Publicado

2022-12-02

Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4

Tasa de sacrificio y precariedad laboral en México, 2005Q1-2019Q4

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783

Palabras clave:

new keynesian phillips curve, labor precariousness, unemployment, disinflation, cointegration, ARDL, sacrifice rate (en)
curva de phillips nuevo keynesiana, precariedad laboral, desempleo, inflación, cointegración, ARDL, tasa de sacrificio (es)

Autores/as

Since 1998, the Mexican economy has clearly presented six disinflationary episodes. We estimate seven Phillips curves, to evaluate the social cost in terms of the sacrifice rate in GDP, unemployment rate and in the Rate of Critical Labor Conditions (RCLC). Our results suggest that, by including labor precariousness in the New Keynesian Phillips Curve, measured with RCLC, inflation behavior is more accurately modeled. We found that there are important cointegration relationships that reflect that for 2005Q1-2019Q4 labor precariousness has been the main disinflationary adjustment variable, since 1 point reduction in inflation corresponds to an increase of 3.65 points in RCLC.

Desde 1998, la economía mexicana ha presentado seis episodios desinflacionarios. Estimamos siete Curvas de Phillips, para evaluar el costo social en términos de la tasa de sacrificio en el PIB, tasa de desempleo y Tasa de Condiciones Críticas de Ocupación (TCCO). Nuestros resultados sugieren que, al incluir la precariedad laboral en la Curva de Phillips, se modela la inflación con mayor precisión. Encontramos relaciones de cointegración entre 2005Q1-2019Q4, también que la precariedad laboral ha sido la variable de ajuste desinflacionario, ya que una reducción de 1 punto en la inflación corresponde a un aumento de 3.65 puntos en TCCO.

Referencias

Andersen, P. S., & Wascher, W. (1999). Sacrifice ratios and the conduct of monetary policy in conditions of low inflation (SSRN Electronic Journal). https://www.bis.org/publ/work82.pdf

Ashley, R., & Verbrugge, R. (2020). Finding a stable Phillips curve relationship: A persistence-dependent regression model. https://www.clevelandfed.org/~/media/content/newsroom%20and%20events/publications/working%20papers/2020/wp1909r.pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-wp-201909r

Attali, J. (1999). Diccionario del Siglo XXI. Paidós Iberoamérica.

Ball, L. (1993). What determines the sacrifice ratio? In Monetary Policy (NBER Chapters, pp. 155-193). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4306

Ball, L., Mankiw, G., & Romer, D. (1988). The newkeynesian economics and the output-inflation trade-off (Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2534424

Banco de México. (2008). Informe Anual. Ciudad de México. https://www.banxico.org.mx/publicaciones-y-prensa/informes-anuales/%7B27E0486F-9932-63AA-548C-7B325FF8C46E%7D.pdf. Accessed 02 August 2020

Bank of England. (1999). Annual Report. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk//media/boe/files/annualreport/1999/boe1999.pdf?la=en&hash=7956409917A9F6125C10B6C5120272D4B10C34E0. Accessed 02 August 2020

Blanchard, O. (2008). The state of macro. National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w14259

Blanchard, O., Dell’ariccia, G., & Mauro, P. (2010). Rethinking macroeconomic policy. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 42, 199-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2010.00334.x

Borio, C., & Gambacorta, L. (2017). Monetary policy and bank lending in a low interest rate environment: Diminishing effectiveness? Journal of Macroeconomics, 54, 217-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2017.02.005

Carlin, W., & Soskice, D. (2015). Macroeconomics: Institutions, instability, and the financial system: Oxford University Press.

Cecchetti, S. G., & Rich, R. W. (2001). Structural estimates of the U. S. sacrifice ratio. Journal of business & economic statistics: a publication of the American Statistical Association, 19(4), 416-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/07350010152596664

Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Ropele, T. (2020). Inflation expectations and firm decisions: New causal evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 135(1), 165-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz029

Enders, W. (2004). Applied econometric times series (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Fisher, P., Mahadeva, L., & Whitley, J. (1996). The output gap and inflation: Experience at the Bank of England. BIS Model Builders Meeting. https://www.bis.org/publ/confp04c.pdf

Friedman, M. (1968). The role of monetary policy. American Economic Review, 58, 102-110.

Friedman, M. (1977). Nobel lecture: Inflation and unemployment. Journal of political economy, 85(3), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1086/260579 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/260579

Fuhrer, J. (1994). Optimal monetary policy and the sacrifice ratio. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 38, 43-84.

Galí, J., & Gertler, M. (1999). Inflation dynamics: A structural econometric analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 44(2), 195-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(99)00023-9

Galí, J., Gertler, M., & López-Salido, J. D. (2001). European inflation dynamics. European Economic Review, 45(7), 1237-1270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00105-7

Gonçalves, C. E. S., & Carvalho, A. (2008). Inflation targeting and the sacrifice ratio. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 62(2), 177-188. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbe/a/rRRtC77JySWJMmpS7tBKwVc/?lang=en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71402008000200003

Greene, W. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Hayashi, F. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton University Press.

Hendry, D., & Richard, J-F. (1983). The econometric analysis of economic time series. International Statistical Review, 51(2), 111-148. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1402738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1402738

Hodrick, R., & Prescott, E. (1980). Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29(1), 16.https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/rhodrick/prescott-hodrick1997.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2953682

Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. (1991). Econometric models and economic forecasts. McGraw-Hill.

Ramos-Francia, M., & Torres, A. (2005). Reducción de la inflación a través de un esquema de objetivos de inflación: la experiencia mexicana (Working Papers, 2005-01). Banco de México. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36095/banxico/di.2005.01

Ramos-Francia, M., & Torres, A. (2008). Inflation dynamics in Mexico: A characterization using the New Phillips curve. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 19(3), 274-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2008.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2008.04.001

Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (1989). Does monetary policy matter? A new test in the spirit of Friedman and Schwartz. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 4, 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/654103

Samuelson, P., & Solow, R. (1960). Analytical aspects of anti-inflation policy. The American Economic Review, 50(2), 177-194.

Stock, J., & Watson, M. (2002). Has the business cycle changed and why?. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 17, 159-218. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11075/c11075.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/ma.17.3585284

Turrent, E. (2007). El Banco de México en evolución: transición hacia el esquema de objetivos de inflación. Análisis Económico, XXII(50), 243-260.

Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54(3), 426-482. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1990256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-1943-0012401-3

Cómo citar

APA

Loría, E. y Cossio, R. (2022). Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4. Cuadernos de Economía, 41(87), 427–456. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783

ACM

[1]
Loría, E. y Cossio, R. 2022. Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4. Cuadernos de Economía. 41, 87 (dic. 2022), 427–456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783.

ACS

(1)
Loría, E.; Cossio, R. Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4. Cuad. econ 2022, 41, 427-456.

ABNT

LORÍA, E.; COSSIO, R. Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4. Cuadernos de Economía, [S. l.], v. 41, n. 87, p. 427–456, 2022. DOI: 10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/92783. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2024.

Chicago

Loría, Eduardo, y Raúl Cossio. 2022. « Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4». Cuadernos De Economía 41 (87):427-56. https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783.

Harvard

Loría, E. y Cossio, R. (2022) « Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4», Cuadernos de Economía, 41(87), pp. 427–456. doi: 10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783.

IEEE

[1]
E. Loría y R. Cossio, « Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4», Cuad. econ, vol. 41, n.º 87, pp. 427–456, dic. 2022.

MLA

Loría, E., y R. Cossio. « Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4». Cuadernos de Economía, vol. 41, n.º 87, diciembre de 2022, pp. 427-56, doi:10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.92783.

Turabian

Loría, Eduardo, y Raúl Cossio. « Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4». Cuadernos de Economía 41, no. 87 (diciembre 2, 2022): 427–456. Accedido julio 18, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/92783.

Vancouver

1.
Loría E, Cossio R. Sacrifice rate and labor precariousness in Mexico, 2005Q1-2019Q4. Cuad. econ [Internet]. 2 de diciembre de 2022 [citado 18 de julio de 2024];41(87):427-56. Disponible en: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ceconomia/article/view/92783

Descargar cita

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations0

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

321

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.