ello pone de relieve la necesidad de implantar modelos de gobernanza participativa en la gestión del patrimonio cultural y revela sus repercusiones en el desarrollo económico local.
Referencias
1. Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple correspondence analysis. Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, 2, 651-657. Sage.
2. Andreoni, J. (1998). Toward a theory of charitable fund-raising. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1186-1213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/250044
3. Ashworth, G. (2013). Heritage and local development: A reluctant rela tionship. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignosa (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage (pp. 367-385). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00031
4. Asselin, L. (2009). Analysis of multidimensional poverty. Theory and case studies. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0843-8
5. Ateca-Amestoy, V. (2008). Determining heterogeneous behavior for theater attendance. Journal of Cultural Economics, 32(2), 127-151. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10824-008-9065-z
6. Ateca-Amestoy, V., Gorostiaga, A., & Rossi, M. (2020). Motivations and barriers to heritage engagement in Latin America: Tangible and intangible dimensions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 44, 397-423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09366-z
7. Ayer, M., Brunk, H., Ewing, G., Reid, W., & Silverman, E. (1955). An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641-647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728423
8. Báez, A., & Herrero, L. (2012). Using contingent valuation and cost-ben efit analysis to desing a policy for restoring cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 13(3), 235-245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.12.005
9. Bauer, T. K., Bredtmann, J., & Schmidt, C. M. (2013). Time vs. money— The supply of voluntary labor and charitable donations across Europe. European Journal of Political Economy, 32, 80-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.06.006
10. Bekkers, R. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of inten tions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.08.008
11. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giv ing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924-973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
12. Benhamou, F. (2013). Public intervention for cultural heritage: Normative issues and tools. In I. Rizzo and A. Mignosa (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage (pp. 3-16). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00008
13. Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621-630. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x
14. Bertacchini, E., Santagata, W., & Signorello, G. (2011). Individual giving to support cultural heritage. International Journal of Arts Management, 13(3). https://ssrn.com/abstract=1844292
15. Bína, V., Chantepie, P., Deroin, V., Frank, G., Kommel, K., Kotýnek, J., & Robin, P. (2012). ESSnet-CULTURE Final Report. ESSnet-CULTURE/ Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/culture/library/reports/ess-net-report_en.pdf
16. Bonet, L. (2013). Heritage tourism. In I. Rizzo and A. Mignosa (eds), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage (pp. 386-401). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00032
17. Bonet, L., & Négrier, E. (2018). The participative turn in cultural policy: Paradigms, models, contexts. Poetics, 66, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. poetic.2018.02.006
18. Brida, J., Dalle Nogare, C., & Scuderi, R. (2016). Frequency of museum attendance: Motivation matters. Journal of Cultural Economics, 40, 261 283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-015-9254-5
19. Brooks, A. C. (2003). Charitable giving to humanitarian organizations in Spain. Hacienda Pública Española/Revista de Economía Pública, 165(2), 9-24.
20. Brown, J., MacDonald, R., & Mitchell, R. (2015). Are people who par ticipate in cultural activities more satisfied with life?. Social Indicators Research, 122, 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0678-7
21. Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811241
22. Cavalieri, M., Ferrara, P., Martorana, M., & Rizzo, I. (2022). Cultural her itage restoration and visitors´ experience evaluation. Evidence from an Italian UNESCO site. Session B2 – Cultural heritage and valuation. Tenth European Workshop on Applied Cultural Economics. Torino.
23. Cazorla-Artiles, J., & Eugenio-Martín, J. (2023). Optimal targeting of latent tourism demand segments. Tourism Management, 95, 104685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104685
24. Cerisola, S. (2019). Cultural heritage, creativity and economic develop ment. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975292
25. Chafla Martínez, P. (2019). La disposición al pago para la conservación de bienes patrimoniales: caso del Centro Histórico de la ciudad de Quito. Cuadernos de Economía, 38(76), 231-258. https://doi.org/10.15446/ cuad.econ.v38n76.63574
26. Chen, B., Nakama, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Traditional village forest landscapes: Tourists’ attitudes and preferences for conservation. Tourism Management, 59, 652-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.09.007
27. Ch’ng, K. S., Khoo, S. L., & Chin, P. N. (2014). The effects of cultural and historical information and contribution threshold on public contributions: An experimental study on the conservation of heritage houses in Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38, 207-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-013-9206-x
28. Del Barrio-Tellado, M., Reyes-Gutiérrez, A., & Gómez-Zapata, J. (2025). Reading and libraries in Peru: A demand estimation through a latent class model. Public Library Quarterly, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846 .2025.2521227
29. De Wit, A., & Bekkers, R. (2017). Government support and charitable donations: A meta-analysis of the crowding-out hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 301-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9ysjm
30. Eça de Abreu, M., Laureano, R. M., da Silva, R. V., & Dionísio, P. (2015). Volunteerism, compassion and religiosity as drivers of donations prac tices. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 20(3), 256-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1526
31. Falk, M., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2016). Cultural participation in Europe: Can we identify common determinants?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 40, 127-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-015-9242-9
32. Fernández-Blanco, V., Orea, L., & Prieto-Rodriguez, J. (2009). Analyzing consumers heterogeneity and self-reported tastes: An approach consist ent with the consumer’s decision making process. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(4), 622-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.04.005
33. Ferretti, V., & Gandino, E. (2018). Co-designing the solution space for rural regeneration in a new World Heritage site: A Choice Experiments approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 268(3), 1077 1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.003
34. Gayo, M. (2017). Exploring cultural disengagement: The exam ple of Chile. Cultural Sociology, 11(4), 468-488. https://doi. org/10.1177/1749975517727441
35. Giannoni, S. (2009). Tourism, growth and residents’ welfare with pollution. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 9(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1057/ thr.2008.43
36. Gómez-Zapata, J., Espinal-Monsalve, N., & Herrero-Prieto, L. (2018). Economic valuation of museums as public club goods: Why build loyalty in cultural heritage consumption? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 30, 190 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.09.010
37. Gómez-Zapata, J., del Barrio-Tellado, M., Espinosa-Casero, F., & Herrero Prieto, L. (2024a). I like participatory museums but, how much? Embedding demand-side value in assessing strategies. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 96, 102111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102111
38. Gómez-Zapata, J., Herrero-Prieto, L., & Arboleda-Cardona, J. (2024b). A choice experiment economic valuation of cultural heritage tourism eco systems. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 33(3), 591-612. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09669582.2024.2382840
39. Greenacre, M., & Blasius, J. (Eds.). (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https:// doi.org/10.1201/9781420011319
40. Grisolía, J., & Willis, K. (2012). A latent class model of theatre demand. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36, 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10824-012-9158-6
41. Hand, C. (2018). Do the arts make you happy? A quantile regression approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42, 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10824-017-9302-4
42. Hagenaars, J., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499531
43. Herrero, L., Sanz, J., & Bedate, A. (2003). Valoración económica de bienes públicos en relación al patrimonio cultural de Castilla y León. Propuesta metodológica y aplicación empírica. Revista de Investigación Económica y Social de Castilla y León, 6, 6-122
44. Herrero, L., Sanz, J., Devesa, M., Bedate, A., & del Barrio, M. (2006). The economic impact of cultural events: A case-study of Salamanca 2002, European capital of culture. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406058946
45. Herrero-Prieto, L. C., & Sanz-Lara, J. Á. (2025). Funding immaterial cul tural heritage through commons: Altruism versus reputation. In C. Guccio, I. Mazza & G. Pignataro (eds.), New perspectives in the public and cul tural sectors, 3-19. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81892-9_1
46. Hoyos, D., Mariel, P., Fernandez-Macho, J., 2009. The influence of cul tural identity on the WTP to protect natural resources: Some empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 68, 2372-2381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.015
47. Jurowski, C., & Gursoy, D. (2004). Distance effects on residents’ attitudes toward tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(2), 296-312. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.005
48. Karayazi, S., Dane, G., & Arentze, T. (2024). Visitors’ heritage location choices in Amsterdam in times of mass tourism: A latent class analy sis. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17438 73X.2024.2331227
49. Klamer, A., Petrova, L., & Mignosa, A. (2006). Financing the arts and culture in the European Union, European Parliament’s Committee on Culture and Education. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/EST/download. do?file=13231#sea rch=%20Financing%20the%20arts%20and%20cul ture%20in%20 the%20Eu%20
50. Klamer, A., Mignosa, A., & Lyudmila, L. (2013). Cultural heritage pol icies: A comparative perspective. In I. Rizzo and A. Mignosa (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage (pp. 37-86). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00010
51. Kriström, B. (1990). A non-parametric approach to the estimation of wel fare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Economics, 66(2), 135-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3146363
52. Lazarsfeld, F. (1950). The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II Vol. IV: Measurement and Prediction, 362-412. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/ crid/1572824499801064704.bib?lang=ja
53. Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple correspondence analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993906
54. Linzer, D., & Lewis, J. (2011). poLCA: An R Package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(10), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i10
55. Mäntymaa, E., Ovaskainen, V., Juutinen, A. & Tyrväinen, L. (2018). Integrating nature-based tourism and forestry in private lands under hetero geneous visitor preferences for forest attributes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61, 724-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/096405 68.2017.1333408
56. Mignosa, A. (2016). Theory and practice of cultural heritage policy. In I. Rizzo & R. Towse (eds.), The artful economist: A new look at cultural economics, 227-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40637-4_14
57. Musgrave, R. (1959). The theory of public finance. McGraw-Hill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23426-4
58. Navarro, D. (2015). Recursos turísticos y atractivos turísticos: conceptua lización, clasificación y valoración. Cuadernos de Turismo, 35, 335-357. https://doi.org/10.6018/turismo.35.221641
59. Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Developing a community support model for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 964 988. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.017
60. Otte, H. (2019). Bonding or bridging? On art participation and social cohesion in a rural region of the Netherlands. Poetics, 76, 101355. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.02.006
61. Palma, M., Palma, L., & Aguado, L. (2013). Determinants of cul tural and popular celebration attendance: The case study of Seville Spring Fiestas. Journal of Cultural Economics, 37, 87-107. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10824-012-9167-5
62. Peacock, A. (1994). A future for the past: The political economy of herit age. David Hume Institute. Edinburg.
63. Pretty, J., & Smith, D. (2004). Social capital in biodiversity conserva tion and management. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 631-638. http://www. jstor.org/stable/3589073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00126.x
64. Pulido-Fernández, J., & Sánchez-Rivero, M. (2010). Attitudes of the cultural tourist: A latent segmentation approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34(2), 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-010-9115-1
65. Revelli, F. (2013). Tax incentives for cultural heritage conservation. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignosa (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, 129-148. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00014
66. Richards, G. W., & Van der Ark, L. A. (2013). Dimensions of cultural consumption among tourists: Multiple correspondence analysis. Tourism Management, 37, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.01.007
67. Ritchie, B., Kemperman, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2021). Which types of prod uct attributes lead to aviation voluntary carbon offsetting among air passengers? Tourism Management, 85, 104276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2020.104276
68. Rizzo, I., & Throsby, D. (2006). Cultural heritage: Economic analysis and public policy. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 1, 983-1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01028-3
69. Santana, L. (2020). Arte como inversión: Construcción de un índice hedónico para medir la valorización de arte colombiano en el período 1989- 2015. Cuadernos de Economía, 39(79), 167-190. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad. econ.v39n79.71870
70. Schuster, J. M. (2006). Tax incentives in cultural policy. In V. Ginsburgh and D. Throsby (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 1, 1253-1298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0676(06)01036-2
71. Snowball, J. (2013). The economic, social and cultural impact of cul tural heritage: Methods and examples. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignosa (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Cultural Heritage, 438-455. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931009.00036
72. Soini, K., Vaarala, H. & Pouta, E., 2012. Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landsc. Urban Plan. 104(1), 124-134. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002.
73. Tan, S., Tan, S., Kok, Y., & Choon, S. (2018). Sense of place and sustainability of intangible cultural heritage–The case of George Town and Melaka. Tourism Management, 67, 376-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.012
74. Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
75. Throsby, D., Zednik, A., & Araña, J. E. (2021). Public preferences for heritage conservation strategies: A choice modelling approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, 45(3), 333-358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-021-09406-7
76. Towse, R. (1994). Achieving public policy objectives in the arts and her itage. In Cultural economics and cultural policies (pp. 143-165). Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1140-9_11
77. Ulman, S., & Dobay, K. (2020). Environmental protection in Romania: Perceptions versus active participation. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 19(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2020.017
78. Van de Vyver, J., & Abrams, D. (2018). The arts as a catalyst for human prosociality and cooperation. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 664-674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720275
79. Van der Ark, L. A., & Richards, G. (2006). Attractiveness of cultural activi ties in European cities: A latent class approach. Tourism Management, 27(6), 1408-1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.12.014
80. Walker, E., Fancourt, D., Bu, F., & McMunn, A. (2023). A Bourdieusian latent class analysis of cultural, arts, heritage and sports activities in the UK representative understanding society dataset. Sociology, 57(4), 843 864. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221130163
81. Weller, B., Bowen, N., & Faubert, S. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287-311. https://doi. org/10.1177/0095798420930932
82. Wheatley, D., & Bickerton, C. (2019). Measuring changes in subjective well-being from engagement in the arts, culture and sport. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(3), 421-442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-019-09342-7
83. Zubrow, E. (2016). Archaeological cultural heritage: A consideration of loss by smuggling, conflict or war. In I. Rizzo & R. Towse (eds.), The art ful economist: A new look at cultural economics (pp. 215-226). Springer Cham. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-40637-4
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Cuadernos de Economía
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Cuadernos de Economía a través de la División de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia promueve y garantiza el acceso abierto de todos sus contenidos. Los artículos publicados por la revista se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), lo que implica lo siguiente:
