Intervención pública y jurisdicciones en economías metropolitanas: una revisión teórica
Public intervention and jurisdictions in metropolitan economies: A theoretical review
Intervenção pública e jurisdições em economias metropolitanas: uma revisão teórica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v39n79.81162Keywords:
Federalismo Fiscal, Metropolización, Jurisdicciones, Instituciones Subnacionales (es)fiscal federalism, metropolization, jurisdictions, subnational institutions (en)
federalismo fiscal, metropolização, jurisdições, instituições subnacionais (pt)
Downloads
La tradición del Federalismo Fiscal ha comprendido la intervención pública desde múltiples ámbitos de gobierno territorial, entre otros, configurando el tamaño de su jurisdicción en función de una correspondencia óptima con la eficiencia en la provisión de bienes públicos. Esto supone la dificultad por encontrar un único tamaño óptimo cuando -como es el caso de las regiones metropolitanas- se superpone la provisión de múltiples bienes públicos, fragmentando y traslapando jurisdicciones de gobierno. El artículo explora este dilema y lo expone como no resuelto, planteando la necesidad de avanzar en esquemas de tipo gobernanza que superen la rigidez de la jurisdicción.
The tradition of Fiscal Federalism has included public intervention from multiple spheres of the territorial government, among others, configuring the size of its jurisdiction according to an optimal correspondence with efficiency in the provision of public goods. This makes it challenging to find a single optimal size when -as in the case in metropolitan regions- the provision of multiple public goods overlaps, fragmenting and overlapping government jurisdictions. The article explores this dilemma and exposes it as an unresolved issue, raising the need to advance in governance-type schemes that overcome the rigidity of the jurisdiction.
A tradição do Federalismo Fiscal tem compreendido a intervenção pública desde múltiplos âmbitos de governo territorial, entre outros, configurando o tamanho de sua jurisdição em função de uma correspondência ótima com a eficiência na provisão de bens públicos. Isto supõe a dificuldade por encontrar um único tamaño ótimo quando -como é o caso das regiões metropolitanas- se superpõe a provisão de múltiplos bens públicos, fragmentando e sobrepondo jurisdições de governo. O artigo explora este dilema e o expõe como não resolvido, colocando a necessidade de avançar em esquemas de tipo governança que superem a rigidez da jurisdição.
References
Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá D.C. (2015). Documento técnico de soporte para la construcción del Comité de Integración Territorial de Bogotá y los municipios circunvecinos. Bogotá: Colección Integración Regional No. 20.
Alfonso, Ó. (2012). Polimetropolitanismo y fiscalidad, Colombia 1984 - 2010. Bogotá: Documentos de Trabajo No. 38, Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Anderson, G. (2008). Una introducción al federalismo. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Anderson, G. (2010). Una introducción comparada al federalismo fiscal. Madrid: Marcial Pons.
Bagchi, A. (2003). Rethinking federalism: changing power relations between the center and the states. Oxford Journals, 33(4), 21-42.
Bahl, R. W. (2013). The decentralization governance in metropolitan areas. En R. W. Bahl, J. F. Linn, & D. L. Wetzel (Eds.), Financing metropolitan governments in developing countries (pp. 85-105). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Bahl, R. W., & Lilnn, J. F. (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bahl, R. W., Linn, J. F., & Wetzel, D. L. (2013). Governing and financing metropolitan areas in the developing world. En R. W. Bahl, J. F. Linn, & D. L. Wetzel (Eds.), Financing metropolitan governments in developing countries (pp. 1-30). Cambridge, Massachusettes: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2009). Fiscal federalism. Principles and practice of multiorder governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Boschman, R., & Martin, R. (2010). The handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Breton, A. (2006). Modelling vertical competition. En E. Ahmad, & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism, (pp. 86-105). Cheltenham, UK; Northampon, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Carruthers, J. I. (2012). The public finance of urban form. En R. Crane, & R. Weber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban planning. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374995.013.0027.
Eberts, R. W., & McMillen, D. P. (1999). Agglomeration economies and urban public infrastructure. En Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 3), (pp. 1455-1495), Elsevier.
Eichenberger, R. & Frey, B. (2006). Functional, Overlapping and Competing Jurisdictions (FOCJ): a complement and alternative to today’s federalism. En E. Ahmad, & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Feiock, R. C. (2004). Metropolitan governance: conflict, competition and cooperation. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Forero, C., Hidalgo, C., Jiménez, G., Ortiz, M., & Pulido, S. (1997). Descentralización, eficiencia y participación ciudadana. Bogotá D.C.: TM Editores y Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Forum of Federations & Committee of the Regions. (2011). Governance of metropolitan regions: European and global experiences. Recuperado de https://espas.secure.europarl.europa.eu/orbis/sites/default/files/generated/document/en/Consolidated%20version%20-%20Metropolitan%20Governance%20-%20final.pdf
Frey, B., & Eichenberger, R. (1995). Competition among jurisdictions: The idea of FOCJ. En L. Gerken (Ed.), Competition among jurisdictions (pp. 209-229). London: London: MacMillan.
Frey, B., & Eichenberger, R. (1996a). FOCJ: Competitive governments for Europe. International Review of Law and Economics, 16(3), 315-327. doi:10.1016/0144-8188(96)00019-1
Frey, B., & Eichenberger, R. (1996b). To harmonize or to compete? That’s not the question. Journal of Public Economics, 60(3), 335-349. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(95)01555-8
Frey, B., & Eichenberger, R. (1999). The new democratic federalism for Europe: functional, overlapping and competing jurisdictions. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
Fujita, M. (1989). Urban Economic Theory. Land Use and City Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511625862
Fujita, M. (2010). The Evolution of Spatial Economics: from Thünen to the New Economic Geography. The Japanese Economic Reviwe, 61(1) 1-32. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5876.2009.00504.x
Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. (2000). Economía Espacial: Las ciudades, las regiones y el comercio internacional. Barcelona: Ariel.
Hindriks, J., Peralta, S., & Weber, S. (2005). Fiscal competition, revenue sharing, and policy-induced agglomeration. (Core Discussion Paper 2005/93). Recuperado de https://alfresco.uclouvain.be/alfresco/service/guest/streamDownload/workspace/SpacesStore/fcc1f8a7-6a98-4bd5-95ef-501c0c304f75/coredp_2005_93.pdf?a=true&guest=true
Jin, H., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. (2005). Regional decentralization and fiscal incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9-10), 1719-1742. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.11.008
Ladd, H. F. (1992). Population growth, density and the costs of providing public services. Urban Studies, 29(2), 273-295.
Lanaspa, L., Pueyo, F., & Sanz, F. (2000). Provisión de servicios públicos y localización industrial. (Fedea Documento de trabajo 2000/26). Recuperado de http://documentos.fedea.net/pubs/dt/2000/dt-2000-26.pdf
Lanaspa, L., Pueyo, F., & Sanz, F. (2001). The public sector and core-periphery models. Urban Studies, 38(10), 1639–1649. doi: 10.1080/00420980120084796
Lefevre, C., Piperno, S., Piazza, S., Pola, G., Briffault, R., & Alfonso, O. A. (2015). La utopía metropolitana-I. Cuatro estudios sobre la metropolización planetaria y los obstáculos para su reconocimiento político (Vol. 1). Bogotá, D.C., Colombia: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
León, N., & Ruiz, C. A. (2016). El sistema urbano en Colombia y la formación metropolitana: una aproximación desde la Nueva Geografía Económica. Cuadernos de Geografía-Revista Colombiana de Geografía, 25(2), 21-37. doi:10.15446/rcdg.v25n2.52850
Mitchell, C. (2008). Advancing the study of decentralization and federalism in Latin America. Miami: University of Miami.
Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance: A study in public economy. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
Oakerson, R. (2004). The Study of Metropolitan Governance. En R. Feiock, Metropolitan governance: conflict, competition and cooperation (pp. 17- 45). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Nueva York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates, W. E. (1977). Federalismo Fiscal. Colección Nuevo Urbanismo. Madrid: Instituto de estudios de Administración Local.
Oates, W. E. (2005). Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International tax and public finance, 12(4), 349-373.
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1969). The Principle of “fiscal equivalence”: the division of responsabilities among different levels of government. The American economic review, 59(2), 479-487
Ortiz, M., & Pulido, S. L. (1998). Modelos de grado óptimo de descentralización y preferencias ciudadanas. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencias Económicas.
Ostrom, V., Tiebout, C. M., & Warrem, R. (1958). The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. The American Political Science Review 55(4), 831-842. doi:10.2307/1952530
Rodríguez, J. A. (2001). El Estado unitario descentralizado: Una crítica del enfoque constitucional colombiano. Cuadernos de Economía, 20(35), 163-202.
Ruiz, C. A. (2015a). Metropolización y gobernanza económica: Bases para una propuesta de análisis económico. Suma de Negocios, 6(13), 52–65. doi:10.1016/j.sumneg.2015.04.003
Ruiz, C. A. (2015b). Metropolización de las grandes ciudades en Colombia: una aproximación desde las instituciones subnacionales y el desarrollo económico. (Tesis doctoral, Universidad Nacional de Colombia). Recuperado de http://bdigital.unal.edu.co/49831/1/Tesis_Doctoral_CienciasEcon%C3%B3micas_CesarAugustoRuiz_2015.pdf
Salmon, P. (1987a). The logic of pressure groups and the structure of the public sector. En A. Breton, G. Galeotti, P. Salmon, & R. Wintrobe (Eds.) Villa Colombella Papers on Federalism, European Journal of Political Economy, 3(1-2), 55-86.
Salmon, P. (1987b). Decentralization as an incentive scheme. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 3(2), 24-43. doi:10.1093/oxrep/3.2.24
Salmon, P. (2006). Horizontal competition among governments. In E. Ahmad, & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of Fiscal Federalism (pp. 61-85). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
Sellers, J. & Hofmann-Marriot, V. (2008). Gobernanza Metropolitana. Ciudades y Gobiernos Locales Unidos, 266-293. Recuperado de https://www.gold.uclg.org/sites/default/files/GOLDI_%20ESP_9.Metropolis.pdf
Singh, N. (2009). Fiscal decentralization in China and India: Competitive, cooperative or market preserving federalism? Public Finance and Managment, 9(1), 97 - 136.
Smoke, P. (2013). Metropolitan cities in the national fiscal and institutional structure. En R. Bahl, J. Linn, & D. Wetzel (Eds.), Financing metropolitan governments in developing countries (pp. 57-84). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Stigler, G. (1957). The tenable range of functions of local government. En Joint Economic Committee, Federal expenditure policy for economic growth and stability (pp. 213-219). Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416-424.
Tiebout, C. M., & Houston, D. B. (2007). Metropolitan finance reconsidered: budget functions and multi-level governments. En W. Ver Eecke, An Anthology Regarding Merit Goods (pp. 320-326). West Lafayette, USA: Pordue University Press.
Unicipio. (2019, Febrero 22). Unicipio. Obtenido de Consejo de Coordinación de Políticas Públicas para el Área Metropolitana: http://www.unicipio.mendoza.gov.ar/
Weingast, B. R. (2009). Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279-293. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005
Wood, R. C. (1958). Metropolitan Government, 1975: An extrapolation of trends: the new metropolis: Green Belts, Grass Roots or Gargantua? American Political Science Review, 52(1), 108-122. doi:10.2307/1953016
Young, D. (1976). Consolidation or diversity: choices in the structure of urban governance. American Economic Review, 66(2), 378 - 385.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Cuadernos de EconomíaCuadernos de Economía through the Libraries Division of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia promotes and guarantees open access to all its contents. The articles published by the journal are available globally with open access and licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No_Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which implies the following: