Published

2017-04-01

Space-time assessing of the earthquake potential in recent years in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey

Evaluación espacio-temporal del potencial de terremotos en los años recientes para la región de Anatolia, en el este de Turquía

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v21n2.50889

Keywords:

Eastern Anatolia region, b-value, Z-value, annual probability, recurrence time, earthquake potential (en)
Región este de Anatolia, valor b, valor z, probabilidad anual, tiempo de recurrencia, potencial de terremoto (es)

Downloads

Authors

In this study, a statistical analysis is carried out to reveal the current earthquake potential in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. For this purpose, a space-time assessing based on the recent changes in Gutenberg-Richter b-value, seismic quiescence Z-value, cumulative moment, annual probability and recurrence time of earthquakes is achieved. Temporal variation of b-value indicates that average b-value decreased from 1.25±0.02 between 2002 and 2010 to 1.08±0.02 between 2011 and 2015. A clear quiescence in the seismic moment in recent years may be a clue foretelling the occurrence of an intense event. Annual probability of the earthquakes between 3.5 and 4.0 magnitude levels exhibits a value equal to and larger than 30. Recurrence time of the earthquakes has a value between 2.0 and 3.0 years for magnitude level of 6.0, and a value between 6.0 and 7.0 years for magnitude level of 7.0. A significant decrease in b-value and clear quiescence anomalies in Z-value at the beginning of 2015 are observed in the several same regions. These areas cover the Central Anatolia Fault Zone, Malatya and Ovacık faults, the southeastern part of the Eastern Anatolia Fault Zone, and the junction of the Eastern Anatolia and Dead Sea Fault Zones. In these anomaly regions, a decreasing trend in b-value may be an indicator of stress increases and an increasing trend in Z-value may show the quiescence areas before the next earthquake occurrences. As a remarkable fact, these areas in the Eastern Anatolia region may be interpreted as one of the most likely locations for the major earthquakes in the future.

En este estudio se realizó un análisis estadístico para evidenciar el potencial actual de terremotos en la región de Anatolia, al oriente de Turquía. Con este objetivo, se obtuvieron una evaluación espacio-temporal basada en los cambios recientes del valor b en la ley Gutenberg-Richter, el valor z de inactividad sísmica, el momento acumulado, la probabilidad anual y el tiempo recurrente de los terremotos. La variación temporal del valor b indica que este factor cayo desde 1.25±0.02, entre 2002 y 2010, a 1.08±0.02 entre 2011 y 2015. La clara inactividad en el momento sísmico de los años recientes podría ser una clave predictiva de la ocurrencia de un terremoto intenso. La probabilidad anual de terremotos de magnitud entre 3.5 y 4.0 muestra un valor igual o mayor a 30. El tiempo de recurrencia de terremotos tiene un valor de 2.0 y 3.0 años en la magnitud de nivel 6.0 y un valor entre 6.0 y 7.0 años para la magnitud de nivel 7.0. A comienzos de 2015 se observó una caída significante del valor b y claras anomalías en el valor z de inactividad en varias regiones. Estas áreas cubren la zona de la falla de Anatolia Central, las fallas Malatya y Ovacık, la parte sureste de la falla Este de Anatolia, y las zonas de intersección de la falla este de Anatolia con la falla del Mar Muerto. En estas regiones de anomalías, una tendencia a la baja en el valor b podría ser el indicador de un aumento de tensión, y una tendencia al alza del valor z podría mostrar las zonas de inactividad antes de la ocurrencia de próximos terremotos. Como un hecho remarcable, estas áreas en la región Este de Anatolia pueden ser calificadas como unas de las más propensas a sufrir terremotos mayores en el futuro.

References

Aki, K. (1965). Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula logN = a - bM and its confidence limits. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, 43, 237-239.

Bayrak, Y., Öztürk, S., Çınar, H., Koravos, G. Ch., & Tsapanos, T. M. (2008). Seismicity assessment for the different regions in and around Turkey based on instrumental data: Gumbel first asymptotic distribution and Gutenberg-Richter cumulative frequency law. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 8, 109-122.

Bayrak, Y., Öztürk, S., Çınar, H., Kalafat, D., Tsapanos, T. M., Koravos, G. C., & Leventakis, G. A. (2009). Estimating earthquake hazard parameters from instrumental data for different regions in and around Turkey. Engineering Geology, 105, 200-210.

Bozkurt, E. (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodinamica Acta, 14, 3-30.

Cao, A., & Gao, S. S. (2002). Temporal variation of seismic b-values beneath northeastern Japan island arc. Geophysical Research Letters, 29(9), 10.1029/2001GL013775.

Frohlich, C., & Davis, S. (1993). Teleseismic b-values: Or, much ado about 1.0. Journal of Geophysical Research, 98 (B1), 631-644.

Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 34, 185-188.

Han, Q., Wang, L., Xu, J., Carpinteri, A., & Lacidogna, G. (2015). A robust method to estimate the b-value of the magnitude-frequency distribution of earthquakes. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 81, 103-110.

Hempton, M. R. (1987). Constraints on Arabian plate motion and extensional history of the Red Sea. Tectonics, 6, 687–705.

Ishimoto, M., & Iida, K. (1939). Observations of earthquakes registered with the micro seismograph constructed recently. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 17, 443-478.

Joseph, J. D. R., Rao, K. B., & Anoop, M. B. (2011). A study on clustered and de-clustered world-wide earthquake data using G-R recurrence law. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, 4, 178-182.

Katsumata, K., & Kasahara, M. (1999). Precursory seismic quiescence before the 1994 Kurile earthquake (Mw = 8.3) revealed by three independent seismic catalogs. Pure Applied Geophysics, 155(2-4), 443-470

Maden, N., & Öztürk, S. (2015). Seismic b-values, bouguer gravity and heat flow data beneath Eastern Anatolia, Turkey: Tectonic implications. Survey in Geophysics, 36, 549-570.

Marcellini, A. (1995). Arrhenius behavior of aftershock sequences. Journal of Geophysical Research, 100(B4), 6463-6468.

McClusky, S., Balassanian, S., Barka, A., Demir, C., Ergintav, S., Georgiev, I., Gürkan, O., Hamburger, M., Hurst, K., Kahle, H., Kastens, K., Kekelidze, G., King, R., Kotzev, V., Lenk, O., Mahmoud, S., Mishin, A., Nadariya, M., Ouzounis, A., Paradissis, D., Peter, Y., Prilepin, M., Reilinger, R., S¸ Anlı, I., Seeger, H., Tealeb, A., Toksöz, M. N., & Veis, G. (2000). Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(B3), 5695-5719.

Mogi, K. (1962). Magnitude-frequency relation for elastic shocks accompanying fractures of various materials and some related problems in earthquakes. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, 40, 831–853.

Negi, S. S., & Paul, A. (2015). Space time clustering properties of seismicity in the Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya, India. Himalayan Geology, 36 (1), 91-101.

Olsson, R. (1999). An estimation of the maximum b-value in the Gutenberg-Richter relation. Geodynamics, 27, 547-552.

Öztürk, S., Bayrak, Y., Çınar, H., Koravos, G. Ch., & Tsapanos, T. M. (2008). A quantitative appraisal of earthquake hazard parameters computed from Gumbel I method for different regions in and around Turkey. Natural Hazards, 47, 471-495.

Öztürk, S. (2009). An application of the earthquake hazard and aftershock probability evaluation methods to Turkey earthquakes. Ph.D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, 346 pp (in Turkish with English abstract).

Öztürk, S. (2011). Characteristics of Seismic Activity in the Western, Central and Eastern Parts of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey: Temporal and Spatial Analysis. Acta Geophysica, 59 (2), 209-238.

Öztürk, S., & Bayrak, Y. (2012). Spatial variations of precursory seismic quiescence observed in recent years in the eastern part of Turkey. Acta Geophysica, 60 (1), 92-118.

Öztürk, S. (2015a). A study on the correlations between seismotectonic b-value and Dc-value, and seismic quiescence Z-value in the Western Anatolian region of Turkey. Austrian Journal of Earth Sciences, 108 (2), 172-184.

Öztürk, S. (2015b). Fractal Dimension of Seismicity and a Modeling on the Intermediate-Term Forecasting for the Locations of Expected Strong Earthquakes: Eastern Anatolian Region, Turkey. Gümüşhane University Journal of Science and Technology Institute, 5(1), 1-23 (in Turkish with English abstract).

Polat, O., Gok, E., & Yılmaz, D. (2008). Earthquake hazard of the Aegean Extension region (West Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 17, 593-614.

Reasenberg, P. A. (1985). Second-order moment of Central California seismicity, 1969-1982. Journal of Geophysical Research, 90 (B7), 5479-5495.

Rehman, K., Ali, A., Ahmed, S., Ali, W., Ali, A., & Khan, M. Y. (2015). Spatio-temporal variations of b-value in and around north Pakistan. Journal of Earth System Science, 124(7), 1445-1456.

Sayıl, N. (2005). An application of the time- and magnitude-predictable model to long-term earthquake prediction in eastern Anatolia. Journal of Seismology, 9, 367-379.

Scholz, C.H. (1968). The frequency-magnitude relation of microfracturing in rock and its relation to earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58, 399-415.

Singh, C. (2016). Spatial variation of seismic b-values across the NW Himalaya, Geomatics. Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(2), 522-530.

Şaroğlu, F., Emre, O., & Kuşcu, O. (1992). Active fault map of Turkey. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey.

Şengör, A. M. C., & Yılmaz, Y. (1981). Tethyan evolution of Turkey: a plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics, 75, 181–241.

Tsapanos, T. M., Bayrak, Y., Cinar, H., Koravos, G.C h., Bayrak, E., Kalogirou, E. E., Tsapanou, A. V., & Vougiouka, G. E. (2014). Analysis of largest earthquakes in Turkey and its vicinity by application of the Gumbel III distribution. Acta Geophysica, 62(1) 59-82.

Tsapanos, T. M., Yadav, R. B. S., Olasoglou, S. M., & Singh, M. (2016). Assessment of the relative largest earthquake hazard level in the NW Himalaya and its adjacent region. Acta Geophysica, 64(2), 362-378.

Utsu, T. (1971). Aftershock and earthquake statistic (III): Analyses of the distribution of earthquakes in magnitude, time and space with special consideration to clustering characteristics of earthquake occurrence (1). Journal of Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series VII (Geophysics), 3, 379-441.

Westeway, R. (1994). Present-day kinematics of the Middle East and Eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, 12,071–12,090.

Wiemer, S., & Wyss, M. (1994). Seismic quiescence before the Landers (M=7.5) and Big Bear (M = 6.5) 1992 earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84, 3, 900-916.

Wiemer, S. (2001). A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP. Seismological Research Letters, 72, 3, 373-382.

Wyss, M., & Habermann, R. E. (1988). Precursory seismic quiescence. Pure Applied Geophysics, 126, 2-4, 319-332.

Yadav, R. B. S., Koravos, G. Ch., Tsapanos, T. M., & Vougiouka, G. E. (2015). A probabilistic estimate of most perceptible earthquake magnitudes in the NW Himalaya and adjoining regions. Pure Applied Geophysics 172(2), 197-212.

Dimensions

PlumX

Article abstract page views

693

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Space-time assessing of the earthquake potential in recent years in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. (2017). Earth Sciences Research Journal, 21(2), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v21n2.50889