Publicado

2018-01-01

Dependencia ontológica y fundamentalidad

Ontological Dependence and Fundamentality

Palabras clave:

dependencia ontológica, entidad fundamental (es)
ontological dependence, fundamental entity (en)

Descargas

Autores/as

  • Ricardo Mena Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Se examina una de las maneras más naturales e intuitivas de entender las nociones de entidad fundamental y dependencia ontológica. Se argumenta que quienes adoptan estas nociones enfrentan serios problemas y se recomienda abandonarlas, lo que no quiere decir que no haya otra forma plausible de entender estos conceptos.

The paper examines one of the most natural and intuitive ways of understanding the notions of fundamental entity and ontological dependence, It argues that those who adopt these notions face serious problems and should abandon them; however, this does not mean that there is no other plausible way of understanding these concepts.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Barnes, E. “Ontic Vagueness: A Guide for the Perplexed.” Nous 44.4 (2010): 601-627. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00762.x

Barnes, E. “Emergence and Fundamentality.” Mind 121.484 (2012): 873-901. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzt001

Bohn, E. D. “Must There Be a Top Level?” The Philosophical Quarterly 59.235 (2009): 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2008.573.x

Fine, K. “Ontological Dependence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95 (1995): 269-290.

Fine, K. “The Question of Realism.” Philosopher’s Imprint 1.2 (2001): 1-30. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0001.002

Fine, K. “Guide to Ground.” Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Eds. Fabrice Correia and Benjamin Schnieder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 37-80.

Fine, K. “Unified Foundations for Essence and Ground.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1.2 (2015): 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2014.26

Morganti, M. “Metaphysical Infinitism and the Regress of Being.” Metaphilosophy 45.2 (2014): 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12080

Russell, B. “Analytic Realism.” Bulletin de la societé francaise de philosophie 11 (1911): 282-291.

Schaffer, J. “Is There a Fundamental Level?” Nous 37.3 (2003): 498-517. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00448

Schaffer, J. “On What Grounds What.” Metaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Eds. David Chalmers, David Manley and Ryan Wasserman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. 347-383.

Schaffer, J. “Monism: The Priority of the Whole.” Philosophical Review 119.1 (2010): 31-76.

Sider, T. Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Sider, T. “Against Parthood.” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Vol. 8. Eds. Karen Bennett and Dean Zimmerman. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 237-293.

Simons, P. M. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.

Van Inwagen, P. Material Beings. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press, 1995.

Williams, J. R. G. “Illusions of Gunk.” Philosophical Perspectives 20.1 (2006): 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2006.00117.x

Williams, J. R. G. “Fundamental and Derivative Truths.” Mind 119.473 (2010): 103-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzp137

Williamson, T. Vagueness. Oxford; New York: Routledge, 1994.

Zimmerman, D. W. “Could Extended Objects Be Made Out of Simple Parts? An Argument for Atomless Gunk.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56.1 (1996): 1-29.