Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
¿Se comparte la misma idea al utilizar el termino neoclasicismo?
Does the term neoclassicism always mean the same thing?
Compartilha-se a mesma ideia ao usar o termo neoclassicismo?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v37n73.55414Palabras clave:
economía neoclásica, teoría económica, economía matemática (es)Neoclassical economics, economic theory, mathematical economics (en)
economia neoclássica, teoria econômica, economia matemática (pt)
Descargas
La gran diversidad de acepciones que tiene el término economía neoclásica ha generado gran confusión entre los economistas y entre los estudiantes de economía. Dadas las implicaciones que tiene la utilización del lenguaje en la construcción y la enseñanza del conocimiento, es fundamental precisar de qué se habla cuando se hace referencia al término neoclásico. El objetivo de este artículo es mostrar que el término neoclásico no debería utilizarse con el fin de definir el cuerpo de ideas de la corriente principal sino, como lo emplean los historiadores de las ideas económicas, para describir el periodo comprendido entre 1870 y 1930.
Referencias
Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for ‘‘lemons’’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
Arnsperger, C., & Varoufakis, Y. (2006). What is neoclassical economics?: The three axioms responsible for its theoretical oeuvre, practical irrelevance and, thus, discursive power. Panoeconomicus, 53(1), 5-18.
Arrow, K. (1964). The role of securities in the optimal allocation of risk-bearing. Review of Economic Studies, 31(2), 91-96.
Arrow, K., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265-290.
Arrow, K., & Enthoven, A. (Octubre, 1961). Quasi-concave programming. Econometrica, 29(4), 779-800.
Arrow, K., Hurwicz, L., & Uzawa, H. (1961). Constraint qualifications in maximization problems. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 8, 175-191.
Aspromourgos, T. (1986). On the origins of the term ‘Neoclassical’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 10(3), 265-270.
Aspromourgos, T. (1991). Neoclassical. En J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new palgrave: The world of economics (pp. 502-503). Londres: The Macmillan Press Limited.
Aumann, R. (1964). Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica, 32(1-2), 39-50.
Becker, G. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blanchard, O. (2008). The state of macro (Working Paper 14259). National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de http://www.nber.org/papers/w14259.
Blaug, M. (1994). Why I am not a constructivist: Confessions of an unrepentant popperian. En R. Backhouse (Ed.), New directions in economic methodology (pp. 111-139). Londres: Routledge.
Borges, J. L. (1945). El Aleph. Alianza Editorial. 1971.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1992). Power and wealth in a competitive capitalist economy. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 21(4), 324-353.
Colander, D. (2000). The death of neoclassical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), 127-143.
Colander, D. (2008). Complexity and the history of economic thought (Economics Discussion Paper 08-04). Middlebury College.
Colander, D. (2009). Moving beyond the rhetoric of pluralism: Suggestions for an ‘inside-the-mainstream heterodoxy’. En R. Garnett, E. Olsen, & M. Starr (Eds.), Economic pluralism (pp. 36-47). Nueva York: Routledge.
Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (Octubre, 2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485-499.
Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (2007). Live and dead issues in the methodology of economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30(2), 303-312.
Colander, D., Howitt, P., Kirman, A., Leijonhufvud, A., & Mehrling, P. (2008). Beyond DSGE models: Towards an empirically based macroeconomics. American Economic Review, 98(2), 236-240.
Davis, J. (2006). The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance or mainstream pluralism? Journal of Institutional Economics, 2(1), 1-20.
Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of value: An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium. New Haven, Londres: Cowles Foundation, Yale University Press.
Debreu, G. (1974). Excess demand functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 15-21.
Debreu, G. (1984). Economic theory in the mathematical mode. American Economic Review , 74(3), 267-278.
Dequech, D. (2007). Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics. Journal of Postkeynesian Economics, 30(2), 279-302.
Fiorito, A. (2008). La crítica clásica del excedente de la economía neoclásica. Cuadernos de Economía, 49, 23-59.
Friedman, M. (2005). The optimum quantity of money. Nuevo Brunswick, Nueva Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Hahn, F. (1984). Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hahn, F. (1985). In praise of economic theory. Jevons memorial fund lecture. Londres: University College.
Hicks, J. (1932). Marginal productivity and the principle of variation. Economica, 35, 79-88.
Hurtado, J., & Jaramillo, C. (2008). La economía: una disciplina definida por su método. En E. Bonilla, J. Hurtado, & C. Jaramillo (Eds.), La investigación, aproximaciones a la construcción del conocimiento científico (pp. 235-314). Bogotá: Alfaomega.
Ilut, C., Krivenko, P., & Schneider, M. (2015). uncertainty aversion and heterogeneous beliefs in linear models (Working Paper 1407). Society for Economic Dynamics. Recuperado de http://www.economicdynamics.org/meetpapers/2015/paper1407.pdf.
Kakutani, S. (1941). A generalization of Brouwer´s fixed point theorem. Duke Mathematical Journal, 8, 457-459.
Keynes, J. (1936). The general theory of interest, employment and money. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Laibson, D. (1996). Hyperbolic discount functions, undersaving and savings plans (Working Paper 5635). National Bureau of Economic Research. Recuperado de http://www.nber.org/papers/w5635.
Lawson, T. (2006). The nature of heterodox economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 483-505.
Lawson, T. (2013). What is this ‘school’ called neoclassical economics? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 947-983.
Leontief, W. (1936). Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18(3), 105-125.
Mantel, R. (1974). On the characterization of aggregate excess demand. Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 348-353.
Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in n -person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48-49.
Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Piccione, M., & Rubinstein, A. (2007). Equilibrium in the jungle. The Economic Journal, 117, 883-896.
Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. Londres: Macmillan.
Rubinstein, A. (1998). Modeling bounded rationality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Rubinstein, A. (2000). Economics and language. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.
Samuelson, L. (2002). Evolution and game theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 47-66.
Samuelson, P. (1955). Economics: An introductory analysis. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
Sonnenschein, H. (1973). Do Walras’ identity and continuity characterize the class of community excess demand functions? Journal of Economic Theory, 6, 345-354.
Stigler, G. (1941). Production and distribution theories. Macmillan Company.
Uzawa, H. (1962). Walras existence theorem and Brouwer’s fixed point theorem. Economics Studies Quarterly, 13, 59-62.
Veblen, T. (1900). The preconceptions of economic science. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 14(2), 240-269.
Weibull, J. (1995). Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press .
Weintraub, R. (1993). Neoclassical economics. The concise encyclopedia of economics. Library of Economics and Liberty. Recuperado de http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NeoclassicalEconomics.html.
White, L. (2012). The clash of economic ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Woodford, M. (junio, 1999). Revolution and evolution in twentieth-century macroeconomics. Frontiers of the Mind in the Twenty-First Century, Library of Congress, Washington
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Cuadernos de EconomíaCuadernos de Economía a través de la División de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia promueve y garantiza el acceso abierto de todos sus contenidos. Los artículos publicados por la revista se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), lo que implica lo siguiente:
