Logros educativos y TIC: análisis comparativo de la productividad latinoamericana
Educational achievement and ICT: A comparative analysis of Latin American productivity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v43n92.99849Keywords:
Educación, Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación, Productividad Total de los Factores, Hicks-Moorsteen (es)Education, Information and Communication Technologies, Total Factor Productivity, Hicks-Moorsteen (en)
Downloads
Esta investigación analiza la evolución de los cambios en la productividad total de los factores (CPTF) de las tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC) en los logros educativos latinoamericanos del 2009 al 2018. Para ello se calculó el índice de productividad total de los factores de Hicks-Moorsteen (HMTFP) de Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Colombia, México y Perú. La evidencia empírica muestra pérdidas de productividad debido al uso deficiente de las TIC en los logros educativos. Chile tuvo la mayor pérdida de productividad promedio (-40,66%) y Brasil, la menor (-13,98%), solo Colombia observó un aumento de la productividad en el último año (2,91%). Se concluye que existe una brecha entre políticas y programas educativos que no ha permitido mejorar la productividad en el uso de las TIC.
This research analyses the evolution of changes in the total factor productivity (TFP) of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Latin American educational attainment during 2009-2018. For this purpose, the Hicks-Moorsteen
Total Factor Productivity Index (HMTFP) is calculated for Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. The empirical evidence shows productivity losses due to the efficient use of ICT in educational attainment. Chile stands out with the highest average productivity loss (-40.66%) and Brazil with the lowest average productivity loss (-13.98%), only Colombia observed an increase in productivity in the last year (2.91%). In conclusion, there is a gap between educational policies and programmes that has not allowed for improved productivity in the use of ICT.
References
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The Economics of Growth. MIT Press.
Alderete, M. V., & Formichella, M. M. (2016). Efecto de las TIC en el rendimiento educativo: el programa Conectar igualdad en la Argentina. Cepal Review, 2016(119), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.18356/c7045fd1-es
Alderete, M. V., & Formicella, M. M. (2020). Análisis de la primera brecha digital y su vínculo con el fracaso escolar en la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Anales de la Reunión Anual de la Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
Aparicio, J., López-Torres, L., & Santín, D. (2018). Economic crisis and public education. A productivity analysis using a Hicks-Moorsteen index. Economic Modelling, 71, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.11.017
Aristovnik, A. (2012). The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: A non-parametric analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2187482
Aristovnik, A. (2013). ICT expenditures and education outputs/outcomes in selected developed countries: An assessment of relative efficiency. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(3), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311330401
Aristovnik, A. (2014). Development of the information society and its impact on the education sector in the EU: Efficiency at the regional (NUTS 2) level. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 54-60.
Becerra-Peña, D. L. (2018). Análisis de la productividad del gasto público en educación primaria por entidad federativa en México durante el período 2006 a 2013. Universidad de Guadalajara.
Becerra-Peña, D. L., Rodríguez Ruiz, J. G., & Gutiérrez Moreno, P. (2023). TIC y educación superior en México: un análisis de productividad a nivel estatal. Revista Iberoamericana para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Educativo, 13(26). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v13i26.1379
Becerra-Peña, D. L., & Santín, D. (2021). Measuring public primary education productivity across Mexican states using a Hicks-Moorsteen index. Applied Economics, 53(8), 924-939. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2020.1819951
Bjurek, H. (1996). Total Factor Productivity The Malmquist Index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 98(2), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440861
Bjurek, H., Førsund, F. R., & Hjalmarsson, L. (1998). Malmquist Productivity Indexes: An Empirical Comparison. En R. Färe, S. Grosskopf, & R. R. Russell (Eds.), Index Numbers: Essays in Honour of Sten Malmquist (pp. 217-239). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4858-0_6
Claro, M., & Jara, I. (2020). The end of enlaces: 25 years of an ICT education policy in Chile. Digital Education Review, 37, 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1344/DER.2020.37.96-108
De Witte, K., & López-Torres, L. (2017). Efficiency in education: A review of literature and a way forward. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(4), 339-363. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.92
Diewert, W. E. (1992). Fisher ideal output , input, and productivity indexes revisited. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(3), 211-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158354
Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
Grifell-Tatjé, E., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1995). A note on the Malmquist Productivity Index. Economics Letters, 47, 169-175.
Gülbahar, Y. (2008). ICT usage in higher education: A case study on preservice teachers and instructors. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(1), 32-37.
Herrera, M. A., Fernández, D. C., & Seguel, R. C. (2018). Percepción de los profesores sobre integración de TIC en las prácticas de enseñanza en relación a los marcos normativos para la profesión docente en Chile. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 26(98), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362017002501119
Hicks, J. R. (1961). The Measurement of Capital in Relation to the Measurement of Other Economic Aggregates. En F. A. Lutz & D. C. Hague (Eds.), The Theory of Capital (pp. 18-31). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08452-4_2
Hinostroza, J. E. (2018). ICT-Supported Innovations in Small Countries and Developing Regions. In I. Lubin (Ed.), ICT-Supported Innovations in Small Countries and Developing Regions. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations (pp. 99-119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67657-9
ITU (2021). ICT Data Portal. ICT Eye. https://www.itu.int/net4/ITU-D/icteye#/
Kerstens, K., & Van De Woestyne, I. (2014). Comparing Malmquist and Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(3), 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.009
López de la Madrid, M. C., Flores Guerrero, K., & Tejeda Mercado, C. (2021). Las TIC en el diseño de las políticas educativas. El caso de México. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29, 32. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.4408
Malamud, O., Cueto, S., Cristia, J., & Beuermann, D. W. (2019). Do children benefit from Internet access? Experimental evidence from Peru. Journal of Development Economics, 138, 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.11.005
Mimbi, L., & Bankole, F. O. (2016). ICT Efficiency in Creating Public Value, 2005-2014: A Cross-National Enquiry of BRICS Countries. Proceedings Annual Workshop of the AIS Special Interest Group for ICT in Global Developm, December, 2005-2014. https://aisel.aisnet.org/globdev2016/9/
Moorsteen, R. (1961). On Measuring Productive Potential and Relative Efficiency. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(3), 451-467. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885133
O’Donnell, C. J. (2008). An aggregate quantityprice framework for measuring and decomposing productivity and profitability change (Working Paper Series WP072008). School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
O’Donnell, C. J. (2010). Measuring and decomposing agricultural productivity and profitability change. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 54(4), 527-560. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2010.00512.x
O’Donnell, C. J. (2012). An aggregate quantity framework for measuring and decomposing productivity change. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 38(3), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0275-1
OECD (2019). Pisa 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD (2021). Pisa en español. Pisa in Focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-en-espanol.htm
Oyerinde, Y., & Bankole, F. (2018). Influence of Constant Returns to Scale and Variable Returns to Scale Data Envelopment Analysis Models in ICT Infrastructure Efficiency Utilization. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Pre-ICIS SIG GlobDev Workshop, December, 158-181. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8229-8.ch007
Oyerinde, Y., & Bankole, F. O. (2019). Creating Public Value Using ICT: An Efficiency And Productivity Assessment AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
Oyerinde, Y., & Bankole, F. (2021). Influence of Constant Returns to Scale and Variable Returns to Scale Data Envelopment Analysis Models in ICT Infrastructure Efficiency Utilization. In Empowering Businesses With Collaborative Enterprise Architecture Frameworks (pp. 158-181). IGI Global.
Rueda, R., & Franco-Avellaneda, M. (2018). Políticas educativas de TIC en Colombia: entre la inclusión digital y formas de resistencia-transformación social. Pedagogía y Saberes, 48, 9-25. https://doi.org/10.17227/pys.num48-7370
Spiezia, V. (2010). Educational Achievements ? Student-level Evidence from Pisa. OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 2010(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2010-5km33scwlvkf
Tomczyk, Ł., & Oyelere, S. (2019). ICT for learning and inclusion in Latin America and Europe. Case of study from countries: Bolivia, Brazil, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Finland, Poland, Turkey, Uruguay. Pedagogical University of Cracow. https://doi.org/10.24917/9788395373732
Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2007). Towards a typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00205.x
World Bank (2021). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). Sustainable Development Goals. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cuadernos de Economía
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Cuadernos de Economía through the Libraries Division of the Universidad Nacional de Colombia promotes and guarantees open access to all its contents. The articles published by the journal are available globally with open access and licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No_Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which implies the following: