Embarazo heterotópico de ubicación tubárica. Reporte de caso

Tubal heterotopic pregnancy. Case report

Introducción. El embarazo heterotópico se considera una patología de interés debido a que, aunque su incidencia es baja, su tasa de mortalidad es elevada; además, esta es una entidad que representa un reto diagnostico por sus diversas presentaciones clínicas.

Presentación del caso. Mujer de 32 años, mestiza, procedente de Pasto (Colombia) y en estado de embarazo, quien asistió al servicio de urgencias de una institución de tercer nivel de atención por un dolor abdominal difuso asociado a sangrado vaginal. Teniendo en cuenta los hallazgos imagenológicos (ecografía) y los niveles de gonadotropina encontrados, la paciente fue diagnosticada con embarazo heterotópico de ubicación tubárica derecha que requirió tratamiento quirúrgico por laparotomía. A los 8 días del procedimiento la paciente asistió a control y mediante ecografía se evidenció continuidad de embarazo intrauterino.

Conclusiones. El pilar fundamental para el diagnóstico del embarazo heterotópico es la sospecha clínica, pero es necesario confirmarlo mediante ayudas diagnosticas como la ecografía y a través de la medición de los niveles de gonadotropina coriónica humana. Este evento se debe sospechar en pacientes con cuadro de dolor abdominal a pesar de que no tengan factores de riesgo para presentarlo. La elección de tratamiento (médico o quirúrgico) depende de la condición clínica y hemodinámica de cada paciente y de la ubicación y el tamaño del embarazo ectópico.

Introduction: Heterotopic pregnancy (HP) is an uncommon yet interesting condition with a high mortality rate despite its low incidence. It can be difficult to diagnose due to its diverse clinical manifestations.

Case presentation. A 32-year-old, mestizo, pregnant woman from Pasto (Colombia) attended the emergency department of a tertiary care institution due to diffuse abdominal pain associated with vaginal bleeding. Taking into account the imaging findings (ultrasound) and the gonadotropin levels found, the patient was diagnosed with heterotopic pregnancy in right fallopian tube that required surgical treatment by laparotomy. Eight days after the procedure, the patient attended a follow-up appointment during which an ultrasound showed continuity of intrauterine pregnancy.

Conclusions. The mainstay for the diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy is clinical suspicion, but it is necessary to confirm it through diagnostic aids such as ultrasound and the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin levels. A heterotopic pregnancy should be suspected in patients with abdominal pain, even if they do not have risk factors for this type of pregnancy. Choosing medical or surgical treatment will depend on the clinical and hemodynamic condition of the patient and the location and size of the ectopic pregnancy.

https://doi.org/10.15446/cr.v7n2.86507

Keywords: Ectopic Pregnancy; Hemoperitoneum; Laparotomy; Ultrasonography.

Palabras clave: Embarazo ectópico; Hemoperitoneo; Laparotomía; Ultrasonografía.

Mayerli Catalina Díaz-Narváez

Fundación Universitaria San Martín - Pasto Campus - Faculty of Health Sciences - Medical Program

- Pasto - Colombia.

Clínica Hispanoamérica - Gynecology and Obstetrics Service - Pasto Colombia.

Universidad Libre – Barranquilla Campus - School of Health Sciences - Specialty in Gynecology and Obstetrics - Barranquilla - Colombia.

Erika Cristina Enriquez-Enriquez

Fundación Universitaria San Martín - Pasto Campus - Faculty of Health Sciences - Medical Program

- Pasto - Colombia.

Clínica Hispanoamérica - Gynecology and Obstetrics Service - Pasto Colombia.

Corresponding author

Mayerli Catalina Díaz-Narváez. Facultad de Ciencias de la salud, Fundación Universitaria San Martín. Pasto. Colombia. Email: catadiaz181@gmail.com

Received: 21/04/2020 Accepted: 26/08/2020

Resumen

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the coexistence of an intrauterine pregnancy and an ectopic pregnancy at any location, although most cases occur in the uterine tubes (1). According to Zatarain-Gulmar & Torres-Hernández (2), the first case of heterotopic pregnancy was described by Duberney in 1708 in the findings of an autopsy.

Even though this type of pregnancy is extremely rare, it is estimated to occur in 1 out of every 30 000 to 50 000 spontaneous pregnancies. In recent years, there has been an increase in cases related to the use of assisted reproductive technologies since the prevalence rate increases by up to 1% in pregnancies achieved using these techniques (3).

Determination of the human chorionic gonadotropin ß-core fragment and transvaginal ultrasound are the most useful options for diagnosing heterotopic pregnancy. Methotrexate, hypertonic injectables, expectant management, and laparoscopic surgery are all options for treating this illness (4) and the best option should be chosen based on the expertise of the treating physician and the patient’s clinical and hemodynamic status (5).

Heterotopic pregnancy is associated with high maternal morbidity and mortality, so its diagnosis and timely care are crucial. The following is the case of a patient who presented with abdominal pain suggestive of the aforementioned condition.

Case presentation

A 32-year-old mestizo patient from the city of Pasto, Colombia, who worked as a nursing assistant and came from a middle-income household, consulted the emergency department of a tertiary health care institution. For five hours, she presented with diffuse, abdominal, colicky pain with predominance in the hypogastrium and right iliac fossa of moderate intensity that progressed to intense, associated with moderate vaginal bleeding. At the time of consultation, the patient was 5.1 weeks pregnant. She stated that it was his first pregnancy and that it was not the result of fertilization techniques. Her medical history revealed that she had hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine 50mcg and that she had no surgical or allergy history and no sexually transmitted diseases.

On physical examination, the following vital signs were found: blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg; heart rate of 62 bpm; respiratory rate of 19 rpm; and temperature of 36.2°C. She also presented painful expression and soft abdomen, depressible and tender to palpation at the level of hypogastrium and right iliac fossa. Vaginal examination showed a closed central cervix and scant red vaginal bleeding, although no signs of peritoneal irritation were found.

In view of the findings, complementary laboratory tests were performed, showing C-reactive protein level of 0.57 mg/L; blood count with leukocytes of 16.85 mg/L, neutrophils of 90.4%, hemoglobin of 14.8 mg/L, hematocrit of 43.2%, and platelets of 294 mg/L; normal urinalysis; negative gram stain of uncentrifuged urine; and quantitative human chorionic gonadotropin ß-subunit levels of 16 627.77 mlU/mL.

Because gonadotropin levels were elevated for gestational age and the patient had vaginal bleeding, it was decided to perform a transvaginal ultrasound that showed anteverted retroflexed uterus with a well implanted gestational sac in the uterine cavity and adequate decidual reaction. In the right adnexa, an echogenic yolk sac of 47x29mm was observed, which is characteristic of the “tubal ring sign” or “bagel sign.” The ultrasound reading concluded intrauterine pregnancy of less than 6 weeks and the presence of a right adnexal mass that ruled out a second extrauterine gestational sac with free fluid in the posterior sac fundus (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Transvaginal ultrasound with visualization of intrauterine pregnancy less than 6 weeks and right adnexal mass.

Source: Document obtained during the course of the study.

Due to the suspicion of heterotopic pregnancy, the patient was taken to laparotomy, a procedure in which there were no complications. A hemoperitoneum of 150cm3 was found and an ectopic right tubal pregnancy was confirmed, leading to a total right salpingectomy (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Sample removed during salpingectomy.

Source: Document obtained during the course of the study.

The patient progressed satisfactorily and was discharged with an indication for outpatient follow-up at 8 days, when a new transvaginal obstetric ultrasound was performed. It showed early pregnancy with retrochorial hematoma and a single live fetus that, according to fetal biometry, had a gestational age of 6.4 weeks.

At 12 weeks of gestation, the patient underwent a genetic screening ultrasound in which markers suggestive of chromosomopathy were detected, so she decided to request the voluntary interruption of her pregnancy.

Discussion

Ectopic pregnancy is a serious public health concern in Colombia as it is one of the leading causes of maternal death. It is defined as the implantation of the blastocyst anywhere outside the uterine cavity (6,7), the most common location being the uterine tubes, with an incidence between 95 and 98%. Other less frequent locations are the cervix, ovaries, and abdomen (8-10).

Heterotopic pregnancy, on the other hand, is defined as the coexistence of a uterine and ectopic pregnancy (11). The literature reports that the main risk factors for this type of pregnancy are anatomical alterations of the uterine tubes, which in turn could be caused by infections; a history of pelvic inflammatory disease, tubal procedures, and ectopic pregnancy; use of intrauterine devices; and use of assisted reproductive techniques (12-16). However, in some cases, as in the case reported here, there is no associated risk factor.

The diagnosis of heterotopic pregnancy is based on clinical suspicion, but it should be confirmed with an ultrasound, preferably transvaginal, and the measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin levels. Ultrasound aids in the detection of significant findings such as an adnexal mass separated from the ovary, the tubal ring sign (17), and the visualization of another intrauterine embryo. It also helps to determine whether there is embryonic cardiac activity outside the uterus (18).

The ability to detect a heterotopic pregnancy in a timely manner is critical because it allows for the early adoption of appropriate treatment and, in this way, reduce maternal morbidity and mortality associated with this cause (19).

Although the symptomatology of heterotopic pregnancies may vary greatly depending on the location and weeks of gestation, the most common symptoms and signs include abdominal pain (80%), vaginal bleeding (50%), and hypovolemic shock (13%) (20).

There are several therapeutic options for treating this condition, including expectant management, medical management, and surgical management. Treatment with methotrexate and injection of hypertonic solutions in the extrauterine embryo are two options that are not currently recommended because their effects on intrauterine pregnancy are still unclear (21,22), which is why these options were ruled out in this case.

With regard to surgical treatment, laparotomy or laparoscopy may be performed, but the latter is chosen if the patient is hemodynamically stable and if the size of the ectopic pregnancy is adequate, because it is a safe technique and less painful and costly than the open surgical approach (23-25). In the clinical case presented here, laparotomy was chosen due to the presence of free fluid in the cul-de-sac, suggesting hemoperitoneum secondary to ectopic pregnancy that was confirmed during the procedure.

Conclusions

Although heterotopic pregnancy is a rare condition, it is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. For this reason, it is essential that physicians are aware of it so that they can make a timely diagnosis and implement appropriate treatment. It should also be noted that this condition can have various clinical presentations.

Moreover, clinical signs and symptoms, human chorionic gonadotropin levels and ultrasound findings should be correlated in order to confirm a case of heterotopic pregnancy; it should also be considered that the pathognomonic sign of ectopic pregnancy is the visualization of the tubal ring sign and heterotopic pregnancy on ultrasound, as well as the visualization of intrauterine and extrauterine embryonic cardiac activity at the same time.

Finally, in cases of tubal ectopic pregnancies, medical treatment is not recommended as there is no evidence that intrauterine pregnancy may or may not be affected. As for surgical management, laparoscopy is the treatment of choice, as long as the patient’s condition allows it.

Ethical considerations

The patient’s informed consent was obtained for the preparation of this case report.

Conflicts of interest

None stated by the authors.

Funding

None stated by the authors

Acknowledgments

None stated by the authors

References

1.Álvarez-Bernabeu R, Reina-Paniagua M, Encinas-Pardilla MB, Serrano-González L, Salcedo-Mariña A, Tejerina-Gonzalez E, et al. Gestación heterotópica: dos casos con gestación intrauterina viable a término. Rev. Chil. Obstet. ginecol. 2016;81(2):117-21. https://doi.org/gcdp.

2.Zatarain-Gulmar A, Torres-Hernández VE. Embarazo heterotópico espontáneo en una mujer sin factores de riesgo: reporte de un caso. Anales de Radiología México. 2019;18:59-64. https://doi.org/gcdq.

3.Luna Lugo G. Embarazo heterotópico espontáneo en pacientes con antecedente de embarazo gemelar familiar: 2 casos. Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia, Hospital General de Pachuca, Servicios de Salud de Hidalgo, Hidalgo, México. Progr Obstet Ginecol. 2012;55 (3):141–5. 

4.Hernández-Cruz R, Tobón-Delgado SR, García-Rodríguez AM, Escobar-Ponce LF, Olguín-Ortega AA. Embarazo heterotópico espontáneo. Reporte de un caso y revisión de la bibliografía. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85(6):403-8.

5.Monzón-Castillo EP, Tejada-Martínez G, Oliva-García AB. Embarazo heterotópico espontáneo. Presentación de dos casos. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet. 2019;65(3):355. https://doi.org/gcdt.

6.Stulberg DB, Cain LR, Dahlquist I, Lauderdale DS. Ectopic pregnancy rates in the Medicaid population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):274-7. https://doi.org/f2hrmd.

7.Escobar-Vidarte MF, Caicedo-Herrera G, Solarte-Erazo JD, Thomas-Pérez LS, Dávalos-Pérez DM, López-Tenorio J, et al. Embarazo ectópico abdominal avanzado: reporte de casos y revisión de la literatura. Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. 2017;68(1):71-2. https://doi.org/gcdv.

8.Nkusu-Nunyalulendho D, Einterz EM. Advanced abdominal pregnancy: Case report and review of 163 cases reported since 1946. Rural Remote Health. 2008;(8):1087.

9.Govindarajan MJ, Rajan R. Heterotopic pregnancy in natural conception. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2008;1(1):37-8. https://doi.org/cqf37w.

10.Simsek T, Dogan A, Simsek M, Pestereli E. Heterotopic triplet pregnancy (twin tubal) in a natural cycle with tubal rupture: case report and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2008;34(4 Pt 2):759-62. https://doi.org/bp759s.

11.Berek J. Early pregnancy loss and ectopic pregnancy. In: Berek JS, Novak E, editors. Berek and Novak’s Gynecology. 14th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams y Wilkins; 2007. p. 533-4.

12.Herrera E, Otero E, Hincapié LC, Camacho R, Gómez G, Quintero CH, et al. Heterotopic pregnancy: Presentation of four cases. Colomb. Med. 2015;42(4):518-22.

13.Giarenis I, Shenoy J, Morris E. Cervical ectopic pregnancy after endometrial ablation: A case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;277(6):567-9. https://doi.org/cwqts5.

14.Ahmadi F, Irani S. Cervical ectopic pregnancy following assisted reproductive technology: A case report. Int J Fertil Steril. 2012;6(3):201-4.

15.Pantelis A, Daniilidis A, Dinas K. Conservative treatment of a 7 weeks cervical ectopic pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Hippokratia. 2013;17(1):95.

16.Anev I, Wang J, Palep-Singh M, Seif MW. Monochorionic diamniotic twin cervicalectopic pregnancy following assisted conception: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2013;58(9-10):445-7.

17.Lin E, Bhatt S, Dogra VS. Diagnostic clues to ectopic pregnancy. Radiographics. 2008;28(6):1661-71. https://doi.org/bjr4tf.

18.Singhal M, Ahuja CK, Saxena AK, Dhaliwal L, Khandelwal N. Sonographic appearance of heterotopic pregnancy with ruptured ectopic tubal pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010;38(9):509-11. https://doi.org/b6v7tt.

19.Paspulati RM, Bhatt S, Nour SG. Sonographic evaluation of first-trimester bleeding. Radiol Clin North Am. 2004;42(2):297-314. https://doi.org/fdvqhk.

20.López-Luque PR, Bergal-Mateo GJ, López-Olivares MC. El embarazo ectópico: su interés en atención primaria de salud. Semergen. 2014;40(4):211-7. https://doi.org/f2p35s.

21.Umranikar S, Umranikar A, Rafi J, Bawden P, Umranikar S, O’Sullivan B, et al. Acute presentation of a heterotopic pregnancy following spontaneous conception: a case report. Cases J. 2009;2:9369. https://doi.org/fsg5xb.

22.Stika CS. Methotrexate: the pharmacology behind medical treatment for ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(2):433-9. https://doi.org/gcdx.

23.Chetty M, Elson J. Treating non-tubal ectopic pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(4):529-38. https://doi.org/cmgc7g.

24.Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, Ankum WM, Van der Veen F. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(1): :CD000324. https://doi.org/cgbkdv.

25.León-Cid I, Rodríguez-Iglesias G, Segura-Fernández A, Atienza-Barzaga A. Embarazo ectópico abdominal con implantación en el hígado. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2011:40(3-4).