Publicado

2020-03-31 — Actualizado el 2021-11-25

Versiones

Water requirements and restrictions to sugarcane in cane plants and ratoon cane cycles in Southern Brazil

Requerimientos y restricciones de agua en caña de azúcar plantilla y soca en el sur de Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v69n2.60246

Palabras clave:

Climate, Sacharum spp, Southern Brazil, Water balance, Water deficit, WRSI (en)
Balance hídrico, Déficit de agua, Requerimiento hídricos, Saccharum sp., Sur de Brasil (es)

Autores/as

In a site with a Cfa-type climate in southern Brazil, the water requirements and restrictions for the cultivation of sugar cane (Saccharum spp.), in plant and soca (second cut) were characterized. Water availability was calculated based on the daily water balance and evapotranspiration was estimated using the Penman-Monteith method. The thermal and water requirements of sugarcane were calculated taking as reference the agroecological zoning in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Water requirement index did not show limiting factors for the development of the crop both in plant and soca. Water deficit was the most important agroclimatic risk factor. In Paranavaí-PR, Brazil, sugarcane is a safe crop, with possibilities of saving water in the development stage (phase II), with frequent additional irrigation needs of 508.8 mm/crop cycle for plant and 486.5 mm/sugarcane cycle for soca.

En un sitio con clima tipo Cfa del sur de Brasil, se caracterizaron los requerimientos y restricciones de agua para el cultivo de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en plantilla y soca (segundo corte). La disponibilidad de agua fue calculada con base en el balance hídrico diario y la evapotranspiración se estimó mediante el método de Penman-Monteith. Los requerimientos térmicos e hídricos de la caña fueron calculados tomando como referencia la zonificación agroecológica en el estado de Paraná, Brasil. El índice de requerimiento de agua no mostró factores restrictivos para el desarrollo del cultivo tanto en plantilla como en soca. El déficit de agua fue el factor de riesgo agroclimático más importante. En Paranavaí-PR, Brasil, la caña de azúcar es un cultivo seguro, con posibilidades de ahorro de agua en la etapa de desarrollo (fase II), con necesidades de riego adicional frecuente de 508.8 mm por ciclo de cultivo en plantilla y 486.5 mm por ciclo de caña soca.

Referencias

Allen, R. G.; Pereira, L. S.; Raes, D.; Smith. M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Rome: FAO. http://www. fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm

Alvares, C.A.; Stape, J.L.; Sentelhas, P.J.; Gonçalves, J.L.M.; Sparovek, G. 2014. Koppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 22 (6), 711-728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507

Brito, A. D.; Libardi, P. L.; Ghiberto, P. J. 2009. Water balance components in soils cropped to sugarcane, with and without nitrogen fertilization. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 33(2), 295-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000200007

Buso, P. H.; Koehler, H. S.; Zambon, J. L.; Ido, O. T.; Bespalhok-Filho, J. C.; Weber, H.; Oliveira, R. A.; Zeni Neto, H. 2009. Sugarcane root system of RB855536 variety planted in one bud and three buds setts. Scientia Agraria. 10(5), 343-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rsa.v10i5.15185

Dantas Neto, J.; Figueredo, J. L.; Farias, C. H.; Azevedo, H. M.; Azevedo, C. A. 2006. Response of sugarcane, second leaf, to irrigation levels and topdressing manuring. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 10(2), 283-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662006000200006

EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. 1997. Manual de métodos de análise de solo. 2. ed. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Rio de Janeiro. Brazil. 212 p. https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/Repositorio/Manual+de+Me todos_000fzvhotqk02wx5ok0q43a0ram31wtr.pdf

EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. 2009. Zoneamento agroecológico da cana-de-açúcar. Rio de Janeiro. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. 55 p. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/301624955_Zoneamento_ Agroecologico_da_Cana-de_Acucar_Expandir_a_ producao_preservar_a_vida_garantir_o_futuro

Inman-Bamber, N. G. 2004. Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off. Field Crops Research. 89(1), 107-122. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.018

Inman-Bamber, N. G.; Smith, D. M. 2005. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research. 92(2-3), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.023

Machado, R.S.; Ribeiro, R. V.; Ribeiro-Marchiori, P. E.; São Pedro-Machado, D. F.; Caruso-Machado, E.; de Andrade-Landell, M G. 2009. Biometric and physiological responses to water deficit in sugarcane at different phenological stages. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 44(12), 1575-1582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009001200003

Oliveira, E. C.; Freire, F. J.; Oliveira, A. C.; Neto, D. E. S.; Rocha, A. T.; Carvalho, L. A. 2011. Productivity, water use efficiency, and technological quality of sugarcane subjected to different water regimes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 46(6), 617-625. http://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/10222

Rijtema, P.E.; Aboukhaled, A. 1975. Crop Water Use. p. 5. In: Aboukhaled, A.; Arar, A.; Balba, A.M.; Bishay, B.G.; Kadry, L.T.; Rijtema, P. E.; Taher, A. Research on crop water use, salt affected soils and drainage in the Arab Republic of Egypt. FAO Regional Office for the Near East, 104 p. https://edepot.wur.nl/370376

Silva, M. A.; Jeronimo, E. M.; Lucio, A. D. 2008. Height of cut and harvest period effects on tillering and yield of sugarcane. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 43(8), 979-986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2008000800005

Silva, V.P.R.; Silva, B.B; Albuquerque, W.G.; Borges, C.J.R.; Sousa, I.F.; Dantas Neto, J. 2013. Crop coefficient, water requirements, yield and water use efficiency of sugarcane growth in Brazil. Agricultural Water Management. 128, 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.06.007

Singels, A.; Van Den Berg, M.; Smit, M. A.; Jones, M. R.; Van Antwerpen, R. 2010. Modelling water uptake, growth and sucrose accumulation of sugarcane subjected to water stress. Field Crops Research. 143 117(1), 59-69. https://doi-org.ezproxy.unal.edu.co/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.02.003

SEAB. Secretaria da agricultura e do abastecimento. 2015. Prognosis of sugarcane 2014/2015. Departamento de Economia Rural. URL: http://www.agricultura.pr.gov.br

Souza, J. L. M.; Jerszurki, D.; Damazio, E. C. 2013. Functional relations between probable and average rainfall in Brazilian regions and climates. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 48(7), 693-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000700001

Thornthwaite, C. W.; Mather, J. R. 1955. The Water Balance. Drexel Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Climatology, Hydrometeorology. 104 p.

Van Genuchten, M. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 44(5), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

Vianna, M. S; Sentelhas, P. C. 2014. Simulation of the water deficit risk in sugarcane-crop expansion regions in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 49(4): 237-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014000400001

Wrege, M. S.; Caramori, P. H. C.; Gonçalves, A.; Bertonha, A.; Ferreira, R. C.; Caviglione, J. H.; Faria, R. T.; Lourenço, P. S.; Gonçalves, S L. 2005. Potential regions for sugarcane cultivation in the State of Paraná, Brazil, based on frost risk analysis. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia. 13(1), 113-122. https://www.esalq.usp.br/departamentos/leb/aulas/lce630_ANTIGA_ SENTELHAS/EC_2_2016_2_ZonCana.pdf

Dimensions

PlumX

Visitas a la página del resumen del artículo

1549

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Cómo citar

Requerimientos y restricciones de agua en caña de azúcar plantilla y soca en el sur de Brasil. (2021). Acta Agronómica, 69(2), 136-144. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v69n2.60246 (Original work published 2020)