Desempeño innovador y tamaño de la firma: heterogeneidad y sesgo de publicación abordados desde un análisis de meta-regresión
Innovative performance and firm size: heterogeneity and disclosure biases via meta-regression analysis
Desempenho inovador e tamanho da empresa: heterogeneidade e viés de publicação abordados sob uma análise de metarregressão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v31n81.95575Keywords:
análisis de meta-regresión, empresas industriales, innovación tecnológica, sesgo de publicación (es)Meta-regression analysis, industrial companies, technological innovation, disclosure bias (en)
análise de metarregressão, empresas industriais, inovação tecnológica, viés de publicação (pt)
El presente trabajo aborda la relación entre tamaño de la firma y desempeño innovador desde un análisis de meta-regresión (amr). La diversidad de coeficientes de regresión estimados reportados por la literatura empírica lleva a preguntarse si dicha disparidad se debe a la variabilidad muestral o si existen otros factores que moderan esta relación. El amr es una metodología que permite responder esta pregunta y mediante la cual se pueden detectar sesgos en la publicación de resultados de investigaciones empíricas. A partir de una intensa revisión bibliográfica y de la conformación de una muestra de 125 artículos que reportan un total de 880 estimaciones econométricas de la citada relación, se analiza la presencia de heterogeneidad y de sesgo de publicación. Los resultados señalan indicios de sesgos de publicación; una vez descontado dicho sesgo, se observa la persistencia de un efecto positivo del tamaño de la firma sobre el desempeño innovador.
This work addresses the relationship between firm size and innovative performance from a meta-regression analysis (mra). The diversity of estimated regression coefficients reported by the empirical literature poses the question of whether such disparity in results is due to sampling variability or if there are other factors affecting this relationship. MRA allows both answering this question and also identifying biases in the disclosure of empirical research results. Through the review of 125 articles that report a total of 880 econometric estimates of the aforementioned relationship, we examine the existence of heterogeneity and disclosure biases. The results show evidence of disclosure biases. Although once this situation is discounted, firm size shows a steady positive effect on companies’ innovative performance.
Neste trabalho, aborda-se a relação entre tamanho da empresa e desempenho inovador sob a análise de metarregressão. A diversidade de coeficientes de regressão estimados relatados pela literatura empírica leva à pergunta de que se essa disparidade se deve à variabilidade amostral ou se existem outros fatores que interferem nessa relação. A análise de metarregressão é uma metodologia que permite responder a essa pergunta e mediante a qual podem ser detectados vieses na publicação de resultados de pesquisas empíricas. A partir de uma intensa revisão bibliográfica e da conformação de uma amostra de 125 artigos que relatam um total de 880 estimativas econométricas dessa relação, é analisada a presença de heterogeneidade e de viés de publicação. Os resultados dão indícios de vieses de publicação. Após se descontar esse viés , é observada a persistência de um efeito positivo do tamanho da empresa sobre o desempenho inovador.
References
Arthur, W. B. (1990). Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, 262, 92-99. https://www.adamdell.com/media/file/original/17_Positive_Feedbacks_in_the_Economy.pdf
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26(5-6), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
Berends, H., Jelinek, M., Reymen, I., & Stultiëns, R. (2014). Product innovation processes in small firms: Combining entrepreneurial effectuation and managerial causation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 616-635. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12117
Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. The Economic Journal, 110(463), 388-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00530
Buesa, M., Baumert, T., Heijs, J., & Martínez, M. (2002). Los factores determinantes de la innovación: Un análisis econométrico sobre las regiones españolas. Economía Industrial, 347, 67-84. https://www.mincotur.gob.es/Publicaciones/Publicacionesperiodicas/EconomiaIndustrial/RevistaEconomiaIndustrial/347/67-84%20347%20MIKEL%20BUESA.pdf
Camisón, C., Lapiedra, R., Segarra, M., & Boronat, M. (2002). Meta-análisis de la relación entre tamaño de empresa e innovación. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, SA. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/7150721.pdf
Card, D., & Krueger, A. (1995). Time-series minimum-wage studies: A meta-analysis. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 238-243. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117925
Cohen, W. M. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. En B. H. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 129-213). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01004-X
Crepon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599800000031
Crespi, G., & Peirano, F. (Mayo, 2007). Measuring innovation in Latin America: What we did, where we are and what we want to do. [Conferencia]. Conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Countries (MEIDE I), Maastricht, Países Bajos. https://www.merit.unu.edu/meide/papers/2007/PEIRANO_CRESPI_Measuring%20innovation%20in%20Latin%20America_what%20we%20did,%20where%20we%20are%20and%20what%20we%20want%20to%20do.pdf
Crespi, G., Dohnert, S., Maffioli, A. (eds). (2017). Exploring firm-level innovation and productivity in developing countries: The perspective of Caribbean small states. Washington, DC: IDB. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Exploring-Firm-Level-Innovation-and-Productivity-in-Developing-Countries-The-Perspective-of-Caribbean-Small-States.pdf
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590. https://doi.org/10.5465/256406
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13(3), 375-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300304
Damanpour, F. (2010). An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process pnnovations. British Journal of Management, 21(4), 996-1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00628.x
de-Oliveira, F., & Rodil-Marzábal, Ó. (2019). Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 306-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.021
Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002
Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Forés, B., & Camisón, C. (2016). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 831-848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.006
Galindo, L. M., Samaniego, J., Alatorre, J. E., Ferrer Carbonell, J., & Reyes, O. (2015). Meta-análisis de las elasticidades ingreso y precio de la demanda de gasolina: Implicaciones de política pública para América Latina. Revista CEPAL, 117, 7-25. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/39463/REV117_Galindo_et_al.pdf
Gomes de Carvalho, G. D., Westarb Cruz, J., Gomes de Carvalho, H., Duclós, L., & Stankowitz, R. (2017). Innovativeness measures: A bibliometric review and a classification proposal. International Journal of Innovation Science, 9(1), 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2016-0038
Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (2006). Empirical studies of innovation in the knowledge-driven economy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4-5), 289-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500512760
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data File: Lessons, insights and methodological tools [Documento interno de trabajo n.° 8498]. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w8498
Jaramillo, H., Lugones, F., & Salazar, M. (2001). Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe: manual de Bogotá (No. Doc. 21557) CO-BAC, Bogotá). http://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/bogota-1.pdf
Krassoi, E., & Stanley, T. D. (2009). Efficiency wages, productivity and simultaneity: A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Labor Research, 30(3), 262-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-009-9066-5
Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Millán, A. G., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. (2015). Organizational unlearning, innovation outcomes, and performance: The moderating effect of firm size. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 803-809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.032
Mairesse, J., & Mohnen, P. (2010). Using innovation surveys for econometric analysis. En B. H. Hall, & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 1129-1155). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02010-1
Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Calantone, R. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397-417. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1150397
Nelson, J. P., & Kennedy, P. E. (2009). The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: An assessment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42(3), 345-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9253-5
Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?. Strategic management journal, 12(S2), 61-74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/smj.4250121006?casa_token=s3oyhDioH6sAAAAA:fYjSBwAECHyqTJPf6XyZUOE-e-D9P9hsXiXjat0LKEH1RzQryCQ8HZTapRBo7Vlm_l2XBvANgpSn5kRLwA
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OECD). (1992). Oslo manual. OCDE. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2367614.pdf
Petruzzelli, A., Ardito, L., & Savino, T. (2018). Maturity of knowledge inputs and innovation value: The moderating effect of firm age and size. Journal of Business Research, 86, 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.009
Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
Salomon, R. M., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Learning by exporting: New insights from examining firm innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 14(2), 431-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2005.00047.x
Schumpeter, J. A. (1935). The analysis of economic change. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 17(4), 2-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927845
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
Sequeira, T., & Neves, P. (2020). Stepping on toes in the production of knowledge: A meta-regression analysis. Applied Economics, 52(3), 260-274 https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1644447
Stanley, T. D. (2001). Wheat from chaff: Meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.3.131
Stanley, T. D. (2005). Beyond publication bias. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(3), 309-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2005.00250.x
Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2012). Meta-regression analysis in economics and business. Routledge.
Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095
Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2017). Neither fixed nor random: Weighted least squares meta-regression. Research Synthesis Methods, 8(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1211
Sterne, J., & Egger, M. (2001). Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54(10), 1046-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
Sterne, J., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J., Terrin, N., Jones, D., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rücker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., Tetzlaff, J., Deeks, J. J., Peters, J., Macaskill, P., Schwarzer, G., Duval, S., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ, 343, d4002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4002
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, D., Rennie, D., Moher, D., Becker, B. J., Sipe, T. A., & Thacker, S. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology. A proposal for reporting. JAMA, 283(15), 2008-2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Sutton, A J, Duval, S., Tweedie, R. L., Abrams, K. R., & Jones, D. R. (2000). Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ, 320(7249), 1574-1577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7249.1574
Sutton, A. J., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2008). Recent developments in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 27(5), 625-650. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2934
Teplov, R., Albats, E., & Podmetina, D. (2019). What does open innovation mean? Busines versus academic perceptions. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919619500026
Ugur, M., Awaworyi, S., & Solomon, E. (2016). Technological innovation and employment in derived labour demand models: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(1), 50-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12187
Ugur, M., Trushin, E., Solomon, E., & Guidi, F. (2015). R&D and productivity in OECD firms and industries: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2693943
Viechtbauer, W. (2007). Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 60(1), 29-60. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X64042
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data MIT press. Cambridge, MA, 108.
How to Cite
APA
ACM
ACS
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver
Download Citation
CrossRef Cited-by
1. María Mercedes Melo Torres, José Manuel Jurado Almonte, Ligia Inés Melo Torres. (2024). Innovación en la agroindustria de la guayaba en la Hoya del Río Suárez-Colombia. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 29(Especial 11), p.69. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.29.e11.4.
2. Jimena Andrieu, Enrique Bernal Jurado, Adoración V. (2024). La internacionalización del sector apícola argentino desde una mirada empresarial con énfasis en las cooperativas. REVESCO. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, , p.1. https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.95355.
Dimensions
PlumX
Article abstract page views
Downloads
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Innovar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
All contents published by Innovar are open access and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International copyright license (cc by-nc-nd 4.0).
Once the articles for a specific issue have been selected, and before starting editorial production, authors must sign a transfer of economic rights. Innovar adheres to Colombian regulations on copyright.
Material from this journal may be reproduced or quoted for scholarly purposes, citing the source.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License: