Publicado

2021-11-01

Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries

Promotores, facilitadores y condiciones para la innovación en el sector público europeo

Motivadores, facilitadores e condições para a inovação do setor público nos países europeus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255

Palavras-chave:

competitiveness, innovation, innovation in services, national culture, public sector (en)
competitividad, innovación, innovación en servicios, cultura nacional, sector público (es)
competitividade, inovação, inovação em serviços, cultura nacional, setor público (pt)

Autores

This study identifies the factors that influence innovation in the public sector in different countries. To do this, we identified innovation patterns in European countries and established the factors associated with such patterns. A cluster analysis was performed to group countries in terms of public sector innovation, while mean differences tests were used to identify the aspects that characterize these differences. The data are derived from the European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard database, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, the European Innovation Scoreboard (eis) 2017 Database, and the Global Competitiveness Report (2017-2018) by the World Economic Forum. The results indicate the existence of three groups of countries, where the factors identified are related to (i) the governance of public services, namely government effectiveness and regulatory quality, share of service innovators that innovate in-house, share of process innovators that innovate in-house, and importance of external knowledge; (ii) national culture, in particular uncertainty avoidance and indulgence; and (iii) national innovation capacity. This study provides empirical insights into the need to develop innovation capabilities as an element of successful innovation in public services.

Este  trabajo  analiza  las  variables  que  determinan  el  nivel  de  innovación  del  sector  público  en  diferentes  países  de  Europa.  Para  ello,  se  identificaron  patrones  de  innovación  en  varios  países  europeos  para  luego establecer los factores asociados a dichos patrones. Metodológicamente, se realizó un análisis de conglomerados con el objetivo de agrupar a los países analizados a partir de sus características de innovación en el sector público. Además, se emplearon pruebas de comparación de medias para  identificar  los  aspectos  que  caracterizan  las  diferencias  existentes  entre países. Los datos empleados fueron recopilados de la base de datos del Cuadro europeo de indicadores de innovación en el sector público, el Cuadro europeo de indicadores de innovación (eis, en inglés) de 2017 y el Informe  de  competitividad  global  (2017-2018)  del  Foro  Económico  Mundial, teniendo en cuenta además las dimensiones culturales del modelo de Hofstede. Los resultados ponen de manifiesto la existencia de tres grupos de  países,  donde  los  factores  identificados  se  relacionan  con  i)  la  gobernanza de los servicios públicos, es decir, la eficacia del gobierno y su calidad regulatoria, la proporción de innovadores de servicios e innovadores de procesos que llevan a cabo innovaciones internas y la importancia asignada al conocimiento externo; ii) la cultura nacional, en particular la aversión  a  la  incertidumbre  y  la  indulgencia;  y  iii)  la  capacidad  nacional  de  innovación. Esta investigación proporciona hallazgos que dan cuenta de la necesidad de desarrollar capacidades de innovación como elemento esencial para procesos exitosos de innovación en el sector público.

Este  estudo  identifica  os  fatores  que  influenciam  a  inovação  no setor público em diferentes países. Para isso, identificamos os padrões de inovação nos países europeus e estabelecemos os fatores associados a tais padrões. Foi realizada uma análise de cluster (agrupamento de dados) para classificar países em termos de inovação do setor público, enquanto testes de diferenças de médias foram usados para identificar os aspectos que  caracterizam  essas  diferenças.  Os  dados  são  derivados  do  banco  de  dados do Painel Europeu da Inovação do Setor Público, das dimensões culturais de Hofstede, do banco de dados do Painel Europeu da Inovação (eis, na sigla em inglês) 2017 e do Relatório de Competitividade Global (2017-2018) pelo Fórum Econômico Mundial. Os resultados indicam a existência de três grupos de países, nos quais os fatores identificados estão relacionados com i) a governança dos serviços públicos, ou seja, a eficácia do governo e a qualidade regulatória, a participação de inovadores de serviços que inovam internamente, a participação de inovadores de processos que inovam internamente e a importância do conhecimento externo; ii) a cultura nacional, em particular, a prevenção de incertezas e a indulgência, iii) a capacidade de inovação nacional. Este estudo fornece descobertas empíricas sobre a necessidade de desenvolver capacidades de inovação como um elemento de inovação bemsucedida nos serviços públicos.

Referências

Arundel, A., Bloch, C., & Ferguson, B. (2019). Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals. Research Policy, 48(3), 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.001

Bloch, C., & Bugge, M. M. (2013). Public sector innovation – From theory to measurement. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 133-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.008

Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review, 21(2), 264-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477

Daglio, M., Gerson D., & Kitchen H. (2014). Building organisational capacity for public sector innovation. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/innovating-the-public-sector/Background-report.pdf

De-Vries, H. A., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209

Djellal, F., Gallouj, F., & Miles, I. (2013). Two decades of research on innovation in services: Which place for public services? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 27, 98-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2013.06.005

European Commission. (2013). European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013 - A pilot exercise. European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fe2a3b4b-3d7e-444d-82bc-790a0ab33737

European Innovation Scoreboard [EIS]. (2017). European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. EIS. https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2017/06/European_Innovation_Scoreboard_2017.pdf

European Union (2013). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0b41700a-ad23-440f-9f7e-96230a3aa510

Gallouj, F., & Djellal, F. (Eds.) (2010). The handbook of innovation and services: A multidisciplinary perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803304

Gallouj, F., & Djellal, F. (Eds.) (2019). A research agenda for service innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786433459

Gallouj, F., & Savona, M. (2009). Innovation in services: A review of the debate and a research agenda. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 149-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4

Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 537-556. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00030-9

Gonzalez, R., Llopis, J., & Gasco, J. (2013). Innovation in public services: The case of Spanish local government. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2024-2033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.028

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd Ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Kallio, K., Lappalainen, I., & Tammela, K. (2013). Co-innovation in public services: Planning or experimenting with users? The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 18(3), 1-16. https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2013_18_3_7_kallio_innovate-public-serve.pdf

Lewis, J. M., Ricard, L. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). How innovation drivers, networking and leadership shape public sector innovation capacity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317694085

Meijer, A. (2019). Public innovation capacity: Developing and testing a self-assessment survey instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(8), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498102

Mulgan, G. (2007). Ready or not? Taking innovation in the public sector seriously. NESTA. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/ready-or-not-taking-innovation-in-the-public-sector-seriously/

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2017). Fostering innovation in the public sector. OECD Publishing, http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270879-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270879-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Eurostat (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd Ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19900414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/19900414

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/Eurostat (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th Ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674879904

Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf

Smith, G., & Sandberg, J. (2018). Barriers to innovating with open government data: Exploring experiences across service phases and user types. Information Polity, 23(3), 249-265. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170045

Timeus, K., & Gascó, M. (2018). Increasing innovation capacity in city governments: Do innovation labs make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 40(7), 992-1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1431049

Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe [UNECE]. (2017). Innovation in the Public Sector. United Nations. https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ceci/publications/Innovation_in_the_Public_Sector/Public_Sector_Innovation_for_web.pdf

Vergori, A. S. (2014). Measuring innovation in services: The role of surveys. The Service Industries Journal, 34(2), 145-161, http://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2013.763343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2013.763343

Como Citar

APA

Natário, M. M. . e Couto, J. . (2022). Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries. Innovar, 32(83). https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255

ACM

[1]
Natário, M.M. e Couto, J. 2022. Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries. Innovar. 32, 83 (jan. 2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255.

ACS

(1)
Natário, M. M. .; Couto, J. . Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries. Innovar 2022, 32.

ABNT

NATÁRIO, M. M. .; COUTO, J. . Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 83, 2022. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99255. Acesso em: 16 jul. 2024.

Chicago

Natário, Maria Manuela, e Joao Couto. 2022. “Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries”. Innovar 32 (83). https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255.

Harvard

Natário, M. M. . e Couto, J. . (2022) “Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries”, Innovar, 32(83). doi: 10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255.

IEEE

[1]
M. M. . Natário e J. . Couto, “Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries”, Innovar, vol. 32, nº 83, jan. 2022.

MLA

Natário, M. M. ., e J. . Couto. “Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries”. Innovar, vol. 32, nº 83, janeiro de 2022, doi:10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99255.

Turabian

Natário, Maria Manuela, e Joao Couto. “Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries”. Innovar 32, no. 83 (janeiro 1, 2022). Acessado julho 16, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99255.

Vancouver

1.
Natário MM, Couto J. Drivers, Enables and conditions for Public Sector Innovation in European Countries. Innovar [Internet]. 1º de janeiro de 2022 [citado 16º de julho de 2024];32(83). Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99255

Baixar Citação

CrossRef Cited-by

CrossRef citations6

1. Shaker A. Aladwan, Aseel Alrababah. (2024). Government innovation management: challenges and opportunities. The TQM Journal, https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2023-0351.

2. Yanamandra Ramakrishna, Siti Norida Wahab, Srivastava Babita. (2023). Leadership and Governance for Sustainability. Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability. , p.21. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9711-1.ch002.

3. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska. (2023). Innovation in the economies of Central and Eastern Europe – long-term benchmarking. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 16(4), p.27. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2023/16-4/2.

4. Fradreck Nyambandi, Andre de la Harpe. (2024). Sensemaking of social media management: Seizing affordances in a dynamic complex environment. South African Journal of Information Management, 26(1) https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v26i1.1641.

5. Costa Hofisi, Lewis Edwin Chigova. (2023). Rethinking the Role of Local Government in Service Delivery in South Africa: Towards Digital Transformation. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, , p.64. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20234147.

6. Julia Viezzer Baretta, Micheline Gaia Hoffmann, Luciana Militao, Josivania Silva Farias. (2024). Coproduction, public sector innovation and governance: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Innovation Science, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-05-2023-0107.

Dimensions

PlumX

Acessos à página de resumo

611

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.