Publicado

2021-02-04

Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving.

¿Países en una rueda de hámster? El efecto demostración de Nurkse-Duesenberry y los determinantes del ahorro.

Países em uma roda de hamster? O efeito de demonstração Nurkse-Duesenberry e os determinantes da poupança.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069

Palabras clave:

private saving rates, demonstration effect, behavioral economics (en)
poupança privada, efeito de demonstração, economia comportamental (pt)
ahorro privado, efecto demostración, economía del comportamiento (es)

Descargas

Autores/as

Throughout the world, stable regional patterns relating to private savings are hard to access. This article revisits the hypothesis that, as there is evidence of emulation patterns between consumers, there might be international (macroeconomic) “emulation”. We test demonstration effect theories exploiting international data on savings, incomes, and means of global exposure. We use two methods of media communication given that their penetration peaked at different times in the sample period: TV and internet were a means of discovering foreign consumption standards. With the resulting country panels, we find some evidence in favour of a statistically significant negative association for the demonstration effect.

El comportamiento de las tasas de ahorro permanece como un puzle aún sin resolver. Este artículo revisa la hipótesis de que, así como se encuentran comportamientos emulativos entre consumidores, es posible explorar la existencia de patrones de emulación internacionales. Testea el efecto demostración internacional sobre las tasas de ahorro utilizando un análisis de datos de panel y propone dos medidas de exposición a pautas de consumo globales —tenencia de televisión y uso de internet—. Los resultados aportan evidencia a favor de la existencia de una relación negativa estadísticamente significativa entre el efecto demostración y las tasas de ahorro.

O comportamento das taxas de poupança continua sendo um quebra-cabeça sem solução. Este artigo revisita a hipótese de que, além dos comportamentos emulativos entre consumidores, é possível explorar a existência de padrões de emulação internacionais. Testa o efeito de demonstração internacional sobre as taxas de poupança usando uma análise de dados em painel e propõe duas medidas de exposição aos padrões de consumo globais—posse de televisão e uso de internet—. Os resultados fornecem evidências a favor da existência de uma relação negativa estatisticamente significativa entre o efeito demonstração e as taxas de poupança.

Referencias

Apergis, N., & Tsoumas, C. (2009). A survey of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: What has been done and where we stand. Research in Economics, 63, 64-76.

Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-297.

Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error component models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-51.

Bagwell, L. S., & Bernheim, B. D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 349-373.

Baltagi, B. (2012). Econometric analysis of panel data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Becerra, O., Cavallo, E., & Noy, I. (2015). The mystery of saving in Latin America (Working Paper Series, 615). IDB.

Bresser-Pereira, L. C., & Nakano, Y. (2003). Economic growth with foreign savings? Revista de Economía Política, 22(2), 3-27.

Castilla, C. (2010). Subjective poverty and reference dependence (Working Paper, 76). UNU-WIDER.

Cavallo, E., & Serebrisky, T. (2016). Saving for development: How Latin America and the Caribbean can save more and better. Washington, New York: IADB, Springer.

Davis, J. (2008). The turn in recent economics and return of orthodoxy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32, 349-66.

Deaton, A. (1992). Understanding consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Deaton, A. S. (2009). Are economists human? The Lancet, 374(9701), 1585-1586.

Duesenberry, J. (1949). Income, saving and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.

Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. Nations and Households in Economic Growth, 89, 89-125.

Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35-47.

Edwards, S. (1995). Why are saving rates so different across countries? An international comparative analysis. NBER, 5097.

Edwards, S. (1996). Why are Latin America’s saving so low? An International comparative analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 51(1), 5-44.

Feldstein, M., & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic saving and international capital flows. Economic Journal, 90(358), 314-329.

Filgueira, C. (1981). Acerca del consumo en los nuevos modelos latinoamericanos. Revista de la CEPAL, 15, December.

Frank, R. (2005). Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. American Economic Review, 95(2) May, 137-141.

Frank, R., & Heffetz, O. (2011). Preferences for status: Evidence and economic implications. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, & M. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Economics (1st Ed., pp. 69-91). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Freytag, A., & Voll, S. (2013). Institutions and savings in developing and emerging economies. Public Choice, 157(3-4), 475-509.

Gavin, M., Hausmann, R., & Talvi, E. (1997). Saving behavior in Latin America: Overview and Policy Issues (Working Paper, 346). IADB.

Goodwin, N. R., Ackerman, F., & Kiron, D. (Eds.). (1996). The consumer society. Washington: Island Press.

Grigoli, F., Herman, A., & Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (2014). World Saving. (Working Paper,N14/204). International Monetary Fund.

Gutiérrez, M. (2007). Savings in Latin America after the mid-1990s. Determinants, constraints and policies. Series Macroeconomía del Desarrollo, 57, CEPAL.

International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/02/weodata/index.aspx

James, J. (1987). Positional goods, conspicuous consumption and the international demonstration effect. World Development, 15(4), 449-462.

James, J., & Lister, S. (1980). Galbraith revisited: Advertising in non-affluent societies. World Development, 8(1), 87-96.

Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumer demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 183-207.

Loayza, N., López, H., Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Serven, L. (1998a). The World Saving data base. Washington: The World Bank.

Loayza, N., López, H., Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Serven, L. (1998b). Saving in the world: Facts, trends, correlations. World Bank Conference on Saving in The World: Puzzles and Policies. Washington: The World Bank.

Loayza, N., Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Serven, L. (2000). What drives private saving across the world? (Policy Research Working Paper, 2309). The World Bank.

Loayza, N., Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Serven, L. (2001). Una revisión del comportamiento y de los determinantes del ahorro en el mundo (Documentos de Trabajo, 95). Banco Central de Chile.

Nurkse, R. (1953). Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Oxford: Basil Backwell.

Ochoa, M., & Orellana, W. (2002). Una aproximación no lineal a la relación inflación crecimiento económico: un estudio para América Latina. Growth, Math methods, 0211003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Oh, S. Y., Park, Y., & Bowles, S. (2012). Veblen effects, political representation, and the reduction in working time over the 20th century. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(2), 218-242.

Ray, W. (2011). Minsky’s money manager capitalism and the global financial crisis view less (Working Paper, 661) March, Levy Economics Institute.

Reinhardt, N. (2008). The conundrum of low savings rates in Latin America. Development Policy Review, 26(6), 727-744.

Rodrik, D. (2000). Saving transitions. World Bank Economic Review, 14(3), 481-507.

Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.

Rojas, M. (2008). Relative income and well-being in Latin America. Informe para la Red de Centros del BID. Puebla, México: Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, sede México y Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla.

Rojas, M., & Jiménez, E. (2008). Pobreza subjetiva en México: el papel de las normas de evaluación del ingreso. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 16(32), 11-33.

Schmidt-Hebbel, K., & Servén, L. (1997). Saving across the world. Puzzles and policies. World Bank Discussion Paper, 354.

Schor, J. B. (1998). The Overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. New York: Basic Books.

Smith, V. L. (1982). Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. The American Economic Review, 72(5), 923-955.

Simon, H. A. (1976). From substantive to procedural rationality. In 25 years of economic theory. Boston: Springer.

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man; social and rational. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Connecticut: Yale University Press.

United Nations. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/default.aspx

Veblen, T. (1899). Theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

World Bank. World Development Indicators (WDI). Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Cómo citar

APA

Román Ramos, C. y Rius, A. (2021). Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving. Cuadernos de Economía, 40(82), 193–226. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069

ACM

[1]
Román Ramos, C. y Rius, A. 2021. Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving. Cuadernos de Economía. 40, 82 (ene. 2021), 193–226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069.

ACS

(1)
Román Ramos, C.; Rius, A. Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving. Cuadernos 2021, 40, 193-226.

ABNT

ROMÁN RAMOS, C.; RIUS, A. Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving. Cuadernos de Economía, [S. l.], v. 40, n. 82, p. 193–226, 2021. DOI: 10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/78069. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2024.

Chicago

Román Ramos, Carolina, y Andrés Rius. 2021. «Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving». Cuadernos De Economía 40 (82):193-226. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069.

Harvard

Román Ramos, C. y Rius, A. (2021) «Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving»., Cuadernos de Economía, 40(82), pp. 193–226. doi: 10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069.

IEEE

[1]
C. Román Ramos y A. Rius, «Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving»., Cuadernos, vol. 40, n.º 82, pp. 193–226, ene. 2021.

MLA

Román Ramos, C., y A. Rius. «Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving». Cuadernos de Economía, vol. 40, n.º 82, enero de 2021, pp. 193-26, doi:10.15446/cuadecon.v40n82.78069.

Turabian

Román Ramos, Carolina, y Andrés Rius. «Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving». Cuadernos de Economía 40, no. 82 (enero 1, 2021): 193–226. Accedido abril 18, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/78069.

Vancouver

1.
Román Ramos C, Rius A. Countries in the hamster’s wheel?: Nurkse- Duesenberry demonstration effects and the determinants of saving. Cuadernos [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2021 [citado 18 de abril de 2024];40(82):193-226. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/78069

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Rodrigo Gorga, Martín Leites, Andrea Vigorito. (2024). Visible Consumption, Income Inequality and Social Comparisons. Evidence from Four Latin American Countries. The Journal of Development Studies, 60(4), p.511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2024.2314120.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

319

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.