Evaluación de algunos factores de riesgo para la presentación de síndrome de úlcera gástrica (SUGE) en el caballo criollo colombiano en el Valle de Aburrá, Antioquia (Colombia)
Evaluation of some risk factors for the presentation of Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome (EGUS) in colombian creole horse in Valle De Aburrá, Antioquia (Colombia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v67n2.90705Keywords:
caballo, gastroscopia, prevalencia, úlcera gástrica (es)horse, gastric ulcer, gastroscopy, prevalence (en)
Downloads
Las úlceras gástricas se definen como la pérdida de continuidad de la mucosa gástrica. Se originan principalmente por desequilibrio entre factores injuriantes y de protección del estómago. Generalmente se manifiestan con signos como pérdida de peso, cólico, bruxismo e inapetencia, conllevando al bajo rendimiento del animal y pérdidas económicas. El objetivo del presente estudio fue determinar la prevalencia y factores de riesgo para la presentación de SUGE en CCC del Valle de Aburra. Se realizó gastroscopia a 100 animales de diferentes pesebreras, entre dos y 25 años de edad; cada estómago se caracterizó macro y microscópicamente. Las lesiones macroscópicas se valoraron de acuerdo con el grado de lesión según el Equine Gastric Ulcer Council, y la clasificación microscopica se basó en una adaptación hecha por patrones de descripción de lesiones más utilizados como: The sidney system y Equine gastritis grading system (EGGS). Para el análisis de los resultados, se tuvieron en cuenta variables como la intensidad del ejercicio, alojamiento, tipo y frecuencia de alimentación, transporte y frecuencia del mismo. El 65% de los equinos evaluados presentaron lesiones compatibles con SUGE. Macroscópicamente el grado 2 de severidad fue el más común (38%), con mayor presentación en la región aglandular. Microscópicamente el edema en la región fundica y pilórica fue la lesión más frecuente (35,2% y 30,7%, respectivamente). Los principales factores de riesgo asociados a la presentación de las lesiones fueron el transporte de los animales y la intensidad del ejercicio.
Gastric ulcers are defined as the loss of continuity of the gastric mucosal. They are mainly caused by an imbalance between harmful and protective factors of the stomach. It generally manifests itself with signs such as weight loss, colic, bruxism and inappetence,
which can lead to low performance and economic losses. The objective of the present study was to determine the prevalence and risk factors for the presentation of SUGE in CCC of the Valle del Aburra. Gastroscopy was made to 100 animals from different
stables, between two and 25 years of age; each stomach characterized, macro and microscopically.
Lesions are evaluate depending on the degree of injury to the “Equine Gastric Ulcer Council”. Microscopic lesions classification was based on an adaptation by patterns most commonly used description of injuries such as: the Sidney System and
the equine gastritis grading system (EGGS). For the analysis of the results, variables such as exercise intensity, accommodation, type and frequency of feeding, transportation and its frequency were taken into account. 65% of the equines evaluated presented SUGEcompatible lesions, of which the most common degree of severity macroscopically was grade 2 (38%), with grater presentation in the non-glandular region. Microscopically, edema in the fundic and pyloric region was the most frequent (35.2% and 30.7%,
respectively). The main risk factors associated with the presentation of the lesions were the transport of the animals and the intensity of the exercise.
References
Andrews FM, Reinemeyer CR, McCracken MD, Blackford JT, Nadeau JA, Saabye L, Sötell M, Saxton A. 2002. Comparison of endoscopic, necropsy and histology scoring of equine gastric ulcers. Equine Vet J. 34(5): 475-478. Doi: 10.2746/042516402776117827.
Andrews FM, Nadeau JA. 2010. Clinical syndromes of gastric ulceration in foals and mature horses. Equine Vet J. 31(S29): 30-33. Doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05165.x.
Aranzales JRM, Cassou F, Andrade BSC, Alves GES. 2012. Presencia del síndrome úlcera gástrica en equinos la policía Militar. 44: 185-189. Doi: 10.4067/S0301-732X2012000200013 .
Bell RJW, Mogg TD, Kingston JK. 2007a. Equine gastric ulcer syndrome in adult horses: a review. N Z Vet J. 55: 1-12. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2007.36728.
Bell RJW, Kingston JK, Mogg TD, Perkins NR. 2007b. The prevalence of gastric ulceration in racehorses in New Zealand. N Z Vet J. 55: 13-18. Doi: 10.1080/00480169.2007.36729.
Berger H, Silvia R, Klemm MOA. 2009. Gastric ulcers in Brazilian performance horses. En: WEVA - International Congress – Brazil, 2009. World Equine Veterinary Association.
Buchanan BR, Andrews FM. 2003. Treatment and prevention of equine gastric ulcer syndrome. Vet Clin North Am - Equine Pract. 19: 575-597. Doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2003.08.012.
Fernandes WR, Belli CB SL. 2003. Achadosgastroscópicosem equinos adultos assintomáticos. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 55: 405-410.
Graaf-Roelfsema E, Keizer HA, Wijnberg ID, Van Der Kolk JH. 2010. The incidence and severity of gastric ulceration does not increase in overtrained Standardbred horses. Equine Vet J. 42: 58-61. Doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00268.x.
Jonsson H, Egenvall A. 2006. Prevalence of gastric ulceration in Swedish Standardbreds in race training. Equine Vet J. 38(3): 209-213. Doi: 10.2746/042516406776866390.
Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, Robbins Y. 2015. Cotran patologia estructural y funcional. 9° ed. España: Elsevier Inc.
Luthersson N, Nielsen KH, Harris P, Parkin TDH. 2009a. Risk factors associated with equine gastric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Vet J. 41: 625-630. Doi: 10.2746/042516409x441929.
Luthersson N, Nielsen KH, Harris P, Parkin TDH. 2009b. The prevalence and anatomical distribution of equine gastric ulceration syndrome (EGUS) in 201 horses in Denmark. Equine Vet J. 41(7): 619-624. Doi: 10.2746/042516409x441910.
Martineau H, Thompson H, Taylor D. 2009a. Pathology of gastritis and gastric ulceration in the horse. Part 1: range of lesions present in 21 mature individuals. Equine Vet J. 41: 638-644. Doi: 10.2746/042516409x464816.
Martineau H, Thompson H, Taylor D. 2009b. Pathology of gastritis and gastric ulceration in the horse. Part 2: a scoring system. Equine Vet J. 41: 646-651. Doi: 10.2746/042516409x464799.
Martinez JR, Silveira GE. 2014. Equine gastric ulcer syndrome: risk factor and therapeutics aspects. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu. 27: 157-169.
Maxie MG, Miller MA. 2008. Jubb, Kennedy and Palmer’s Pathology of Domestic Animals: Fifth Edition. 1-737. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-5317-7.00001-1.
McClure SR, Glickman LT, Glickman NW. 1999. Prevalence of gastric ulcers in show horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 215: 1130-1133.
McClure SR, Carithers DS, Gross SJ, Murray MJ. 2005. Gastric ulcer development in horses in a simulated show or training environment. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 227(5): 775-777. Doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.775.
Murray MJ, Grodinsky C, Anderson CW, Radue PF, Schmidt GR. 1989. Gastric ulcers in horses: a comparison of endoscopic findings in horses with and without clinical signs. Equine Vet J Suppl. 68-72. Doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb05659.x.
Murray MJ, Haven ML, Eichorn ES, Zhang D, Eagleson J, Hickey GJ. 1997. Effects of omeprazole on healing of naturally-occurring gastric ulcers in thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J. 29(6): 425-429. Doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1997.tb03153.x.
Nieto JE, Spier S, Pipers FS, Stanley S, Aleman MR, Smith DC, Snyder JR. 2002. Comparison of paste and suspension formulations of omeprazole in the healing of gastric ulcers in racehorses in active training. 221(8): 1139-1143. Doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.1139.
Nieto JE, Aleman M, Anderson JD, Fiack C, Snyder JR. 2012. Effects of phenylbutazone on gene expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in the oral, glandular gastric, and bladder mucosae of healthy horses. Am J Vet Res. 73: 98-104. Doi: 10.2460/ajvr.73.1.98.
Orsini JA, Hackett ES, Grenager N. 2009. The Effect of Exercise on Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome in the Thoroughbred and Standardbred Athlete. J Equine Vet Sci. 29: 167-171. Doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2009.01.006.
Reed SM, Bayly WM, Sellon DC, Frazer GS. 2004. Equine Internal Medicine. Equine Intern Med. 1025-1168. Doi: 10.1016/B0-72-169777-1/50018-4.
Robinson NE, Sprayberry KA. 2009. Current therapy in equine medicine. 6th ed. St. Louis (Mo): Saunders Elsevier.
Tamzali Y, Marguet C, Priymenko N, Lyazrhi F. 2011. Prevalence of gastric ulcer syndrome in high-level endurance horses. Equine Vet J. 43: 141-144. Doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00129.x.
Taylor FGR, Hillyer MH. 1999. Técnicas Diagnósticas de Medicina Equina. Manual de Técnicas Diagnósticas Para Estudiantes y Profesionales Aplicables al Caballo Adulto. Zaragoza (España): Editorial Acribia.
Vatistas NJ, Snyder JR, Carlson G, Johnson B, Arthu RM, Thurmond M, Zhou H, Lloyd KLK. 1999. Cross-sectional study of gastric ulcers of the squamous mucosa in thoroughbred racehorses. Equine Vet J Suppl. (29): 34-39. Doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb05166.x
Videla R, Andrews FM. 2009. New Perspectives in Equine Gastric Ulcer Syndrome. Vet Clin North Am - Equine Pract. 25: 283-301. Doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.04.013.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Angie L. Medina B․, Rafael R. Faleiros, José R. Martínez A․. (2024). Prevalence of squamous gastric disease in Colombian equids at slaughter: A postmortem comparative study among horses, donkeys and mules. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 140, p.105138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2024.105138.
2. L. C. Calixto, J. R. Martínez. (2022). Determinación de Helicobacter spp. en mucosa gástrica glandular de mulas a través de la prueba de la actividad de la ureasa e histopatología. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y de Zootecnia, 69(2) https://doi.org/10.15446/rfmvz.v69n2.103260.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Felipe Gómez, Jhon Didier Ruiz, Dubel Balvin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
The authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication.
Readers are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the license terms, provided proper attribution is given, the work is not used for commercial purposes, and no modifications or derivatives are made.



