Publicado

2022-12-16

Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible

Charting New Common Routes: A State of the Art of Partnerships for Sustainable Development

Estabelecendo novos caminhos em comum: um estado da arte das parcerias para o desenvolvimento sustentável

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255

Palavras-chave:

desarrollo, alianzas, colaboración, cambio sistémico, actores, partes interesadas, cooperación, concepto (es)
Development, alliances, collaboration, systemic change, actors, stakeholders, cooperation, concept (en)
desenvolvimento, parcerias, colaboração, mudança sistêmica, atores, partes interessadas, cooperação, conceito (pt)

Autores

Existen retos para lograr el desarrollo sostenible que no pueden ser abordados de manera aislada y donde colaboran diversos actores del sector público y privado. En los últimos años ha surgido mayor interés en el tema sobre las alianzas multisector, sin tener una definición establecida sobre el concepto o sobre quiénes son los actores que forman parte de las colaboraciones. La investigación se elabora mediante una revisión de literatura de la noción de alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible con el fin de identificar conceptos, actores involucrados, roles de los actores y sus características, así como las aportaciones dentro de las alianzas mediante un enfoque descriptivo. Los datos se recolectaron en el buscador de Scopus, encontrando 464 resultados de 1.179 diferentes autores con los términos “sustainable development” AND “partnerships”, y una segunda búsqueda en literatura gris con los mismos conceptos entre el 2010 y el 2020. Finalmente, se presenta un análisis de los seis términos más relevantes alrededor del concepto, así como de los actores y los roles dentro de las colaboraciones. Asimismo, se aborda la necesidad de futuras líneas de investigación en modelos de gobernanza, gestión y efectividad de las alianzas para lograr el desarrollo sostenible.

Certain challenges for sustainable development cannot be addressed individually but require the collaboration of various actors from the public and private sectors. In recent years, there has been an upsurge of multi-sector alliances towards sustainability, although there is not an established definition of the concept nor information about the actors that make part of collaborations. This work is a literature review on the notion of alliances for sustainable development and was conducted in order to identify concepts, actors involved, roles of these actors and their characteristics, and the main contributions of such alliances. The data was collected in the Scopus search engine, obtaining 464 results from 1,179 different authors after using the terms “sustainable development” and “partnerships.” A second search in gray literature works with the same concepts was performed for the 2010-2020 period. An analysis of the six most relevant terms around the concept and the actors and roles within collaborations is presented. Finally, the need for future lines of research on governance models and the management and effectiveness of alliances to achieve sustainable development is addressed.

Existem desafios para chegar ao desenvolvimento sustentável que não podem ser abordados de maneira isolada e em que diversos atores do setor público e privado colaboram. Nos últimos anos, maior interesse no tema sobre as parcerias multissetoriais — sem contar com uma definição estabelecida sobre o conceito ou quem são os atores que fazem parte das colaborações — vem surgindo. Nesse contexto, esta pesquisa é elaborada mediante uma revisão de literatura da noção de parecerias para o desenvolvimento sustentável a fim de identificar conceitos, atores envolvidos, papéis dos atores e suas características, bem como as contribuições dentro das alianças por meio de uma abordagem descritiva. Os dados foram coletados no buscador de Scopus, com um total de 464 resultados de 1.179 diferentes autores com os termos “sustainable development” AND “partnerships”, e uma segunda busca na literatura cinzenta com os mesmos conceitos entre 2010 e 2020. Finalmente, é apresentada uma análise dos seis termos mais relevantes ao redor do conceito, bem como dos autores e dos papéis dentro das colaborações. Além disso, é abordada a necessidade de futuras linhas de pesquisa em modelos de governança, gestão e efetividade das parcerias para atingir o desenvolvimento sustentável.

Referências

Austin, J. E. (2000). The collaboration challenge: How nonprofits and business succeed through strategic alliances. Jossey-Bass.

Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 726-758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012450777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012450777

Babiak, K., & Thibault, L. (2009). Challenges in multiple cross-sector partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(1), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008316054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008316054

Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.425

Benedetti, M. (1999). Antología poética. Alianza Editorial.

Bitzer, V., Francken, M., & Glasbergen, P. (2008). Intersectoral partnerships for a sustainable coffee chain: Really addressing sustainability or just picking (coffee) cherries? Global Environmental Change, 18(2), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.01.002

Bovaird, T. (2004). Public-private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044250

Brouwer, J. H., Woodhill, A. J., Hemmati, M., Verhoosel, K. S., & Van Vugt, S. M. (2018). La guía de las MSP: cómo diseñar y facilitar asociaciones de múltiples partes interesadas. Wageningen Centre for Development Innovation. https://edepot.wur.nl/467335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780447520

Brunet, I. & Böcker, R. (2015). Desarrollo sostenible, humano y endógeno. Estudios Sociológicos, 33(98), 311-335. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=59844199003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/es.2015v33n0.4

Butcher, J., & Balian de Tagtachian, B. (2016). Latin America and the Caribbean revisited: Pathways for research. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9659-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9659-y

Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complimentary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002

Clarke, A., & Crane, A. (2018). Cross-sector partnerships for systemic change: Systematized literature review and agenda for further research. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3922-2

Clarke, A., & Fuller, M. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(S1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0781-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0781-5

Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe [CEPAL]. (2017). Asociaciones público-privadas como instrumento para fortalecer los objetivos del proyecto Mesoamérica. Naciones Unidas. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/41063-asociaciones-publico-privadas-como-instrumento-fortalecer-objetivos-proyecto

Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V., & Schouten, G. (2018). Harnessing wicked problems in multi‑stakeholder partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3858-6

Dodds, F. (2015). Multi-stakeholder partnerships: Making them work for the Post-2015 Development Agenda. University of North Carolina. http://sdg.iisd.org/news/ecosoc-discusses-partnerships-for-post-2015-development-agenda/

Gajda, R. (2004). Utilizing collaboration theory to evaluate strategic alliances. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400402500105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400402500105

Glasbergen, P. (2011). Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: The ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.545

Hamann, R. (2012). The business of development: Revisiting strategies for a sustainable future. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 54(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2012.657570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2012.657570

Hale, T. N., & Mauzerall, D. L. (2004). Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the Johannesburg Partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development? Journal of Environment and Development, 13(3), 220-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496504268699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496504268699

Herlin, H. (2013). Better safe than sorry: Nonprofit organizational legitimacy and cross-sector partnerships. Business & Society, 54(6), 822-858. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312472609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312472609

Huang, Y., & Quibria, M. G. (2015). The global partnership for sustainable development. Natural Resources Forum, 39(3-4), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12068

Jupp, B. (2000). Working together: Creating a better environment for cross-sector partnership. Demos.

Kim, A., Bansal, P., & Haugh, H. (2019). No time like the present: How a present time perspective can foster sustainable development. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 607-634. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1295 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1295

Klitsie, E. J., Ansari, S., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). Maintenance of cross-sector partnerships: The Role of frames in sustained collaboration. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3859-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3859-5

MacDonald, A., Clarke, A., & Huang, L. (2018). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: Designing decision-making processes for partnership capacity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(3), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3885-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3885-3

MacDonald, A., Clarke, A., Huang, L., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2019). Partner strategic capabilities for capturing value from sustainability-focused multi-stakeholder partnerships. Sustainability, 11(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030557 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030557

Margerum, R. D., & Robinson, C. J. (2015). Collaborative partnerships and the challenges for sustainable water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 12, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.003

Marx, A. (2019). Public-private partnerships for sustainable development: Exploring their design and its impact on effectiveness. Sustainability, 11(4), 1087. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041087

Mendoza, D., & Alianza Shire. (2020). Alianzas multi-actor y transformación: el caso de la Alianza Shire. Revista Diecisiete, 2, 2695-4427. https://www.plataforma2030.org/es/alianzas-multi-actor-y-transformacion-el-caso-de-la-alianza-shire DOI: https://doi.org/10.36852/2695-4427_2020_02.08

Mert, A. (2009). Partnerships for sustainable development as discursive practice: Shifts in discourses of environment and democracy. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5-6), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.003

McLennan, S. & Banks, G. (2019). Reversing the lens: Why corporate social responsibility is not community development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1664 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1664

Naciones Unidas. (2015). Resolución 70/1. “Transformar nuestro mundo: la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible”. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ares70d1_es.pdf

Naciones Unidas. (2018). Resolución 69/313. “Agenda de Acción de Addis Abeba de la Tercera Conferencia Internacional sobre la Financiación para el Desarrollo (Agenda de Acción de Addis Abeba)”. https://www.un.org/es/ga/69/resolutions.shtml

Ocampo, J. A. 2015. La gobernanza económica y social y el sistema de las Naciones Unidas. En J. A. Ocampo (Ed.), Gobernanza global y desarrollo. Nuevos desafíos y prioridades de la cooperación internacional (pp. 31-70). Siglo XXI Editores. http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/38855

Organización de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). (1987). Nuestro futuro común (Informe Brundtland). ONU.

Organización para la Cooperación Económica y el Desarrollo (OCDE). (2011). Alianza de Busán para la cooperación eficaz al desarrollo. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/49650200.pdf

Phillips, R., Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Stutz, C. (2019). The Past, history, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04319-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04319-0

Pinkse, J., & Kolk, A. (2012). Addressing the climate change–sustainable development nexus: The role of multistakeholder partnerships. Business & Society, 51(1), 176-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311427426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311427426

Poret, S. (2019). Corporate–NGO Partnerships through sustainability labeling schemes: Motives and risks. Sustainability, 11(9), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092689

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 1-17.

Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo [UNDP]. (2020). Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.undp.org/es/sustainable-development-goals

Red Sumarse Nuevo León. (2018). Sumando esfuerzos para la transformación social. Quinto informe. Red SumaRSE Nuevo León. https://sumarse.org.mx/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/QuintoInforme.pdf

Reed, A. M., & Reed, D. (2009). Partnerships for development: Four models of business involvement. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(S1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9913-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9913-y

Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730

Sachs, J. D. (2012). From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206-2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60685-0

Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Sustainability, 2, 805-814. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9

Salazar, J. (2018). La alianza intersectorial Oxxo-VETSA y su impacto en la cohesión social en la colonia Rubén Jaramillo, Monterrey, México. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 33(2), 437-467. https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v33i2.1764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v33i2.1764

Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849-873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279601

Serageldin, I., Barrett, R., & Martin-Brown, J. (Eds.). (1995). The business of sustainable cities: Public-private partnerships for creative technical and institutional solutions. Environmentally Sustainable Development. World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-3319-4

Stadtler, L. (2018). Tightrope walking: Navigating competition in multi-company cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3579-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3579-2

Stott, L. (2017). Partnership and social progress: Multi-stakeholder collaboration in context [Tesis doctoral, University of Edinburgh]. ERA. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/22948

Tassara, C. (2018). Cooperación internacional, gobernanza global y soberanía estatal en las políticas sociales. El caso latinoamericano. En E. Tremolada Álvarez (Ed.), La cooperación internacional como alternativa a los unilateralismos (pp. 301-342). Universidad Externado de Colombia.

Trujillo, D. (2018). Multiparty alliances and systemic change: The role of beneficiaries and their capacity for collective action. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 425-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3855-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3855-9

Van Tulder, R., & Keen, N. (2018). Capturing collaborative challenges: Designing complexity-sensitive theories of change for cross-sector partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7

Waddock, S. (1991). A typology of social partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 22(4), 480-515. https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979102200405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009539979102200405

Como Citar

APA

Rodríguez Cotilla, M. (2023). Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible. Innovar, 33(88), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255

ACM

[1]
Rodríguez Cotilla, M. 2023. Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible. Innovar. 33, 88 (jan. 2023), 37–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255.

ACS

(1)
Rodríguez Cotilla, M. Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible. Innovar 2023, 33, 37-50.

ABNT

RODRÍGUEZ COTILLA, M. Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 33, n. 88, p. 37–50, 2023. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/106255. Acesso em: 4 set. 2024.

Chicago

Rodríguez Cotilla, Montserrat. 2023. “Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible”. Innovar 33 (88):37-50. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255.

Harvard

Rodríguez Cotilla, M. (2023) “Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible”, Innovar, 33(88), p. 37–50. doi: 10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255.

IEEE

[1]
M. Rodríguez Cotilla, “Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible”, Innovar, vol. 33, nº 88, p. 37–50, jan. 2023.

MLA

Rodríguez Cotilla, M. “Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible”. Innovar, vol. 33, nº 88, janeiro de 2023, p. 37-50, doi:10.15446/innovar.v33n88.106255.

Turabian

Rodríguez Cotilla, Montserrat. “Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible”. Innovar 33, no. 88 (janeiro 1, 2023): 37–50. Acessado setembro 4, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/106255.

Vancouver

1.
Rodríguez Cotilla M. Trazando nuevas rutas en común: un estado del arte de las alianzas para el desarrollo sostenible. Innovar [Internet]. 1º de janeiro de 2023 [citado 4º de setembro de 2024];33(88):37-50. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/106255

Baixar Citação

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations1

1. Ledy Gómez-Bayona, Sorely García Gutiérrez, Luis Fernando Montes Gómez, Olga Vélez Bernal. (2023). Gestión del conocimiento y capacidad de gestión de alianzas: Revisión de literatura de junio a diciembre 2021. Cuadernos de Administración, 39(75), p.e2312101. https://doi.org/10.25100/cdea.v39i75.12101.

Dimensions

PlumX

Acessos à página de resumo

498

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.