Correo Electrónico
DNINFOA - SIA
Bibliotecas
Convocatorias
Identidad U.N.
Publicado
El Arcaico Colombiano y el Arcaico Amazónico
The Colombian Archaic and the Amazonian Archaic
O Arcaico Colombiano e o Arcaico Amazônico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/ma.v15n2.104930Palabras clave:
Arcaico, nómadas, cultivadores, sedentarismo, domesticación, Amazonia (es)Archaic, nomads, cultivators, sedentarism, Domestication, Amazonia (en)
Arcaico, nômades, cultivadores, sedentarismo, domesticação, Amazônia (pt)
Descargas
Este artículo analiza el concepto de «Arcaico» y sus características en el contexto de la arqueología colombiana, desde mediados del siglo XX, en la arqueología colombiana. Se valoran las dificultades que el uso del mismo implicó para el desarrollo de la investigación. Finalmente, se examina la posibilidad del empleo de esta categoría en el contexto de la arqueología amazónica para concluir que su empleo impide un adecuado análisis de los problemas que se estudian en el presente en la región.
This paper analyzes the concept of the "Archaic” and its characteristics within the context of Colombian archaeology since the mid-twentieth century. It highlights some challenges that the termimplies for archaeological research. Finally, potential application of this category in Amazonian archaeology is explored, concluding that its use hinders a proper analysis of the issues currently under study in the region.
Este artigo analisa o conceito de “arcaico” e suas características no contexto da arqueologia colombiana, desde meados do século XX, na arqueologia colombiana. São avaliadas as dificuldades que sua utilização implicou para o desenvolvimento da pesquisa. Por fim, examina-se a possibilidade de utilização desta categoria no contexto da arqueologia amazônica para concluir que seu uso impede uma análise adequada dos problemas atualmente estudados na região.
Referencias
ADAMS, J Y H. FAURE. (1997). Preliminary vegetation maps of the world since the last Glacial Maximum: an aid to archaeological understanding. Journal of Archaeological Science, 24(7), 623-647. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.1996.0146
ALDENDERFER, MARK S. (1989). The Archaic Period in the South-Central Andes. Journal of World Prehistory, 3,117-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00975759
ALDENDERFER, MARK S. Y FLORES BLANCO, L. (2011). Reflexiones para avanzar en los estudios del período Arcaico en los Andes centro-sur / Thoughts on moving forward of the study of the Archaic period in the south-central Andes. Chungara: Revista de Antropología Chilena, 43(especial), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-73562011000300011
ARROYO-KALIN, M. (2017). Human niche construction and population growth in Pre-Columbian Amazonia. Archaeology International, 20(1), 122–136 https://doi.org/10.5334/ai-367
BALÉE, W. L. (1987). Cultural forest of the Amazon. Garden, 11(6),12-32.
BINFORD, L. R. (1968). Post-Pleistocene adaptations. En S. Binford y L. Binford (Eds.), New perspectives in archaeology (pp. 313-341). Aldine. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315082165-19
BONZANI, R. M. (1999). Seasonality, predictibility, and plant use strategies at San Jacinto 1, northern Colombia. UMI Dissertation Services. https://ehrafarchaeology.yale.edu/document?id=s060-001
BRAIDWOOD, R. J. (1960). The agricultural revolution. Scientific American, 203(3), 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-130
BURBRIDGE, R. E., MAYLE, F. E. Y KILLEEN, T. J. (2004) Fifty-thousand-year vegetation and climate history of Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, Bolivian Amazon. Quaternary Research, 61(2), 215-230 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2003.12.004
CAPRILES, J. M., LOMBARDO, U., MALEY, B., ZUNA, C., VEIT, H., Y KENNETT, D. J. (2019). Persistent Early to Middle Holocene tropical foraging in southwestern Amazonia. Sciece Advances, 5(4): 5449. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav5449
CHILDE, V. G. (1951). Man makes himself. New American Library.
CLAASSEN, C. (1991). Gender, shelllfishing and the shell mound Archaic. En Gero, J.M. y Conkey, M.W (Eds.), Engendering archaeology: women in prehistory (pp. 276-300). Basil Blackwell.
ÇILINGIROĞLU, Ç., KACZANOWSKA, M., KOZŁOWSKI, J. K., DINÇER, B., ÇAKIRLAR, C., & TURAN, D. (2020). Between Anatolia and the Aegean: Epipalaeolithic and Mesolithic Foragers of the Karaburun Peninsula. Journal of Field Archaeology, 45(7), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00934690.2020.1786929
CLEMENT, C. (2006). Domesticação de paisagens e plantas amazônicas - a interação de etnobotânica, genética molecular e arqueologia. En Morcote Ríos, G., Mora, S. y Franky Calvo, C. (Eds.), Pueblos y paisajes antiguos de la selva Amazónica (pp. 97-112). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Tearaxacum.
CLEMENT, C. R., DENEVAN, W. M., HECKENBERGER, M. J., JUNQUEIRA, A. B., NEVES, E. G., TEIXEIRA, W. G., & WOODS, W. I. (2015). The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1812), 20150813. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0813
CLEMENT, C. R., DE CRISTO-ARAÚJO, M., COPPENS D’EECKENBRUGGE, G., ALVES PEREIRA, A., & PICANÇO-RODRIGUES, D. (2010). Origin and domestication of native Amazonian crops. Diversity, 2(1), 72-106. https://doi.org/10.3390/d2010072
CRAIG, O. E. (2021). Prehistoric fermentation, delayed-return economies, and the adoption of pottery technology. Current Anthropology, 62(24), 233-241 https://doi.org/10.1086/716610
DE BLASIS, P., FISH, S. K., GASPAR, M. D., & FISH, P. R. (1998). Some references for the discussion of complexity among the sambaqui moundbuilders from the southern shores of Brazil. Revista de Arqueologia Americana, 75-105.
DESCOLA, P. (1996). Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice. En Descola, P. y Pálsson, G. (Eds.), Nature and society. Anthropological perspectives (pp. 82-102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451069_chapter_5
DOW, G. K., & REED, C. G. (2015). The origins of sedentism: Climate, population, and technology. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 119, 56-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.07.007
FLANNERY, K. V. (1973). The origins of agriculture. Annual review of Anthropology, 271-310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.02.100173.001415
FREEMAN, J. (2012). Alternative adaptive regimes for integrating foraging and farming activities. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(9), 3008-3017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.039
GASPAR, M. D. (1998). Considerations of the sambaquis of the Brazilian coast. Antiquity, 72(277), 592-615. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00087020
HAUSMANN, N., & MEREDITH-WILLIAMS, M. (2017). Exploring accumulation rates of shell deposits through seasonality data. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24, 776-795. https://doi 10.1007/s 10816-016-9287-x
HOOGHIEMSTRA, H., & VAN DER HAMMEN, T. (1998). Neogene and Quaternary development of the neotropical rain forest: the forest refugia hypothesis, and a literature overview. Earth-Science Reviews, 44(3-4), 147-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(98)00027-0
HOOPES, J. W. (199 4). Ford revisited: A critical review of the chronology and relationships of the earliest ceramic complexes in the New World, 6000-1500 BC. Journal of World Prehistory, 8, 1-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02221836
INGOLD, T. (1996). Hunting and gathering as ways of perceiving the environment. En Ellen, R. y Fukui, K. Redefining nature: ecology, culture and domestication (pp. 117-156). Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135746-6
ISERN, N., Y FORT, J. (2012). Modelling the effect of Mesolithic populations on the slowdown of the Neolithic transition. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39(12), 3671-3676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.027
KNEIP, L. M. (1998). Os pescadores, coletores e caçadores pré-históricos da área arqueológica de Saquarema, RJ. Revista de arqueologia americana, 57-73.
LALAND, K. N., Y O’BRIEN, M. J. (2010). Niche construction theory and archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17, 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9096-6
LEGROS, T. (1990). Les premieres ceramiques americaines. Les Dossiers d'Archeologie, 145, 60-63.
LEGROS, T., RODRIGUEZ, C., Y PAULY, C. (1988). Arqueología del Formativo Temprano en las llanuras del Caríbe Colombiano. Museo del Oro, Boletín, 20(1), 131-132.
LOMBARDO, U., SZABO, K., CAPRILES, J. M., MAY, J. H., AMELUNG, W., HUTTERER, R., ... & VEIT, H. (2013). Early and middle Holocene hunter-gatherer occupations in Western Amazonia: The hidden shell middens. Plos one, 8(8), e72746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072746
LOVIS, W. A., WHALLON, R., Y DONAHUE, R. E. (2006). Social and spatial dimensions of Mesolithic mobility. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25(2), 271-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaa.2005.11.012
MCMICHAEL, C. N., MATTHEWS-BIRD, F., FARFAN-RIOS, W., Y FEELEY, K. J. (2017). Ancient human disturbances may be skewing our understanding of Amazonian forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(3), 522-527. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614577114
MEGGERS, B. J. (1997). La cerámica temprana de América del Sur: ¿Invención independiente o difusión? Revista de Arqueología Americana, 13: 7-40.
MORA, S. (2003). Early inhabitants of the Amazonian Tropical Rain Forest. A study of humans and environmental dynamics. Latin American Archaeological reports no. 3. Pittsburgh.
MORA, S. (2017, 29 de mayo-2 de abril). Sedentism and plant domestication in Amazonia. Ponencia presentada en Society for American Archaeology 82nd Annual Meeting. Vancouver, BC, Canada, Vancouver Convention Centre.
MORISAKI, K. (2022). What motivated early pottery adoption in the Japanese Archipelago: A critical review. Quaternary International, 608, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.006
NEVES, E. G. (2020). Rethinking the role of agriculture and language expansion for ancient Amazonians. En Pearce, A. J, Beresford-Jones, D. G., Heggarty, P. (Eds.), Rethinking the Andes–Amazonia divide. A cross-disciplinary exploration (pp. 211-220). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13xps7k.24
NEVES, E. G. (2016). Não existe Neolítico ao sul do Equador: as primeiras cerâmicas Amazônicas e sua falta de relação com a agricultura. En Barreto, M. C., Lima, H. y Betancourt, C. J., Cerâmicas arqueológicas da Amazônia: rumo a uma nova síntese (pp. 32-39). Iphan.
NEVES, E. G., & HECKENBERGER, M. J. (2019). The call of the wild: Rethinking food production in ancient Amazonia. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48(1), 371-388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011057
O’BRIEN, M. J., & LALAND, K. N. (2012). Genes, culture, and agriculture: An example of human niche construction. Current Anthropology, 53(4), 434-470. https://doi.org/10.1086/666585
OYUELA-CAYCEDO, A. (1993) Sedentism, food production and pottery origins in the tropics: the case of San Jacinto I, Colombia [Tesis doctoral, University of Pittsburgh]. University of Pittsburgh.
OYUELA-CAYCEDO, A. (1995). Rocks versus Clay. The evolution of pottery technology in the case of San Jacinto 1, Colombia. En Barnett, W. K. y Hoopes, J. W. (Eds.), The emergence of pottery technology and innovation in ancient societies (pp. 133-144). Smithsonian Institution press.
OYUELA-CAYCEDO, A. (1996) The study of collector variability in the transition to sedentary food producers in Northern Colombia. Journal of World Prehistory, 10(1):49-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02226071
OYUELA-CAYCEDO, A. (1998). Seasonality in the Tropical Lowlands of Northwestern South America: The Case of San Jacinto 1, Colombia. En Rocek, T. R. and Bar-Yosef, O. (Eds.), Seasonality and sedentism archaeological perspectives from the Old a New World Sites (pp. 165-179). Peabody Museum of archaeology and ethnology Harvard University.
OYUELA-CAYCEDO, A. Y BONZANI, R. M. (2005). San Jacinto 1: A Historical Ecological Approach to an Archaic Site in Colombia. The University of Alabama Press.
OYUELA-CAYCEDO, A. Y RODRÍGUEZ, C. (1995). La formación de los concheros: el caso de noroccidente de América del Sur. Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, 11, 73-123.
ÖZDOĞAN, M. (2011). Archaeological evidence on the westward expansion of farming communities from eastern Anatolia to the Aegean and the Balkans. Current Anthropology, 52(S4), S415-S430. https://doi.org/10.1086/658895
PICKERSGILL, B. (2007). Domestication of plants in the Americas: Insights from Mendelian and molecular genetics. Annals of Botany, 100, 925–940. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm193
PICKERSGILL, B. (2013). Some current topics in plant domestication: An overview with particular reference to Amazonia. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, 11(2), 16-29.
PIPERNO, D. (1999). Report on phytoliths from the site of Peña Roja, Western Amazon basin. Fundación Eriagie, Inédito.
PIPERNO, D. (2011). The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World tropics. Patterns, process, and new developments. Current Anthropology, 52(S4), S453-S470. https://doi.org/10.1086/659998
PIPERNO, D., RANERE, A. J., DICKAU, R., & ACEITUNO, F. (2017). Niche construction and optimal foraging theory in Neotropical agricultural origins: A re-evaluation in consideration of the empirical evidence. Journal of Archaeological Science, 78, 214-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.01.001
PIPERNO, D. Y PEARSALL, D. (1998). The origins of agriculture in the lowlands Neotropics. Academic Press.
POLITIS, G. (1996). Moving to produce: Nukak mobility and settlement patterns in Amazonia. World Archaeology, 27(3), 492-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1996.9980322
POLITIS, G. Y RODRÍGUEZ, J. (1994). Algunos aspectos de la subsistencia de los Nukak de la Amazonía Colombiana. Colombia Amazónica, 7(1-2),169-207.
PRANCE, G. T. (1973). Phytogeographic support for the theory of Pleistocene forest refuges in the Amazon Basin, based on evidence from Dischapetalaceae and Lecythidaceae. Acta Amazonica, 3, 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921973033005
PUGLIESE JUNIOR, F. A., ZIMPEL NETO, C. A., & NEVES, E. G. (2017). Los concheros de la Amazonía y la historia indígena profunda de América del Sur. En Rostain, S. y Betancourt, J. (Eds.), Las siete maravillas de la Amazonía precolombina (pp. 27-46). Bonner Amerikanistische Studien - Estudios Americanistas de Bonn Nº 53.
REICHEL-DOLMATOFF, G. (1955). Excavaciones en los conchales de las costas de Barlovento. Revista Colombiana de Antropología, 4, 247-272. https://doi.org/10.22380/2539472X.1815
REICHEL-DOLMATOFF, G. (1965). Colombia. Ancient peoples and places. Frederick A. Prager, Publishers.
RIVAL, L. (1998). Domestication as a historical and symbolic process: wild gardens and cultivated forest in the Ecuadorian Amazon. En Balée, W. (Ed.), Advances in Historical Ecology (pp. 232- 250). Columbia University Press.
RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ, C. (1995). Sites with early pottery in the Caribbean littoral: A discussion of the periodization and typologies. En Barnett, W. IC, y Hoopes, J. W (Eds)., The emergence of pottery (pp. 145-168). Smithsonian Institution Press.
ROOSEVELT, ANNA C. (1995). Early pottery in the Amazon: twenty years of scholarly obscurity. En W.K. Barnett y J.W. Hoopes (Eds.), The emergence of pottery: Technology and innovation in ancient societies (pp. 115-132). Smithsonian Institution Press.
TRUJILLO-ARIAS, N., RODRÍGUEZ-CAJARVILLE, M. J., SARI, E., MIYAKI, C. Y., SANTOS, F. R., WITT, C. C., ... & CABANNE, G. S. (2020). Evolution between forest macrorefugia is linked to discordance between genetic and morphological variation in Neotropical passerines. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 149,106849 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106849
VENKATARAMAN, V. V., KRAFT, T. S., DOMINY, N. J., & ENDICOTT, K. M. (2017). Hunter-gatherer residential mobility and the marginal value of rainforest patches. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 114(12), 3097-3102. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617542114
WILLIAMS, D. (1997). Early pottery in the Amazon: a correction. American Antiquity, 62(2), 342-352. https://doi.org/10.2307/282516
ZEDER, M. A. (2015). Core questions in domestication research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(11), 3191-3198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501711112
Cómo citar
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Descargar cita
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Santiago Mora
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores son responsables de todas las autorizaciones que la publicación de sus contribuciones pueda requerir. Cuando el manuscrito sea aceptado para publicación, los autores deberán enviar una declaración formal sobre la autenticidad del trabajo, asumiendo personalmente la responsabilidad por todo lo que el artículo contenga e indicando expresamente su derecho a editarlo. La publicación de un artículo en Mundo Amazónico no implica la cesión de derechos por parte de sus autores; sin embargo, el envío de la contribución representa autorización de los autores a Mundo Amazónico para su publicación. En caso de realizarse una reimpresión total o parcial de un artículo publicado en Mundo Amazónico, ya sea en su idioma original o en una versión traducida, se debe citar la fuente original. Los artículos publicados en la revista están amparados por una licencia Creative Commons 4.0.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan el copyright y otorgan a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con el reconocimiento de la autoría y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Los autores pueden hacer arreglos contractuales adicionales para la distribución no-exclusiva de la versión publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, colocar en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con el reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
