Published

2014-07-01

A semi-automatic approach to identify first arrival time: the Cross-Correlation Technique

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v18n2.35887

Keywords:

first arrival picking, first break, cross-correlation, seismic refraction, semi-automatic picking. (en)
Primeros tiempos de llegada, primer arribo, correlación cruzada, refracción sísmica, selección semiautomática. (es)

Downloads

Authors

  • Mustafa Senkaya Department of Geophysics Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University
  • Hakan Karslı Department of Geophysics Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University
The high-quality interpretation of seismic refraction data depends on the accurate and reliable identification of the first arrival times. First arrivals can be identified on a graphic or image by conventional picking, but this process depends on external factors, such as the scale and quality of the imaging data, amplitude ratio, sensitivity of the picking cursor and user experience. Under these considerations, identifying first arrivals in noisy data becomes more complex and unstable. In this study, the Cross-Correlation Technique (CCT), which is widely used in the process of analyzing reflection data, has been used to pick the first arrival times in noisy or noiseless seismic refraction data by a semi-automatic process. The CCT has reduced the dependence on user and decreased incorrect picking caused by environmental noise, displaying characteristics and scaling factors. The CCT has been tested with synthetic models with different noise contents and various field data. The Chi-square error criterion was used to assess the performance of the pickings. In addition, effects of small-time differences between the conventional picking process and the CCT have been demonstrated on a refraction tomography velocity section. Therefore, we believe that our proposed method is a useful contribution to the existing methods of first arrival picking.
La buena interpretación de datos estadísticos de refracción sísmica depende de la identificación acertada y confiable de los tiempos de llegada. Los primeros tiempos de llegada se pueden identificar en un gráfico o imagen por picado convencional, pero este proceso depende de factores externos como la escala y la calidad de información de la imagen, el índice de amplitud, la sensibilidad del cursor de recolección y la experiencia del usuario. Bajo estas consideraciones, la identificación de los tiempos de llegada bajo información ruidosa se vuelve más compleja e inestable. En este estudio, la técnica de Correlación Cruzada (CCT, en inglés), que es ampliamente trabajada en el proceso de análisis de datos de reflexión, se utilizó para seleccionar los primeros tiempos de llegada en información sísmica ruidosa o no ruidosa con un proceso semiautomático. La CCT redujo la dependencia en el usuario y bajó el nivel de selección incorrecta causada por el ruido ambiental al desplegar características y factores de escala. La CCT se ha probado en modelos sintéticos con diferentes contenidos de ruidos y diversa información de campo. El error de la norma Chi-cuadrado se utilizó para evaluar el desempeño de las selecciones. En adición, los efectos de las pequeñas diferencias de tiempo entre el proceso convencional de selección y la CCT se han demostrado en una tomografía reflexiva de velocidad. Además, se estima que el método propuesto es una contribución útil a los métodos existentes de la recolección de los primeros tiempos de llegada.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baer M and Kradolfer U. (1987). An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 77 1437-1445.

Blais E (2011) Optimization approach to automatic first arrival picking for three-component three-dimensional vertical seismic profiling data Geophysical Prospecting Early view version.

Bois P (1980) Autoregressive pattern recognition applied to the delimitation of oil and gas reservoirs Geophysical Prospecting 28 572-591.

Boschetti F, Dentith M D and List R D (1996) A fractal-based algorithm for detecting first arrivals on seismic traces Geophysics 61 1095-1102.

Coppen F (1985) First arrival picking on common-offset trace collections for automatic estimation of static corrections Geophysical Prospecting 33 1212-1231.

Cox M (1999) Static corrections of seismic reflection surveys (Society of Exploration Geophysics - Geophysical Reference Series Tulsa OK USA).

Douglas A, Bowers D and Young J B (1997) On the onset of P seismograms Geophysical Journal International 129 681-690.

Earle P S and Shearer P M (1994) Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 84 366-376.

Ervin C P, McGinnis L D, Otis R M and Hall M L (1983) Automated analysis of marine refraction data: a computer algorithm Geophysics 48 582-589.

Gelchinsky B T and Shtivelman V (1983) Automatic picking of first arrivals and parameterization of traveltime curve Geophysical Prospecting 31 915-928.

Geldart P L and Sheriff R E (2004) Problems in Exploration Seismology and Their Solutions (Society of Exploration Geophysics - Geophysical Reference Series No.14 Tulsa OK USA) p 251.

Gu H, Zhou H and Zhang X (1992) Automatic pick of first arrival time Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration 16 120-129.

Hatherly P J (1982) A computer method for determining seismic first arrival times Geophysics 47 1431-1436.

Keho T H and Zhu W (2009) Revisiting automatic first arrival picking for large 3d land surveys SEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting (Dhahran Saudi Arabia) p.3198-3202.

Kusuma T and Fish B C (1993) Toward more robust neural-network first break and horizon pickers Soceity of Exploration Geophysics 63rd Annual Meeting, (Washington, DC).

Leung M T (2003) Controls of traveltime data and problems of the generalized reciprocal method Geophysics 68 1626-1632.

Liao Q, Kouri D, Nanda D and Castanga J (2011) Automatic first break detection by spectral decomposition using minimum uncertainty wavelets Soceity of Exploration Geophysics 81st Annual Meeting (San Antonio) p.1627-1631.

Liu H H and Fu K S (1982) A syntactic pattern recognition approach to seismic discrimination Geoexploration 20 183-196.

Mausa WA, Al-Shuhail A A and Al-Lehyani A (2011) A new technique for first-arrival picking of refracted seismic data based on digital image segmentation Geophysics 76 79-89 .

McCormack M D, Zaucha D E and Dushek D W (1993) First-break refraction event picking and seismic data trace editing using neural networks Geophysics 58 67-78.

McEvilly T V and Majer E L (1982) ASP: An automated seismic processor for microearthquake networks Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 72 303-325.

Murat M E and Rudman A J (1992) Automated first arrival picking: A neural network approach Geophysical Prospecting 40 587-604.

Peraldi R and Clement A (1972) Digital processing of refraction data study of first arrivals Geophysical Prospecting 20 529-548.

Sabbione J I and Velis D (2010) Automatic first-breaks picking: New strategies and algorithms Geophysics 75 V67-V76.

Al-Ghamdi A S (2007) Automatic first arrival picking using energy ratios MS Thesis (King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals) publication number 1451102.

Wu X and Nyland E (1987) Automated stratigraphic interpretation of well log data Geophysics 52 1665-1676.

Xu C, Yike L and Ashida Y (1999) Hausdorff fractal algorithm for picking first break in seismic traces Geophysical Exploration 52 316-322.

Yilmaz O (2001) Seismic data analysis: processing, inversion and interpretation of seismic data Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa Oklahoma.

Yung S K and Ikelle L T (1997) An example of seismic time picking by third-order bicoherence Geophysics 62 1947-1951.