Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto

Mariutsi Alexandra  Osorio-Sanabria; Piedad Lucía  Barreto-Granada

doi:10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884

Publicado

2021-11-01

Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto

Public transparency: analysis of its evolution and contribution to the development of open governments

Transparência pública: análise de sua evolução e contribuições para o desenvolvimento do governo aberto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884

Palavras-chave:

administración pública, gobierno abierto, mapeo sistemático, tecnologías de la información y la comunicación, transparencia pública (es)
Open government, public transparency, systematic mapping study, ict, public administration (en)
administração pública, governo aberto, mapeamento sistemático, tecnologias da informação e da comunicação (tic), transparência pública (pt)

Downloads

Autores

Mariutsi Alexandra Osorio-Sanabria Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-3052
Piedad Lucía Barreto-Granada Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-1907

La transparencia pública (tp) es un medio que promueve la rendición de cuentas y el acceso de información a los ciudadanos sobre lo que está haciendo con su gobierno. Este proceso apoya a los gobiernos para que sean más abiertos y generen nuevos espacios de comunicación e interacción con la ciudadanía. El propósito del artículo es analizar, a través de un estudio de mapeo de literatura, la producción científica en torno a los enfoques, beneficios, desafíos, impactos y evaluaciones de la transparencia pública en el gobierno abierto. Se examinaron 52 estudios publicados entre el 2010 y el 2018, en revistas y conferencias indizadas en la base de datos Scopus. Los resultados muestran que existe un interés en investigar las estrategias que promueven la transparencia e identificar las barreras políticas, de gestión y tecnológicas que interfieren en el logro de los objetivos de la transparencia y los efectos deseados en los ciudadanos y el Gobierno. Se concluye que la trasparencia no es un monólogo planteado por el Estado, sino que debe identificar las características del ciudadano a quien pretende llegar, por los cual se requiere abordar diferentes elementos para satisfacer las necesidades de información del ciudadano respecto a la gestión pública.

Public transparency (pt) is a tool that promotes accountability and access to information about the actions carried out by governments. This process helps governments be more open and generate new spaces for communication and interaction with citizens. By means of a literature review, the purpose of this article is to examine the current scientific production encompassing the approaches, benefits, challenges, impacts, and evaluations of pt under open government thinking. A total of 52 works published between 2010 and 2018 in journals and conferences indexed in the Scopus database were studied. The results show a clear interest in researching strategies that promote transparency and identify political, management and technological barriers that could interfere in achieving transparencyrelated objectives and the desired effects over citizens and their governments. It is concluded that transparency is not a monologue proposed by States, but must be a mean to identify the characteristics of the citizen to whom it intends to reach. Therefore, it becomes necessary to address different elements in order to meet information needs regarding public management by citizens.

A transparência pública é um meio que promove a prestação de contas e o acesso a informações aos cidadãos sobre o que o seu governo está fazendo. Esse processo apoia os governos para que sejam maisabertos e gerem espaços de comunicação e interação com a cidadania. Nesse contexto, o objetivo deste artigo é analisar, por meio de um estudo de mapeamento da literatura, a produção científica ao redor das abordagens, dos benefícios, dos desafios, dos impactos e das avaliações da transparência pública no governo aberto. Foram analisados 52 estudos publicados entre 2010 e 2018, em revistas e conferências indexadas na base de dados Scopus. Os resultados mostram que existe um interesse em pesquisar as estratégias que promovem a transparência e identificar as barreiras políticas, de gestão e tecnológicas que interferem na conquista dos objetivos da transparência e nos efeitos desejados nos cidadãos e no governo. Concluise que a transparência não é um monólogo proposto pelo Estado, mas sim que deve identificar as características do cidadão a quem pretende chegar; por isso, devese abordar diferentes elementos para satisfazer as necessidades de informação do cidadão a respeito da gestão pública.

Referências

Alonso-Muñoz, L., & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2017). Transparency and political monitoring in the digital environment. Towards a typology of citizen-driven platforms. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 72, 1351–1366. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1223en

Araújo, A. C., Reis, L., & Cardoso Sampaio, R. (2016). Do Transparency and Open Data Walk Together? An Analysis of Initiatives in Five Brazilian Capitals. Medijske studije, 7(14), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.7.14.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20901/ms.7.14.6

Bearfield, D. A., O’, A., & Bowman, M. (2017). Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency. American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015627694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015627694

Capuano, E. A. (2014). Business intelligence systems as management, accountability and transparency tools for the government: The case of Platform Aquarius. En A, Kö, & E. Francesconi (Eds.), Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (pp. 73-90). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_7

Casalino, N., Buonocore, F., Rossignoli, C., & Ricciardi, F. (2013). Transparency, openness and knowledge sharing for rebuilding and strengthening government institutions. IASTED Multiconferences - Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education, WBE 2013, 866–871. https://doi.org/10.2316/P.2013.792-044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2316/P.2013.792-044

Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo. (2016). Carta Iberoamericana de Gobierno Abierto. CLAD. https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/admon/files/empresas/ZW1wcmVzYV83Ng==/archivos/1470417708_350c543cc190276e5a10618fd50a3245.pdf

Chaves, P. (2013). Democracia participativa. Eunomía. 3, 213-217. https://e-revistas.uc3m.es/index.php/EUNOM/article/view/2133/1065

Concha, G., & Naser, A. (Eds.). (2012). El desafío hacia el gobierno abierto en la hora de la igualdad. CEPAL; Naciones Unidas. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/3969/S2012004_es.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Corrêa, A. S., Corrêa, P. L. P., & da Silva, F. S. C. (2014). Transparency portals versus open government data: An Assessment of Openness in Brazilian Municipalities. Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research - dg.o ’14, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612760

Cucciniello, M., Porumbescu, G. A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). 25 Years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685

Da Silva Craveiro, G., & Albano, C. (2017). Open data intermediaries: Coproduction in budget transparency. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1), 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0057

Dawes, S. S. (2010). Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 377-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.001

Dawes, S. S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency. In: Wimmer M.A., Chappelet JL., Janssen M., Scholl H.J. (eds) Electronic Government. EGOV 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6228. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_5

dos Santos Brito, K., dos Santos Neto, M., da Silva Costa, M. A., Cardoso Garcia, V., & de Lemos Meira, S. R. (2014). Using parliamentary Brazilian open data to improve transparency and public participation in Brazil. En Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 171-177). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612769

Dos Santos Brito, K., Silva Costa, M. A., Garcia, V. C., & Romero de Lemos Meira, S. R. (2014). Experiences integrating heterogeneous government open data sources to deliver services and promote transparency in Brazil. En C. K. Chang, Y. Gao, M. Matskin, B. McMillin, Y. Okabe, C. Seceleanu, & K. Yoshida (Eds.), 2014 IEEE 38th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (pp. 606-607). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2014.87

Fenster, M. (2015). Transparency in search of a theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014555257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014555257

Fox, J., Haight, L., & Palmer-Rubin, B. (2011). Proporcionar transparencia. ¿Hasta qué punto responde el gobierno mexicano a las solicitudes de información pública? Gestión y Política Pública, 20(1), 3-61. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=13321098001

Fundación Telefónica. (2013). Las TIC en el gobierno abierto: Transparencia, participación y colaboración. Ariel. http://www.fundacion.telefonica.com/es/arte_cultura/publicaciones/detalle/211

Fung, A. (2013). Infotopia: Unleashing the democratic power of transparency. Politics and Society, 41(2), 183-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213483107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213483107

Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2012). Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers. Government Information Quarterly, 29(2), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.006

Ganapati, S., & Reddick, C. G. (2014). The Use of ICT for Open Government in U. S. Municipalities. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370302

García García, J. (2014). Gobierno abierto: transparencia, participación y colaboración en las Administraciones Públicas. Innovar, 24(54), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46441

Ginsberg, W. R. (2011). The Obama administration’s open government initiative: Issues for Congress [Reporte preparado para los miembros y comités del Congreso]. Congress Research Sevice. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/secrecy/R41361.pdf

Groff, J., Baker, M., & Détienne, F. (2016). Aligning Public Administrators and Citizens on and Around Open Data: An Activity Theory Approach. En HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations: Information Systems (pp. 151–158). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_15

Gunawong, P. (2015). Open government and social media: A focus on transparency. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 587-598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560685

Harrison, T.M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G. B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., Hrdinova, J., & Pardo, T. (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0269

Harrison, T. M., & Sayogo, D. S. (2013). Open budgets and open government: Beyond disclosure in pursuit of transparency, participation and accountability. En Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 235-244). https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479757

Harrison, T. M., & Sayogo, D. S. (2014). Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.002

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6 Ed.). McGrawHill Education.

Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy? Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 363-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.007

Kassen, M. (2017). Understanding transparency of government from a Nordic perspective: Open government and open data movement as a multidimensional collaborative phenomenon in Sweden. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 20(4), 236-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2017.1388696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2017.1388696

Kimball, M. B. (2011). Mandated state-level open government training programs. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 474-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.003

Kitchenham, B., Charters, S., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Linkman, S., Visaggio, G. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering [Reporte técnico, EBSE]. School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University; Department of Computer Science, University of Durham. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/525444systematicreviewsguide.pdf

Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001

Liu, A. C. (2016). Two faces of transparency: The regulations of people’s Republic of China on open government information. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(6), 492-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1018426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1018426

Lourenço, R. P. (2013). Open government portals assessment: A transparency for accountability perspective. En M. A. Wimmer, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government (pp. 62-74). IFIP; Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_6

Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006

Lourenço, R. P., Jorge, S., & Rolas, H. (2016). Towards a transparency ontology in the context of open government. Electronic Government, 12(4), 375-394. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.080440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.080440

Lux Wigand, F. D. (2011). Gov 2.0 and beyond: Using social media for transparency, participation and collaboration. En S. Fong (Ed.), Communications in Computer and Information Science, (Vol. 136, pp. 307-318). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22185-9_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22185-9_26

Machado, V., Mantini, G., Viterbo, J., Bernardini, F., & Barcellos, R. (2018). An instrument for evaluating open data portals: A case study in Brazilian cities. En Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1-10). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209370

Manfredi Sánchez, J, L., Herranz de la Casa, J. M., & Calvo Rubio, L. M. (2017). Transparency and diplomacy: New social demands and professional routines. Revista Latina de Comunicación, 72, 832-848. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1195en DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1195en

Marino, P. de B. L. P., Sucupira, G. I. C. S., de Siqueira, W. R., & de Sousa Bermejo, P. H. (2017). Public transparency in the Brazilian context: An integrative review. En M. Themistocleous, & V. Morabito (Eds.), Information Systems (Vol. 299, pp. 261-274). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_22

Marjanovic, O., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2017). Exploring the tension between transparency and datification effects of open government IS through the lens of Complex Adaptive Systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(3), 210-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.07.001

Martínez-Rolán, X., Piñeiro-Otero, T., & Baamonde-Silva, X. M. (2016). El desafío de la transparencia en la comunicación digital. Un estudio de caso sobre las webs municipales de Galicia y Norte de Portugal. Observatorio, 10(4), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS1042016909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS1042016909

McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002

Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533

Mendoza, G. Q. (2013). Open Government in Latin America limited to Transparency, and Access to Information. Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 269–270. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/sites/www.opengov DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2479724.2479767

Montero, G. (2017). Del gobierno abierto al Estado abierto: la mirada del Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo. En A. Naser, Á. Ramírez-Alujas, & D. Rosales (Eds.), Desde el gobierno abierto al Estado abierto en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 53-81). CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/44769/1/S1601154_es.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/d4ae5157-es

Moore, S. (2018). Towards a Sociology of Institutional Transparency: Openness, Deception and the Problem of Public Trust. Sociology, 52(2), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516686530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516686530

Mora-Rodriguez, M., Atemezing, G. A., & Preist, C. (2017). Adopting semantic technologies for effective corporate transparency. En E. Blomqvist, D. Maynard, A. Gangemi, R. Hoekstra, P. Hitzler, & O. Hartig O. (Eds.), The Semantic Web (pp. 655-670). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_40

Murillo, M. J. (2015). Evaluating the role of online data availability: The case of economic and institutional transparency in sixteen Latin American nations. International Political Science Review, 36(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114541163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114541163

Naser, A., & Ramírez-Alujas, Á. (2017). Plan de gobierno abierto. Una hoja de ruta para los gobiernos de la región. CEPAL; ECLAC. http://hdl.handle.net/11362/36665

Naser, A., Ramírez-Alujas, Á., & Rosales, D. (Eds.). (2017). Desde el gobierno abierto al Estado abierto en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL; Naciones Unidas. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/44769/1/S1601154_es.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/320272ce-es

O’Donovan, P., Leahy, K., Bruton, K., & O’Sullivan, D. T. J. (2015). Big data in manufacturing: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0028-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-015-0028-x

Open Data Charter. (2015). The international open data charter. ODC. Consultado noviembre 30, 2017, en https://opendatacharter.net/#

Open Government Partnership. (2019). Open Government Partnership Informe Global. Open Government Partnership. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Global-Report_Volume-1_ES.pdf

Open Knowledge International. (2017). The Open Data Handbook. Open Data Handbook. Consultado septiembre 18, 2017, en http://opendatahandbook.org/

Osorio-Sanabria, M. A., Amaya-Fernández, F. O., & González-Zabala, M. P. (2018). Colombian Case Study for the Analysis of Open Data Government. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 389–394. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209474

Oztoprak, A. A., & Ruijer, E. (2016). Variants of transparency: An analysis of the English Local Government Transparency Code 2015. Local Government Studies, 42(4), 536-556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1154845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1154845

Palmirani, M., Martoni, M., & Girardi, D. (2014). Open government data beyond transparency. En A, KÖ, & E. Francesconi (Eds.), Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (pp. 275-291). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10178-1_22

Patiño, J. A. (Comp.) (2014). Datos abiertos y ciudades inteligentes en América Latina. Estudios de caso. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/37089/1/S1420540_es.pdf

Patiño, J. A., Poveda, L., & Martínez, A. L. (2018). Monitoreo de la Agenda Digital para América Latina y el Caribe eLAC2018. CEPAL; CETIC.br; NIC.br; GIZ. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43444/1/S1800256_es.pdf

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. En G. Visaggio & M. T. Badassarre (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (pp. 68-77). BCS Learning & Development Ltd. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2227123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8

Piotrowski, S. J. (2017). The “Open government reform” movement: The case of the open government partnership and U.S. transparency policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016676575

Ramírez-Alujas, Á. (2012). Gobierno abierto es la respuesta: ¿Cuál era la pregunta? Más Poder Local. 12, 14-22. http://www.maspoderlocal.es/files/articulos/92-F50524f44921347571524-articulo-1.pdf

Reddick, C. G., Chatfield, A. T., & Puron-Cid, G. (2017). Online budget transparency innovation in Government: A case study of the U.S. state governments. En Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (Vol. 10, pp. 232-241). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085271

Reggi, L., & Dawes, S. (2016). Open government data ecosystems: Linking transparency for innovation with transparency for participation and accountability. En H. Scholl, O. Glassey, M. Janssen, B. Klievink, I. Lindgren, P. Parycek, E. Tambouris, M. Wimmer, T. Janowsky, & D. Sá Soares (Eds.), Electronic Government (pp. 74-86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44421-5_6

Ruijer, H. J. M. (2017). Proactive Transparency in the United States and the Netherlands. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016628176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016628176

Sadiq, S., & Indulska, M. (2017). Open data: Quality over quantity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(3), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.003

Sandoval-Almazán, R. (2015). Gobierno abierto y transparencia: construyendo un marco conceptual. Convergencia. 22(68), 203-227. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=10536227008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29101/crcs.v0i68.2958

Sayogo, D. S., & Harrison, T. M. (2012). Effects of the Internet and sociocultural factors on budget transparency and accountability. En Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 11-20). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307729.2307733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2307729.2307733

Scholl, H. J., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2011). Transparency and Openness in Government: A System Dynamics Perspective. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 107–114. http://www.whitehouse.gov/open DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072088

Trenovski, B., Mangova, I., & Levkov, N. (2016). The level of fiscal transparency and accountability of budget users - evidence from Macedonia. International Journal of Public Policy, 12(3/4/5/6), 210. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2016.079740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPP.2016.079740

Trigo, M. F., & Álvarez, V. (2017). Gestión pública, gobierno abierto y fortalecimiento de la democracia en América. En A. Naser, Á. Ramírez-Alujas, & D. Rosales (Eds.), Desde el gobierno abierto al Estado abierto en América Latina y el Caribe (pp. 33-52). CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/44769/1/S1601154_es.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/2b1704d7-es

Villoria, M., & Iglesias, Á. (2017). Developments in transparency in the Spanish municipalities: An analytical revision of the last research. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 15(3), 411-432. https://doi.org/10.4335/15.3.411-432(2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4335/15.3.411-432(2017)

Yavuz, N., & Welch, E. W. (2014). Factors affecting openness of local government websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.07.004

Como Citar

APA

Osorio-Sanabria, M. A. . e Barreto-Granada, P. L. . (2022). Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto. Innovar, 32(83). https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884

ACM

[1]

Osorio-Sanabria, M.A. e Barreto-Granada, P.L. 2022. Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto. Innovar. 32, 83 (jan. 2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884.

ACS

(1)

Osorio-Sanabria, M. A. .; Barreto-Granada, P. L. . Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto. Innovar 2022, 32.

ABNT

OSORIO-SANABRIA, M. A. .; BARRETO-GRANADA, P. L. . Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto. Innovar, [S. l.], v. 32, n. 83, 2022. DOI: 10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884. Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99884. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2024.

Chicago

Osorio-Sanabria, Mariutsi Alexandra, e Piedad Lucía Barreto-Granada. 2022. “Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto”. Innovar 32 (83). https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884.

Harvard

Osorio-Sanabria, M. A. . e Barreto-Granada, P. L. . (2022) “Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto”, Innovar, 32(83). doi: 10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884.

IEEE

[1]

M. A. . Osorio-Sanabria e P. L. . Barreto-Granada, “Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto”, Innovar, vol. 32, nº 83, jan. 2022.

MLA

Osorio-Sanabria, M. A. ., e P. L. . Barreto-Granada. “Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto”. Innovar, vol. 32, nº 83, janeiro de 2022, doi:10.15446/innovar.v32n83.99884.

Turabian

Osorio-Sanabria, Mariutsi Alexandra, e Piedad Lucía Barreto-Granada. “Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto”. Innovar 32, no. 83 (janeiro 1, 2022). Acessado agosto 29, 2024. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99884.

Vancouver

1.

Osorio-Sanabria MA, Barreto-Granada PL. Transparencia pública: análisis de su evolución y aportes para el desarrollo del gobierno abierto. Innovar [Internet]. 1º de janeiro de 2022 [citado 29º de agosto de 2024];32(83). Disponível em: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/99884

Baixar Citação

CrossRef Cited-by

2

1. Ricardo Curto-Rodríguez. (2023). Herramientas digitales de comunicación de datos públicos. VISUAL REVIEW. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura Visual, 14(2), p.1. https://doi.org/10.37467/revvisual.v10.4606.

2. Alexander Zuñiga-Collazos, Julian Mauricio Gómez-López, José Fabián Ríos-Obando, Lina Marcela Vargas-García. (2023). Innovación y políticas públicas como factores para promover el desarrollo de organizaciones de turismo en Colombia. Retos, 13(26), p.341. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n26.2023.10.

Dimensions

PlumX

Acessos à página de resumo

1325

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Licença

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Todos os artigos publicados pela Innovar estão disponíveis no mundo inteiro com acesso aberto e sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Assim que os artigos para um número forem selecionados e antes de começar a etapa da produção editorial, os autores devem assinar uma cessão de direitos patrimoniais de sua obra. A Innovar recorre às leis colombianas em matéria de direitos autorais.

O material desta revista pode ser reproduzido ou citado para fins académicos, citando a fonte.

Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons: