Published

2022-11-01

Effects of Variations in Operating Conditions on the Preci-sion and Accuracy of Standardless Elemental Analysis of Stainless Steel by SEM-EDS

Efectos de cambios en las condiciones de operación en la precisión y la exactitud del microanálisis químico sin patrones de acero inoxidable por MEB-EDE

Keywords:

Scanning electron microscopy, Energy dispersive spectroscopy, SDD detector, Elemental analysis, Accuracy (en)
Microscopía electrónica de barrido, Espectroscopía por dispersión de energía, Detectores SDD, Microanálisis químico, Exactitud (es)

Downloads

Authors

It is a customary practice to carry out standardless elemental microanalysis by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) under the very same operational conditions as those used for scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. In this article, EDS experiments were carried out with stainless steel (SS), varying the EDS testing operating conditions. The results showed that, if X-ray spectra are acquired under operating conditions that are very dissimilar to those optimized for microanalysis, both the detectability limit of minor species (Si, Mo, and Mn) and the uncertainty in the concentration of major alloying elements (Cr and Ni) are noticeably impaired. It was observed that, by improving the signal-to-noise (S-to-N) ratio (i.e., by increasing the accelerating voltage, beam intensity, and total acquisition time, or when the working distance is optimized), the precision of the elemental concentration increases, but the accuracy is only marginally affected. For the major alloying elements, 25% of the measurements showed a percent discrepancy higher than three times the standard deviation, which is inconsistent with a normal statistical distribution.

Es común que el microanálisis químico por espectroscopia por dispersión de energía (EDE) se realice en las mismas condiciones en las usadas para la adquisición de imágenes mediante el microscopio electrónico de barrido (MEB). En este artículo se realizaron experimentos de EDE sobre acero inoxidable, variando las condiciones de operación. Los resultados mostraron que, cuando se adquieren espectros de rayos X bajo condiciones de operación muy disímiles de aquellas optimizadas para el microanálisis, tanto la detectabilidad de las especies minoritarias (Si, Mo y MN) como la incertidumbre en la concentración de los principales elementos de aleación (Cr y Ni) se ven notoriamente afectadas. Se observó que, al mejorar la relación señal a ruido (S-R) (i.e., aumentando el voltaje de aceleración, la intensidad del haz y el tiempo de adquisición total, o cuando se optimiza la distancia de trabajo), aumenta la precisión en la concentración elemental, pero la exactitud se ve afectada solo de manera marginal. Para los elementos de aleación principales (Cr y Ni), 25% de las medidas presentaron discrepancias porcentuales mayores a tres veces la desviación estándar, lo cual no es consistente con una distribución estadística normal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burgess S., Li X., and Holland J. (2013). High spatial resolution energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry in the SEM and the de-tection of light elements including lithium. Microscopy and Analysis 27(4) S8-S13. https://analyticalscience.wiley.com/do/10.1002/micro.620/full/id0f755c16020bfdbfe4de8804e569337.pdf

Carlton, R. (2009). Comparison of SiLi and SDD Detectors for Pharmaceutical Applications. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 15(S2), 382-383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927609096731

Çubukçu H. E., Ersoy O, Ayudar E., and Çakir U. (2008). WDS versus silicon drift detector EDS: A case report for the com-parison of quantitative chemical analyses of natural silicate minerals. Micron, 39(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2006.11.004

Franchi G., Angulo J., Moreaud M., and Sorbier I. (2017). En-hanced EDX images by fusion of multimodal SEM images using pansharpening techniques. Journal of Microscopy, 269(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12612

Gernet U. (2008, September 1-5). Comparing the Si(Li)-detector and the silicon drift detector (SDD) using EDX in SEM [Confer-ence presentation]. EMC 2008 14th European Microscopy Congress, Aachen, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85156-1_349

Goldstein, J. I., Newbury, D. E., Michael, J. R., Ritchie, N. W. M., Scott, J. H. J., and Joy, D.C. (2018). Scanning electron micros-copy and X-ray microanalysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6676-9

Liao, Y. (2006). Practical electron microscopy and database. https://www.globalsino.com/EM/

Lifshin, E., and Gauvin, R. (2003). Precision and detection limits for EDS analysis in the SEM. Microscopy Today, 11(5), 46-49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1551929500053256

Maniguet, L., Robaut, F., Meuris, A., Roussel-Dherbey, F., and Charlot, F. (2012). X-ray microanalysis: The state of the art of SDD detectors and WDS systems on scanning electron micro-scopes (SEM). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 32, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/32/1/012015

Newbury, D. E., and Ritchie, N. W. M. (2013). Is scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) quantitative? Scanning, 35(3),141-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21041

Newbury, D. E., and Ritchie, N. W. M. (2015). Performing ele-mental microanalysis with high accuracy and high precision by scanning electron microscopy/silicon drift detector ener-gy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/SDD-EDS). Journal of Materials Science, 50, 493-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8685-2

Newbury, D., and Ritchie, N. W. M. (2019). Electron-excited X-ray microanalysis by energy dispersive spectrometry at 50: Analyt-ical accuracy, precision, trace sensitivity, and quantitative compositional mapping. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 25(5), 1075-1105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S143192761901482X

Rackwitz V., Procop M., Bjeoumikhova S., Panneac U., and Hodoroabaa V. (2010). A routine procedure for the character-isation of polycapillary X-ray semi-lenses in parallelising mode with SEM/EDS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 26, 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0JA00135J

Ritchie, N. W. M., Newbury, D. E., and Davis J. M. (2012). EDS measurements of X-Ray intensity at WDS precision and accu-racy using a silicon drift detector. Microscopy and Microanal-ysis, 18(4), 892-904. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927612001109

Scholze, F., and Procop, M. (2009). Modelling the response function of energy dispersive X‐ray spectrometers with silicon detectors. X-Ray Spectrometry, 38(4), 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1165

Streli, C., Wobrauschek, P., and Schraik, I. (2004) Comparison of SiLi detector and silicon drift detector for the determination of low Z elements in total reflection X-ray fluorescence. Spectro-chimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 59(8), 1211-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2004.01.018

Wassilkowska, A., Czaplicka-Kotas, A., Bielski, A., and Zielina, M. (2014). An analysis of the elemental composition of micro-samples using eds technique. Technical Transactions, Czasop-ismo Techniczne, 18, 133-148. https://www.ejournals.eu/pliki/art/4168/