Felicidad en la política pública: una revisión de literatura
Happiness in public policy, a literature review
Felicidade na política pública: uma revisão de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v37n73.59586Palavras-chave:
felicidad, utilidad, políticas públicas (es)Happiness, Utility, Public policy (en)
felicidade, utilidade, políticas públicas (pt)
Downloads
El artículo revisa la literatura sobre felicidad desde una perspectiva de política pública. Se encuentra una tendencia, que debería fortalecerse en el futuro, a estudiar los efectos de diversas políticas sobre la felicidad, en lugar de extrapolar los efectos de trabajos sobre los determinantes. Dado que muchos métodos fueron diseñados para estudiar la utilidad, hace falta adaptarlos, especialmente en el tratamiento del tiempo, y en el uso de métodos experimentales y la evaluación de impacto. La noción de felicidad plantea preguntas importantes, pero todavía son necesarios más desarrollos para su uso fructífero en la toma de decisiones de política.
The article surveys the recent literature on happiness from a policy perspective. We identified a trend in order to study the effects of different policies on happiness instead of simply extrapolating policy recommendations from studies on the determinants of happiness. We predict that this trend will become more pronounced in the future. As many policy tools were made for utility, they require adaptation to promote happiness, especially in terms of the treatment of time, the use of experimental methods, and impact evaluation. Happiness studies raise important and interesting questions; however, more developments are needed for them to be use-ful in aiding public policy.
O artigo revisa a literatura sobre felicidade desde uma perspectiva de política pública. Encontra-se uma tendência, que deveria ser fortalecida no futuro, estudar os efeitos de diversas políticas sobre a felicidade, em vez de extrapolar os efeitos de trabalhos sobre os determinantes. Visto que muitos métodos foram desenhados para estudar a utilidade, faz falta adaptá-los, especialmente no tratamento do tempo, e no uso de métodos experimentais e na avaliação de impacto. A noção de felicidade levanta preguntas importantes, mas ainda são necessários mais desenvolvimentos para seu uso frutífero na tomada de decisões políticas.
Referências
Abdellaoui, M., Driouchi, A., & L'Haridon, O. (2011). Risk aversion elicitation: Reconciling tractability and bias minimization. Theory and Decision, 71, 63-80.
Adler, M. D. (2013). Happiness surveys and public policy: What’s the use? Duke Law Journal, 62, 1509-1601.
Adler, M. D. (2016). Behavioral economics, happiness surveys, and public policy. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), 196-219.
Antolini, F. (2016). The evolution of national accounting and new statistical information: Happiness and gross domestic product, can we measure it? Social Indicators Research, 129, 1075-1092.
Austin, A. (2016). On well-being and public policy: Are we capable of questioning the hegemony of happiness? Social Indicators Research , 127, 123-38.
Ball, J., & Wangchuk, K. C. (2015). Using a policy of ‘gross national happiness’ to guide the development of sustainable early learning programs in the Kingdom of Bhutan: Aspirations and challenges. Global Education Review, 2(1), 5-22.
Banerjee, A. A., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor Economics. A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. Nueva York: Public Affairs.
Bartolini, S. (2014). Building sustainability through greater happiness. Economic and Labour Relations Review, 25, 587-602.
Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., Bruni, L., & Porta, P. L. (2016a). Policies for happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bartolini, S., Bilancini, E., & Sarracino, F. (2016b). Social capital predicts happiness over time: The worldwide evidence from time series. En S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, L. Bruni, & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Policies for happiness (pp. 175-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Batty, E., & Flint, J. (2013). Talking 'bout poor folks (thinking 'bout my folks): Perspectives on comparative poverty in working class households. International Journal of Housing Policy, 13(1), 1-16.
Batz, C., Parrigon, S., & Tay, L. (2016). The impact of scale transformation on national subjective well-being scores. Social Indicators Research , 129, 13-27.
Becchetti, L., & Pelloni, A. (2013). What are we learning from the life satisfaction literature? International Review of Economics, 60, 113-155.
Becchetti, L., Massari, R., & Naticchioni, P. (2014). The drivers of happiness inequality: Suggestions for promoting social cohesion. Oxford Economic Papers, 66, 419-442.
Bernal, R., & Peña, X. (2010). Guía práctica para la evaluación de impacto. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
Blanchflower, D. G., Oswald, A. J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2013). Is psychological well-being linked to the consumption of fruit and vegetables? Social Indicators Research , 114, 785-801.
Boelhouwer, J., & van Campen, C. (2013). Steering towards happiness in The Netherlands. Social Indicators Research , 114, 59-72.
Borghesi, S., & Vercelli, A. (2012). Happiness and health: Two paradoxes. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 203-233.
Bradford, W. D., & Dolan, P. (2010). Getting used to it: The adaptive global utility model. Journal of Health Economics, 29(6), 811-20.
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 917-27.
Cheah, Y. K., & Tang, C. F. (2013). The socio-demographic determinants of self-rated happiness: The case of Penang, Malaysia. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 54(1), 1-16.
Chicaíza, L., García Molina, M., & Romano, G. (2013). Años de vida ajustados por calidad: evolución, fundamentos e implicaciones. Coyuntura Económica, 53(2), 153-65.
Chicaíza-Becerra, L. A., & Garcia-Molina, M. (2014). From the EQ-5D tool and the visual analog scale to happiness. Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología, 42, 1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.rcae.2013.10.003
Chicaíza, L. A., & García, M. (2015). Riesgo, incertidumbre y política pública en vacunas. Cuadernos de Economía. 34(65), 229-235.
Choudhary, M. A., Levine, P., Mcadam, P., & Welz, P. (2012). The happiness puzzle: Analytical aspects of the Easterlin paradox. Oxford Economic Papers , 64, 27-42.
Cid, A., Ferrés, D., & Rossi, M. (2007). Testing happiness hypothesis among the elderly. Cuadernos de Economía , 27(48), 23-45.
Cyert, R. M., & Degroot, M. H. (1975). Adaptive utility. En R. H. Day, & T. Groves (Eds.), Adaptive Economic Models (pp. 223-246). Nueva York: Academic Press.
DeBow, M. E., & Lee, D. R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A partial dissent (or why a department of homeland happiness would be a bad idea). Journal of Law and Politics, 22, 283-301.
Delquié, P. (1993). Inconsistent trade-offs between attributes: New evidence in preference assessment biases. Management Science, 39, 1382-1395.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Preferences over inflation and employment: Evidence from surveys of happiness. American Economic Review, 91, 335-41.
Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 809-27.
Dolan, P., & Peasgood, T. (2008). Measuring well-being for public policy: Preferences or experiences? Journal of Legal Studies, 37, S5-31.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. En P. A. David, & M. W. Reder, (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. Nueva York: Academic Press .
Easterlin, R. A. (2013). Happiness, growth, and public policy. Economic Inquiry, 51, 1-15.
Easterlin, R. A., & Angelescu, L. (2010). Happiness and growth the world over. En R. A. Easterlin, & H. Hinte (Eds.), Happiness, growth and the life cycle (pp. 111-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Ebrahim, A., Botha, F., & Snowball, J. (2013). Determinants of life satisfaction among race groups in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 30(2), 168-185.
Ekici, T., & Koydemir, S. (2014). Social capital, government and democracy satisfaction, and happiness in Turkey: A comparison of surveys in 1999 and 2008. Social Indicators Research , 118(3), 1031-1053.
Eren, K. A., & Aşici, A. A. (2016). The determinants of happiness in Turkey: Evidence from city-level data. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1-23.
Farquhar, P. H. (1984). Utility assessment methods. Management Science , 30, 1283-1300.
Feeny, S., McDonald, L., & Posso, A. (2014). Are poor people less happy? Findings from Melanesia. World Development, 64, 448-459.
Fissi, M. (2014). Should happiness guide social policy? South African Journal of Philosophy, 33(4), 473-85.
Frey, B. S., & Gallus, J. (2013). Political economy of happiness. Applied Economics, 45, 4205-4211.
Frey, B. S., Gallus, J., & Steiner, L. (2014). Open issues in happiness research. International Review of Economics , 61(2), 115-125.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2012). The use of happiness research for public policy. Social Choice and Welfare, 38(4), 659-674.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2016). Policy consequences of happiness research. En S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, L. Bruni, & P. L. Porta, (Eds.), Policies for happiness (pp. 21-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Gerstenblüth, M., Melgar, N., & Rossi, M. (2013). Ingreso y desigualdad. ¿Cómo afectan a la felicidad en América Latina? Cuadernos de Economía , 32(59), 165-80.
Gertler, P., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L., & Vermeersch, C. (2011). Impact evaluation in practice. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank. Disponible en http://www.worldbank.org/pdf.
Gielen, A.C., & Van Ours, J.C. (2014). Unhappiness and job finding. Economica, 81(323), 544-565.
Goetzke, F., & Rave, T. (2015). Automobile Access, peer effects and happiness. Transportation, 42, 791-805.
Goudie, R. J. B., Mukherjee, S., de Neve, J.-E., Oswald, A. J., & Wu, S. (2014). Happiness as a driver of risk-avoiding behaviour: Theory and an empirical study of seatbelt wearing and automobile accidents. Economica , 81(324), 674-697.
Graham, C. (2016). Adaptation amidst prosperity and adversity: Insights from happiness studies from around the world. En S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, L. Bruni, & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Policies for happiness (pp. 95-125). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Gruber, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2006). Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? En Y. K. Ng, & L. S. Ho, Happiness and public policy; theory, case studies and implications (pp. 109-146). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Haidt, J., Seder, J. P., & Kesebir, S. (2008). Hyve psicology, happiness, and public policy. Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), S133-S156.
Hasan, H. (2016). Does happiness adapt to increase in income? Evidence from Pakistan Socio-economic survey (1998-2001). Pakistan Development Review, 55(2), 113-22.
Hey, J. D., Morone, A., & Schmidt, U. (2009). Noise and bias in eliciting preferences. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(3), 213-235.
Ifcher, J. (2011). The happiness of single mothers after welfare reform. The B. E: Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11, 1-29.
Hirschauer, N., Lehberger, M., & Musshoff, O. (2015). Happiness and utility in economic thought-or: What can we learn from happiness research for public policy analysis and public policy making? Social Indicators Research , 121, 647-674.
Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401-405.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwartz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5572), 1776-780.
Kahneman, D., & Sugden, R. (2005). Experienced utility as a standard of policy evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), 161-181.
Kahneman, D., & Thaler, R. H. (2006). Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 221-234.
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. W., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375-405.
Lam, K. C. J., & Liu, P. W. (2014). Socio-economic inequalities in happiness in China and U.S. Social Indicators Research , 116, 509-533.
Landes, X. (2013). Happiness and politics. Ethics and Economics, 10, 1-30.
Layard, R. (1980). Human satisfactions and public policy. Economic Journal, 90, 737-50.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Allen Lane.
Layard, R. (2006). Happiness and public policy: A challenge to the profession. Economic Journal , 116, C24-33.
Lelkes, O. (2013). Minimising misery: A new strategy for public policies instead of maximising happiness? Social Indicators Research , 114, 121-137.
Li, Z., Folmer, H., & Xue, J. (2014). To what extent does air pollution affect happiness? The case of the Jinchuan mining area, China. Ecological Economics, 99, 88-99.
Liang, Y., & Wang, P. (2014). Influence of prudential value on the subjective well-being of Chinese urban-rural residents. Social Indicators Research , 118(3), 1249-1267.
Lin, Y. C., Hwang, R. C., & Deng, W. S. (2015). Heterogeneity in the relationship between subjective well-being and its determinants over the life cycle: A varying-coefficient ordered probit approach. Economic Modelling, 49, 372-86.
Lobos, G., Grunert, K. G., Bustamante, M., & Schnettler, B. (2016). With health and good food, great life! Gender differences and happiness in Chilean rural older adults. Social Indicators Research , 127, 865-85.
Lora, E., & Chaparro, J. C. (2009). Paradox and perception: Measuring quality of life in Latin America. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
MacKerron, G. (2012). Happiness economics at 35,000 feet. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26, 705-735.
Mishra, T., Parhi, M., & Fuentes, R. (2015). How interdependent are cross-country happiness dynamics? Social Indicators Research, 122, 491-518.
Mujcic, R., & Oswald, A. C. (2016). Evolution of well-being and happiness after increases in consumption of fruit and vegetables. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 1504-1510.
Musikanski, L. (2014). Happiness in public policy. Journal of Social Policy, 6, 55-85.
Musikanski, L. (2015). Measuring happiness to guide public policy making: A survey of instruments and policy initiatives. Journal of Social Change, 7, 39-55.
O'Donnell, G., & Oswald, A. J. (2015). National well-being policy and a weighted approach to human feelings. Ecological Economics, 120, 59-70.
Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2014). Can and should happiness be a policy goal? Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 195-203.
Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2015). Income inequality explains why economic growth does not always translate to an increase in happiness. Psychological Science , 26, 1630-1638.
Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (2012). Progressive taxation and the subjective well-being of nations. Psychological Science, 23, 86-92.
Ono, H., & Lee, K. S. (2013). Welfare states and the redistribution of happiness. Social Forces, 92, 789-814.
Opfinger, M. (2016). The Easterlin paradox worldwide. Applied Economic Letters, 23(2), 85-88.
Ott, J. C. (2010). Happiness and public policy: A critique. Journal of Happyness Studies, 11, 125-130.
Patrizii, V., Pettini, A., & Resce, G. (2016). The cost of well-being. Social Indicators Research , 128, 1-26.
Potts, J. (2011). The use of happiness in society. Policy, 27, 3-10.
Pullinger, M. (2014). Working time reduction policy in a sustainable economy: Criteria and options for its design. Ecological Economics , 103, 11-19.
Redelmeier, D., & Kahneman, D. (1996). Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain, 116, 3-8.
Redelmeier, D., Katz, J., & Kahneman, D. (2003). Memories of colonoscopy: A randomized trial. Pain, 104, 187-194.
Reynaud, A., & Couture, S. (2012). Stability of risk preference measures: Results from a field experiment on French farmers. Theory and Decision , 73, 203-221.
Sacks, D. W., Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Subjective well-being, income, economic development and growth (NBER Working Papers Series). Cambridge, MA.
Sarracino, F., & Bartolini, S. (2015). The dark side of Chinese growth: Declining social capital and well-being in times of economic boom. World Development , 74, 333-351.
Samuelson, P. A. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behaviour. Economica , 5, 61-71.
Schreiber, C. A. & Kahneman, D. (2000). Determinants of remembered utility of aversive sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 27-42.
Schroeder, K. (2015). The politics of Gross National Happiness: Values, power and policy implementation. Disponible en http://www.bhutanstudies.org.bt/2015GNHConference/Paperfor2015GNHConference/7.%20The%20Politics%20of%20Gross%20National%20Happiness%20-%20Schroeder.pdf
Schubert, C. (2012). Pursuing happiness. Kyklos, 65(2), 245-261.
Schwand, C., Vetschera, R., & Wakolbinger, L. M. (2010). The influence of probabilities on the response mode bias in utility elicitation. Theory and Decision , 69, 395-416.
Schwarze, J., & Winkelmann, R. (2011). Happiness and altruism within the extended Family. Journal of Population Economics, 24, 1033-1051.
Shi, K., Wang, X. L., Zheng, R., Shi, W., Lu, J. F., & Fan, H. X. (2006). Psychological approaches to the relationship between happiness and public policy in P. R. China. En Y. K. Ng, & L. S. Ho, Happiness and public policy; theory, case studies and implications (pp. 169-192). Basingstoke: Macmillan .
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008). Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1-87.
Stucke, M. E. (2013). Should competition promote happiness? Fordham Law Review, 5, 2575-2645.
Sugden, R. (2008). Why incoherent preferences do not justify paternalism. Constitutional Political Economy, 19, 226-48.
Tanasescu, C., & Oprean C. (2013). Towards a sustainable well-being. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 5, 170-178.
Teng J. C-Y., & Sugden, R. (2016). Is happiness a matter for governments? A Millian perspective on Layard’s “new science”'. En S. Bartolini, E. Bilancini, L. Bruni, & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Policies for happiness (pp. 36-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science , 185, 1124-1131.
Vargas, A. (2013). Bienestar subjetivo y políticas públicas de los gobiernos locales. Revista de Economía del Caribe, 12, 106-129.
Venhoeven, R. (2000). Well-being in the welfare state: Level not higher, distribution not more equitable. Journal of Comparative PolicyAnalysis, 2, 91-125.
Waligora, K. (2015). Developed societies-happy societies? Growth or development-BRIC. Journal of International Studies, 8, 114-25.
Walter, J. R., (1989, enero-febrero). Monetary aggregates: A user’s guide. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 20-28.
White, S. C., Fernandez, A., & Jha, S. (2016). Beyond the grumpy rich man and the happy peasant: Mixed methods and the impact of food security on subjective dimensions of wellbeing in India. Oxford Development Studies, 44, 332-348
Como Citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Baixar Citação
CrossRef Cited-by
1. Paulina Segarra, Cristian E. Villanueva, Lorena Martínez. (2023). Faculty's subjective well-being: insights from a Mexican business school. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 18(1), p.46. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-12-2021-2257.
2. Víctor-Raúl López-Ruiz, Nuria Huete-Alcocer, José-Luis Alfaro-Navarro, Domingo Nevado-Peña, Yuriy Bilan. (2021). The relationship between happiness and quality of life: A model for Spanish society. PLOS ONE, 16(11), p.e0259528. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259528.
3. Óscar Julián Cuesta Moreno. (2019). LA CONSTRUCCIÓN DE LA FELICIDAD COMO OBJETO DE ESTUDIO Y SU POSIBLE ABORDAJE DESDE EL CAMPO DE LA COMUNICACIÓN. Luciérnaga-Comunicación, 11(21), p.140. https://doi.org/10.33571/revistaluciernaga.v11n21a7.
4. José Luis Rojas-Solís, Julián Méndez-Rizo, María Laura Cristina Oyarzábal-Jiménez. (2022). Felicidad en estudiantes universitarios de América Latina: Una revisión sistemática. Psicumex, 12, p.1. https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v12i1.463.
Dimensions
PlumX
Acessos à página de resumo
Downloads
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Cuadernos de EconomíaCuadernos de Economía, através da Divisão de Bibliotecas da Universidad Nacional de Colombia, promove e garante o acesso aberto a todos os seus conteúdos. Os artigos publicados pela revista estão disponíveis globalmente com acesso aberto e licenciados sob os termos da Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), o que implica o seguinte: