Síntomas en la mujer con síndrome coronario agudo: desde las pruebas de validez
Symptoms in Women with Acute Coronary Syndrome: from Validity Tests
Sintomas na mulher com síndrome coronário agudo: desde as provas de validade
Keywords:
validez de las pruebas, síndrome coronario agudo, Salud de la Mujer (es)Test validity, acute coronary syndrome, Women Health (en)
validade das provas, síndrome coronário agudo, Saúde da Mulher (pt)
Downloads
References
(1)Demsey SJ, Dracup K, Moser DK. Women ́s decisions to seek medical care for acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung. 1995; 24(6): 444-456.
(2)Hauser ST. Physician-patient relationships. Social Con-texts of Health, illness, and patient care. Cambridge: Cambrid-ge University Press; 1987. p. 104-140.
(3)Johnson JI. Nurse practitioner-pacient discourse: unco-vering the voice of nursing in primary care practice. Scholarly inquiry for nursing practice: an International Journal. 1993; 7(3): 143-157.
(4)Wright BD, Stone MH. Validity in Rasch measurement. Research memorandum 54. MESA. Chicago: University of Chi-cago; 1988. p. 12.
(5)Dodd MJ. The pathogenesis and characterization of oral mucositis associated with cancer therapy. In innovative ap-proaches to oral mucositis and cancer pain: linking mecha-nisms to management. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2004; 31(4): 5-11.
(6)University of California. A model for symptom manage-ment. San Francisco School of Nursing Symptom Management Faculty Group. J Nurs Scholarship. 1994; 26 (4): 272-276.
(7)Dodd M, Janson S, Facione N, Faucett J, Froelicher E, Humphreys J, et al. Advancing the science of symptom mana-gement. J Advance Nurs. 2001; 33(5): 668-676.
(8)Lenz ER, et al. The middle-range theory of unpleasant symptoms: An update. Advances in Nursing Science. 1997; 19(3): 14-27.
(9)Lenz ER, et al. Collaborative development of middle-ran-ge nursing theories: Toward a theory of unpleasant symptoms. Advances in Nursing Science. 1995; 17(3): 1-13.
(10)Keele KD. The pain chart. Lancet. 1948; 3(2): 6-8.
(11)Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen N, et al. The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia. 1976; 31(9): 1191-1198.
(12)Liu WH, Aitkenhead AR. Comparison of contempo-raneous and retrospective assessment of postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale. Br J Anaesth. 1991; 67(6): 768-771.
(13)Frank M, Olsen S. Instruments for clinical health-care research. Measuring Pain. 2a Ed. Jones and Bartlett Publis-hers; 1997. p. 528-561.
(14)Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Journal of Pain Symptom Management. 1987; 30(2): 191-197.
(15)Dudgeon D, Raubertas RF, Rosenthal SN. The Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire in chronic cancer pain. Jour-nal of Pain Symptom Management. 1993; 8(4): 191-195.
(16)McGuire DB, Altomonte V, Peterson DE, et al. Patterns of mucositis and pain in patients receiving preparative che-motherapy and bone marrow transplantation. Oncology Nur-sing Forum. 1993; 20(10): 1493-1502.
(17)Swanston M, Abraham C, Nacrae WA, et al. Pain as-sessment with interactive computer animation. Review of Pain. 1993; 53(3): 347-351.
(18)Zerwic JJ. Symptoms of acute myocardial infarction: Expectations of a community sample. Heart Lung: Journal of Acute & Critical Care. 1998, 27(2): 75-81.
(19)Champion VL. Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Advances in Nursing Science. 1984; 6(3): 72-85.
(20)Porter LA. Cognitive appraisal of psychological stress, appraisal contexts, and life disruption in patients having per-cutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Rochester: The University of Rochester; 1992.
(21)Delunas LR, Potempa K. Adaptation after treatment for Heart disease: preliminary examination within a stress apprai-sal context. Heart Lung. 1999; 28(3): 186-191.
(22)Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L, et al. El cuestionario de salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos de-sarrollos. Gac Sanit. 2005; 19(2): 135-50
(23)Wann-Hansson C, Rahm Hallberg I, Risberg B, et al. A comparison of the Nottingham Health Profile and Short Form 36 Health Survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischae-mia in a longitudinal perspective. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2004; 2(9): 5-11.
(24)Céspedes V. Modelo Conceptual del Manejo del sínto-ma: clasificación por percepción, evaluación y respuesta de mujeres con síndrome coronario agudo; originada por la cons-trucción de un instrumento validado en Bogotá, Colombia [Te-sis doctoral]. Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2009.
(25)Lawshe CH. Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28(4): 563-575.
(26)Tristán LA. Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instru-mento objetivo. Avances en Medición. 2008; Vol. 6: 35-44.
(27)Wright BD, Stone MH. Making measures. Chicago (USA): The Phaneron Press; 2004. p. 35-39.
(28)Tristán LA, Vidal UR. Linear model to assess the scale’s validity of a test. Chicago: AERA Annual Meeting; 2007.
(29)Tristán LA. Contribución al estudio del error de medida, (Parte 1). Notas sobre evaluación criterial. N.º 5. Ceneval y fa-milia de programas KALT; 1999. p. 12.
(30)Tristán LA. Diseño de pruebas, (Parte 4). México: Insti-tuto de Evaluación e Ingeniería Avanzada; 1999-2007. p. 13-17.
(31)Batista JM, Coenders G, Alonso J. Análisis factorial con-firmatorio. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/sites/de-fault/files/elsevier/pdf/2/2v122nSupl.1a13057542pdf001.pdf. Consultado mayo de 2011.
(32)Campbell DT, Fiske CD. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix. Psychologi-cal Bulletin. 1959; 56(2): 81-105.
(33)Wright BD, Stone MH. Making measures. Chicago (USA): The Phaneron Press; 2004. p. 35-39.
(34)Rodríguez P, Cifuentes M, Moreno E, Sanjuán P. Ma-triz Multirasgo Multimétodo. Disponible en: http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/redalyc/pdf/727/72797112.pdf. Consultado mayo de 2011.
(35)Martínez JA, Martínez L. Matriz Multirasgo Multiméto-do. Disponible en: http://repositorio.bib.upct.es:8080/jspui/handle/10317/1600. Consultado mayo de 2011.
Article abstract page views
Downloads
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Avances en Enfermería

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published by Avances en Enfermería are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Starting 2020, we added the CC-BY-NC recognition to the license, which means anyone is allowed to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and transform our contents with non-commercial purposes, and although new works must adequately cite the original work and source and also pursue non-commercial purposes, users do not have to license derivative works under the same terms.


















