Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
Versiones
- 2022-12-05 (2)
- 2022-12-02 (1)
La relación organización- entorno: Los aportes desde la ontología y la economía evolutiva de Kurt Dopfer
The organization-environment relationship: The contributions from the ontology and the evolutionary economy of Kurt Dopfer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v41n87.95102Palabras clave:
Teoría organizacional, teoría evolutiva, economía evolutiva (es)organizational theory, evolutionary theory, evolutionary economics (en)
teoria organizacional, teoria evolutiva, economia evolucionária (pt)
El artículo propone una perspectiva conceptual para la compresión de la relación organización-entorno (O-E), desde el marco evolutivo. La revisión acude a perspectivas de estudio relacionadas con este campo. La teoría evolutiva es utilizada como marco para la comprensión del comportamiento de los sistemas sociales. El trabajo referencia el marco ontológico evolutivo planteado por el economista evolutivo Kurt Dopfer, que entiende a la organización como un sistema de reglas. Finalmente, se establece la discusión sobre las contribuciones que se lograrían desde la perspectiva teórica propuesta, en el estudio del comportamiento organizacional, especialmente, comprendiendo a la organización como un sistema de actividades desarrolladas en ambientes cambiantes, en los que es posible la adaptación.
The paper proposes a conceptual perspective for the understanding of the organization-environment (O-E) relationship from the evolutionary framework; the review draws on study perspectives related to this field. Evolutionary theory is used as a framework for understanding the behavior of social systems. The paper refers to the evolutionary ontological framework proposed by the evolutionary economist Kurt Dopfer, in this framework the organization is understood as a system of rules. Finally, a discussion is established on the contributions that could be achieved from the proposed theoretical perspective in the study of organizational behavior, especially understanding the organization as a system of activities developed in changing environments in which adaptation is possible.
Referencias
Aldrich, H y Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of Organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000455
Aldrich, H; Hodgson, G; Hull, D; Knudsen, T; Mokyr, J y Vanderg, V. (2008). In defense of generalized Darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 5, 577-596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0110-z
Ansoff, I. (1964). Corporate Strategy. New York: E.U.A. Mc Graw Hill.
Amburgey, T. y Hayagreeva, R. (1996). Organizational Ecology: Past, Present, and Future Directions, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 5, 1265-1286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256999
Banham, H. (2010). External Environmental Analysis for Small and Medium Enterprises. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8, 10, 19-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v8i10.770
Barnett, W. P. y McKendrick, D. G. (2004) Why are some organizations more competitive than theirs? evidence from a changing global market. Administrative science quarterly, 49, 4. 535-571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4131490
Barney, J y Zajac, E (1994). Competitive Organizational Behavior: Toward an Organizationally-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 5-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150902
Boone, C., Brocheler, V., y Carroll, G. R. (2000). Custom service: Application and tests of resource-partitioning theory among Dutch auditing firms from 1896 to 1992. Organization Studies, 21, 2, 355-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600212003
Boone, C., y Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2004). A unified theory of market partitioning: an integration of resource-partitioning and sunk cost theories. Industrial and corporate change, 13, 5, 701-725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth028
Brownlee, J. (2007). Darwinism and Selectionist Theories. CIS Technical Report, 070618.
Burgelman, R (1991). Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theroy and Field Research. Organization Science, 2, 3, 239-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.3.239
Caldart, A y Ricart, J. (2004). Corporate strategy revisited: a view from complexity theory. European Management Review, 1, 96–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500005
Castrogiovanni, G. (1991). Enviroment munificence: a theorical assessment. Academy of Management Review, 16, 3, 542 – 565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279475
Carroll, G., Dobrev, S., y Swaminathan, A. (2002). Organizational processes of resource partitioning. Research in organizational behavior, 24, 1-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24002-2
Dennett, D.C (1995). Natural Selection as an Algorithmic Process, in Darwin's Dangerous Idea, D.C. Dennett, Editor. Penguin Books: London. 48-73.
Dimaggio, P y Powell, W (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizations fields. American sociological review, 82, 147-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dopfer, K. (2001). Evolutionary Economics: Framework for Analysis, in Evolutionary Economics: Program and Scope, K. Dopfer, Editor, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston/Dordrecht/London, 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0648-4_1
Dopfer, K. (2004). The Economic Agent as Rule Maker and Rule User: Homo Sapiens Oeconomicus. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 177-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0189-9
Dopfer, K. (2005). Evolutionary Economics: A Theoretical Framework, in The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Editor, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 3-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492297.001
Dopfer. (2013). Evolutionary Economics. Papers on Economics and Evolution, 1308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710477
Emery, F. & Trist, E. (1965). The casual Texture of Organizational Environments. Human Relations, 18, 21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800103
Furrer, O, Thomas, H.A y Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 1, 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00217.x
Galaskiewicz, J y Wasserman, S (1989). Mimetic processes within and interorganizational field: an empirical test. Administrative Science Quartely, 34, 454 – 479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393153
García, C. y Olaya, C. (2017). Social Systems Engineering: The Design of Complexity. ed:J Wiley And Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118974414
Hall, R (1996). Organizaciones: Estructuras, procesos y resultados. México D.F: México. Prentice Hall hispanoamericana.
Hannan, M. & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. The American Journal of Sociology, 82, 5, 929 – 964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
Hannan, M. (1988). Organizational Population Dynamics and Social Change, European Sociological Review, 4, 2, 95-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036483
Hannan, M. y J. Freeman. (1993). Organizational ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hannan, M. y Carroll, G. (1995) An introduction to organizational ecology. En Carrol & Hannan (eds.), Organizations and industry: strategy, structure and selection, 17-31.
Hannan, M. T., Carroll, G. R., y Pólos, L. (2003). The organizational niche. Sociological Theory, 21, 4, 309-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9558.2003.00192.x
Hannan, M. (2005). Ecologies of Organizations: Diversity and Identity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 1, 51-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147985
Hannan, M. T., Pólos, L., y Carroll, G. R. (2007). Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton University Press.
Hodgson, G. (1998). Evolutionary and competence-based theories of the firm. Journal of Economics Studies.25, 1, 25 – 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01443589810195606
Hodgson, G. (2001). ¿Is Social Evolution Lamarckian or Darwinian? Darwinism and Evolutionary Economics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), 87-118.
Hodgson, G y Knudsen, T. (2004). The firm as an interactor firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 281 – 307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0192-1
Lawrence, P. y Lorsch, J. (1967) Organization and Environment. New York: Harper Raw.
Lomi, A., Larsen, E. R., y Freeman, J. H. (2005). Things change: dynamic resource constraints and system-dependent selection in the evolution of organizational populations. Management Science, 51, 6, 882-903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0364
Manjula, S y Raymond, J (2011) "Population ecology theory: implications for sustainability", Management Decision, 49, 6, 874 – 910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111143595
Miles, R.; Snow, C y Pfeffer, J. (1974). Organization-Environment: Concepts and Issues. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 13, 3, 244–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1974.tb00581.x
Miles, R. y Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure and process. NewYork: McGraw-Hill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/257544
Miles, R.; Snow, C.; Meyer, A. y Coleman, H. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. The Academy of Management Review, 3,3, 546-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1978.4305755
Miller, K. D. y Lin, S. (2015). Analogical Reasoning for Diagnosing Strategic Issues in Dynamic and Complex Environments. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 2000-2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2335
Mintzberg, H y Waters, A. (1985). Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 3, 257-272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060306
Mintzberg, H. Quinn, J y Voyer, J. (1997). El proceso estratégico: conceptos, contextos y casos. México D.F: México. Prentice Hall.
Mizruchi, M y Galaskiewicz, J (1993). Networks of Interorganizational Relations. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 46, 46 -70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124193022001003
Moore. James F (1993), Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business review, 75-86.
Moore, James F (2005), Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The antitrust Bulletin, 51, 1, 31-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X0605100103
Nelson, R y Winter, S (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Olaya, C., Guzmán, L., & Gomez-Quintero, J. (2017). An engineering perspective for policy design: self-organizing crime as an evolutionary social system. Trends in Organized Crime, 20(1/2), 55–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-016-9282-3
Péli, G. (2016). Population adaptation with newcomers and incumbents: The effects of the organizational niche. Industrial and Corporate Change (online first). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtw020
Teece, D.J. y Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilites of firms: an introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 3, 537-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a
Teece, D. Pisano, G y Shuen, A (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, 509-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Winter, S. (2008). Understanding dynamic capabilities. En M. Augier y D. J. Teece (Eds.), Fundamentals of Business Strategy (pp. 217-222). Los Angeles - London: SAGE.
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
CrossRef Cited-by
Dimensions
PlumX
- Captures
- Mendeley - Readers: 9
- Mendeley - Readers: 1
Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Cuadernos de EconomíaCuadernos de Economía a través de la División de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia promueve y garantiza el acceso abierto de todos sus contenidos. Los artículos publicados por la revista se encuentran disponibles globalmente con acceso abierto y licenciados bajo los términos de Creative Commons Atribución-No_Comercial-Sin_Derivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), lo que implica lo siguiente:
