Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Controversias en torno a los conceptos cotidianos y conceptos científicos de emoción
Controversies Around Everyday Concepts and Scientific Concepts of Emotion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ideasyvalores.v71n8Supl.103859Palabras clave:
construccionismo psicológico, emociones básicas, psicología folk, subdeterminación (es)psychological constructionism, basic emotions, folk psychology, underdetermination (en)
Descargas
Sostengo que la controversia entre la teoría de las emociones básicas y el construccionismo psicológico yace en diferencias sobre el rol de los conceptos cotidianos de emoción en el ámbito científico. Para esto, analizo las discusiones en torno a la universalidad de las expresiones faciales y a la existencia de correspondencias neurofisiológicas para cada emoción. Muestro que en ambas discusiones estamos en un espacio de subdeterminación empírica, lo que impide saldar la controversia aludiendo a resultados experimentales. Finalizo con algunas sugerencias sobre cómo podría saldarse la controversia.
I argue that the controversy between Basic Emotion Theory and Psychological Constructionism lies in differences regarding the role of folk concepts of emotion in the scientific domain. To do so, I analyze the discussions surrounding the universality of facial expressions and the existence of neurophysiological correspondences for each emotion. I show that in both discussions we are in a space of empirical underdetermination, that precludes settling the controversy by appealing to experimental results. Finally, I conclude with some suggestions as to how to settle the controversy
Referencias
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. “Are Emotions Natural Kinds?” Perspectives on Psychological Science 1.1 (2006): 28-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00003.x
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. “Emotions Are Real.” Emotion 12.3 (2012): 413-429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027555
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. How Emotions Are Made. Pan Books, 2018.
Barrett, Lisa Feldman. “The Theory of Constructed Emotion: An Active Inference Account of Interoception and Categorization.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 12.1 (2017): 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx060
Clark-Polner, Elizabeth et al. “Multivoxel Pattern Analysis Does Not Provide Evidence to Support the Existence of Basic Emotions.” Cerebral Cortex 27.3 (2017): 1944-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw028
Collet, Christian et al. “Autonomic Nervous System Response Patterns Specificity to Basic Emotions.” Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System 62.1 (1997): 45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1838(96)00108-7
Crivelli, Carlos and Fridlund, Alan J. “Facial Displays Are Tools for Social Influence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 22.5 (2018): 388-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.006
Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. 1914. Translated by Philip P. Wiener. Princeton University Press, 1954.
Ekman, Paul. “An Argument for Basic Emotions.” Cognition & Emotion 6.3 (1992a): 169-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
Ekman, Paul. “Are There Basic Emotions?” Psychological review 99.3 (1992b): 550-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.550
Ekman, Paul. “Universals and Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotion.” Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 19 (1972): 207-282.
Ekman, Paul et al. “Universals and Cultural Differences in the Judgments of Facial Expressions of Emotion.” Journal of personality and social psychology 53.4 (1987): 712-717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.712
Ekman, Paul and Cordaro, Daniel “What Is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic.” Emotion Review 4 (2011): 364-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410740
Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace V. “Constants across Cultures in the Face and Emotion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 17.2 (1971): 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030377
Ekman, Paul and Friesen, Wallace V. “The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding.” Semiotica 1.1 (1969): 49-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
Elfenbein, Hillary Anger and Ambady, Nalini. “On the Universality and Cultural Specificity of Emotion Recognition: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 128.2 (2002): 203-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203
Gendron, Maria et al. “Perceptions of Emotion from Facial Expressions Are Not Culturally Universal: Evidence from a Remote Culture” Emotion 14.2 (2014): 251-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036052
Izard, Carroll E. “Basic Emotions, Natural Kinds, Emotion Schemas, and a New Paradigm.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 2.3 (2007): 260-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00044.x
Jack, Rachael E. et al. “Facial Expressions of Emotion Are Not Culturally Universal.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109.19 (2012): 7241-7244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200155109
Jack, Rachael E. et al. “Four Not Six: Revealing Culturally Common Facial Expressions of Emotion.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145.6 (2016): 708-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000162
Kassam, Karim S. et al. “Identifying Emotions on the Basis of Neural Activation.” Plos One 8.6 (2013):e66032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066032
Kragel, Philip A. and Kevin S. LaBar. “Decoding the Nature of Emotion in the Brain.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20.6 (2016): 444-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.011
Kragel, Philip A. and Kevin S. LaBar. “Multivariate Neural Biomarkers of Emotional States Are Categorically Distinct.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 10.11 (2015):1437-1448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv032
Kreibig, Sylvia D. “Autonomic Nervous System Activity in Emotion: A Review.” Biological Psychology 84.3 (2010): 394-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.010
Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge University Press, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621123
LeDoux, Joseph E. “The amygdala.” Current Biology 17.20 (2007): 868-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.005
LeDoux, Joseph E. “The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala.” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 23.4-5 (2003): 727-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025048802629
Levenson, Robert W. et al. “Voluntary Facial Action Generates Emotion-Specific Autonomic Nervous System Activity.” Psychophysiology 27.4 (1990): 363-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb02330.x
Lindquist, Kristen A. et al. “The Brain Basis of Emotion: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35.3 (2012): 121-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000446
Loaiza, Juan R. Emotions as functional kinds: A meta-theoretical approach to constructing scientific theories of emotions. 2020. PhD dissertation. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Loaiza, Juan R. “Emotions and the problem of variability.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 12 (2021): 329-351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00492-8
Longino, Helen E. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209753
Murphy, Fionualla C., et al. “Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotions: A Meta-Analysis.” Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 3.3 (2003): 207-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.3.207
Panksepp, Jaak. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195096736.001.0001
Panksepp, Jaak. “Neurologizing the Psychology of Affects: How Appraisal-Based Constructivism and Basic Emotion Theory Can Coexist.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 2.3 (2007): 281-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00045.x
Phan, K. Luan et al. “Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Activation Studies in pet and fmri.” NeuroImage 16.2 (2002): 331-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
Phelps, Elizabeth A. “The Interaction of Emotion and Cognition: Insights from Studies of the Human Amygdala.” Emotion and consciousness. Edited by Lisa Feldman Barrett et al. Guilford Press 2005.
Phelps, Elizabeth A. and Joseph E. LeDoux. “Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior.” Neuron 48.2 (2005): 175-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025
Quine, Willard Van Orman. “Two dogmas of empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 60 (1951): 20-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2181906
Quine, Willard Van Orman. “On empirically equivalent systems of the world.” Erkenntnis 9 (1975): 313-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00178004
Rainville, Pierre et al. “Basic Emotions Are Associated with Distinct Patterns of Cardiorespiratory Activity.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 61.1 (2006): 5-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.024
Russell, James A. “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion.” Psychological review 110.1 (2003): 145-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
Russell, James A. “Emotion, Core Affect, and Psychological Construction.” Cognition & Emotion 23.7 (2009): 1259-1283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902809375
Russell, James A. “Is There Universal Recognition of Emotion From Facial Expression? A Review of the Cross-Cultural Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 115.1 (1994): 102-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.102
Saarimäki, Heini et al. “Discrete Neural Signatures of Basic Emotions.” Cerebral Cortex 2015 (2015): 1-11.
Saarimäki, Heini et al. “Distributed Affective Space Represents Multiple Emotion Categories across the Human Brain.” Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 13.5 (2018): 471-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy018
Scarantino, Andrea. “Basic Emotions, Psychological Construction, and the Problem of Variability.” The Psychological Construction of Emotion. Edited by Lisa Feldman Barrett and James A. Russell. The Guilford Press, 2015. 334-376.
Scarantino, Andrea. “How to Define Emotions Scientifically.” Emotion Review 4.4 (2012): 358-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445810
Scarantino, Andrea and Griffiths, Paul E. “Don’t Give Up on Basic Emotions.” Emotion Review 3.4 (2011): 444-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911410745
Siegel, Erika H. et al. “Emotion Fingerprints or Emotion Populations? A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Autonomic Features of Emotion Categories.” Psychological Bulletin 144.4 (2018): 343-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000128
Vytal, Katherine and Hamann, Stephan. “Neuroimaging Support for Discrete Neural Correlates of Basic Emotions: A Voxel-Based Meta-Analysis.” Journal of cognitive neuroscience 22.12 (2010): 2864-2885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21366
Cómo citar
MODERN-LANGUAGE-ASSOCIATION
ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Los derechos son del autor(es), quien(es) puede re-publicar en parte o en su totalidad el documento ya publicado en la revista siempre y cuando se dé el debido reconocimiento a Ideas y Valores
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
De acuerdo con la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial-SinDerivar 4.0 Internacional. Se autoriza copiar, redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, siempre y cuando se conceda el crédito a los autores de los textos y a Ideas y Valores como fuente de publicación original. No se permite el uso comercial de copia o distribución de contenidos, así como tampoco la adaptación, derivación o transformación alguna de estos sin la autorización previa de los autores y de la dirección de Ideas y Valores. Para mayor información sobre los términos de esta licencia puede consultar: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.
.jpg)
