Publicado

2026-10-29

Smart financial strategy: digital transformation and AI-baseddecision-making in modern administrative management

Estrategia financiera inteligente: transformación digital y toma dedecisiones basadas en inteligencia artificial en la gestión administrativa moderna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v93n243.126338

Palabras clave:

smart financial strategy, artificial intelligence, algorithmic governance, financial decision-making, institutional legitimacy, emerging economies (en)
estrategia financiera inteligente, inteligencia artificial, gobernanza algorítmica, toma de decisiones financieras, Legitimidad institucional, economías emergentes (es)

Descargas

Autores/as

This study examines artificial intelligence (AI) in financial and administrative decision-making and proposes a framework for smart financial strategy that integrates algorithmic capabilities, organizational decision processes, and institutional legitimacy. A mixed-methods design covering Chile, Brazil, and Colombia combines a survey of 208 financial and administrative professionals, 18 interviews with executives and digital transformation leaders, and documentary analysis of regulatory frameworks. Descriptive survey results indicate perceived improvements in processing time and decision quality, alongside varying levels of trust in AI-supported decisions. Interview and documentary findings highlight concerns about explainability, accountability, and governance. These findings suggest that assessments of AI in financial management should consider institutional legitimacy alongside perceived performance. The proposed framework emphasizes human oversight, transparency, and clear responsibility, while the descriptive evidence does not establish causal effects. It offers a perspective grounded in three Latin American countries for examining how organizations interpret and govern the use of AI in finance.

Este estudio examina la inteligencia artificial (IA) en las decisiones financieras y administrativas y propone un marco de estrategia financiera inteligente que integra capacidades algorítmicas, procesos decisorios organizacionales y legitimidad institucional. El diseño de métodos mixtos abarca Chile, Brasil y Colombia y combina una encuesta a 208 profesionales financieros y administrativos, 18 entrevistas con directivos y líderes de transformación digital y análisis documental de marcos regulatorios. Los resultados descriptivos indican mejoras percibidas en tiempos de procesamiento y calidad decisoria y niveles variables de confianza en decisiones apoyadas por IA. Las entrevistas y los documentos señalan preocupaciones sobre explicabilidad, rendición de cuentas y gobernanza. Los hallazgos sugieren evaluar la legitimidad institucional junto al desempeño percibido. El marco enfatiza supervisión humana, transparencia y responsabilidades claras; la evidencia descriptiva no permite establecer relaciones de causalidad. Aporta una perspectiva latinoamericana para examinar cómo las organizaciones interpretan y gobiernan el uso de IA en finanzas.

Referencias

[1] Athey, S., and Imbens, G., Machine learning methods that economistsv should know about. Annual Review of Economics, 11, pp. 685–725, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433

[2] Mullainathan, S., and Spiess, J., Machine learning: An applied econometric approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), pp. 87–106, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.87

[3] Brynjolfsson, E., and McAfee, A., The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review, 2017.

[4] Varian, H.R., Artificial intelligence, economics, and industrial organization. In A., Agrawal, J., Gans, and Goldfarb (Eds.), A., The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press, pp. 399–422, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0016

[5] Fountaine, T., McCarthy, B., and Saleh, T., Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard Business Review, 2019.

[6] Gu, S., Kelly, B., and Xiu, D., Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Review of Financial Studies, 33(5), pp. 2223–2273, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa009

[7] Begenau, J., Farboodi, M., and Veldkamp, L., Big data in finance and the growth of large firms. Journal of Monetary Economics, 97, pp. 71–87, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2018.05.013

[8] Cockburn, I. M., Henderson, R., & Stern, S. The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 24449, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24449

[9] North, D.C., Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

[10] Suchman, M.C., Managing legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp. 571–610, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

[11] Power, M., Organized Uncertainty. Oxford University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287192.001.0001

[12] Mittelstadt, B.D., et al., The ethics of algorithms. Big Data and Society, 3(2), 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679

[13] Yeung, K., Algorithmic regulation: a critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), pp. 505–523, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158

[14] Busuioc, M., Accountable artificial intelligence: holding algorithms to account. Public Administration Review, 81(5), pp. 825–836, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13293.

[15] Rahwan, I., et al., Machine behaviour. Nature, 568, pp. 477–486, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y

[16] Floridi, L., et al., AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28, pp. 689–707, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

[17] Janssen, M., et al., Data governance: organizing data for trustworthy artificial intelligence. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), art. 101493, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493

[18] World Bank., World Development Report. Digital Transformation. World Bank, 2022.

[19] Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). A Digital Path for Sustainable Development in Latin America and the Caribbean (LC/CMSI.8/3). Santiago: ECLAC, 2022.

[20] Scott, W.R., Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, 2014.

[21] Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J.A., Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown, 2012.

[22] Stiglitz, J.E., The coming great transformation. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(4), pp. 625–638, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.05.009

[23] Hall, P.A., and Soskice, D., Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247757.001.0001

[24] Williamson, O.E., The new institutional economics: taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), pp. 595–613, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595

[25] Ostrom, E., Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), pp. 641–672, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641

[26] Creswell, J.W., and Plano Clark, V.L., Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506386621

[27] Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., and Turner, L.A., Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), pp. 112–133, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

[28] Simon, H.A., Models of man: social and rational; Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley, 1957.

[29] Kahneman, D., Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

[30] Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G., The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row, 1978.

[31] Athey, S., The impact of machine learning on economics. In A., Agrawal, J., Gans, and A., Goldfarb (Eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press, pp. 507–552. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.003.0021

[32] Doshi-Velez, F., and Kim, B., Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1702.08608

[33] Pasquale, F., The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.

[34] Alessi, L., Savona, R., Machine learning and financial stability. Data Science for Economics and Finance. Springer, Cham., 13, pp. 65–87, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66891-4_4

[35] Sezer, O.B., Gudelek, M.U., and Ozbayoglu, A.M., Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: a systematic literature review: 2005–2019. Applied Soft Computing, 90, art. 106181, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106181

[36] Gasser, U., and Almeida, V.A.F., A layered model for AI governance. IEEE Internet Computing, 21(6), pp. 58–62, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835

[37] Cihon, P., Maas, M.M., and Kemp, L., Fragmentation and the future: investigating architectures for international AI governance. Global Policy, 11(5), pp. 545–556, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12890

[38] Margetts, H., and Dorobantu, C., Rethink government with AI. Nature, 568, pp. 163–165, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01099-5

[39] Rodrik, D., The globalization paradox: democracy and the future of the world economy. New York: W.W., Norton and Company, 2011.

[40] Sen, A., Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

[41] OECD/CAF., The strategic and responsible use of artificial intelligence in the public sector of Latin America and the Caribbean. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/1f334543-en

[42] Erman, E., and Furendal, M., Artificial intelligence and the political legitimacy of global governance. Political Studies, 72(2), pp. 421–441, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221126665

[43] Fielding, N.G., Triangulation and mixed methods designs: data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), pp. 124–136, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437101.

[44] Mertens, D.M., and Hesse-Biber, S., Triangulation and mixed methods research: Provocative positions. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), pp. 75–79, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437100

[45] Angrist, J.D., and Pischke, J.S., Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 2009.

[46] George, A.L., Case studies and theory development: the method of structured, focused comparison., In D., Caldwell (Ed.), Alexander L., George. A Pioneer in Political and Social Sciences, Cham: Springer, 15, pp. 191–214, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90772-7_10

[47] Yin, R.K., Case study research and applications: design and methods (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

[48] Nunnally, J.C., and Bernstein, I.H., Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

[49] Tsang, E.W.K., Generalizing from research findings: the merits of case studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), pp. 369–383, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12024.

[50] Tavakol, M., and Dennick, R., Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, pp. 53–55, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.

[51] Brinkmann, S., and Kvale, S., InterViews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2015.

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

0

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

[1]
S. Camacho-Galindo y W. A. Guerrero, «Estrategia financiera inteligente: transformación digital y toma dedecisiones basadas en inteligencia artificial en la gestión administrativa moderna», DYNA, vol. 93, n.º 243, pp. 89–99, oct. 2026, doi: 10.15446/dyna.v93n243.126338.