Publicado

2025-09-25

Evaluación del riesgo en personal de salud expuestos a casos sospechosos o confirmados con Covid-19 en instituciones de baja, mediana y alta complejidad en Chía, Facatativá y Bogotá D.C., Colombia

Risk assessment of healthcare personnel exposed to suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 in low-, medium-, and high-complexity institutions in Chía, Facatativá, and Bogotá D.C., Colombia

Avaliação de risco de profissionais de saúde expostos a casos suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19 em instituições de baixa, média e alta complexidade em Chía, Facatativá e Bogotá, Colômbia

Palabras clave:

Covid-19, Personal de salud, Evaluación de riesgo, Análisis de modo efecto de fallas en el cuidado de la salud (es)
: Covid-19, Health personnel, Risk assessment, Healthcare failure mode and effect analysis (en)
COVID-19, Profissionais de saúde, Avaliação de risco, Análise de modo e efeito de falha em saúde (pt)

Descargas

Autores/as

  • José Urrego Novoa Universidad Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1496-6610
  • Karol Andrea Méndez Leguizamón Programa Química Farmacéutica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A., Campus Universitario Calle 222 No 55-37, Bogotá D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4181-584X
  • Nancy Yaneth Portela Escandón Programa Enfermería, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambienta-les U.D.C.A., Campus Universitario Calle 222 No 55-37, Bogotá D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5177-3634
  • Lorena Martínez Delgado Programa Enfermería, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A., Campus Universitario Calle 222 No 55-37, Bogotá D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4513-1835
  • Nelson Rolando Campos Guzman Programa Enfermería, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A., Campus Universitario Calle 222 No 55-37, Bogotá D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-7116
  • Danny Wilson Sanjuanelo Programa Química Farmacéutica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Ciencias Aplicadas y Ambientales U.D.C.A., Campus Universitario Calle 222 No 55-37, Bogotá D.C., Colombia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2729-1234

Objetivo: Evaluar el riesgo relacionado con el lugar de trabajo, la fuerza laboral y el individuo en personal de salud expuesto a casos sospechosos o confirmados con Covid-19 en instituciones de II, III y IV nivel de complejidad en BogotáD.C., Chía y Facatativá-Colombia. Métodos: Realizado en el período de agosto de 2020 a mayo de 2021, con personal de salud que atendió casos sospechosos o confirmados con Covid-19. Se identificaron modos de falla en procesos de atención por medio de un análisis matriz de modo falla efecto (AMFE) para cuantificación de ocurrencia, detectabilidad y gravedad por riesgo de exposición a casos sospechosos y confirmados. Resultados: Se incluyeron cinco procesos y se identificaron 25 modos de fallo, cuantificados mediante el número prioritario de riesgo (NPR) y clasificados según probabilidad de ocurrencia y severidad en bajo, medio y alto. Conclusión: Durante el periodo de tiempo del estudio, el riesgo de contagio en trabajadores de la salud expuestos por atención ambulatorial e intramural de casos sospechosos o confirmados por Covid-19 en las instituciones participantes, se caracterizó por poseer modos de fallo con una ocurrencia media-alta y una severidad moderada a catastrófica.

Objetive: Evaluate the risk related to the workplace, the workforce and the individual in health person-nel exposed to suspected or confirmed cases with Covid-19 in institutions of II, III and IV level of com-plexity in Bogotá D.C., Chía and Facatativá-Colombia. Methods: Carried out in the period from August 2020 to May 2021, with health personnel who treated suspected or confirmed cases with Covid-19. Fail-ure modes in care processes were identified through a failure mode effect matrix analysis (FMEA) to quantify occurrence, detectability, and severity by risk of exposure to suspected and confirmed cases. Results: Five processes were included, and 25 failure modes were identified, quantified by the risk pri-ority number (NPR) and classified according to probability of occurrence and severity in low, medium and high. Conclusion: During the study period, the risk of contagion in health workers exposed by ambulatory and intramural care of suspected or confirmed cases of Covid-19 in the participating insti-tutions was characterized by failure modes with a medium-high occurrence and moderate to cata-strophic severity.

Objetivo: Avaliar o risco no local de trabalho, na força de trabalho e individual de profissionais de saúde expostos a casos suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19 em instituições de complexidade nível II, III e IV em Bogotá, Chía e Facatativá, Colômbia. Métodos: Realizado de agosto de 2020 a maio de 2021, com profissionais de saúde que atenderam casos suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19. Os modos de falha nos processos de cuidado foram identificados por meio de uma análise de matriz de modo-efeito de falha (FMEA) para quantificar a ocorrência, a detectabilidade e a gravidade por risco de exposição a casos suspeitos e confirmados. Resultados: Cinco processos foram incluídos e 25 modos de falha foram identificados, quantificados usando o número de risco prioritário (PRN) e classificados de acordo com a probabilidade de ocorrência e gravidade em baixa, média e alta. Conclusão: Durante o período do estudo, o risco de infecção entre profissionais de saúde expostos a casos suspeitos ou confirmados de COVID-19 por meio de atendimento ambulatorial e hospitalar nas instituições participantes foi caracte-rizado por modos de falha com ocorrência média-alta e gravidade moderada a catastrófica.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

1. República de Colombia, Instituto Nacional de Salud (INS). COVID-19 en Colombia. Bogotá D.C. URL: https://www.ins.gov.co/Noticias/Paginas/Coronavirus.aspx, consultado en junio de 2023.

2. Z. Gao, Y. Xu, C. Sun, X. Wang, Y. Guo, S. Qiu & K. Ma. A systematic review of asymptomatic infections with COVID-19. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect., 54(1), 12–16 (2021). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.05.001

3. S.A. Gómez, O.H. Franco, L.Z. Rojas, P.F. Ranguindin, Z. M. Roa, B.M. Wyssmann, S.L. Romero, L.E. Echeverría, M.Glisic & T. Muka. COVID-19 in health-care workers: A living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Am. J. Epidemiol., 190(1), 161–175 (2021) Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa191

4. C. Paris, E. Tadié, C. Heslan, P. Gary-Bobo, S. Oumary, A. Saade, A. Sitruk, P. Wild, V. Thibault, P. Tattevin & R. Garlantezec. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection among health care workers. Am. J. Infect. Control, 50(4), 375–382 (2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.001

5. B. Teklewold, D. Anteneh, D. Kebede & W. Gezahegn. Use of failure mode and effect analysis to reduce admission of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients to the Adult Emergency Department: An institutional experience. Risk Managem. Healthcare Policy, 14, 273–282 (2021). Doi: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s284835

6. G. Chowell, F. Abdirizak, S. Lee, J. Lee, E. Jung, H. Nishiura & C. Vibout. Transmission characteristics of MERS and SARS in the healthcare setting: a comparative study. BMC Medicine, 13, 210 (2015). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0450-0

7. R. Sommertein, C.Andreas Fux, D. Vuichard-Gysin, M. Abbas, J. Marschall, C. Balmelli, N. Troillet, S. Harbath, M. Schlegel & A. Widmer. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission by aerosols, the rational use of masks, and protection of healthcare workers from COVID-19. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control, 9(1), 100 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-020-00763-0

8. B. Montes-Verges & E. Fernández-García. The effect of pandemic on health and Burnout Syndrome in ICU nursing professionals. Enfermería Global, 66, 15–27 (2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.483261

9. G. Ye, H. Lin, S. Chen, S. Wang, Z. Zeng, W. Wang, S. Zhang, T. Rebmann, Y. Li, Z. Pan, Z. Yang, Y. Wang, F. Wang, Z. Qian & X. Wang. Environmental contamination of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare premises. J. Infect., 81(2), e1–e5 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.034

10. C. Ağalar & D.Ö. Engin. Protective measures for COVID-19 for healthcare providers and laboratory personnel. Turk. J. Med. Sci., 50(9), 578–584 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2004-132

11. E.F. Ríos-Bracamontes, L.E. Iñiguez-Arias, R.J. Ochoa-Jiménez, J. Guzmán-Esquivel, M.I. Cárdenas-Rojas & E. Murillo-Zamora. Risk of testing positive for COVID-19 among healthcare and healthcare-related workers. Vaccines, 11(7), 1260 (2023). Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11071260

12. L.H. Nguyen, D.A. Drew, M.S. Graham, A.D. Joshi, C.G. Guo, W. Ma, R.S. Mehta, E.T. Warner, D.R. Sikavi, C.H. Lo, et al. Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study. Lancet, Public Health, 5(9), e475–e483 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30164-X

13. J. O’Keffe. Field inquiry: COVID-19 risks from handling the deceased. National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health, Vancouver (BC), 2021; 12 p. URL: https://ncceh.ca/resources/evidence-briefs/covid-19-risks-handling-deceased

14. S.P. Putra, T. Hidayat & R.T. Zhuhra. SARS-CoV-2 persistence and infectivity in COVID-19 corpses: a systematic review. Forensic Sci. Med. Pathol., 19(1), 94–102 (2023). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-022-00518-w

15. G. Kampf, D. Todt, S. Pfaender & E. Steinmann. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J. Hosp. Infect., 104(3), 246–251 (2020). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022

16. J. León-Molina & E. Abad-Corpa. Desinfectantes y antisépticos frente al coronavirus: Síntesis de evidencias y recomendaciones. Enfermería Clínica, 31(Suppl. 1), S84–S88 (2021). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.05.013

17. A. Gaspar-Rodríguez, A. Padilla-González & E. Rivera-Toledo. Coronavirus persistence in human respiratory tract and cell culture: An overview. Braz. J. Infect. Dis., 25(5), 101632 (2021). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2021.101632

18. S. Plenzig, D. Bojkova, H. Held, A. Berger, F. Holz, J. Cinatl, E. Gradhand, M. Kettner, A. Pfeiffer, M.A. Verhoff & S. Ciesek. Infectivity of deceased COVID-19 patients. Int. J. Legal Med., 135(5), 2055–2060 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02546-7

19. C.G. Murphy, M.S. Nishikawa, S.T. Char, S.K. Nemeth, M. Parekh, W.A. Bulman, C. Wu, G.W. Neuberg, I.K. Louh, N.W. Schluger, et al. In COVID-19 patients who suffer in-hospital cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes may be impacted by arrest etiology and local pandemic conditions. Crit. Care Explor., 4(2), e0605 (2022). Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/cce.0000000000000605

20. A.P. Kulkarni, Y. Singh, H. Garg & S. Jha. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during COVID-19 pan-demic: outcomes, risks, and protective strategies for the healthcare workers and ethical considera-tions. Indian J. Crit. Care Med., 24(9), 868–872 (2020). URL: https://pub-med.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33132575/